1
|
Argumánez V, Plumé G, Bustamante-Balén M. Periendoscopic management of antithrombotic drugs: Is cold snare polypectomy the answer? GASTROENTEROLOGIA Y HEPATOLOGIA 2025; 48:502286. [PMID: 39549819 DOI: 10.1016/j.gastrohep.2024.502286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2024] [Revised: 10/27/2024] [Accepted: 10/29/2024] [Indexed: 11/18/2024]
Abstract
Patients undergoing colonoscopy are increasingly taking antithrombotic medication. These patients, who are generally older, also have a higher prevalence of colon polyps. Therefore, it is general practice to modify or discontinue antithrombotic treatment before colonoscopy, to reduce the risk of post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). However, this modification increases the risk of thrombotic events. Currently, the main clinical guidelines recommend cold-snare resection for polyps smaller than 10mm because of its better safety profile, especially in reducing post-polypectomy bleeding. This reduced PPB rate could open the door to maintaining antithrombotic drugs in patients undergoing colonoscopy. This review aims to evaluate the evidence available so far that may support a modification of current guidelines on the management of antithrombotic drugs in the periendoscopic period.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victor Argumánez
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia 46026, Spain
| | - Gema Plumé
- Hematology Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Valencia 46026, Spain
| | - Marco Bustamante-Balén
- Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Unit, Digestive Diseases Department, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, La Fe Health Research Institute (IISLaFe), Valencia 46026, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shin SY, Cho MS, Nam J, Kim JH, Yoon YH, Park H, Kang J, Park JJ. Clinical outcomes and risk factors of post-polypectomy microperforation in patients with colorectal neoplasia: a case-control study. Ther Adv Gastrointest Endosc 2025; 18:26317745241312521. [PMID: 39802936 PMCID: PMC11719433 DOI: 10.1177/26317745241312521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2024] [Accepted: 12/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background Colonoscopic polypectomy significantly reduces the incidence of colorectal cancer, but it carries potential risks, with colonic perforation being the most common and associated with significant morbidity. Objectives This study evaluated the clinical outcomes and risk factors of microperforation during colonoscopic polypectomy. Design A retrospective cohort study. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the patients' records who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy and subsequent plain radiographic examination to monitor perforation. Patients with pneumoperitoneum detected on plain radiography were enrolled. Patients who underwent adverse event-free colonoscopic polypectomies within 1 week of each case and were matched 2:1 by age and sex to the cases were selected as controls. Results Microperforations occurred in 12 patients (8 males; age: median 64.5 years). Polyps with microperforations were more frequent in the right colon (83.3% vs 33.3%). Endoscopic mucosal resection with precutting (EMR-P; 16.7% vs 0.0%) or hot-snare polypectomy (8.3% vs 0.0%) was more frequently performed in the microperforation group. Muscle fibers at the polypectomy site were more frequently visible in the microperforation group (58.3% vs 8.3%). By multivariate analysis, right colon location and visible muscle fibers were independent risk factors for microperforation. All patients with microperforation received intravenous antibiotics and were advised to fast. Patients responded well to these conservative treatments and were discharged after a median of 3 (2-6.75) days of hospital stay. Conclusion Our data suggest that conservative treatment is feasible and could be the primary management option for selected patients with microperforations postcolonoscopic polypectomy. Right-sided colonic polyps and visible muscle fibers predispose to microperforations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seung Yong Shin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Internal Medicine, Chung-Ang University, College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Min Soo Cho
- Division of Colon and Rectal Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinhoon Nam
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Ewha Womans University Mokdong Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jie-Hyun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyojin Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeonghyun Kang
- Department of Surgery, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 211 Eonju-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06273, Korea
| | - Jae Jun Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, 50-1 Yonsei-ro, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul, Seoul 03722, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ikeda R, Kaneko H, Sato H, Anan H, Suzuki Y, Ikeda A, Goda Y, Sue S, Irie K, Maeda S. Risk factors for unclear margin in cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyp. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 36:1404-1409. [PMID: 39324929 PMCID: PMC11527374 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002845] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 08/14/2024] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a common, simple, and safe procedure; however, it has a high rate of unclear margins. We analyzed the risk factors for unclear margins of colorectal polyp. METHODS We retrospectively investigated colorectal polyps treated with CSP between July 2021 and July 2022, excluding those that could not be retrieved or pathologically nonneoplastic and hyperplastic polyps without margin evaluation. The clinicopathological features and risk factors for unclear margins were analyzed. Furthermore, the polyps were divided into two groups: those resected by experts and those resected by trainees. A 1 : 1 propensity score matching was performed. After matching, the risk factors for unclear margins in each group were analyzed as secondary outcomes. RESULTS We analyzed 237 patients with 572 polyps; the margins were negative in 58.6% (negative group) and unclear in 41.4% (unclear group). The unclear margin was significantly higher at straddling folds ( P = 0.0001), flexure points ( P = 0.005), and in the procedures performed by trainees ( P < 0.0001). Altogether, 198 propensity score matched pairs were explored for secondary outcomes. There were no significant differences in risk factors for unclear margins in the expert group, while in the trainee group, the unclear margin was significantly higher at the straddling folds ( P = 0.0004) and flexure points ( P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS We demonstrated that straddling folds, flexure points, and procedures performed by the trainees were significant risk factors for unclear margins, and we hypothesized that the rate of unclear margins will reduce as the trainees accumulate experience at difficult sites.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryosuke Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Kaneko
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hiroki Sato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Hideyuki Anan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yuichi Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Aya Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Yoshihiro Goda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Soichiro Sue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Kuniyasu Irie
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Shin Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Kanagawa, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Jakobs JK, Zumblick M, von Gerlach S, Stathopoulos P, Glas S, Denkert C, Denzer UW. Endoscopic submucosal dissection of colorectal pedunculated polyps. Endosc Int Open 2024; 12:E1437-E1446. [PMID: 39650095 PMCID: PMC11624022 DOI: 10.1055/a-2427-1948] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2024] [Accepted: 08/22/2024] [Indexed: 12/11/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and study aims For pedunculated colon polyps, en bloc resection with inclusion of the polyp stalk is necessary to yield an accurate histologic staging. This can be challenging in cases of a large polyp and/or broad stalk using conventional snare resection. We evaluated the feasibility of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for large pedunculated polyps with broad stalks. Patients and methods Between February 2019 and November 2021 all patients with large pedunculated polyps defined as polyp diameter ≥ 20 mm and or a broad stalk > 5 mm were enrolled in the study. All polyps were resected in ESD technique with dissection of the polyp stalk at the base after injection. Results Twenty-five patients (male = 18, age mean: 67 years) were included. En bloc resection was achieved in 100% of the patients (25/25 polyps). Polyps were mainly located in the sigmoid (n = 19) and rectum (n = 3). Median polyp size was 30×25×17 mm. Histologic examination revealed the following results: adenoma low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LG-IEN): nine; high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HG-IEN): seven; pTis: three; adenoarcinoma: five (G1, pT1, L0, V0, Haggitt 3: 2/G2, pT1, L0, V0, Haggitt 3:2/G3, pT1, Bd3, V1, Haggitt 4: 1); other: 1. R0 resection rate was 100% and the curative resection rate yielded 96% (24/25) without severe adverse events. Conclusions ESD achieved high en bloc and R0 resection rates for large pedunculated polyps. In our collective, up to 32% of polyps already had adenocarcinoma, resulting in a high curative resection rate due to complete resection and subsequently accurate risk classification.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Malte Zumblick
- Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Susanne von Gerlach
- Pathology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Petros Stathopoulos
- Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Glas
- Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Pathology, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Ulrike Walburga Denzer
- Division of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital of Giessen and Marburg Campus Marburg Clinic for Gastroenterology Endocrinology Metabolism and clinical Infectiology, Marburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Crăciun R, Grapă C, Mocan T, Tefas C, Nenu I, Buliarcă A, Ștefănescu H, Nemes A, Procopeț B, Spârchez Z. The Bleeding Edge: Managing Coagulation and Bleeding Risk in Patients with Cirrhosis Undergoing Interventional Procedures. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:2602. [PMID: 39594268 PMCID: PMC11593119 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/28/2024] [Revised: 11/17/2024] [Accepted: 11/18/2024] [Indexed: 11/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This review addresses the peri-procedural bleeding risks in patients with cirrhosis, emphasizing the need for careful coagulation assessment and targeted correction strategies. Liver disease presents a unique hemostatic challenge, where traditional coagulation tests may not accurately predict bleeding risk, complicating the management of procedures like paracentesis, endoscopic therapy, and various interventional procedures. As such, this paper aims to provide a comprehensive analysis of current data, guidelines, and practices for managing coagulation in cirrhotic patients, with a focus on minimizing bleeding risk while avoiding unnecessary correction with blood products. The objectives of this review are threefold: first, to outline the existing evidence on bleeding risks associated with common invasive procedures in cirrhotic patients; second, to evaluate the efficacy and limitations of standard and advanced coagulation tests in predicting procedural bleeding; and third, to examine the role of blood product transfusions and other hemostatic interventions, considering potential risks and benefits in this delicate population. In doing so, this review highlights patient-specific and procedure-specific factors that influence bleeding risk and informs best practices to optimize patient outcomes. This review progresses through key procedures often performed in cirrhotic patients. The discussion begins with paracentesis, a low-risk procedure, followed by endoscopic therapy for varices, and concludes with high-risk interventions requiring advanced hemostatic considerations. Each chapter addresses procedural techniques, bleeding risk assessment, and evidence-based correction approaches. This comprehensive structure aims to guide clinicians in making informed, evidence-backed decisions in managing coagulation in cirrhosis, ultimately reducing procedural complications and improving care quality for this high-risk population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rareș Crăciun
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.C.); (C.G.); (A.B.); (B.P.); (Z.S.)
- Gastoenterology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. O. Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Cristiana Grapă
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.C.); (C.G.); (A.B.); (B.P.); (Z.S.)
- Gastoenterology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. O. Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Tudor Mocan
- Gastoenterology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. O. Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
- UBBmed Department, Babeș-Bolyai University, 400084 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Cristian Tefas
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.C.); (C.G.); (A.B.); (B.P.); (Z.S.)
- Gastoenterology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. O. Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Iuliana Nenu
- Department of Physiology, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Alina Buliarcă
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.C.); (C.G.); (A.B.); (B.P.); (Z.S.)
| | - Horia Ștefănescu
- Gastoenterology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. O. Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Andrada Nemes
- 2nd Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
- Intensive Care Unit, Cluj-Napoca Municipal Hospital, 400139 Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | - Bogdan Procopeț
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.C.); (C.G.); (A.B.); (B.P.); (Z.S.)
- Gastoenterology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. O. Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| | - Zeno Spârchez
- Department of Internal Medicine, “Iuliu Hațieganu” University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 400012 Cluj-Napoca, Romania; (R.C.); (C.G.); (A.B.); (B.P.); (Z.S.)
- Gastoenterology Clinic, “Prof. Dr. O. Fodor” Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, 400162 Cluj-Napoca, Romania;
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Bong JW, Kim JY, Ju Y, Cheong C, Kang S, Lee SI, Min BW. Optimal withdrawal time in initial surveillance colonoscopy after colorectal cancer surgery: comparison between anterior/low anterior resection and right hemicolectomy. Ann Surg Treat Res 2024; 107:212-220. [PMID: 39416886 PMCID: PMC11473322 DOI: 10.4174/astr.2024.107.4.212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2024] [Revised: 07/29/2024] [Accepted: 08/05/2024] [Indexed: 10/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the optimal withdrawal time (WT) for initial surveillance colonoscopy after curative resection for colorectal cancer (CRC) by comparing anterior/low anterior resection (AR/LAR) and right hemicolectomy (RHC) groups. Methods This retrospective study analyzed 1,212 patients who underwent initial surveillance colonoscopy after CRC resection between 2015 and 2022. The patients were divided into the AR/LAR (n = 846) and RHC (n = 366) groups. The optimal WT was determined using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis and validated using logistic regression models. The adenoma and advanced neoplasia detection rates (ADR/ANDR) were evaluated based on the optimal WT. Results The optimal WT was 7 and 6 minutes in the AR/LAR and RHC groups, respectively. In multivariate analysis, WT ≥7 and ≥6 minutes in the AR/LAR (odds ratio [OR], 2.38; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.75-3.24; P < 0.001) and RHC (OR, 2.64; 95% CI, 1.59-4.39; P = 0.001) groups, respectively, were significant factors for adenoma detection. In the AR/LAR group, ADR was 41.5% for WT ≥7 minutes compared to 21.9% for WT <7 minutes (P < 0.001). In the RHC group, ADR for WT ≥6 minutes was 33.9% compared to 15.8% for WT <6 minutes (P < 0.001). The ANDR also significantly improved with longer WTs in both groups. Conclusion This study suggests that a minimum WT of 7 and 6 minutes for AR/LAR and RHC patients, respectively, during the initial surveillance colonoscopy after CRC resection is optimal for maintaining a satisfactory ADR and ANDR. These findings highlight the importance of tailoring colonoscopic procedures according to the type of surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Woo Bong
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Young Kim
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeonuk Ju
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chinkock Cheong
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sanghee Kang
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sun Il Lee
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Byung Wook Min
- Department of Surgery, Korea University Guro Hospital, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Steinbrück I, Ebigbo A, Kuellmer A, Schmidt A, Kouladouros K, Brand M, Koenen T, Rempel V, Wannhoff A, Faiss S, Pech O, Möschler O, Dumoulin FL, Kirstein MM, von Hahn T, Allescher HD, Gölder SK, Götz M, Hollerbach S, Lewerenz B, Meining A, Messmann H, Rösch T, Allgaier HP. Cold Versus Hot Snare Endoscopic Resection of Large Nonpedunculated Colorectal Polyps: Randomized Controlled German CHRONICLE Trial. Gastroenterology 2024; 167:764-777. [PMID: 38795735 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2024.05.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/26/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/28/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is standard therapy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm. It has been suggested recently that polyp resection without current (cold resection) may be superior to the standard technique using cutting/coagulation current (hot resection) by reducing adverse events (AEs), but evidence from a randomized trial is missing. METHODS In this randomized controlled multicentric trial involving 19 centers, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps ≥20 mm were randomly assigned to cold or hot EMR. The primary outcome was major AE (eg, perforation or postendoscopic bleeding). Among secondary outcomes, major AE subcategories, postpolypectomy syndrome, and residual adenoma were most relevant. RESULTS Between 2021 and 2023, there were 396 polyps in 363 patients (48.2% were female) enrolled for the intention-to-treat analysis. Major AEs occurred in 1.0% of the cold group and in 7.9% of the hot group (P = .001; odds ratio [OR], 0.12; 95% CI, 0.03-0.54). Rates for perforation and postendoscopic bleeding were significantly lower in the cold group, with 0% vs 3.9% (P = .007) and 1.0% vs 4.4% (P = .040). Postpolypectomy syndrome occurred with similar frequency (3.1% vs 4.4%; P = .490). After cold resection, residual adenoma was found more frequently, with 23.7% vs 13.8% (P = .020; OR, 1.94; 95% CI, 1.12-3.38). In multivariable analysis, lesion diameter of ≥4 cm was an independent predictor both for major AEs (OR, 3.37) and residual adenoma (OR, 2.47) and high-grade dysplasia/cancer for residual adenoma (OR, 2.92). CONCLUSIONS Cold resection of large, nonpedunculated colorectal polyps appears to be considerably safer than hot EMR; however, at the cost of a higher residual adenoma rate. Further studies have to confirm to what extent polyp size and histology can determine an individualized approach. German Clinical Trials Registry (Deutsches Register Klinischer Studien), Number DRKS00025170.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo Steinbrück
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Alanna Ebigbo
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Armin Kuellmer
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Freiburg, Germany; Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Tübingen, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Konstantinos Kouladouros
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Department, Mannheim University Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Markus Brand
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Teresa Koenen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Rhein-Maas-Klinikum Würselen, Academic Teaching Hospital Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen, Würselen, Germany
| | - Viktor Rempel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Anna Hospital Herne, Academic Teaching Hospital Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Andreas Wannhoff
- Department of Gastroenterology, Regionale Kliniken Holding und Services GmbH (RKH) Klinikum Ludwigsburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Heidelberg, Ludwigsburg, Germany
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oliver Pech
- Department of Gastroenterology and Endoscopy, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Regensburg and Technical University of Munich, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Oliver Möschler
- Department of Endoscopy and Ultrasound, Marienhospital Osnabrück, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Hannover, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Martha M Kirstein
- Department of Medicine I, University Hospital Lübeck, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Dieter Allescher
- Department of Gastroenterology, Klinikum Garmisch-Patenkirchen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University Munich, Garmisch-Patenkirchen, Germany
| | - Stefan K Gölder
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Ostalb-Klinikum Aalen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Ulm, Aalen, Germany
| | - Martin Götz
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kliniken Böblingen, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Tübingen, Böblingen, Germany
| | - Stephan Hollerbach
- Department of Gastroenterology, Allgemeines Krankenhaus Celle, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Hannover, Celle, Germany
| | - Björn Lewerenz
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Klinikum Traunstein, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Munich, Traunstein, Germany
| | - Alexander Meining
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Helmut Messmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Thomas Rösch
- Department of Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, University Hospital Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Allgaier
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Ali S, Khetpal N, Fatima M, Hussain S, Ali A, Khan MA, Childs C, Hasan MK. The Safety of Cold Versus Hot Snare Polypectomy in Polyps 10-20 mm: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus 2024; 16:e58462. [PMID: 38765346 PMCID: PMC11100549 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.58462] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/17/2024] [Indexed: 05/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Colonoscopy remains the primary method for preventing colorectal cancer. Traditionally, hot snare polypectomy (HSP) was the method of choice for removing polyps larger than 5 mm. Yet, for polyps smaller than 10 mm, cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has become the favored approach. Lately, the use of CSP has expanded to include the removal of sessile polyps that are between 10 and 20 mm in size. Our systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the safety of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) compared to hot snare polypectomy (HSP) for resecting polyps measuring 10-20 mm. We searched the Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (MEDLINE), Embase, and Cochrane databases up to April 2020 to find studies that directly compared CSP to HSP for polyps larger than 10 mm. Our main focus was on assessing the risk of delayed bleeding after polypectomy; a secondary focus was the incidence of any adverse events that required medical intervention post procedure. Our search yielded three comparative studies, two observational studies, and one randomized controlled trial (RCT), together encompassing 1,193 polypectomy procedures. Of these, 485 were performed using CSP and 708 with HSP. The pooled odds ratio (OR) for post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) was 0.36 (95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.02, 7.13), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.11 and an I2 of 53%. For the risk of any adverse events necessitating medical care, the pooled OR was 0.15 (95% CI: 0.01, 2.29), with a Cochran Q test P-value of 0.21 and an I2 of 35%. The quality of the two observational studies was deemed moderate, and the RCT was only available in abstract form, preventing quality assessment. Our analysis suggests that there is no significant difference in the incidence of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding or other adverse events requiring medical attention between CSP and HSP for polyps measuring 10-20 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saeed Ali
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, USA
| | - Neelam Khetpal
- Department of Hospital Medicine, Hartford Hospital, Hartford, USA
| | - Munazza Fatima
- Department of Anesthesiology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Sana Hussain
- Department of Medicine, Khyber Teaching Hospital, Peshawar, PAK
| | - Asad Ali
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, State University of New York (SUNY) Upstate Medical University Hospital, Syracuse, USA
| | - Muhammad Ali Khan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, USA
| | - Christopher Childs
- Hardin Library for the Health Sciences, University of Iowa, Iowa City, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth Orlando, Orlando, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Alali AA, Almadi MA, Barkun AN. Review article: Advances in the management of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2024; 59:632-644. [PMID: 38158721 DOI: 10.1111/apt.17859] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 10/15/2023] [Accepted: 12/19/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lower gastrointestinal bleeding (LGIB) is a common emergency with substantial associated morbidity and mortality. Elective colonoscopy plays an essential role in management, with an even more important role for radiology in the acute setting. Recent advances in the management of patients with LGIB warrant review as the management has recently evolved. AIMS To provide a comprehensive and updated overview of advances in the approach to patients with LGIB METHODS: We performed a comprehensive literature search to examine the current data for this narrative review supplemented by expert opinion. RESULTS The incidence of LGIB is increasing worldwide, partly related to an ageing population and the increasing use of antithrombotics. Diverticulosis continues to be the most common aetiology of LGIB. Pre-endoscopic risk stratification tools, especially the Oakland score, can aid appropriate patient triage. Adequate resuscitation continues to form the basis of management, while appropriate management of antithrombotics is crucial to balance the risk of worsening bleeding against increased cardiovascular risk. Radiological imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis and treatment of acute LGIB, especially among unstable patients. Colonoscopy remains the gold-standard test for the elective management of stable patients. CONCLUSIONS The management of LGIB has evolved significantly in recent years, with a shift towards radiological interventions for unstable patients while reserving elective colonoscopy for stable patients. A multidisciplinary approach is essential to optimise the outcomes of patients with LGIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali A Alali
- Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Kuwait University, Jabriya, Kuwait
| | - Majid A Almadi
- Division of Gastroenterology, King Khalid University Hospital, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Alan N Barkun
- Division of Gastroenterology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, The McGill University Health Center, Montreal General Hospital, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Sermonesi G, Tian BWCA, Vallicelli C, Abu-Zidan FM, Damaskos D, Kelly MD, Leppäniemi A, Galante JM, Tan E, Kirkpatrick AW, Khokha V, Romeo OM, Chirica M, Pikoulis M, Litvin A, Shelat VG, Sakakushev B, Wani I, Sall I, Fugazzola P, Cicuttin E, Toro A, Amico F, Mas FD, De Simone B, Sugrue M, Bonavina L, Campanelli G, Carcoforo P, Cobianchi L, Coccolini F, Chiarugi M, Di Carlo I, Di Saverio S, Podda M, Pisano M, Sartelli M, Testini M, Fette A, Rizoli S, Picetti E, Weber D, Latifi R, Kluger Y, Balogh ZJ, Biffl W, Jeekel H, Civil I, Hecker A, Ansaloni L, Bravi F, Agnoletti V, Beka SG, Moore EE, Catena F. Cesena guidelines: WSES consensus statement on laparoscopic-first approach to general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma. World J Emerg Surg 2023; 18:57. [PMID: 38066631 PMCID: PMC10704840 DOI: 10.1186/s13017-023-00520-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2023] [Accepted: 11/01/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopy is widely adopted across nearly all surgical subspecialties in the elective setting. Initially finding indication in minor abdominal emergencies, it has gradually become the standard approach in the majority of elective general surgery procedures. Despite many technological advances and increasing acceptance, the laparoscopic approach remains underutilized in emergency general surgery and in abdominal trauma. Emergency laparotomy continues to carry a high morbidity and mortality. In recent years, there has been a growing interest from emergency and trauma surgeons in adopting minimally invasive surgery approaches in the acute surgical setting. The present position paper, supported by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES), aims to provide a review of the literature to reach a consensus on the indications and benefits of a laparoscopic-first approach in patients requiring emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies or abdominal trauma. METHODS This position paper was developed according to the WSES methodology. A steering committee performed the literature review and drafted the position paper. An international panel of 54 experts then critically revised the manuscript and discussed it in detail, to develop a consensus on a position statement. RESULTS A total of 323 studies (systematic review and meta-analysis, randomized clinical trial, retrospective comparative cohort studies, case series) have been selected from an initial pool of 7409 studies. Evidence demonstrates several benefits of the laparoscopic approach in stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgical emergencies or abdominal trauma. The selection of a stable patient seems to be of paramount importance for a safe adoption of a laparoscopic approach. In hemodynamically stable patients, the laparoscopic approach was found to be safe, feasible and effective as a therapeutic tool or helpful to identify further management steps and needs, resulting in improved outcomes, regardless of conversion. Appropriate patient selection, surgeon experience and rigorous minimally invasive surgical training, remain crucial factors to increase the adoption of laparoscopy in emergency general surgery and abdominal trauma. CONCLUSIONS The WSES expert panel suggests laparoscopy as the first approach for stable patients undergoing emergency abdominal surgery for general surgery emergencies and abdominal trauma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giacomo Sermonesi
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Brian W C A Tian
- Department of General Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Carlo Vallicelli
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | - Fikri M Abu-Zidan
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, United Arab Emirates University, Al‑Ain, United Arab Emirates
| | | | | | - Ari Leppäniemi
- Abdominal Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Joseph M Galante
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California Davis, Sacramento, CA, USA
| | - Edward Tan
- Department of Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Andrew W Kirkpatrick
- Departments of Surgery and Critical Care Medicine, University of Calgary, Foothills Medical Centre, Calgary, AB, Canada
| | - Vladimir Khokha
- Department of Emergency Surgery, City Hospital, Mozyr, Belarus
| | - Oreste Marco Romeo
- Trauma, Burn, and Surgical Care Program, Bronson Methodist Hospital, Kalamazoo, MI, USA
| | - Mircea Chirica
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Grenoble Alpes, La Tronche, France
| | - Manos Pikoulis
- 3Rd Department of Surgery, Attikon General Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), Athens, Greece
| | - Andrey Litvin
- Department of Surgical Diseases No. 3, Gomel State Medical University, Gomel, Belarus
| | | | - Boris Sakakushev
- General Surgery Department, Medical University, University Hospital St George, Plovdiv, Bulgaria
| | - Imtiaz Wani
- Department of Surgery, Sheri-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences, Srinagar, India
| | - Ibrahima Sall
- General Surgery Department, Military Teaching Hospital, Dakar, Senegal
| | - Paola Fugazzola
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Enrico Cicuttin
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Adriana Toro
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Francesco Amico
- Discipline of Surgery, School of Medicine and Public Health, Newcastle, Australia
| | - Francesca Dal Mas
- Department of Management, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, Campus Economico San Giobbe Cannaregio, 873, 30100, Venice, Italy
| | - Belinda De Simone
- Department of Emergency Surgery, Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal de Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, Villeneuve-Saint-Georges, France
| | - Michael Sugrue
- Donegal Clinical Research Academy Emergency Surgery Outcome Project, Letterkenny University Hospital, Donegal, Ireland
| | - Luigi Bonavina
- Department of Surgery, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, University of Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Carcoforo
- Department of Surgery, S. Anna University Hospital and University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Federico Coccolini
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Massimo Chiarugi
- Department of General, Emergency and Trauma Surgery, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Isidoro Di Carlo
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Advanced Technologies, General Surgery Cannizzaro Hospital, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Salomone Di Saverio
- General Surgery Department Hospital of San Benedetto del Tronto, Marche Region, Italy
| | - Mauro Podda
- Department of Surgical Science, Emergency Surgery Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Michele Pisano
- General and Emergency Surgery, ASST Papa Giovanni XXIII, Bergamo, Italy
| | | | - Mario Testini
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, Unit of Academic General Surgery, University of Bari "A. Moro", Bari, Italy
| | - Andreas Fette
- Pediatric Surgery, Children's Care Center, SRH Klinikum Suhl, Suhl, Thuringia, Germany
| | - Sandro Rizoli
- Surgery Department, Section of Trauma Surgery, Hamad General Hospital (HGH), Doha, Qatar
| | - Edoardo Picetti
- Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care, Azienda Ospedaliero‑Universitaria Parma, Parma, Italy
| | - Dieter Weber
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Australia
| | - Rifat Latifi
- Department of Surgery, Westchester Medical Center, New York Medical College, Valhalla, NY, USA
| | - Yoram Kluger
- Department of General Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel
| | - Zsolt Janos Balogh
- Department of Traumatology, John Hunter Hospital and University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW, Australia
| | - Walter Biffl
- Division of Trauma/Acute Care Surgery, Scripps Clinic Medical Group, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Hans Jeekel
- Department of Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Ian Civil
- Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Andreas Hecker
- Emergency Medicine Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, University Hospital of Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - Luca Ansaloni
- Department of Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Francesca Bravi
- Healthcare Administration, Santa Maria Delle Croci Hospital, Ravenna, Italy
| | - Vanni Agnoletti
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| | | | - Ernest Eugene Moore
- Ernest E Moore Shock Trauma Center at Denver Health, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Fausto Catena
- Department of General and Emergency Surgery, Bufalini Hospital-Level 1 Trauma Center, Cesena, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tokuhara M, Shimatani M, Tominaga K, Nakahira H, Ohtsu T, Kouda K, Naganuma M. Evaluation of a new method, "non-injection resection using bipolar soft coagulation mode (NIRBS)", for colonic adenomatous lesions. Clin Endosc 2023; 56:623-632. [PMID: 37524565 PMCID: PMC10565442 DOI: 10.5946/ce.2022.200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 08/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIMS Endoscopic resection of all colorectal adenomatous lesions with a low complication rate, simplicity, and negative residuals is challenging. Hence, we developed a new method called "non-injection resection using bipolar soft coagulation mode (NIRBS)" method, adapted for colorectal lesions. In addition, we evaluated the effectiveness of this method. METHODS We performed NIRBS throughout a 12-month period for all colorectal lesions which snare resection was acceptable without cancerous lesions infiltrating deeper than the submucosal layer. RESULTS A total of 746 resected lesions were included in the study, with a 4.5 mm mean size (range, 1-35 mm). The major pathological breakdowns were as follows: 64.3% (480/746) were adenomas, and 5.0% (37/746) were intraepithelial adenocarcinomas (Tis lesions). No residuals were observed in any of the 37 Tis lesions (mean size, 15.3 mm). Adverse events included bleeding (0.4%) but no perforation. CONCLUSIONS NIRBS allowed the resection of multiple lesions with simplicity because of the non-injection and without perforating due to the minimal burn effect of the bipolar snare set in the soft coagulation mode. Therefore, NIRBS can be used to resect adenomatous lesions easily, including Tis lesions, from small to large lesions without leaving residuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuo Tokuhara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Masaaki Shimatani
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazunari Tominaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hiroko Nakahira
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Hoshigaoka Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takuya Ohtsu
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Katsuyasu Kouda
- Department of Hygiene and Public Health, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Makoto Naganuma
- Third Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kansai Medical University Hirakata Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Hayasaka J, Yamashita S, Matsui A, Kawai Y, Ochiai Y, Okamura T, Suzuki Y, Mitsunaga Y, Nomura K, Tanaka M, Fuchinoue K, Odagiri H, Kikuchi D, Takazawa Y, Hoteya S. Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy during Continuous Use of Antithrombotic Drugs for Delayed Post-Polypectomy Bleeding: A Pilot Study. Dig Dis 2023; 41:729-736. [PMID: 37231888 PMCID: PMC10614267 DOI: 10.1159/000531061] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cold snare polypectomy is a high-risk endoscopic procedure with a low delayed post-polypectomy bleeding rate. However, it is unclear whether delayed post-polypectomy bleeding rates increase during continuous antithrombotic treatment. This study aimed to determine the safety of cold snare polypectomy during continuous antithrombotic treatment. METHODS This single-center, retrospective cohort study enrolled patients who underwent cold snare polypectomy during antithrombotic treatment between January 2015 and December 2021. Patients were divided into continuation and withdrawal groups based on whether they continued with antithrombotic drugs or not. Propensity score matching was performed using age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index, hospitalization, scheduled treatment, type of antithrombotic drugs used, multiple medications used, indication for antithrombotic drugs, and gastrointestinal endoscopist qualifications. The delayed polypectomy bleeding rates were compared between the groups. Delayed polypectomy bleeding was defined as the presence of blood in stools and requiring endoscopic treatment or a decrease in hemoglobin level by 2 g/dL or more. RESULTS The continuation and withdrawal groups included 134 and 294 patients, respectively. Delayed polypectomy bleeding was observed in 2 patients (1.5%) and 1 patient (0.3%) in the continuation and withdrawal groups, respectively (p = 0.23), before propensity score matching, with no significant difference. After propensity score matching, delayed polypectomy bleeding was observed in 1 patient (0.9%) in the continuation group but not in the withdrawal group, with no significant difference. CONCLUSION Cold snare polypectomy during continuous antithrombotic treatment did not significantly increase delayed post-polypectomy bleeding rates. Therefore, this procedure may be safe during continuous antithrombotic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Akira Matsui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yusuke Kawai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yorinari Ochiai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Takayuki Okamura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yugo Suzuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Mitsunaga
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kosuke Nomura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masami Tanaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Hiroyuki Odagiri
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Daisuke Kikuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Shu Hoteya
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toranomon Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zachou M, Varytimiadis K, Androutsakos T, Katsaras G, Zoumpouli C, Lalla E, Nifora M, Karantanos P, Nikiteas N, Sougioultzis S, Kalaitzakis E, Kykalos S. Protocol design for randomized clinical trial to compare underwater cold snare polypectomy to conventional cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated colon polyps of size 5-10 mm (COLDWATER study). Tech Coloproctol 2023; 27:325-333. [PMID: 36399201 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-022-02731-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colorectal cancer is internationally the third leading cause of death from a malignant disease. The aim of screening colonoscopy in adults > 45 years of age is early diagnosis and treatment of precancerous polyps. Endoscopic polyp removal (polypectomy) can be achieved with various techniques depending on the size, morphology, and location of the polyp. According to current guidelines, small non-pedunculated polyps should be removed with a cold snare after the colorectal lumen has been insufflated with air (conventional cold snare polypectomy).In recent years, several studies have described the benefits of water aided colonoscopy, as well as the safety and efficacy of underwater cold snare polypectomy for large colon polyps. However, there are insufficient data on conventional and underwater techniques for small polyps, the most commonly diagnosed colorectal polyps. METHODS We have designed a prospective randomized double-blind clinical trial to compare the safety and efficacy of conventional and underwater cold snare polypectomy for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10 mm in size. A total of 398 polyps will be randomized. Randomization will be carried out using the random numbers method of Microsoft Excel 2016. The primary endpoint is the muscularis mucosa resection rate. Secondary endpoints are the depth and percentage of R0 excisions, complications, and the recurrence rate at follow-up endoscopy 6-12 months after polypectomy. DISCUSSION We hypothesize underwater polypectomy will result in a higher muscularis mucosa resection rate. The results of our study will provide useful data for the development of guidelines in polypectomy techniques for non-pedunculated polyps 5-10 mm in size. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov, NCT05273697.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Zachou
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - K Varytimiadis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - T Androutsakos
- Department of Pathophysiology, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - G Katsaras
- Second Neonatal Department and Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU), Medical School, "Papageorgiou" General Hospital, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.,Paediatric Department, General Hospital of Pella-Hospital Unit of Edessa, Edessa, Greece
| | - C Zoumpouli
- Department of Pathology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - E Lalla
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - M Nifora
- Department of Pathology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - P Karantanos
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sismanogleio General Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - N Nikiteas
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - S Sougioultzis
- Department of Pathophysiology, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - E Kalaitzakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital of Heraklion, University of Crete, Heraklion, Greece
| | - S Kykalos
- Second Department of Propaedeutic Surgery, "Laikon" General Hospital, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Steinbrück I, Pohl J, Grothaus J, von Hahn T, Rempel V, Faiss S, Dumoulin FL, Schmidt A, Hagenmüller F, Allgaier HP. Characteristics and endoscopic treatment of interventional and non-interventional iatrogenic colorectal perforations in centers with high endoscopic expertise: a retrospective multicenter study. Surg Endosc 2023:10.1007/s00464-023-09920-z. [PMID: 36759355 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-09920-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/28/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Iatrogenic colorectal perforation is a rare event with a relevant mortality and the need for surgical therapy in around ¾ of cases. METHODS In this retrospective multicentric cohort study iatrogenic colorectal perforations from 2004 to 2021 were analyzed. Primary outcome parameters were incidence and clinical success of 1st line endoscopic treatment. Comparative analysis of interventional and non-interventional perforations was performed and predictors for clinical success of endoscopic therapy were identified. RESULTS From 103,570 colonoscopies 213 (0.2%) iatrogenic perforations were identified. 68.4% were interventional (80 during polypectomy/EMR, 54 during ESD and 11 for other reasons) and 31.6% non-interventional perforations (39 by the tip, 19 by the shaft, 7 by inversion, two by biopsy and one by distension). Incidence of 1st line endoscopic therapy was 61.0% and clinical success 81.5%. Other non-surgical therapies were conducted in 8.9% with clinical success in 94.7% of cases. In interventional perforations both incidence and clinical success of 1st line endoscopic therapy were significantly higher compared to non-interventional perforations [71.7% vs. 38.2% (p < 0.01) resp. 86.5% vs. 61.5% (p < 0.01)]. Mortality was 2.3% and significantly lower in the group of interventional perforations (0.7% vs. 5.9%, p = 0.037). Multivariable analysis revealed perforation size < 5 mm as only independent predictor for clinical success of 1st line endoscopic treatment [OR 14.85 (1.57-140.69), p = 0.019]. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic therapy is treatment of choice in the majority of iatrogenic colorectal perforations. In case of interventional perforations it is highly effective but only a minority of non-interventional perforations are good candidates for endoscopic treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo Steinbrück
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Johannes Grothaus
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Viktor Rempel
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Anna Hospital Herne, Academic Teaching Hospital Ruhr University Bochum, Herne, Germany
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Academic Teaching Hospital, Universtiy of Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Friedrich Hagenmüller
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Academic Teaching Hospital University of Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Allgaier
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital, University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Siau K, Pelitari S, Green S, McKaig B, Rajendran A, Feeney M, Thoufeeq M, Anderson J, Ravindran V, Hagan P, Cripps N, Beales ILP, Church K, Church NI, Ratcliffe E, Din S, Pullan RD, Powell S, Regan C, Ngu WS, Wood E, Mills S, Hawkes N, Dunckley P, Iacucci M, Thomas-Gibson S, Wells C, Murugananthan A. JAG consensus statements for training and certification in colonoscopy. Frontline Gastroenterol 2023; 14:201-221. [PMID: 37056319 PMCID: PMC10086724 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2022-102260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2022] [Accepted: 10/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION In the UK, endoscopy certification is awarded when trainees attain minimum competency standards for independent practice. A national evidence-based review was undertaken to update and develop standards and recommendations for colonoscopy training and certification. METHODS Under the oversight of the Joint Advisory Group (JAG), a modified Delphi process was conducted between 2019 and 2020 with multisociety expert representation. Following literature review and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations appraisal, recommendation statements on colonoscopy training and certification were formulated and subjected to anonymous voting to obtain consensus. Accepted statements were peer reviewed by JAG and relevant stakeholders for incorporation into the updated colonoscopy certification pathway. RESULTS In total, 45 recommendation statements were generated under the domains of: definition of competence (13), acquisition of competence (20), assessment of competence (8) and postcertification support (4). The consensus process led to revised criteria for colonoscopy certification, comprising: (1) achieving key performance indicators defined within British Society of Gastroenterology standards (ie, unassisted caecal intubation rate >90%, rectal retroversion >90%, polyp detection rate >15%+, polyp retrieval rate >90%, patient comfort <10% with moderate-severe discomfort); (2) minimum procedure count 280+; (3) performing 15+ procedures over the preceding 3 months; (4) attendance of the JAG Basic Skills in Colonoscopy course; (5) terminal ileal intubation rates of 60%+ in inflammatory bowel disease; (6) satisfying requirements for formative direct observation of procedure skills (DOPS) and direct observation of polypectomy skills (Size, Morphology, Site, Access (SMSA) level 2); (7) evidence of reflective practice as documented on the JAG Endoscopy Training System reflection tool; (8) successful performance in summative DOPS. CONCLUSION The UK standards for training and certification in colonoscopy have been updated, culminating in a single-stage certification process with emphasis on polypectomy competency (SMSA Level 2+). These standards are intended to support training, improve standards of colonoscopy and polypectomy, and provide support to the newly independent practitioner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith Siau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, Cornwall, UK
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Stavroula Pelitari
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Susi Green
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
| | - Brian McKaig
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Arun Rajendran
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hillingdon Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Uxbridge, Greater London, UK
| | - Mark Feeney
- Department of Gastroenterology, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, Torbay, UK
| | - Mo Thoufeeq
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Anderson
- Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Cheltenham, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Vathsan Ravindran
- Gastroenterology, St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Paul Hagan
- Endoscopy, Royal Derby Hospital, Derby, UK
| | - Neil Cripps
- Colorectal Surgery, University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust, Worthing, West Sussex, UK
| | - Ian L P Beales
- Department of Gastroenterology, Norfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
- University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, UK
| | | | - Nicholas I Church
- Department of Gastroenterology, NHS Lothian, Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Elizabeth Ratcliffe
- Faculty of Medical and Human Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Wrightington Wigan and Leigh NHS Foundation Trust, Wigan, Wigan, UK
| | - Said Din
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals of Derby and Burton NHS Foundation Trust, Derby, UK
| | - Rupert D Pullan
- Colorectal Surgery, Torbay and South Devon NHS Foundation Trust, Torquay, Torbay, UK
| | - Sharon Powell
- Endoscopy, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Catherine Regan
- Endoscopy, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
| | - Wee Sing Ngu
- Colorectal Surgery, City Hospitals Sunderland NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, Tyne and Wear, UK
| | - Eleanor Wood
- Department of Gastroenterology, Homerton University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, London, UK
| | - Sarah Mills
- Colorectal Surgery, Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK
- Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Neil Hawkes
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Glamorgan Hospital, Llantrisant, UK
| | - Paul Dunckley
- Department of Gastroenterology, Gloucestershire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Gloucester, Gloucestershire, UK
| | - Marietta Iacucci
- University of Birmingham College of Medical and Dental Sciences, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, Birmingham, UK
| | - Siwan Thomas-Gibson
- Imperial College London, London, UK
- St Mark's Hospital and Academic Institute Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Christopher Wells
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Tees and Hartlepool NHS Foundation Trust, Hartlepool, Hartlepool, UK
| | - Aravinth Murugananthan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Wolverhampton Hospitals NHS Trust, Wolverhampton, Wolverhampton, UK
- Faculty of Health, Education and Life Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ket S, Tjandra D, Hewett DG, Kheir AO, Metz AJ, Moss A, Ogra R, Tam W, Raftopoulos S, Reynolds J, Secomb R, Cavalieri L, Urquhart P, Gibson PR, Brown G. Cold snare polypectomy of colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm on clopidogrel: Australian and New Zealand randomized controlled trial. Endosc Int Open 2022; 10:E745-E752. [PMID: 35692915 PMCID: PMC9187418 DOI: 10.1055/a-1813-1019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background and study aims Optimal peri-colonoscopic management of clopidogrel remains unclear. Cold snare polypectomy is safe and effective for removing polyps ≤ 10 mm and clips can control intraprocedural bleeding. We conducted a randomized controlled trial to compare continuation of clopidogrel versus temporary replacement of clopidogrel with aspirin for routine colonoscopy using cold snare polypectomy for polyps ≤ 10 mm.
Patients and methods Between August 2016 and August 2019, consenting participants at 12 centers were randomized to continuation of clopidogrel as a single or dual antiplatelet agent, or to temporarily take aspirin alone from 7 days prior to 2 days after routine colonoscopy. Endoscopists were blinded to group allocation. Cold snare polypectomy was used to remove polyps ≤ 10 mm, with endoscopic clips applied if intraprocedural bleeding continued for > 2 minutes. Follow-up was performed on Day 30. The trial was stopped early due to delayed patient enrollment.
Results Two hundred seventy-six consecutive polyps ≤ 10 mm were removed from 107 patients. Of the patients, 61.7 % were male with a median age of 69 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63 to 76.75). Fifty-nine patients continued on clopidogrel and 48 temporarily took aspirin instead. One hundred thirty-four polyps were removed from 49 patients who continued on clopidogrel vs 142 from 43 patients temporarily took aspirin instead (P = 0.33). Intraprocedural bleeding requiring clips occurred in 11 of 49 patients who continued on clopidogrel and in two of 43 patients who temporarily took replacing with aspirin instead (P = 0.02). More post-procedural minor bleeding was seen in the aspirin arm (six of 43 vs one of 49; P = 0.03). One patient in each arm had acute coronary syndrome, which was medically managed. None of the patients had clinically significant post-procedural bleeding.
Conclusions Continuation of clopidogrel in patients undergoing cold snare polypectomy for colorectal polyps ≤ 10 mm does not appear to increase the rate of clinically significant postpolypectomy bleeding. It is associated with an increase in intraprocedural bleeding, which can be successfully treated with clips.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shara Ket
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Monash University, Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Douglas Tjandra
- Department of Gastroenterology, Melbourne Health, Victoria, Australia
| | - David G. Hewett
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Queensland
| | - Ammar O. Kheir
- Department of Gastroenterology, Queen Elizabeth II Jubilee Hospital, Queensland,Digestive Disease Institute, Cleveland Clinic Abu Dhabi, Abu Dhabi, UAE,Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Andrew J. Metz
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Alan Moss
- Department of Endoscopic Services, Western Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Department of Medicine – Western Health, Melbourne Medical School, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - William Tam
- Royal Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia,University of Adelaide, South Australia, Australia,Calvary North Adelaide Hospital, South Australia, Australia
| | - Spiro Raftopoulos
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Western Australia,Peel Health Campus, Western Australia
| | - John Reynolds
- Biostatistics Consulting Platform, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing & Health Sciences, Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Robyn Secomb
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | | - Peter R. Gibson
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Monash University, Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Gregor Brown
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Monash University, Central Clinical School, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia,Epworth Hospital, Richmond, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kouladouros K, Kähler G, Belle S. Colonic Wall Injuries After Endoscopic Resection: Still a Major Complication? A Retrospective Analysis of 3782 Endoscopic Resections. Dis Colon Rectum 2022; 65:581-589. [PMID: 34753890 DOI: 10.1097/dcr.0000000000001974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Colonic wall injuries are the most feared adverse events of endoscopic resections among endoscopists. The implementation of endoscopic closure has offered a reliable way to treat such injuries and, thus, has decreased their overall morbidity and mortality. OBJECTIVES The aim of our study is to assess the characteristics and outcomes of colonic wall injuries after endoscopic resection, focusing on the endoscopic treatment of these injuries. DESIGN This was a retrospective cohort study. SETTINGS Patients treated in the Central Endoscopy Unit of the Medical Centre Mannheim were included. PATIENTS We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent endoscopic mucosal resection and snare polypectomy in our center between 2004 and 2019 and isolated the resection-related colonic wall injuries. These were divided into 3 groups: group A, endoscopically treated early colonic wall injuries; group B, nonendoscopically treated early colonic wall injuries; and group C, late perforations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Periprocedural factors and treatment outcomes were analyzed and compared among the 3 groups. RESULTS Of 3782 endoscopic resections, we identified 177 cases of colonic wall injuries, of which 148 were identified and treated endoscopically (group A), 9 were identified during the procedure but could not be treated endoscopically (group B), and 20 were late perforations (group C). Endoscopic treatment with use of clips had a technical success rate of 94.3%, while the clinical success rate of technically complete endoscopic closure was 92.6%. Twenty-two percent of all colonic wall injuries required surgical treatment; the type and outcomes of surgery were similar in all groups. Overall hospital stay was significantly lower in group A. LIMITATIONS The main limitation of the study is its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic closure with the use of clips is a safe and feasible treatment for intraprocedurally identified colonic wall injuries and is associated with significantly decreased necessity of surgery, morbidity, and hospital stay. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B755. LESIONES DE PARED COLNICA POSTERIOR A RESECCIN ENDOSCPICA ES AN UNA COMPLICACIN IMPORTANTE ANLISIS RETROSPECTIVO DE RESECCIONES ENDOSCPICAS ANTECEDENTES:Las lesiones de la pared del colon son los eventos adversos más temidos por los endoscopistas durante las resecciones endoscópicas. La implementación del cierre endoscópico ha ofrecido una forma confiable de tratar tales lesiones y, por lo tanto, disminuyendo su morbilidad y mortalidad general.OBJETIVOS:El objetivo de nuestro estudio es evaluar las características y resultados de las lesiones de la pared colónica posterior a la resección endoscópica, centrándose en su tratamiento endoscópico.DISEÑO:Es un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ENTORNO CLÍNICO:Se incluyeron pacientes tratados en la Unidad Central de Endoscopia del Centro Médico de Mannheim.PACIENTES:Se analizaron retrospectivamente todos los pacientes sometidos a resección endoscópica de la mucosa y polipectomía en asa en nuestro centro entre 2004 y 2019, seleccionando las lesiones de la pared colónica relacionadas a la resección. Estas se dividieron en tres grupos: Grupo A: lesiones tempranas de la pared colónica tratadas endoscópicamente; Grupo B: lesiones tempranas de la pared colónica no tratadas endoscópicamente; y Grupo C: perforaciones tardías.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VALORACION:Se analizaron y compararon los factores relacionados al procedimiento y los resultados del tratamiento entre los tres grupos.RESULTADOS:De 3782 resecciones endoscópicas identificamos 177 casos de lesiones de la pared colónica, de los cuales 148 fueron identificados y tratados endoscópicamente (Grupo A), 9 fueron identificados durante el procedimiento pero no pudieron ser tratados endoscópicamente (Grupo B) y 20 fueron perforaciones tardías. (Grupo C). El tratamiento endoscópico con el uso de clips tuvo una tasa de éxito técnico del 94,3%, mientras que la tasa de éxito clínico del cierre endoscópico técnicamente completo fue del 92,6%. El veintidós por ciento de todas las lesiones de la pared colónica requirieron tratamiento quirúrgico; el tipo y los resultados de la cirugía fueron los mismos en todos los grupos. La estancia hospitalaria global fue significativamente menor en el grupo A.LIMITACIONES:La principal limitación del estudio es su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:El cierre endoscópico con el uso de clips es un tratamiento seguro y factible para las lesiones de la pared colónica identificadas durante el procedimiento y se asocia con una disminución significativa de la necesidad de cirugía, morbilidad y de estancia hospitalaria. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B755.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konstantinos Kouladouros
- Central Interdisciplinary Endoscopy, Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hsu WF, Chang CY, Chang CC, Chang LC, Chen CH, Lin CC, Lin YM, Lee CL, Wu HY, Lee HC, Lee YC, Su MY, Lin LJ, Chia SL, Wu MS, Chiu HM. Risk of colonoscopy-related complications in a fecal immunochemical test-based population colorectal cancer screening program. Endoscopy 2022; 54:290-298. [PMID: 33271603 DOI: 10.1055/a-1328-5126] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The likelihood of advanced or synchronous neoplasms is significantly higher in fecal immunochemical test (FIT)-positive individuals than in the general population. The magnitude of the colonoscopy-related complication rate in FIT-positive individuals remains unknown. This study aimed to elucidate the colonoscopy-related complication rate after a positive FIT result and compare it with the rate when colonoscopy was performed for other purposes. METHODS Information regarding colonoscopy-related severe complications after a positive FIT result (FIT-colonoscopy) and ordinary colonoscopy during 2010-2014 was collected from the Taiwanese Colorectal Cancer Screening Program Database and National Health Insurance Research Database. Severe complications included significant bleeding, perforation, and cardiopulmonary events ≤ 14 days after colonoscopy. The number of events per 1000 procedures was used to quantify complication rates. Multivariate analysis was conducted to assess the association of various factors with severe complications associated with FIT-colonoscopy compared with ordinary colonoscopy. RESULTS 319 114 FIT-colonoscopies (214 955 patients) were identified, 51 242 (16.1 %) of which included biopsy and 94 172 (29.5 %) included polypectomy. Overall, 2125 significant bleedings (6.7 ‰) and 277 perforations (0.9 ‰) occurred ≤ 14 days after FIT-colonoscopy. Polypectomy, antiplatelet use, and anticoagulant use were associated with higher risk of complications (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 4.41, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 4.05-4.81); aOR 1.35, 95 %CI 1.12-1.53; aOR 1.88, 95 %CI 0.61-5.84, respectively). Compared with ordinary colonoscopy, FIT-colonoscopy involved significantly higher risk of significant bleeding (aOR 3.10, 95 %CI 2.90-3.32). CONCLUSIONS FIT-colonoscopy was associated with a more than two-fold risk of significant bleeding, especially when polypectomy was performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen-Feng Hsu
- Department of Medicine, National Taiwan University Cancer Center, Taipei, Taiwan.,College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chi-Yang Chang
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Chao Chang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Medical University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Taipei Medical University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Li-Chun Chang
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chien-Hua Chen
- Digestive Disease Center, Chang-Bing Show-Chwan Memorial Hospital, Changhua, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Che Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, China Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Yu-Min Lin
- Department of Internal Medicine, Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Long Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cathay General Hospital Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hong-Yuan Wu
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hsin-Chung Lee
- School of Medicine, College of Medicine, Fu Jen Catholic University, New Taipei City, Taiwan.,Department of Surgery, Hsinchu Cathay General Hospital, Hsinchu, Taiwan
| | - Yi-Chia Lee
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yao Su
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital and Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Li-Ju Lin
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Shu-Li Chia
- Health Promotion Administration, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Shiang Wu
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Han-Mo Chiu
- College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.,Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | | |
Collapse
|
19
|
Bendall O, James J, Pawlak KM, Ishaq S, Tau JA, Suzuki N, Bollipo S, Siau K. Delayed Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Colorectal Polyps: Identifying High-Risk Patients. Clin Exp Gastroenterol 2022; 14:477-492. [PMID: 34992406 PMCID: PMC8714413 DOI: 10.2147/ceg.s282699] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Accepted: 12/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (DPPB) is a potentially severe complication of therapeutic colonoscopy which can result in hospital readmission and re-intervention. Over the last decade, rates of DPPB reported in the literature have fallen from over 2% to 0.3–1.2%, largely due to improvements in resection technique, a shift towards cold snare polypectomy, better training, adherence to guidelines on periprocedural antithrombotic management, and the use of antithrombotics with more favourable bleeding profiles. However, as the complexity of polypectomy undertaken worldwide increases, so does the importance of identifying patients at increased risk of DPPB. Risk factors can be categorised according to patient, polyp and personnel related factors, and their integration together to provide an individualised risk score is an evolving field. Strategies to reduce DPPB include safe practices relevant to all patients undergoing colonoscopy, as well as specific considerations for patients identified to be high risk. This narrative review sets out an evidence-based summary of factors that contribute to the risk of DPPB before discussing pragmatic interventions to mitigate their risk and improve patient safety.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oliver Bendall
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Joel James
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| | - Katarzyna M Pawlak
- Endoscopy Unit, Department of Gastroenterology, Ministry of Interior and Administration, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Sauid Ishaq
- Department of Gastroenterology, Dudley Group Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Dudley, UK.,Medicine, Birmingham City Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - J Andy Tau
- Austin Gastroenterology, Austin, TX, USA
| | - Noriko Suzuki
- Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, St. Mark's Hospital, London, UK
| | - Steven Bollipo
- School of Medicine & Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Keith Siau
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Cornwall Hospitals NHS Trust, Truro, UK
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Nakamatsu D, Nishida T, Fujii Y, Yamaoka S, Osugi N, Sugimoto A, Mukai K, Matsumoto K, Yamamoto M, Hayashi S, Nakajima S. Safety of Cold Snare Polypectomy for Small Colorectal Polyps in Patients Receiving Antithrombotic Therapy. TECHNIQUES AND INNOVATIONS IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2022; 24:246-253. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tige.2022.03.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2025]
|
21
|
Huang R, Huang S, Xu L, Mandip R, Chen B, Fan J, Bai Y, Wang Y, Han Z, Wang Z, Liu S, Li Y. OUP accepted manuscript. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2022; 10:goac013. [PMID: 35475290 PMCID: PMC9035811 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goac013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2021] [Revised: 09/27/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Shaohui Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Li Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Rai Mandip
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada
| | - Baomei Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jiayi Fan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yang Bai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yusi Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Zelong Han
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Zhiqing Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Side Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Yue Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Corresponding author. Department of Gastroenterology, Institute of Gastroenterology of Guangdong Province, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Gastroenterology, Nanfang Hospital, Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China. Tel: +86-15975537291;
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lao W, Prasoon P, Cao G, Tan LT, Dai S, Devadasar GH, Huang X. Risk factors for incomplete polyp resection during colonoscopy. LAPAROSCOPIC, ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lers.2021.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
23
|
Guo XF, Yu XA, Hu JC, Lin DZ, Deng JX, Su ML, Li J, Liu W, Zhang JW, Zhong QH. Endoscopic management of delayed bleeding after polypectomy of small colorectal polyps: two or more clips may be safe. Gastroenterol Rep (Oxf) 2021; 10:goab051. [PMID: 35382164 PMCID: PMC8972999 DOI: 10.1093/gastro/goab051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Revised: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 09/29/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The resection of small colorectal polyps (≤10 mm) is routine for endoscopists. However, the management of one of its main complications, namely delayed (within 14 days) postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB), has not been clearly demonstrated. We aimed to assess the role of coloscopy in the management of DPPB from small colorectal polyps and identify the associated factors for initial hemostatic success. Methods We conducted a retrospective study of 69 patients who developed DPPB after the removal of colorectal polyps of ≤10 mm and underwent hemostatic colonoscopy at the Sixth Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University (Guangzhou, China) between April 2013 and June 2021. Demographics, clinical variables, and colonoscopic features were collected independently. We applied univariate and multivariate analyses to assess factors associated with initial hemostatic success. Results General colonoscopy without oral bowel preparation was successfully performed in all the patients, with a median duration of 23.9 (12.5–37.9) minutes. Among 69 patients, 62 (89.9%) achieved hemostasis after initial hemostatic colonoscopy and 7 (10.1%) rebled 2.7 ± 1.1 days after initial colonoscopic hemostasis and had rebleeding successfully controlled by one additional colonoscopy. No colonoscopy-related adverse events occurred. Multivariate analysis showed that management with at least two clips was the only independent prognostic factor for initial hemostatic success (odds ratio, 0.17; 95% confidence interval, 0.03–0.91; P = 0.04). All the patients who had at least two clips placed at the initial hemostatic colonoscopy required no further hemostatic intervention. Conclusions Colonoscopy is a safe, effective, and not too time-consuming approach for the management of patients with DPPB of small colorectal polyps and management with the placement of at least two hemoclips may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xue-Feng Guo
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Xiang-An Yu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jian-Cong Hu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - De-Zheng Lin
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jia-Xin Deng
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Ming-Li Su
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Juan Li
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Wei Liu
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Jia-Wei Zhang
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
| | - Qing-Hua Zhong
- Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Colorectal and Pelvic Floor Diseases, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, P. R. China
- Corresponding author. Department of Endoscopic Surgery, The Sixth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, 26 Yuancun Er Heng Road, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510655, P. R. China. Tel: +86-20-38254166; Fax: +86-20-38254166;
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Ortiz O, Rex DK, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Al-Kawas FH, Gordon SR, Mathew A, Levenick JM, Aslanian HR, Antaki F, von Renteln D, Crockett SD, Rastogi A, Gill JA, Law R, Wallace MB, Elias PA, MacKenzie TA, Pohl H, Pellisé M. Factors associated with complete clip closure after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colorectal polyps. Endoscopy 2021; 53:1150-1159. [PMID: 33291159 DOI: 10.1055/a-1332-6727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIM : Delayed bleeding is a common adverse event following endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) of large colorectal polyps. Prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of nonpedunculated polyps larger than 20 mm reduces the incidence of severe delayed bleeding, especially in proximal polyps. This study aimed to evaluate factors associated with complete prophylactic clip closure of the mucosal defect after EMR of large polyps. METHODS : This is a post hoc analysis of the CLIP study (NCT01936948). All patients randomized to the clip group were included. Main outcome was complete clip closure of the mucosal resection defect. The defect was considered completely closed when no remaining mucosal defect was visible and clips were less than 1 cm apart. Factors associated with complete closure were evaluated in multivariable analysis. RESULTS : In total, 458 patients (age 65, 58 % men) with 494 large polyps were included. Complete clip closure of the resection defect was achieved for 338 polyps (68.4 %); closure was not complete for 156 (31.6 %). Factors associated with complete closure in adjusted analysis were smaller polyp size (odds ratio 1.06 for every millimeter decrease [95 % confidence interval 1.02-1.08]), good access (OR 3.58 [1.94-9.59]), complete submucosal lifting (OR 2.28 [1.36-3.90]), en bloc resection (OR 5.75 [1.48-22.39]), and serrated histology (OR 2.74 [1.35-5.56]). CONCLUSIONS : Complete clip closure was not achieved for almost one in three resected large nonpedunculated polyps. While stable access and en bloc resection facilitate clip closure, most factors associated with clip closure are not modifiable. This highlights the need for alternative closure options and measures to prevent bleeding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oswaldo Ortiz
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Matthew T Moyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, AdventHealth, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Douglas Pleskow
- Division of Gastroenterology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Omid Sanaei
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Firas H Al-Kawas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Stuart R Gordon
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Abraham Mathew
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - John M Levenick
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Harry R Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Fadi Antaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Medical Center (CHUM) and Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas, USA
| | - Jeffrey A Gill
- Division of Gastroenterology, James A. Haley VA, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Ryan Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida, USA
| | - Pooja A Elias
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Todd A MacKenzie
- The Dartmouth Institute, Department for Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Heiko Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA
- Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, Vermont, USA
| | - Maria Pellisé
- Department of Gastroenterology, Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
- Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (CIBERehd), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Cook K, Naguib N, Price CE, Katharios S, Kirsch J, Cortes K, Hohl K, O'Toole GA, Grinstaff MW. Temporary In Situ Hydrogel Dressings for Colon Polypectomies. ACS Biomater Sci Eng 2021; 7:4362-4370. [PMID: 34342427 DOI: 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.1c00549] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Currently, no dressings are utilized after removal of polyps during a colonoscopy rendering these tissue sites susceptible to bleeding, sepsis, and perfusion. We report the design specifications, synthesis, and ex vivo evaluation of in situ polymerized hydrogels as colon wound dressings post polypectomy. The hydrogels exhibited varied properties to include moduli between 100 and 16 000 Pa, dissolution times between 4 h to 7 days or longer, swelling up to 200%, and adhesion to colon tissue from 0.1 to 0.4 N/cm2. The hydrogels displayed minimal cytotoxicity, prevented the migration/spread of bacteria, and exhibited rapid gelation, a requirement for application to the lumen of the colon via an endoscope. This work highlights the structure-property relationship of hydrogels prepared from N-hydroxysuccinimide functionalized PEG cross-linkers and hyperbranched polyethylenimines or 4-arm PEG-NH2 star polymers, and their potential as colon wound dressings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Cook
- Departments of Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| | - Nada Naguib
- Departments of Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| | - Courtney E Price
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States
| | - Stefan Katharios
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States
| | - Jack Kirsch
- Departments of Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| | - Kareen Cortes
- Departments of Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| | - Katherine Hohl
- Departments of Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| | - George A O'Toole
- Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755, United States
| | - Mark W Grinstaff
- Departments of Chemistry, Biomedical Engineering, and Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts 02215, United States
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Wang JZ, Zhang Y, Guo Q. Thoughts on factors related to colonoscopy quality. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2021; 29:977-983. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v29.i17.977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
With the increase in health consciousness and the prevalence of early gastrointestinal cancer screening, the number of diagnosed cases of colorectal polyps and adenomas in the Chinese general population has substantially increased. However, the overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) in China remains lower than the global standard of 30%. High quality colonoscopy is pivotal for increasing the ADR and reducing the risk of interval colon cancer. A few factors are related to the quality of colonoscopy, including preoperative evaluation of examinees, bowel preparation, techniques for intubation, use of image enhancement endoscopy, withdraw time, and prevention of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing-Zhai Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China,Yunnan Provincial Clinical Medicine Center of GI Endoscopy, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China,Yunnan Provincial Clinical Medicine Center of GI Endoscopy, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China
| | - Qiang Guo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First People's Hospital of Yunnan Province, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China,Yunnan Provincial Clinical Medicine Center of GI Endoscopy, Kunming 650032, Yunnan Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Soh H, Chun J, Hong SW, Park S, Lee YB, Lee HJ, Cho EJ, Lee JH, Yu SJ, Im JP, Kim YJ, Kim JS, Yoon JH. Child-Pugh B or C Cirrhosis Increases the Risk for Bleeding Following Colonoscopic Polypectomy. Gut Liver 2021; 14:755-764. [PMID: 31816672 PMCID: PMC7667933 DOI: 10.5009/gnl19131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 09/22/2019] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background/Aims The risk for colonoscopic postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) in patients with chronic liver disease (CLD) remains unclear. We determined the incidence and risk factors for colonoscopic PPB in patients with CLD, especially those with liver cirrhosis. Methods We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with CLD who underwent colonoscopic polypectomy at Seoul National University Hospital between 2011 and 2014. The study endpoints were immediate and delayed PPB. Results A total of 1,267 consecutive patients with CLD were included in the study. Immediate PPB occurred significantly more often in the Child-Pugh (CP) B or C cirrhosis group (17.5%) than in the CP-A (6.3%) and chronic hepatitis (4.6%) groups (p<0.001). Moreover, the incidence of delayed PPB in the CP-B or C cirrhosis group (4.4%) was significantly higher than that in the CP-A (0.7%) and chronic hepatitis (0.2%) groups (p<0.001). The independent risk factors for immediate PPB were CP-B or C cirrhosis (p=0.011), a platelet count <50,000/μL (p<0.001), 3 or more polyps (p=0.017), endoscopic mucosal resection or submucosal dissection (p<0.001), and polypectomy performed by trainees (p<0.001). The independent risk factors for delayed PPB were CP-B or C cirrhosis (p=0.009), and polyps >10 mm in size (p=0.010). Conclusions Patients with CP-B or C cirrhosis had an increased risk for bleeding following colonoscopic polypectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hosim Soh
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jaeyoung Chun
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Department of Internal Medicine, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung Wook Hong
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seona Park
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yun Bin Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jung Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eun Ju Cho
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong-Hoon Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Su Jong Yu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Pil Im
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoon Jun Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Sung Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung-Hwan Yoon
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Arimoto J, Chiba H, Ashikari K, Fukui R, Tachikawa J, Okada N, Suto T, Kawano N, Niikura T, Kuwabara H, Nakaoka M, Ida T, Goto T, Nakajima A. Management of Less Than 10-mm-Sized Pedunculated (Ip) Polyps with Thin Stalk: Hot Snare Polypectomy Versus Cold Snare Polypectomy. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:2353-2361. [PMID: 32623550 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06436-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the use of cold snare polypectomy (CSP) has spread rapidly, its safety for pedunculated (Ip) polyps remains controversial. In particular, the outcomes of hot snare polypectomy (HSP) and CSP for Ip polyps have not been previously compared. AIMS This study evaluated whether the rate of delayed postpolypectomy bleeding (DPPB) after CSP for Ip polyps was higher than that after HSP for Ip polyps and compared other outcomes (the rates of immediate bleeding and pathological margins) between the HSP and CSP procedures. METHODS A total of 5905 colorectal polyps in 4920 patients were resected at Omori Red Cross Hospital between October 2012 and June 2019. The polyps were divided into two groups: the HSP group (86 polyps, 64 patients) and the CSP group (102 polyps, 87 patients). The primary outcome measure was the incidence of DPPB. The secondary outcome measures were the incidences of immediate bleeding during the procedure and pathological margins of the resected specimen. RESULTS The rate of immediate bleeding during CSP was significantly higher than that for the HSP group [38.2% (39/102) versus 3.5% (3/86); p < 0.001]. However, the rate of DPPB was significantly higher in the HSP group than in the CSP group [4.7% (4/86) versus 0% (0/102); p < 0.001]. The rate of DPPB after CSP was 0%. CONCLUSIONS This is the first study to compare the outcomes of HSP and CSP for Ip polyps. CSP is safer than HSP for Ip polyps measuring < 10 mm in diameter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jun Arimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan.
| | - Hideyuki Chiba
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Keiichi Ashikari
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Ryo Fukui
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Jun Tachikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Naoya Okada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Takuma Suto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Naoya Kawano
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Toshihiro Niikura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Hiroki Kuwabara
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Michiko Nakaoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Tomonori Ida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Tohru Goto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Omori Red Cross Hospital, 4-30-1, Chuo, Ota-Ku, Tokyo, 143-8527, Japan
| | - Atsushi Nakajima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Yokohama City University School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Li DF, Lai MG, Yang MF, Zou ZY, Xu J, Peng RM, Xiong F, Wei C, Zhang DG, Xu ZL, Wang LS, Yao J. The efficacy and safety of underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for ≥10-mm colorectal polyps: systematic review and meta-analysis. Endoscopy 2021; 53:636-646. [PMID: 32767283 DOI: 10.1055/a-1234-8918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection (UEMR) is a promising strategy for nonpedunculated colorectal polyp removal. However, the efficacy and safety of the technique for the treatment of ≥ 10-mm colorectal polyps remain unclear. We aimed to comprehensively assess the efficacy and safety of UEMR for polyps sized 10-19 mm and ≥ 20 mm. METHODS PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched for relevant articles from January 2012 to November 2019. Primary outcomes were the rates of adverse events and residual polyps. Secondary outcomes were the complete resection, en bloc resection, and R0 resection rates. RESULTS 18 articles including 1142 polyps from 1093 patients met our inclusion criteria. The overall adverse event and residual polyp rates were slightly lower for UEMR when removing colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm vs. ≥ 20 mm (3.5 % vs. 4.3 % and 1.2 % vs. 2.6 %, respectively). The UEMR-related complete resection rate was slightly higher for colorectal polyps of 10-19 mm vs. ≥ 20 mm (97.9 % vs. 92.0 %). However, the en bloc and R0 resection rates were dramatically higher for UEMR removal of polyps of 10-19 mm vs. ≥ 20 mm (83.4 % vs. 36.1 % and 73.0 % vs. 40.0 %, respectively). In addition, univariate meta-regression revealed that polyp size was an independent predictor for complete resection rate (P = 0.03) and en bloc resection (P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS UEMR was an effective and safe technique for the removal of ≥ 10-mm nonpedunculated colorectal polyps. However, UEMR exhibited low en bloc and R0 resection rates for the treatment of ≥ 20-mm polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De-Feng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Ming-Guang Lai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Mei-Feng Yang
- Department of Hematology, Yantian District People's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Zhi-Yuan Zou
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jing Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Guangzhou Digestive Disease Center, Guangzhou First People's Hospital, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China
| | - Ru-Mei Peng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The First Affiliated Hospital of University of South China, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan, China
| | - Feng Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Cheng Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Ding-Guo Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Zheng-Lei Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Li-Sheng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shenzhen People's Hospital (The Second Clinical Medical College, Jinan University; The First Affiliated Hospital, Southern University of Science and Technology), Shenzhen, Guangdong, China
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Saito Y, Oka S, Kawamura T, Shimoda R, Sekiguchi M, Tamai N, Hotta K, Matsuda T, Misawa M, Tanaka S, Iriguchi Y, Nozaki R, Yamamoto H, Yoshida M, Fujimoto K, Inoue H. Colonoscopy screening and surveillance guidelines. Dig Endosc 2021; 33:486-519. [PMID: 33713493 DOI: 10.1111/den.13972] [Citation(s) in RCA: 68] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2021] [Revised: 02/21/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The Colonoscopy Screening and Surveillance Guidelines were developed by the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society as basic guidelines based on the scientific methods. The importance of endoscopic screening and surveillance for both detection and post-treatment follow-up of colorectal cancer has been recognized as essential to reduce disease mortality. There is limited high-level evidence in this field; therefore, we had to focus on the consensus of experts. These clinical practice guidelines consist of 20 clinical questions and eight background knowledge topics that have been determined as the current guiding principles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaka Saito
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shiro Oka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Ryo Shimoda
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Naoto Tamai
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kinichi Hotta
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Masashi Misawa
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Shinji Tanaka
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | - Ryoichi Nozaki
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| | | | | | | | - Haruhiro Inoue
- Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society, Tokyo, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yabe K, Horiuchi A, Kudo T, Horiuchi I, Ichise Y, Kajiyama M, Tanaka N. Risk of Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Procedure-Related Bleeding in Patients With or Without Continued Antithrombotic Therapy. Dig Dis Sci 2021; 66:1548-1555. [PMID: 32556819 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-020-06393-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prospective studies on bleeding risk during/after gastrointestinal endoscopic procedures are rare. AIM We investigated the risk of endoscopic procedure-related bleeding in patients with biopsy and/or cold snare polypectomy (CSP) in relation to antithrombotic therapy. METHODS This prospective, observational single-center cohort study (NCT02594813) enrolled consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) or colonoscopy. The primary outcome measure was delayed bleeding in patients with biopsy and/or CSP who required endoscopic treatment within 2 weeks post-procedure. The secondary outcomes were immediate bleeding and the number of hemostatic clips used during the procedure. RESULTS From November 2015 to October 2018 at our institution, 3069 (mean age, 66 years) and 37,887 (57 years) patients underwent EGD with and without antithrombotic therapy, respectively. In addition, 1116 (72 years) and 11,901 (65 years) patients had colonoscopy with and without antithrombotic therapy, respectively. In the 3069 EGD patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, no delayed bleeding occurred, whereas immediate bleeding occurred in 9 of 141 patients (6.4%) with biopsy. Of the 1116 colonoscopy patients receiving antithrombotic therapy, delayed bleeding occurred in three of 228 (1.3%) following CSP. Immediate bleeding occurred in nine of 225 (4%) following biopsy and in 32 of 228 (14%) following CSP. Multivariate analysis following univariate analysis identified chronic kidney disease and CSP as factors significantly associated with procedure-related bleeding in patients taking antithrombotic agents. CONCLUSION The risk of delayed bleeding in diagnostic EGD with biopsy or in colonoscopy with biopsy and/or CSP was low despite continuation of antithrombotic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kiyoaki Yabe
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, 3230 Akaho, Komagane, 399-4117, Japan
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Yachiyo, Japan
| | - Akira Horiuchi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, 3230 Akaho, Komagane, 399-4117, Japan.
| | - Takahiro Kudo
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, 3230 Akaho, Komagane, 399-4117, Japan
- Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Juntendo University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Ichitaro Horiuchi
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, 3230 Akaho, Komagane, 399-4117, Japan
| | - Yasuyuki Ichise
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, 3230 Akaho, Komagane, 399-4117, Japan
| | - Masashi Kajiyama
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, 3230 Akaho, Komagane, 399-4117, Japan
| | - Naoki Tanaka
- Digestive Disease Center, Showa Inan General Hospital, 3230 Akaho, Komagane, 399-4117, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Pedersen IB, Bretthauer M, Kalager M, Løberg M, Hoff G, Matapour S, Hugin S, Frigstad SO, Seip B, Kleist BA, Løvdal L, Botteri E, Holme Ø. Incomplete endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps: a prospective quality assurance study. Endoscopy 2021; 53:383-391. [PMID: 32961579 DOI: 10.1055/a-1243-0379] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Endoscopic screening with polypectomy has been shown to reduce colorectal cancer incidence in randomized trials. Incomplete polyp removal and subsequent development of post-colonoscopy cancers may attenuate the effect of screening. This study aimed to quantify the extent of incomplete polyp removal. METHODS We included patients aged 50-75 years with nonpedunculated polyps ≥ 5 mm removed during colonoscopy at four hospitals in Norway. To evaluate completeness of polyp removal, biopsies from the resection margins were obtained after polypectomy. Logistic regression models were fitted to identify factors explaining incomplete resection. RESULTS 246 patients with 339 polyps underwent polypectomy between January 2015 and June 2017. A total of 12 polyps were excluded due to biopsy electrocautery damage, and 327 polyps in 246 patients (mean age 67 years [range 42-83]; 52 % male) were included in the analysis. Overall, 54 polyps (15.9 %) in 54 patients were incompletely resected. Histological diagnosis of the polyp (sessile serrated lesions vs. adenoma, odds ratio [OR] 10.9, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 3.9-30.1) and polyp location (proximal vs. distal colon, OR 2.8, 95 %CI 1.0-7.7) were independent risk factors for incomplete removal of polyps 5-19 mm. Board-certified endoscopists were not associated with lower rates of incomplete resection compared with trainees (14.0 % vs. 14.2 %), OR 1.0 (95 %CI 0.5-2.1). CONCLUSION Incomplete polyp resection was frequent after polypectomy in routine clinical practice. Serrated histology and proximal location were independent risk factors for incomplete resection. The performance of board-certified gastroenterologists was not superior to that of trainees.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ina B Pedersen
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Michael Bretthauer
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Mette Kalager
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Magnus Løberg
- Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Geir Hoff
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Telemark Hospital Skien, Skien, Norway
| | - Senaria Matapour
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Silje Hugin
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Svein O Frigstad
- Department of Medicine, Vestre Viken Hospital Trust, Gjettum, Norway
| | - Birgitte Seip
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Medicine, Vestfold Hospital Trust, Tønsberg, Norway
| | - Britta A Kleist
- Department of Pathology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Leif Løvdal
- Department of Pathology, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Norway
| | - Edoardo Botteri
- Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| | - Øyvind Holme
- Department of Medicine, Sorlandet Hospital Kristiansand, Kristiansand, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Clinical Effectiveness Research Group, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Section for Colorectal Cancer Screening, Cancer Registry of Norway, Oslo, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Harada H, Miyaoka Y, Yuki T, Iwaki T, Maeda G, Nakahara R, Murakami D, Ujihara T, Katsuyama Y, Hayasaka K, Kushiyama Y, Fujishiro H, Amano Y. Postpolypectomy bleeding of colorectal polyps in patients with continuous warfarin and short-term interruption of direct oral anticoagulants. Gastrointest Endosc 2021; 93:691-698. [PMID: 33022270 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2020.09.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 09/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Postpolypectomy bleeding (PPB) is the most common adverse event after colorectal polypectomy. Use of anticoagulants is an important risk factor for PPB. This study aimed to evaluate PPB in patients receiving treatment with warfarin and direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). METHODS Between August 2017 and July 2019, 5449 patients with 12,601 polyps who underwent endoscopic snare resection of colorectal polyps were enrolled. Endoscopic snare resection was performed in patients receiving continuous warfarin (C-warfarin) and in patients who experienced 1 day cessation of (O-) of DOACs in accordance with the Japanese Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society guidelines. RESULTS The PPB rate in the group receiving anticoagulants was statistically higher than that in the group without anticoagulants (8.5% [33/387] vs 1.2% [63/5,062], respectively; P < .001). By multivariate logistic regression analysis, male gender (odds ratio [OR], 2.17; P = .007), warfarin (OR, 4.64; P < .001), DOACs (OR, 6.59; P < .001), and multipolyp removal (OR, 1.77; P = .007) were significant risk factors for PPB. PPB was observed in 9 and 21 patients in the C-warfarin and O-DOACs groups, respectively: C-warfarin (8.0% [9/113]), O-dabigatran (6.1% [2/33]), O-rivaroxaban (14.8% [9/61]), O-apixaban (9.8% [9/92]), and O-edoxaban (1.8% [1/56]). The PPB rate with the O-edoxaban group was significantly lower than that with the O-rivaroxaban group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS Use of anticoagulant therapy was an independent risk factor for PPB. The rates of PPB in patients receiving C-warfarin and O-DOACs were also higher than those in patients not receiving anticoagulants. Edoxaban may be safe through short-term withdrawal in patients undergoing endoscopic snare resection of colorectal polyps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hideaki Harada
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Youichi Miyaoka
- Department of Endoscopy, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Japan
| | - Takafumi Yuki
- Department of Gastroenterology, Matsue Red Cross Hospital, Matsue, Japan
| | - Tomoyuki Iwaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Gen Maeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Ryotaro Nakahara
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Daisuke Murakami
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Ujihara
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Kenji Hayasaka
- Department of Gastroenterology, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | | | - Hirofumi Fujishiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Izumo, Japan
| | - Yuji Amano
- Department of Endoscopy, New Tokyo Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Inoue T, Ishihara R, Nishida T, Akasaka T, Hayashi Y, Nakamatsu D, Ogiyama H, Yamaguchi S, Yamamoto K, Mukai A, Kinoshita K, Yakushijin T, Iijima H, Takehara T. Prophylactic clipping not effective in preventing post-polypectomy bleeding for < 20-mm colon polyps: A multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2021; 36:383-390. [PMID: 32511792 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.15134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 05/29/2020] [Accepted: 06/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Prophylactic clipping (PC) after polypectomy has the potential to prevent post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of PC in preventing PPB for < 20-mm polyps. METHODS This multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled trial conducted from December 2013 to June 2017 at 10 institutions randomly assigned 1080 patients with < 20-mm colon polyps to the non-PC and PC groups. Allocation factors were institution, antiplatelet drug use, and polyp number. The primary endpoint was differences in PPB rates between the groups. The severity of PPB and post-procedural abdominal symptoms were also investigated. These endpoints in intention-to-treat and per-protocol (PP) analyses were evaluated. RESULTS We investigated 1039 patients with 2960 lesions. There was no significant difference between the groups in characteristics including age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, antiplatelet drug use, and lesion characteristics such as type and size. Excluding the clip used in the non-PC group, intraoperative bleeding, and deviation of protocol, 903 patients were investigated in PP analysis. There was no significant difference in the PPB rate between the non-PC and PC groups (2.7% vs 2.3%, P = 0.6973 [intention-to-treat analysis]; 3.0 vs 2.4%, P = 0.7353 [PP analysis]). Severe PPB (≥ grade 3) was similar between the groups. Total procedure time was significantly shorter in the non-PC group than in the PC group (31 vs 36 min, P = 0.0002). Post-procedural abdominal fullness was less common in the non-PC group than in the PC group (20.8% vs 25.6%, P = 0.0833). CONCLUSION Prophylactic clipping is not effective in preventing PBB for < 20-mm colon polyps (UMIN000012163).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takuya Inoue
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Ryu Ishihara
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tsutomu Nishida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan
| | - Tomofumi Akasaka
- Department of Gastrointestinal Oncology, Osaka International Cancer Center, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, National Hospital Organization Osaka National Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yoshito Hayashi
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Dai Nakamatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, Toyonaka, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Kaizuka City Hospital, Kaizuka, Japan
| | - Hideharu Ogiyama
- Department of Gastroenterology, Itami City Hospital, Itami, Japan
| | | | - Katsumi Yamamoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Japan Community Healthcare Organization Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Akira Mukai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sumitomo Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kazuo Kinoshita
- Department of Gastroenterology, Otemae Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Yakushijin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hideki Iijima
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Takehara
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Japan
- Osaka Gut Forum, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Furuhashi H, Dobashi A, Tamai N, Shimamoto N, Kobayashi M, Ono S, Hara Y, Matsui H, Kamba S, Horiuchi H, Koizumi A, Ohya TR, Kato M, Ikeda K, Arakawa H, Sumiyama K. Blood group O is a risk factor for delayed post-polypectomy bleeding. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:6882-6891. [PMID: 33258034 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-08195-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Blood group O of ABO blood group system is considered as a risk factor for various bleeding events, but the relationship with endoscopic treatment-associated bleeding has yet to be investigated. This study aimed to evaluate whether blood group O is associated with delayed bleeding after colorectal endoscopic resection. METHODS This was a retrospective observational study based on medical records at four university hospitals in Japan. We reviewed the records for consecutive patients who underwent colorectal endoscopic resection from January 2014 through December 2017. The primary outcome was the incidence of delayed bleeding, defined as hematochezia or melena, requiring endoscopy, transfusion, or any hemostatic intervention up to 28 days after endoscopic resection. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust the impact of blood group O on the delayed bleeding. RESULTS Among 10,253 consecutive patients who underwent colorectal endoscopic resection during the study period, 8625 patients met the criteria. In total, delayed bleeding occurred in 255 patients (2.96%). The O group had significantly more bleeding events compared with the non-O group (A, B, and AB) (relative risk, 1.62 [95% confidence interval, 1.24-2.10]; P < 0.001). In multivariate logistic regression analysis, blood group O remained an independent risk factor for the bleeding (adjusted odds ratio, 1.60 [95% confidence interval, 1.18-2.17]; P = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Blood group O was associated with an increased risk of delayed bleeding in patients undergoing colorectal endoscopic resection. Preoperative screening for ABO blood group could improve risk assessments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiroto Furuhashi
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan.
| | - Akira Dobashi
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Naoto Tamai
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Nana Shimamoto
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Masakuni Kobayashi
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Shingo Ono
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Yuko Hara
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Hiroaki Matsui
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Shunsuke Kamba
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Hideka Horiuchi
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Akio Koizumi
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Tomohiko R Ohya
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Masayuki Kato
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Keiichi Ikeda
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Hiroshi Arakawa
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| | - Kazuki Sumiyama
- Department of Endoscopy, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8, Nishi-Shimbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, 105-8461, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Rutter MD, Jover R. Personalizing Polypectomy Techniques Based on Polyp Characteristics. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2020; 18:2859-2867. [PMID: 31563558 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2019.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/31/2019] [Accepted: 09/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Polypectomy is an essential skill for all endoscopists performing lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Different polypectomy tools and techniques have evolved and it is important that endoscopists are familiar with these so they can select the most appropriate technique for each polyp. This narrative review updates the different concepts in tailoring polypectomy technique to the characteristics of polyps. Effective polypectomy requires different components, including the following: careful evaluation of the polyp; decision making about optimal polyp management; actual polypectomy, which includes careful positioning of the endoscope and polyp; and postpolypectomy evaluation of the results (for completeness of resection and prophylaxis of complications).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Rutter
- University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton on Tees, United Kingdom; Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, United Kingdom
| | - Rodrigo Jover
- Servicio de Medina Digestiva, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante, Alicante, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Chen CW, Kuo CJ, Chiu CT, Su MY, Lin CJ, Le PH, Lim SN, Yeh CT, Alison MR, Lin WR. The effect of prophylactic hemoclip placement and risk factors of delayed post-polypectomy bleeding in polyps sized 6 to 20 millimeters: a propensity score matching analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2020; 20:309. [PMID: 32962643 PMCID: PMC7510104 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-020-01454-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 09/15/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delayed post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) is a major complication of polypectomy. The effect of prophylactic hemoclipping on delayed PPB is uncertain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of prophylactic hemoclipping and identify the risk factors of delayed PPB. METHODS Patients with polyps sized 6 to 20 mm underwent snare polypectomy from 2015 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. The patients with prophylactic hemoclipping for delayed PPB prevention were included in the clipping group, and those without prophylactic hemoclipping were included in the non-clipping group. The incidence of delayed PPB and time to bleeding were compared between the groups. Multivariate analysis was used to identify the risk factors of delayed PPB. Propensity score matching was used to minimize potential bias. RESULTS After propensity score matching, 612 patients with 806 polyps were in the clipping group, and 576 patients with 806 polyps were in the non-clipping group. There were no significant differences in the incidence of delayed PPB and days to bleeding between two groups (0.8% vs 1.3%, p = 0.4; 3.4 ± 1.94 days vs 4.13 ± 3.39 days, p = 0.94). In the multivariate analysis, the polyp size [Odds ratio (OR):1.16, 95% confidence interval (CI):1.01-1.16, p = 0.03), multiple polypectomies (OR: 4.64, 95% CI:1.24-17.44, p = 0.02) and a history of anticoagulant use (OR:37.52, 95% CI:6.49-216.8, p < 0.001) were associated with delayed PPB. CONCLUSIONS In polyps sized 6 to 20 mm, prophylactic hemoclip placement did not decrease the risk of delayed PPB. Patients without risk factors including multiple polypectomies and anticoagulant use are no need to performing prophylactic hemoclipping.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chun-Wei Chen
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Jung Kuo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Tang Chiu
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Ming-Yao Su
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, New Taipei Municipal TuCheng Hospital, New Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Jung Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Puo-Hsien Le
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
| | - Siew-Na Lim
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Department of Neurology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chau-Ting Yeh
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan
- Liver Research Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Malcolm R Alison
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Wey-Ran Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, No 5, Fu Hsing Street, Guishan Dist., Taoyuan, 333, Taiwan.
- College of Medicine, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
- Liver Research Center, Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Paspatis GA, Arvanitakis M, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M, Saunders B, Turino SY, Dhillon A, Fragaki M, Gonzalez JM, Repici A, van Wanrooij RLJ, van Hooft JE. Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement - Update 2020. Endoscopy 2020; 52:792-810. [PMID: 32781470 DOI: 10.1055/a-1222-3191] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
1: ESGE recommends that each center implements a written policy regarding the management of iatrogenic perforations, including the definition of procedures that carry a higher risk of this complication. This policy should be shared with the radiologists and surgeons at each center. 2 : ESGE recommends that in the case of an endoscopically identified perforation, the endoscopist reports its size and location, with an image, and statement of the endoscopic treatment that has been applied. 3: ESGE recommends that symptoms or signs suggestive of iatrogenic perforation after an endoscopic procedure should be rapidly and carefully evaluated and documented with a computed tomography (CT) scan. 4 : ESGE recommends that endoscopic closure should be considered depending on the type of the iatrogenic perforation, its size, and the endoscopist expertise available at the center. Switch to carbon dioxide (CO2) endoscopic insufflation, diversion of digestive luminal content, and decompression of tension pneumoperitoneum or pneumothorax should also be performed. 5 : ESGE recommends that after endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, further management should be based on the estimated success of the endoscopic closure and on the general clinical condition of the patient. In the case of no or failed endoscopic closure of an iatrogenic perforation, and in patients whose clinical condition is deteriorating, hospitalization and surgical consultation are recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregorios A Paspatis
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizelion General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete-Greece
| | - Marianna Arvanitakis
- Gastroenterology, Hepatopancreatology, and Digestive Oncology, Erasme Hospital, Universite Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Jean-Marc Dumonceau
- Gastroenterology Service, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Charleroi, Charleroi, Belgium
| | | | - Brian Saunders
- St Mark's Hospital, Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, North West London Hospitals University Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | | | - Angad Dhillon
- St Mark's Hospital, Wolfson Unit for Endoscopy, North West London Hospitals University Trust, Harrow, London, UK
| | - Maria Fragaki
- Gastroenterology Department, Venizelion General Hospital, Heraklion, Crete-Greece
| | | | - Alessandro Repici
- Department of Gastroenterology, Digestive Endoscopy Unit, IRCCS Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Milan, Italy
| | - Roy L J van Wanrooij
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, AG&M Research Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jeanin E van Hooft
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Gao LY, Liu XQ, Huang X. Effect of prophylactic clipping on adverse events after colorectal endoscopic resection: A meta-analysis. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2020; 28:710-718. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v28.i15.710] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The effect of prophylactic hemoclip placement on the risk of adverse events such as delayed bleeding and perforation after colorectal polypectomy is still unclear. Its efficiency has not been confirmed and there is no consensus on the usefulness of prophylactic clipping.
AIM To assess the efficacy of prophylactic clipping on adverse events after endoscopic resection of colorectal polyps.
METHODS We performed a search of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, and Wanfang databases for studies comparing the effect of clipping vs no clipping on adverse events following endoscopic resection. The quality of the included studies was performed. Statistical analysis was performed using Revman5.3 software.
RESULTS We identified seven eligible randomized trials from the database search, involving a total of 3777 patients, which included 1880 patients who used prophylactic hemoclips (clip group) and 1897 who did not use (no clip group). Meta-analysis results showed that the delayed bleeding rate of the clip group was significantly lower than that of the no clip group (2.55% vs 4.48%, P = 0.01, 95%CI: 0.40-0.80). There was no significant difference in postoperative perforation rate between the clip group and no clip group (0.66% vs 1.04%, P = 0.42, 95%CI: 0.21-1.92). Subgroup analysis showed that the prophylactic effect on delayed bleeding was mainly observed in polyps with a size of ≥ 20 mm, and the preventive effect in polyps less than 20 mm was poor (RR = 1.18, 95%CI: 0.62-2.23, P = 0.62; RR = 0.47, 95%CI: 0.29-0.77, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in the effect of prophylactic hemoclips on the prevention of delayed bleeding after resection of proximal and distal colonic polyps (RR = 0.57, 95%CI: 0.18-1.80, P = 0.34; RR = 0.78, 95%CI: 0.06-10.33, P = 0.85).
CONCLUSION Prophylactic hemoclips can prevent the occurrence of delayed bleeding after colorectal polypectomy, which is mainly observed in the lesions ≥ 20 mm. In addition, hemoclips have little preventive effect on postoperative perforation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Li-Ying Gao
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xi-Qiao Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Xuan Huang
- Department of Gastroenterology, the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou 310002, Zhejiang Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Li P, Ma B, Gong S, Zhang X, Li W. Underwater endoscopic mucosal resection for colorectal lesions: a meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2020; 35:3003-3013. [DOI: 10.1007/s00464-020-07745-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2019] [Accepted: 06/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
41
|
Li DF, Chang X, Fang X, Wang JY, Yu ZC, Wei C, Xiong F, Xu ZL, Zhang DG, Liu TT, Luo MH, Wang LS, Yao J. Colonoscopic post-polypectomy bleeding in patients on uninterruptedclopidogrel therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Exp Ther Med 2020; 19:3211-3218. [PMID: 32266017 PMCID: PMC7132234 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2020.8597] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend temporary cessation of clopidogrel for 7-10 days for patients on clopidogrel undergoing colonoscopy with polypectomy. However, recent prospective randomized controlled trials have advocated for uninterrupted clopidogrel, due to similar post-polypectomy bleeding (PPB) rates with and without continued clopidogrel therapy. Thus, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess the risk of PPB rate in patients on continued clopidogrel therapy. Systemically identified publications were used to compare the rate of PPB in patients on continued clopidogrel therapy with those who had interrupted clopidogrel therapy. The primary outcome was the incidence of PPB. The secondary outcomes were immediate PPB, delayed PPB and serious cardio-thrombotic events. This study has been registered in PROSPERO (no. CRD42018118325). A total of five studies were identified, which included 655 patients in the continued clopidogrel group and 6620 patients in the control group. There was an increased risk of PPB with continued clopidogrel [P=0.0003; risk ratio (RR), 1.96; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.36-2.83). The rate of immediate PPB was slightly higher in the continued clopidogrel group (5.77% vs. 1.77%, respectively), but was not statistically significant (P=0.06; RR, 1.57; 95%CI, 0.98-2.51). The rate of delayed PPB was increased in the continued clopidogrel group (P=0.0008; RR, 3.10; 95%CI, 1.60-5.98). However, no significant difference in serious cardio-thrombotic events was observed within 30 days (P=0.74; RR, 0.78; 95%CI, 0.18-3.40). Although continued clopidogrel therapy decreased the incidence of serious cardio-thrombotic events, the risk of delayed PPB was increased. Therefore, endoscopists should make all preparations to prevent bleeding in the perioperative period for patients at high thrombotic risk and on continued clopidogrel therapy, if polypectomy cannot be reasonably postponed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- De-Feng Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Xin Chang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China
| | - Xue Fang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai 200433, P.R. China
| | - Jian-Yao Wang
- Department of General Surgery, Shenzhen Children's Hospital, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Zhi-Chao Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Cheng Wei
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Feng Xiong
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Zheng-Lei Xu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Ding-Guo Zhang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Ting-Ting Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Ming-Han Luo
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Li-Sheng Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| | - Jun Yao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Clinical Medicine College (Shenzhen People's Hospital) of Jinan University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518020, P.R. China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Rutter MD, East J, Rees CJ, Cripps N, Docherty J, Dolwani S, Kaye PV, Monahan KJ, Novelli MR, Plumb A, Saunders BP, Thomas-Gibson S, Tolan DJM, Whyte S, Bonnington S, Scope A, Wong R, Hibbert B, Marsh J, Moores B, Cross A, Sharp L. British Society of Gastroenterology/Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland/Public Health England post-polypectomy and post-colorectal cancer resection surveillance guidelines. Gut 2020; 69:201-223. [PMID: 31776230 PMCID: PMC6984062 DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2019-319858] [Citation(s) in RCA: 251] [Impact Index Per Article: 50.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2019] [Revised: 10/14/2019] [Accepted: 10/15/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
These consensus guidelines were jointly commissioned by the British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG), the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland (ACPGBI) and Public Health England (PHE). They provide an evidence-based framework for the use of surveillance colonoscopy and non-colonoscopic colorectal imaging in people aged 18 years and over. They are the first guidelines that take into account the introduction of national bowel cancer screening. For the first time, they also incorporate surveillance of patients following resection of either adenomatous or serrated polyps and also post-colorectal cancer resection. They are primarily aimed at healthcare professionals, and aim to address:Which patients should commence surveillance post-polypectomy and post-cancer resection?What is the appropriate surveillance interval?When can surveillance be stopped? two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE II) instrument provided a methodological framework for the guidelines. The BSG's guideline development process was used, which is National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) compliant.two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps The key recommendations are that the high-risk criteria for future colorectal cancer (CRC) following polypectomy comprise either:two or more premalignant polyps including at least one advanced colorectal polyp (defined as a serrated polyp of at least 10 mm in size or containing any grade of dysplasia, or an adenoma of at least 10 mm in size or containing high-grade dysplasia); or five or more premalignant polyps This cohort should undergo a one-off surveillance colonoscopy at 3 years. Post-CRC resection patients should undergo a 1 year clearance colonoscopy, then a surveillance colonoscopy after 3 more years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew D Rutter
- Gastroenterology, University Hospital of North Tees, Stockton-on-Tees, UK
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| | - James East
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK
| | - Colin J Rees
- Northern Institute for Cancer Research, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
- Gastroenterology, South Tyneside NHS Foundation Trust, South Shields, UK
| | - Neil Cripps
- Western Sussex Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Chichester, UK
| | | | - Sunil Dolwani
- Gastroenterology, Cardiff and Vale NHS Trust, Cardiff, UK
| | - Philip V Kaye
- Histopathology, Nottingham University Hospitals, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kevin J Monahan
- Family History of Bowel Cancer Clinic, West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK
- Imperial College, London, UK
| | | | | | | | | | - Damian J M Tolan
- Clinical Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Sophie Whyte
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | - Alison Scope
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | - Ruth Wong
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK
| | | | | | | | - Amanda Cross
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine of Imperial College, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Linda Sharp
- Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Abraham NS. Antiplatelets, anticoagulants, and colonoscopic polypectomy. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:257-265. [PMID: 31585125 PMCID: PMC7386094 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.09.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The management of antiplatelet and anticoagulant (ie, antithrombotic) agents is challenging in the periendoscopic setting. In this state-of-the-art update, we review current best practice recommendations focusing on the risk of immediate and delayed postpolypectomy bleeding in the context of drug discontinuation (ie, temporary interruption) and drug continuation. The data regarding polypectomy technique (cold snare vs conventional thermal-based) and prophylactic placement of hemostatic clips are evaluated to assess whether these endoscopic techniques are beneficial in reducing postpolypectomy bleeding. Finally, clinical takeaways are provided to facilitate safer polypectomy among patients on antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neena S Abraham
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA; Division of Health Care Policy and Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Periprocedural adverse events after endoscopic resection of T1 colorectal carcinomas. Gastrointest Endosc 2020; 91:142-152.e3. [PMID: 31525362 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.08.046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2019] [Accepted: 08/31/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS In contrast to the adverse event (AE) risk of endoscopic resection (ER) of adenomas, the intra- and postprocedural AE risks of ER of T1 colorectal cancer (CRC) are scarcely reported in the literature. It is unclear whether ER of early CRCs, which grow into the submucosal layer and sometimes show incomplete lifting, is associated with an increased AE risk. We aimed to identify the AE rate after ER of T1 CRCs and to identify the risk factors associated with these AEs. METHODS Medical records of patients with T1 CRCs diagnosed between 2000 and 2014 in 15 hospitals in the Netherlands were reviewed. Patients who underwent primary ER were selected. The primary outcome was the occurrence of endoscopy-related AEs. The secondary outcome was the identification of risk factors. Multivariate logistic regression was performed. RESULTS Endoscopic AEs occurred in 59 of 1069 (5.5%) patients, among which 37.3% were classified as mild, 59.3% as moderate, and 3.4% as severe. AEs were postprocedural bleeding (n = 40, 3.7%), perforation (n = 13, 1.2%), and postpolypectomy electrocoagulation syndrome (n = 6, 0.6%). No fatal AEs were observed. Independent predictors for AEs were age >70 years (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-3.96) and tumor size >20 mm (odds ratio, 2.22; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-4.69). CONCLUSIONS In this large multicenter retrospective cohort study, AE rates of ER of T1 CRC (5.5%) are comparable with reported AE rates for adenomas. Larger tumor size and age >70 years are independent predictors for AEs. This study suggests that endoscopic treatment of T1 CRCs is not associated with an increased periprocedural AE risk.
Collapse
|
45
|
Study design of endoscopic polypectomy on clopidogrel (EPOC): A randomised controlled trial. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 2019; 16:100479. [PMID: 31737799 PMCID: PMC6849125 DOI: 10.1016/j.conctc.2019.100479] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2019] [Revised: 10/20/2019] [Accepted: 10/24/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Concurrent cardiovascular disease and antiplatelet use (clopidogrel, prasugrel and ticagrelor) use poses a significant peri-endoscopic management challenge with a paucity of high-quality evidence available. Antiplatelet temporary interruption places patients at risk of serious cardiovascular thrombotic events. Continuing these agents potentially increases the risk of procedure related bleeding however this risk could be sufficiently mitigated by cold snare polypectomy and endoscopic clipping to manage intraprocedural bleeding, making routine colonoscopy on continued antiplatelet agents safe. The EPOC trial will examine whether continuation of antiplatelet therapy (clopidogrel, prasugrel or ticagrelor) as single or dual therapy with aspirin, is inferior or superior to temporary interruption of antiplatelet therapy, current standard of care, with regard to the use of endoscopic rescue clips or clinically significant post-polypectomy bleeding after cold snare polypectomy of polyps ≤10 mm. EPOC is a parallel group, proceduralist-blinded randomized controlled trial comparing recruiting patients on antiplatelet therapy undergoing elective colonoscopy. This trial is underway throughout Australia and New Zealand with a view to expanding to additional sites. 496 subjects in each arm are required for this study. EPOC is the first randomised controlled trial comparing temporary interruption with continuation of antiplatelet therapy in patients undergoing elective colonoscopy.
Collapse
|
46
|
Yamaguchi D, Yoshida H, Ikeda K, Takeuchi Y, Yamashita S, Jubashi A, Yukimoto T, Takeshita E, Yoshioka W, Fukuda H, Tominaga N, Tsuruoka N, Morisaki T, Ario K, Tsunada S, Fujimoto K. Colorectal endoscopic mucosal resection with submucosal injection of epinephrine versus hypertonic saline in patients taking antithrombotic agents: propensity-score-matching analysis. BMC Gastroenterol 2019; 19:192. [PMID: 31744465 PMCID: PMC6862827 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-019-1114-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2019] [Accepted: 11/11/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) to remove colon polyps is increasingly common in patients taking antithrombotic agents. The safety of EMR with submucosal saline injection has not been clearly demonstrated in this population. Aims The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of submucosal injection of saline–epinephrine versus hypertonic saline in colorectal EMR of patients taking antithrombotic agents. Methods This study enrolled 204 patients taking antithrombotic agents among 995 consecutive patients who underwent colonic EMR from April 2012 to March 2018 at Ureshino Medical Center. Patients were divided into two groups according to the injected solution: saline–epinephrine or hypertonic (10%) saline (n = 102 in each group). Treatment outcomes and adverse events were evaluated in each group and risk factors for immediate and post-EMR bleeding were investigated. Results There were no differences between groups in patient or polyp characteristics. The main antithrombotic agents were low-dose aspirin, warfarin, and clopidogrel. Propensity-score matching created 80 matched pairs. Adjusted comparisons between groups showed similar en bloc resection rates (95.1% with saline–epinephrine vs. 98.0% with hypertonic saline). There were no significant differences in adverse events (immediate EMR bleeding, post-EMR bleeding, perforation, or mortality) between groups. Multivariate analyses revealed that polyp size over 10 mm was associated with an increased risk of immediate EMR bleeding (odds ratio 12.1, 95% confidence interval 2.0–74.0; P = 0.001). Conclusions Two tested solutions in colorectal EMR were considered to be both safe and effective in patients taking antithrombotic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Yamaguchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan. .,Department of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.
| | - Hisako Yoshida
- Department of Medical Statistics, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Kei Ikeda
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Yuki Takeuchi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Shota Yamashita
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Amane Jubashi
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | | | - Eri Takeshita
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan
| | - Wataru Yoshioka
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Hiroko Fukuda
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Naoyuki Tominaga
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan
| | - Nanae Tsuruoka
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan
| | - Tomohito Morisaki
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Keisuke Ario
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Seiji Tsunada
- Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Ureshino Medical Center, Ureshino, Japan
| | - Kazuma Fujimoto
- Department of Internal Medicine, Saga Medical School, Saga, Japan.,Faculty of Medicine, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Maruoka D, Kishimoto T, Matsumura T, Arai M, Akizue N, Ishikawa K, Ohta Y, Kasamatsu S, Taida T, Ishigami H, Okimoto K, Saito K, Nakagawa T, Kato N. Underwater cold snare polypectomy for colorectal adenomas. Dig Endosc 2019; 31:662-671. [PMID: 31038769 DOI: 10.1111/den.13427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe treatment for colorectal adenomas. However, the R0 resection rate is not sufficiently high because of inadequate resection of muscularis mucosa. We hypothesized that CSP in an underwater environment could improve this procedure by helping to safely achieve resection containing the muscularis mucosa. We have named this procedure underwater cold snare polypectomy (UCSP). We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of UCSP for colorectal adenomas. METHODS Between May 2017 and April 2018, patients diagnosed with colorectal adenomas <9 mm underwent UCSP. After follow-up colonoscopy 3 weeks later, the patients post-UCSP scars were biopsied. Outcomes were compared with those of a historical control group who underwent conventional CSP in our previous study using propensity score-matching methods. RESULTS Overall, 224 lesions in 65 patients were prospectively resected by UCSP. Pathologically, 209 lesions were adenomas (4.5 ± 1.5 mm) including one intramucosal carcinoma. Only one pathological residual adenoma was identified, but there was no significant difference in the residual rate between the UCSP and CSP groups (both 1.0%). No complications were observed. R0 resection rate and rate of area containing the muscularis mucosa in the UCSP group were significantly higher than those in the CSP group (80.2% vs 32.7%, P < 0.001; 50.0% vs 35.3%, P = 0.015). CONCLUSION Underwater cold snare polypectomy for diminutive and small colorectal adenomas was safe and effective from the perspective of pathological complete resection, which is likely facilitated by achieving an adequate depth of resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daisuke Maruoka
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
- Translational Research and Development Center, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Kishimoto
- Department of Molecular Pathology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoaki Matsumura
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Makoto Arai
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoki Akizue
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kentaro Ishikawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Yuki Ohta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Shingo Kasamatsu
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Takashi Taida
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Hideaki Ishigami
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Kenichiro Okimoto
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Chiba University Hospital, Chiba, Japan
| | - Keiko Saito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Tomoo Nakagawa
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| | - Naoya Kato
- Department of Gastroenterology, Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Prophylactic endoscopic coagulation to prevent delayed post-EMR bleeding in the colorectum: a prospective randomized controlled trial (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc 2019; 90:813-822. [PMID: 31175874 DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2019.05.039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 05/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Post-EMR bleeding (PEB) is the most common adverse event after EMR. However, there are no established endoscopic methods for the prevention of PEB. This study aimed to investigate whether prophylactic endoscopic coagulation (PEC) using coagulation probes reduces the incidence of overall delayed PEB. METHODS We performed a randomized controlled study of patients undergoing EMR for large (≥10 mm) sessile lesions and laterally spreading tumors. Patients were randomized 1:1 to the EMR with coagulation group (n = 285) or EMR (control) group (n = 285). Immediate bleeding during colon EMR or clean-based ulcer after EMR was excluded. Clinically significant PEB was defined as bleeding requiring endoscopic hemostasis, hospitalization, or a decrease in the hemoglobin level >2 g/dL. RESULTS A total of 569 patients were analyzed. The incidence of overall PEB was significantly lower in the EMR with coagulation group than in the control group (12.6% [36/285] vs 18.7% [53/284], P = .048). However, this was largely because of a reduction in minor bleeding. There was no difference in clinically significant PEB (1.8% [5/285] vs 3.2% [9/284], P = .276). Rectal location was a risk factor associated with overall PEB (odds ratio, 1.256; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-1.41; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Although this study found reduced PEB with prophylactic cautery of visible vessels, this was largely because of a reduction in minor bleeding with no benefit observed for clinically significant bleeding. Overall, PEB was more frequent with rectal lesions. (Clinical trial registration number: KCT0000779.).
Collapse
|
49
|
Won Ma D, Kim JS, Ji JS, Kim BW, Choi H. Cold Snare Polypectomy in Patients Taking Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: A Randomized Trial of Discontinuation of Thienopyridines. Clin Transl Gastroenterol 2019; 10:e00091. [PMID: 31599746 PMCID: PMC6884347 DOI: 10.14309/ctg.0000000000000091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Cold snare polypectomy (CSP) is a safe and effective method for removing polyps ≤10 mm. The aim of this study was to compare the risk of clinically significant bleeding and thromboembolic events after CSP between stopping and continuing thienopyridines in patients taking dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). METHODS The study was a single-center, noninferiority, and randomized controlled study involving patients who received colonoscopy from October 2015 to October 2016. Patients receiving DAPT with polyps ≤10 mm were randomly assigned to either the DAPT group (patients continued DAPT) or the aspirin group (patients discontinued thienopyridines for 1 week). Primary outcome was clinically significant bleeding. Secondary outcomes included intraprocedural bleeding, nonsignificant hematochezia, and occurrence of thromboembolic events. RESULTS Forty-two patients with 104 eligible polyps were allocated to the DAPT group, and 45 patients with 101 eligible polyps were allocated to the aspirin group. Patient demographic characteristics including size, location, shape, and pathology of the removed polyps were similar in the 2 groups. Intraprocedural bleeding and nonsignificant hematochezia rates were also similar between the 2 groups (4.8% vs 2.2%, P = 0.608; 19.0% vs 8.9%, P = 0.170). No thromboembolic event occurred in either group. Only 1 patient (2.4%) in the DAPT group showed clinically significant bleeding. No significant bleeding was found in the aspirin group. DISCUSSION Clinically significant bleeding rate after CSP for polyps ≤10 mm in patients continuing to take DAPT was 2.4%. Therefore, CSP is a safe method for removing small polyps even in patients taking DAPT (ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT02865824).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dae Won Ma
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Joon Sung Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Jeong-Seon Ji
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Byung-Wook Kim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| | - Hwang Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Pohl H, Grimm IS, Moyer MT, Hasan MK, Pleskow D, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA, Sanaei O, Al-Kawas FH, Gordon SR, Mathew A, Levenick JM, Aslanian HR, Antaki F, von Renteln D, Crockett SD, Rastogi A, Gill JA, Law RJ, Elias PA, Pellise M, Wallace MB, Mackenzie TA, Rex DK. Clip Closure Prevents Bleeding After Endoscopic Resection of Large Colon Polyps in a Randomized Trial. Gastroenterology 2019; 157:977-984.e3. [PMID: 30885778 PMCID: PMC8224988 DOI: 10.1053/j.gastro.2019.03.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 158] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/03/2018] [Revised: 03/03/2019] [Accepted: 03/05/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Bleeding is the most common severe complication after endoscopic mucosal resection of large colon polyps and is associated with significant morbidity and cost. We examined whether prophylactic closure of the mucosal defect with hemoclips after polyp resection reduces the risk of bleeding. METHODS We performed a multicenter, randomized trial of patients with a large nonpedunculated colon polyp (≥20 mm) at 18 medical centers in North America and Spain from April 2013 through October 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to groups that underwent endoscopic closure with a clip (clip group) or no closure (control group) and followed. The primary outcome, postprocedure bleeding, was defined as a severe bleeding event that required hospitalization, a blood transfusion, colonoscopy, surgery, or another invasive intervention within 30 days after completion of the colonoscopy. Subgroup analyses included postprocedure bleeding with polyp location, polyp size, or use of periprocedural antithrombotic medications. We also examined the risk of any serious adverse event. RESULTS A total of 919 patients were randomly assigned to groups and completed follow-up. Postprocedure bleeding occurred in 3.5% of patients in the clip group and 7.1% in the control group (absolute risk difference [ARD] 3.6%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.7%-6.5%). Among 615 patients (66.9%) with a proximal large polyp, the risk of bleeding in the clip group was 3.3% and in the control group was 9.6% (ARD 6.3%; 95% CI 2.5%-10.1%); among patients with a distal large polyp, the risks were 4.0% in the clip group and 1.4% in the control group (ARD -2.6%; 95% CI -6.3% to -1.1%). The effect of clip closure was independent of antithrombotic medications or polyp size. Serious adverse events occurred in 4.8% of patients in the clip group and 9.5% of patients in the control group (ARD 4.6%; 95% CI 1.3%-8.0%). CONCLUSIONS In a randomized trial, we found that endoscopic clip closure of the mucosal defect following resection of large colon polyps reduces risk of postprocedure bleeding. The protective effect appeared to be restricted to large polyps located in the proximal colon. ClinicalTrials.gov no: NCT01936948.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heiko Pohl
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire; Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, VA White River Junction, White River Junction, Vermont.
| | - Ian S Grimm
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Matthew T Moyer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Penn State Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Muhammad K Hasan
- Center for Interventional Endoscopy, Florida Hospital, Orlando, Florida
| | - Douglas Pleskow
- Division of Gastroenterology Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - B Joseph Elmunzer
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Mouen A Khashab
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Omid Sanaei
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Firas H Al-Kawas
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University, Sibley Memorial Hospital, Washington, DC
| | - Stuart R Gordon
- Dartmouth Geisel School of Medicine, Hanover, New Hampshire; Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Abraham Mathew
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - John M Levenick
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Harry R Aslanian
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Fadi Antaki
- Division of Gastroenterology, John D. Dingell Veterans Affairs Medical Center and Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan
| | - Daniel von Renteln
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Montreal Medical Center (CHUM) and Research Center (CRCHUM), Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Seth D Crockett
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
| | - Amit Rastogi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Motility, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Jeffrey A Gill
- Division of Gastroenterology James A. Haley VA, University of South Florida, Tampa, Florida
| | - Ryan J Law
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | - Pooja A Elias
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina
| | - Maria Pellise
- Gastroenterology Department, Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Michael B Wallace
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, Florida
| | - Todd A Mackenzie
- The Dartmouth Institute, Department for Biomedical Data Science, Lebanon, New Hampshire
| | - Douglas K Rex
- Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|