Autoimmune pancreatitis is a rare condition of pancreatic inflammation with two classic subtypes. The emergence of a third subtype, ICI-induced pancreatitis, highlights the need for knowledge of each type to ensure accurate diagnosis and treatment. Abbreviations: AIP-Autoimmune pancreatitis; AIP-1-Type 1 autoimmune pancreatitis, also known as lymphoplasmacytic sclerosing pancreatitis (LPSP); AIP-2-Type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis, also referred to as idiopathic duct-centric pancreatitis (IDCP); AIP-3-Type 3 autoimmune pancreatitis, also known as immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-induced autoimmune pancreatitis; IgG4-RD-Immunoglobulin G4-related disease.

Current diagnosis of autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is challenging and often requires combining multiple dimensions. There is a need to explore new methods for diagnosing AIP. The development of artificial intelligence (AI) is evident, and it is believed to have potential in the clinical diagnosis of AIP. This article aims to list the current diagnostic difficulties of AIP, describe existing AI applications, and suggest directions for future AI usages in AIP diagnosis.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is a steroid-responsive fibroinflammatory disorder with 2 clinically distinct subtypes known as type 1 autoimmune and type 2 autoimmune pancreatitis. Type 1 AIP is considered the pancreatic manifestation of immunoglobulin G4-related disease, a systemic disease often presenting with other organ involvement. Advances in understanding the unique clinical presentation, imaging findings, histopathology, and clinical course of this relatively uncommon disease have led to international consensus regarding diagnosis and treatment. While corticosteroids remain the mainstay of treatment, several emerging novel therapies have been explored primarily in the context or relapsing and refractory cases.

Gastrointestinal immune-related adverse events (GI irAEs) are common manifestations of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) toxicity. We present a comprehensive systematic review of the incidence, management, and clinical course of irAEs across the entire GI system, including the luminal GI tract, liver, and pancreas. MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library were used to conduct this review. All studies pertaining to GI irAEs were included. Both abstracts and full manuscripts were eligible if they included human subjects and were written in the English language. Articles not available in English, animal studies, or research not specific to GI toxicity of immunotherapy were excluded. We excluded certain article types depending on whether stronger evidence was available in the literature for a specific toxicity, for example, if prospective studies were available on a topic, retrospective studies and case reports were excluded. We extracted a final 166 articles for our review and followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines for data reporting. Risk of bias tools were not used to evaluate the extracted studies given the narrative nature of this manuscript, but each study was critically appraised by the manuscript writer. We detail the incidence, presentation, evaluation, management, and outcomes of the various GI toxicities that may arise with ICI therapy. Specifically, we discuss the characteristics of upper GI toxicity (esophagitis and gastroenteritis), lower GI toxicity (colitis), hepatobiliary inflammation, pancreatitis, and rarer forms of GI toxicity. We hope this review serves as a useful and accessible clinical tool that helps physicians familiarize themselves with the nuances of gastrointestinal/hepatic/pancreatic ICI toxicity diagnosis and management.

This study is to investigate the incidence of pain and the influencing factors of prognostic complications in early admission care of pancreatitis in the emergency department patients. This provides a basis for clinical nursing management and prognosis improvement. Hundred patients with acute pancreatitis admitted to the tertiary hospital between January 2021 and December 2023 were selected according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. It collected basic baseline data and medical data of patients during admission, clarifies whether patients have complications, and analyzed the length of hospital stay. Comparing hospital stays >7 days with <7 days. A questionnaire on patient psychological status was collected, and single factor analysis was conducted on different prognostic factors. Binary logistic regression was used for single factor analysis, and P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The presence or absence of complications during treatment is the main criterion for determining the prognostic impact of pancreatitis in the emergency department patients. Among 100 patients, 26 (26%) had complications during hospitalization, 74 (74%) had no complications during hospitalization, and 64 (64%) had a stay of >7 days. There were statistically significant differences (P < .05) in smoking status and history of hypertension between the complication group and the non-complication group. In the comparison between the group with <7 days of hospitalization and the group with >7 days of hospitalization, age, education level, smoking status, and history of hyperlipidemia showed statistical significance (P < .05). The fasting days, BISAP score, first bowel movement time, C-reactive protein, blood urea nitrogen, albumin, duration of severe pain within 24 hours of admission, and duration of severe pain within 24 to 48 hours of admission were all statistically significant (P < .05). Pancreatitis in the emergency department patients are prone to exacerbation and prolonged pain during early hospitalization. In nursing, timely attention should be paid to the patient's pain issues, timely pain relief measures should be taken, and the occurrence of complications should be reduced, reducing the patient's hospitalization time. Meanwhile, it is necessary to constantly pay attention to changes in the patient's gastrointestinal function and experimental indicators.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are effective oncologic agents which frequently cause immune-related adverse events (irAEs) which can impact multiple organ systems. Onco-Gastroenterology is a novel and emerging subspecialty within gastroenterology focused on cancer treatment-related complications. Gastroenterologists must be prepared to identify and manage diverse immune-mediated toxicities including enterocolitis, hepatitis, pancreatitis and other ICI-induced toxicities.

To provide a narrative review of the epidemiology, diagnostic evaluation and management of checkpoint inhibitor-induced gastrointestinal and hepatic toxicities.

We searched Cochrane and PubMed databases for articles published through August 2023.

Gastrointestinal and hepatic irAEs include most commonly enterocolitis and hepatitis, but also pancreatitis, oesophagitis, gastritis, motility disorders (gastroparesis) and other rarer toxicities. Guidelines from the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, American Society of Clinical Oncology and European Society for Medical Oncology, in combination with emerging cohort and clinical trial data, offer strategies for management of ICI toxicities. Evaluation of irAEs severity by formal classification and clinical stability, and a thorough workup for alternative etiologies which may clinically mimic irAEs underlie initial management. Treatments include corticosteroids, biologics and other immunosuppressive agents plus supportive care; decisions on dosing, timing and choice of steroid adjuncts and potential for subsequent checkpoint inhibitor dosing are nuanced and toxicity-specific.

Expanding clinical trial and cohort data have clarified the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of gastrointestinal, pancreatic and hepatic toxicities of ICIs. Guidelines, though valuable, remain based principally on retrospective cohort data. Quality prospective, controlled studies may refine algorithms for treatment and potential immunotherapy rechallenge.

A 61-year-old woman was administered 35 cycles of pembrolizumab for the treatment of recurrent endometrial cancer, achieving a complete response. She presented with asymptomatic pancreatic enlargement and elevated hepatobiliary enzymes, but amylase and lipase levels were within the normal ranges. Intrapancreatic bile duct stenosis due to pancreatic enlargement was present, mimicking autoimmune pancreatitis on computed tomography performed before the onset of clinical manifestations. A histological examination of a biopsy specimen showed lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltration with dense fibrosis in the stroma. The patient was successfully treated with oral prednisolone. There were no manifestations of recurrent pancreatitis after tapering the prednisolone dose.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is classified into type 1 (IgG4-related) and type 2 (IgG4-unrelated) and the interpretation of pancreatic biopsy findings plays a crucial role in their diagnosis. Needle biopsy of type 1 AIP in the acute or subacute phase shows a diffuse lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate, storiform fibrosis, obliterative phlebitis, and the infiltration of many IgG4-positive plasma cells. In a later phase, changes become less inflammatory and more fibrotic, making interpretations more challenging. Confirmation of the lack of 'negative' findings that are unlikely to occur in type 1 AIP (e.g., neutrophilic infiltration, abscess) is important to avoid an overdiagnosis. The number of IgG4-positive plasma cells increases to >10 cells/high-power field (hpf), and the IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cell ratio exceeds 40 %. However, these are minimal criteria and typical cases show >30 positive cells/hpf and a ratio >70 % even in biopsy specimens. Therefore, cases with a borderline increase in this number or ratio need to be diagnosed with caution. In cases of ductal adenocarcinoma, the upstream pancreas rarely shows type 1 AIP-like changes; however, the ratio of IgG4/IgG-positive plasma cells is typically <40 %. Although the identification of a granulocytic epithelial lesion (GEL) is crucial for type 2 AIP, this finding needs to be interpreted in conjunction with a background dense lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. An isolated neutrophilic duct injury can occur in peritumoral or obstructive pancreatitis. Drug-induced pancreatitis in patients with inflammatory bowel disease often mimics type 2 AIP clinically and pathologically. IL-8 and PD-L1 are potential ancillary immunohistochemical markers for type 2 AIP, requiring validation studies.

Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) is an autoimmune subtype of chronic pancreatitis resulting from the aberrant immune response against the pancreas, leading to inflammation and fibrosis. Although AIP is rare, its incidence is increasing and is often misdiagnosed as other pancreatic diseases. AIP is commonly classified into two types. Type 1 AIP (AIP-1) is typically associated with elevated serum immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) levels and systemic manifestations, while type 2 AIP is typically a more localized form of the disease, and may coexist with other autoimmune disorders, especially inflammatory bowel diseases. Additionally, there is emerging recognition of a third type (type 3 AIP), which refers to immunotherapy-triggered AIP, although this classification is still gaining acceptance in medical literature. The clinical manifestations of AIP mainly include painless jaundice and weight loss. Elevated serum IgG4 levels are particularly characteristic of AIP-1. Diagnosis relies on a combination of clinical, laboratory, radiological, and histological findings, given the similarity of AIP symptoms to other pancreatic disorders. The mainstay of treatment for AIP is steroid therapy, which is effective in most cases. Severe cases might require additional imm-unosuppressive agents. This review aims to summarize the current knowledge of AIP, encompassing its epidemiology, etiology, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment options. We also address the challenges and controversies in diagnosing and treating AIP, such as distinguishing it from pancreatic cancer and managing long-term treatment, highlighting the need for increased awareness and knowledge of this complex disease.

Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy causes numerous immune-related adverse events, including autoimmune pancreatic injury (AIPI), which results in rapid organ atrophy. We profiled the clinico-radiological features, short-term natural history, and response to steroids of AIPI.

We retrospectively reviewed medical records of 229/11,165 (2.1%) adult patients with AIPI. One hundred and ten out of 229 (48%) had abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan at lipase elevation; data of 110 without pancreatic metastases were analyzed. We analyzed serial CT-based pancreas volumetry data in 48 patients with AIPI (32 with normal CT and 16 with pancreatitis on CT at lipase elevation). We examined impact of steroids on pain and disease course.

In AIPI (n = 229), median lipase elevation was 4x upper limit of normal (range: 3-40x). The injury was more often asymptomatic than painful (143/229 (62%) vs 86/229 (38%), P < .000). Majority (83/110 (75%) had normal CT, often in painless vs painful disease: 51/57 (90%) vs 32/53 (60%), P < .001) 25% had interstitial pancreatitis. On serial pancreas volumetry, marked volume (cc) loss occurred 1 year after vs 3 months before lipase elevation in both normal CT (median 81.6 vs 61.3, P = .00) and pancreatitis on CT groups (91.8 vs 60.5, P = .00), ≥20% volume loss occurred in 47% vs 73%, respectively (P = .08). Steroids, when used did not mitigate pain, biochemical relapse, pancreas volume loss or 1-year diabetes incidence (7.2%).

Autoimmune pancreatic injury (AIPI) is uniquely characterized by painless lipase elevation, normal pancreas on CT and rapid pancreatic volume loss on follow-up. Steroids do not appear to have a role in management.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have revolutionized cancer care and work primarily by blocking CTLA-4 (cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4), and/or PD-1 (programmed cell death protein 1), and/or PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), thereby providing highly efficacious anti-tumor activity. However, this unmitigated immune response can also trigger immune related adverse events (irAEs) in multiple organs, with pancreatic irAEs (now referred to as type 3 Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP) being infrequent.

Type 3 AIP is a drug-induced, immune mediated progressive inflammatory disease of the pancreas that may have variable clinical presentations viz., an asymptomatic pancreatic enzyme elevation, incidental imaging evidence of pancreatitis, painful pancreatitis, or any combination of these subtypes. Management is largely supportive with intravenous fluid hydration, pain control and holding the inciting medication. Steroids have not been shown to demonstrate a clear benefit in acute management. A rapid development pancreatic atrophy is observed on imaging as early as 1 year post initial injury. Type 3 AIP is a chronic inflammatory disease of the pancreas that though predominantly asymptomatic and mild in severity can lead to rapid organ volume loss regardless of type of clinical presentation and despite steroid therapy.