β-blockers are commonly used for the treatment of acute variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone antagonists (angiotensin I-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers and aldosterone antagonists) are potential therapies for portal hypertension. Several studies have compared the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy, with inconsistent results. The aim of the present study was to assess the efficacy of the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy vs. β-blocker monotherapy for hepatic vein pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction in cirrhosis. Studies were obtained using PubMed, Embase, Medline and Cochrane library databases up to July 2015, and the weighted mean difference (WMD) in HVPG reduction was used as a measure of treatment efficacy. In total, three studies (91 patients) were included. When compared to the β-blocker monotherapy, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy resulted in a significant HVPG reduction [WMD 1.70; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-2.88]. However, there was no significant difference in the heart rate reduction between the monotherapy and combination therapy groups (WMD -0.11; 95% CI: -3.51-3.29). In addition, no significant difference in the hemodynamic response was observed between the two groups (WMD 1.46; 95% CI: 0.93-2.30). In conclusion, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduces portal hypertension significantly and to a greater extent than β-blocker monotherapy. Both therapies reduced the heart rate to similar levels; however, the RAAS inhibitor and β-blocker combination therapy reduced the mean arterial pressure to a greater extent. Due to the limited number of studies included, the data available do not allow a satisfactory comparison of adverse events. Moreover, further larger-scale trials are required in order to strengthen the results of the present study.

Cirrhosis is the end-stage of chronic liver disease and leads to the development of portal hypertension and its complications such as esophagogastric varices. Non-selective beta blockers (NSBB) are the keystone for the treatment of portal hypertension since the 1980s and, over the decades, several studies have confirmed their beneficial effect on the prevention of variceal (re)bleeding. Pharmacological studies showed effects of gender, sex hormones, oral contraceptives, and pregnancy on cytochrome P450 (CYPs) enzymes that metabolise NSBB, suggesting that gender differences might exist in the effect of NSBB. In this review, we focused on the 35-year knowledge about the use of beta blockers in cirrhosis and potential gender differences. We specifically examined the role of NSBB in pre-primary, primary and secondary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding, compared two commonly used NSBB (i.e., Propranolol and Carvedilol), and present the current controversies about the window of treatment in advanced cirrhosis with a specific focus on gender differences in NSBB effects. NSBB are not currently recommended in pre-primary prophylaxis of varices mainly because of lack of proven efficacy. On the other hand, NSBB are strongly recommended in patient with cirrhosis as primary (as alternative to endoscopic band ligation, EBL) and secondary prophylaxis (in addition to EBL) of variceal bleeding. To date, no studies have focused specifically on the effect of gender on NSBB treatment. Data extrapolated from clinical studies show that gender was neither a risk factor for the development of varices nor associated with a different response to treatment in primary or secondary prophylaxis. According to the available guidelines, no different, gender-based treatment for portal hypertension is recommended.

It is currently discussed if beta-blockers exert harmful effects and increase mortality in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. In this study, we provide an overview of the available literature in this field in combination with a retrospective analysis of 61 patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites in a tertiary unit.

We performed a systematic search of literature in May 2014. In addition, 61 patients with cirrhosis and ascites were identified and followed from development of refractory ascites until death or end of follow-up.

Fourteen trials (9 trials on propranolol, 1 case-control study and 4 retrospective analyses) were identified. One trial suggested an increased mortality in patients treated with beta-blockers and refractory ascites. The results of the remaining trials were inconclusive. No increase in mortality among beta-blocker-treated patients was found in the present retrospective analysis.

Treatment with beta-blockers may increase mortality in patients with cirrhosis and refractory ascites. However, the current evidence is sparse and high-quality studies are warranted to clarify the matter.

There are many studies investigating the role of non-selective beta-blockers in portal hypertension. Satisfactory reduction in portal pressure is possible in a third to half of patients with propranolol and nadolol, although combining these drugs with nitrates may be more effective. Carvedilol is a more potent agent than propranolol in reducing portal pressure, particularly in non-responders, and is better tolerated. All these drugs have been studied in primary and secondary prophylaxis, sometimes in combination with band ligation and/or nitrates. There is some evidence to support combining these agents with band ligation, despite a lack of survival benefit and increased adverse events. Hemodynamic monitoring can help select non-responders who may benefit from additional therapies such as band ligation, as lack of response is associated with worse outcomes. Propranolol should be used with caution in patients with refractory ascites, although the current evidence is not of sufficient quality to justify not using these drugs in such situations. Beta-blockers have been shown to reduce bacterial translocation and spontaneous bacterial peritonitis in cirrhosis.

Administration of vasopressors or inotropes during liver transplant surgery is almost universal, as this procedure is often accompanied by massive haemorrhage, acid-base imbalance, and cardiovascular instability. However, the actual agents that should be used and the choice between a vasopressor and an inotrope strategy are not clear from existing published evidence. In this prospective, randomised, controlled and single-blinded study, we compared the effects of a vasopressor strategy on intra-operative blood loss and acid-base status with those of an inotrope strategy during living donor liver transplantation. Seventy-six adult liver recipients with decompensated cirrhosis were randomly assigned to receive a continuous infusion of either phenylephrine at a dose of 0.3-0.4 μg.kg(-1).min(-1) or dopamine and/or dobutamine at 2-8 μg.kg(-1).min(-1) during surgery. Vascular resistance was higher over time in the phenylephrine group than in the dopamine/dobutamine group. Estimated blood loss was significantly lower in the phenylephrine group than in the dopamine/dobutamine group (mean (SD) 4.5 (1.8) l vs 6.1 (3.4) l, respectively, p=0.011). Patients in the phenylephrine group had lower lactate levels in the late pre-anhepatic and the early anhepatic phase and needed less bicarbonate administration than those in the dopamine/dobutamine group (median (IQR [range]) 40 (0-100 [0-160]) mEq vs 70 (40-163 [0-260]) mEq, respectively, p=0.018). Postoperative clinical outcomes and laboratory-measured hepatic and renal function did not differ between the groups. Increased vascular resistance and reduction of portal blood flow by intra-operative phenylephrine infusion is assumed to decrease the amount of intra-operative bleeding and thereby ameliorate the progression of lactic acidosis during liver transplant surgery.

Current understanding of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension has resulted in therapeutic approaches aimed at correcting the increased splanchnic blood flow and some of which have been already used in clinical practice. Recently new perspectives opened and erstwhile paradigm has been changed to focus on increased resistance to portal blood flow and the formation of portosystemic collateralization. Several studies revealed the clear-cut mechanisms of hepatic endothelial dysfunction and abnormal angiogenesis contributing to the development of portal hypertension. Thus the modulations of hyperdynamic circulation or angiogenesis seem to be valuable therapeutic targets. In the current review update, we discuss the multidisciplinary management of modulating hepatic vascular resistance and abnormal angiogenesis associated with portal hypertension. However, these new pharmacological approaches are still under investigation and widescale clinical application are needed to develop effective strategies.

Portal hypertension is the main cause of complications in patients with chronic liver disease. Over the past 25 years, progress in the understanding of the pathophysiology of portal hypertension was followed by the introduction of an effective pharmacological therapy, consisting mainly of treatments aimed at correcting the increased splanchnic blood flow. It is only recently that this paradigm has been changed. Progress in our knowledge of the mechanisms of increased resistance to portal blood flow, of the formation of portal-systemic collaterals, and of mechanisms other than vasodilatation maintaining the increased splanchnic blood flow have opened entirely new perspectives for developing more effective treatment strategies. This is the aim of the current review, which focuses on: (a) the modulation of hepatic vascular resistance by correcting the increased hepatic vascular tone due to hepatic endothelial dysfunction, and (b) correcting the abnormal angiogenesis associated with portal hypertension, which contributes to liver inflammation and fibrogenesis, to the hyperkinetic splanchnic circulation, and to the formation of portal-systemic collaterals and varices.

Carvedilol is a potent noncardioselective beta-blocker, with weak vasodilating properties because of alpha 1 blockade. A reduction in both intrahepatic and portocollateral resistance contribute to enhanced effects on portal pressure. There are 10 published hemodynamic studies involving 168 patients investigating the role of carvedilol in portal hypertension. A reduction in the hepatic venous pressure gradient of up to 43% (range 10-43%) has been reported, particularly after chronic administration. However, tolerability at doses greater than 12.5 mg/day was comprised because of a fall in mean arterial pressure (MAP), particularly in ascitic patients. Carvedilol was more effective than propranolol in reducing hepatic venous pressure gradient in two of three studies, albeit with a greater decrease in MAP. One study showed deterioration of pre-existing ascites with carvedilol. The addition of nitrates to propranolol was less effective than carvedilol monotherapy in another study. A large multicentre, randomized controlled trial comparing carvedilol with variceal band ligation for the prevention of variceal bleeding has been published. Carvedilol resulted in fewer episodes of bleeding, although there was no difference in survival. Carvedilol was well tolerated. Carvedilol is a promising agent, and seems to be more effective than propranolol in hemodynamic studies. The efficacy in primary prevention of variceal bleeding suggests that carvedilol has a role in the management of clinically significant portal hypertension.

Patients with cirrhosis develop varices at a rate of 5% per year, and a third of patients with high-risk varices will bleed. The mortality associated with variceal haemorrhage is typically 20%, and still exceeds that of myocardial infarction. Current options to prevent the first variceal bleed include noncardioselective beta-blockers or variceal band ligation. In patients with medium-to-large esophageal varices, both therapies reduce the risk of bleeding by 50% or more. The choice of therapy should take into account patient choice and local availability; although for most patients drug therapy is the preferred first-line treatment. There has been recent interest in carvedilol, with promising initial data. Further studies are necessary before universal recommendation. There is no role for drug therapy in patients without varices, and the use of beta-blockers for patients with small varices is controversial.

Simvastatin improves liver generation of nitric oxide and hepatic endothelial dysfunction in patients with cirrhosis, so it could be an effective therapy for portal hypertension. This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effects of continuous simvastatin administration on the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and its safety in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension.

Fifty-nine patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension (HVPG > or =12 mm Hg) were randomized to groups that were given simvastatin 20 mg/day for 1 month (increased to 40 mg/day at day 15) or placebo in a double-blind clinical trial. Randomization was stratified according to whether the patient was being treated with beta-adrenergic blockers. We studied splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics and variables of liver function and safety before and after 1 month of treatment.

Simvastatin significantly decreased HVPG (-8.3%) without deleterious effects in systemic hemodynamics. HVPG decreases were observed in patients who were receiving beta-adrenergic blockers (-11.0%; P = .033) and in those who were not (-5.9%; P = .013). Simvastatin improved hepatic, fractional, and intrinsic clearance of indocyanine green, showing an improvement in effective liver perfusion and function. No significant changes in HVPG and liver function were observed in patients receiving placebo. The number of patients with adverse events did not differ significantly between groups. No patient was withdrawn from the study based on adverse events.

Simvastatin decreased HVPG and improved liver perfusion in patients with cirrhosis. These effects were additive with those of beta-adrenergic blockers. The beneficial effects of simvastatin should be confirmed in long-term clinical trials for portal hypertension.

The pathogenesis of refractory ascites (RA) is linked to splanchnic vasodilation. We hypothesized that a combination of midodrine, octreotide long-acting release (LAR) and albumin would result in increased natriuresis, better control of ascites and an improvement in renal function in patients with RA+/-Type 2 hepatorenal syndrome.

A prospective pilot study in patients with RA as defined by the International Ascites Club. Consecutive patients received an intramuscular injection of octreotide-LAR, 50 g of albumin three times per week and midodrine titrated to increase the systolic blood pressure for 1 month.

Ten patients with RA were enrolled and eight with complete data to 1 month post-treatment were included in the analysis. There was no change in renal function but there was a trend towards a reduction in the volume of ascites removed by paracentesis (P=0.08) and a significant reduction in the plasma renin (P=0.01) and aldosterone concentrations (P=0.01). Interestingly, there was a transient worsening in the model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score (P=0.01). The deterioration in MELD was completely reversible after discontinuation of therapy.

To our knowledge, this is the first study of prolonged midodrine, octreotide and albumin therapy in RA. We observed a significant reduction in the plasma renin and aldosterone concentrations and a trend towards a reduction in the volume of ascites removed by paracentesis without an effect on renal function. The beneficial effects are at the expense of a reversible deterioration in the MELD score. Large controlled trials are needed before this therapy can be routinely recommended.

Catecholamine exerts profound vascular effects on vascular smooth muscle, and serum norepinephrine (Nepi) and sympathetic nervous activity are increased in cirrhosis. The vascular response of Nepi and acetylcholine (Ach) in portal-systemic collaterals of cirrhotic rats is unknown. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the effects of Nepi and Ach on portal-systemic collaterals of common bile duct-ligated (BDL) cirrhotic rats.

Perfusion studies were performed 6 weeks after BDL when hepatic cirrhosis was induced. Three series of experiments were performed in BDL rats: (i) the Nepi (10(-10) mol/L-10(-5) mol/L) vasoconstrictory responses with (n = 6) and without (n = 5) alpha1- (phentolamine, 5 x 10(-6) mol/L) or beta- (propranolol, 10(-5) mol/L) receptor antagonist (n = 6 and 5, respectively); (ii) the Ach (10(-8) mol/L-10(-5) mol/L) vasodilatory responses in Nepi- preconstricted portal-systemic collaterals in the absence (n = 7) or presence (n = 8) of N(pi)- L-nitro-arginine (NNA, 10(-4) mol/L); and (iii) the effect of indomethacin (10(-5) mol/L; n = 6) on Nepi responses. The collateral vascular responses were evaluated by the in situ collateral perfusion.

Norepinephrine significantly increased the perfusion pressure and was inhibited by phentolamine (P < 0.05). The constrictive responses of Nepi were not significantly modified in the presence of propranolol (P > 0.05). Acetylcholine produced >50% relaxation of the Nepi-preconstricted collateral vessels and was inhibited by NNA (P < 0.05). In addition, indomethacin significantly enhanced the constrictive response of Nepi (P < 0.05).

Norepinephrine has a vasoconstrictive effect on the portal-systemic collaterals of cirrhotic rats and this effect was mediated by alpha1-receptor. Both nitric oxide and prostaglandin are endogenous modulators in the collateral circulation of cirrhotic rats.

Total effective vascular compliance (TEVC), may be increased in cirrhosis. However, its significance is unclear.

To investigate TEVC in patients with cirrhosis, and the effects of propranolol.

Seven patients without liver disease and 44 cirrhotic patients were studied before and after double-blind administration of propranolol (n=33) or placebo (n=11).

TEVC (right atrial pressure response to rapid central volume expansion), hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and systemic hemodynamics.

TEVC (ml x mmHg(-1) x kg(-1)) was increased in cirrhotics (1.67 +/- 0.66 versus 1.33 +/- 0.32 in controls; P<0.05). TEVC was not modified by placebo, but was markedly reduced by propranolol (from 1.74 +/- 0.75 to 1.33 +/- 0.56; P<0.01). Propranolol decreased HVPG >10% in 20 patients ('responders': -20 +/- 9%) but <10% in 13 'non-responders'. TEVC was normalized by propranolol in HVPG 'responders' (from 1.76 +/- 0.88 to 1.21 +/- 0.51; P<0.01), but not in 'non-responders' (1.69 +/- 0.48 to 1.52 +/- 0.59; NS). Reduction of TEVC in responders was accompanied by increased free hepatic vein pressure (+21 +/- 20%, P=0.05; approximately 60% of the fall in HVPG), which was not observed in non-responders (+3 +/- 11%, NS).

TEVC is increased in cirrhosis. This abnormality is corrected by propranolol in patients exhibiting a >10% fall in HVPG, suggesting that changes in vascular compliance may influence the portal pressure response to propranolol.

Each variceal bleed is associated with 20% to 30% risk of dying. Management of portal hypertension after a bleed consists of (1) control of bleeding and (2) prevention of rebleeding. Effective control of bleeding can be achieved either pharmacologically by administering somatostatin or octreotide or endoscopically via sclerotherapy or variceal band ligation. In practice, both pharmacologic and endoscopic therapy are used concomitantly. Rebleeding can be prevented by endoscopic obliteration of varices. In this setting, variceal ligation is the preferred endoscopic modality. B-blockade is as effective as endoscopic therapy and, in combination, the two modalities may be additive.

Patients suspected of having portal hypertension (either by clinical history, physical examination, or previous diagnosis) should undergo ultrasonography and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. Ultrasonography, preferably using the duplex technique, can disclose the patency of the portal venous system, the presence of signs of portal hypertension (splenomegaly, portocollateral vessels, repermeabilization of the umbilical vein, and so forth) and provide additional information about liver, biliary, or pancreatic diseases that may be the cause of portal hypertension. Endoscopy can assess the presence and size of gastroesophageal varices, the appearance of the variceal wall, and the presence and severity of portal hypertensive gastropathy. Patients showing a patent portal vein should have hepatic vein catheterization to evaluate the presence of presinusoidal, sinusoidal, or postsinusoidal portal hypertension. Patients in whom presinusoidal portal hypertension is suspected (those having esophageal varices with an HVPG below 10 mm Hg) should have liver biopsy and percutaneous transhepatic measurement of portal pressure. In sinusoidal portal hypertension, the results of endoscopy and HVPG measurement are decisive for the therapeutic management of the patients. The authors' results indicate that, before starting prophylactic therapy with beta-blockers, all patients should undergo at least an hepatic vein catheterization to assess HVPG; it would be preferable to have a variceal pressure measurement also. These measurements must be repeated 3 to 4 weeks after the final dose of therapy has been reached to assess the risk of variceal bleeding or rebleeding.

The development of varices is a major complication of cirrhosis, and variceal haemorrhage has a high mortality. There have been major advances in the primary and secondary prevention of variceal haemorrhage over the last 20 years involving endoscopic, radiological and pharmacological approaches. This review concentrates principally on drug therapy, particularly on the numerous haemodynamic studies. Many of these drugs have not been studied in clinical trials, but provide data about the underlying pathogenesis of portal hypertension. Also covered in this review are the randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses that involve a large number of patients. These trials involve relatively few drugs such as non-selective beta-blockers and nitrates. Correlations between haemodynamic and clinical parameters are discussed. Despite the recent increase in the use of alternative endoscopic therapies, an effective and well tolerated drug remains a clinically important research goal.

The last half century has witnessed great advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis and natural history of portal hypertension in cirrhotics. Several pharmacologic and endoscopic techniques have been developed for the treatment of portal hypertension. The use of these agents in a given patient must be based on an understanding of the stage in the natural history of the disease and the relative efficacy and safety of the available treatment options.

Increased resistance to portal blood flow is the primary factor in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension, and is mainly determined by the morphological changes occurring in chronic liver diseases. This is aggravated by a dynamic component, due to the active-reversible- contraction of different elements of the porto-hepatic bed. A decreased synthesis of NO in the intrahepatic circulation is the main determinant of this dynamic component. This provides a rationale for the use of vasodilators to reduce intrahepatic resistance and portal pressure. Another factor contributing to aggravate the portal hypertension is a significant increase in portal blood flow, caused by arteriolar splanchnic vasodilation and hyperkinetic circulation. Splanchnic arteriolar vasodilation is a multifactorial phenomenon, which may involve local (endothelial) mechanisms as well as neurogenic and humoral pathways. Most pharmacological treatments have been aimed at correcting the increased portal blood inflow by the use of splanchnic vasoconstrictors, such as beta-blockers, vasopressin derivatives and somatostatin. Several studies have demonstrated that changes in the hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) during maintenance therapy are useful to identify those patients who are going to have a variceal bleeding or rebleeding. The wide individual variation in the HVPG response to pharmacological treatment makes it desirable to schedule follow-up measurements of HVPG during pharmacological therapy. A priority for research in the forthcoming years is to develop accurate non-invasive methods to assess prognosis, which can be used to substitute or as surrogate indicators of the HVPG response. In the clinical management of portal hypertension, beta-blockers are at present the only accepted treatment for the prevention of variceal bleeding. Whether the association of isosorbide-5-mononitrate will improve the high efficacy of beta-blockers is questionable. The efficacy of more aggressive techniques, such as endoscopic band ligation, should be further tested against beta-blockers in patients with a high risk of bleeding. In the treatment of acute variceal bleeding, administration of somatostatin or terlipressin is an established therapy. It may be used alone or, preferably, as an initial treatment before sclerotherapy or endoscopic band ligation. No more than two sessions of endoscopic treatment should be used to control the bleeding. If the bleeding is not easily controlled, other alternatives such as transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts (TIPS) or derivative surgery should be considered, the former being the best in patients with poor liver function. Recent studies suggest that early measurement of HVPG during variceal bleeding may be used as a guide for therapeutic decisions in the treatment of patients with acute variceal bleeding. Those patients with a high HVPG have a high risk of poor evolution, and may be candidates for more intensive and aggressive therapy, such as surgery or TIPS. Those with lower HVPG have a very high probability of an uneventful evolution, and may thus be managed more conservatively using medical and endoscopic treatments. Pharmacological agents (propranolol or nadolol), endoscopic treatment (preferably banding ligation) or surgery can be used to prevent rebleeding. A pending task for the new millennium is to assess whether the early treatment of asymptomatic, compensated cirrhotic patients with portal pressure reducing agents can prevent the development of esophageal varices and of other complications of portal hypertension.

Terlipressin decreases portal pressure. However, its effects on variceal pressure have been poorly investigated. This study investigated the variceal, splanchnic and systemic hemodynamic effects of terlipressin.

Twenty cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices grade II-III, and portal pressure > or =12 mmHg were studied. Hepatic venous pressure gradient, variceal pressure and systemic hemodynamic parameters were obtained. After baseline measurements, in a double-blind administration, 14 patients received a 2mg/iv injection of terlipressin and six patients received placebo. The same measurements were repeated 60 min later.

No demographic or biochemical differences were observed in basal condition between groups. Terlipressin produced significant decreases in intravariceal pressure from 20.9+4.9 to 16.3+/-4.7 mmHg (p<0.01, -21+/- 16%), variceal pressure gradient from 18.9+/-4.8 to 13.5+/-6.0 mmHg (p<0.01, -28+/-27%), estimated variceal wall tension from 78+/-29 to 59+/-31 mmHg x mm (p<0.01, -27+/-22%), and hepatic venous pressure gradient from 19.4+/-4.5 to 16.8+/-5 mmHg (p<0.01, -14+/-12%) at 60 min. The change in variceal pressure after 60 min of terlipressin administration was greater than the change in wedge hepatic venous pressure (-4.7 mmHg vs -0.5 mmHg, respectively, p<0.0001). Terlipressin also caused significant decreases in heart rate and cardiac index and increases in mean arterial pressure and peripheral vascular resistance.

Our results demonstrate that terlipressin produces significant and prolonged decreases in variceal pressure and variceal wall tension and has intrinsic effects on portal pressure and systemic hemodynamics. Variceal pressure provides a better assessment of the effects of terlipressin administration on esophageal varices than hepatic venous pressure gradient.

Only some patients show a substantial hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) reduction after propranolol, which makes it desirable to investigate drugs with greater portal hypotensive effect. The aim of this study was to investigate whether carvedilol, a nonselective beta-blocker with anti-alpha1-adrenergic activity, may cause a greater HVPG reduction than propranolol. Thirty-five cirrhotic patients had hemodynamic measurements before and after the random administration of carvedilol (n = 14), propranolol (n = 14), or placebo (n = 7). Carvedilol markedly reduced HVPG, from 19.5 +/- 1.3 to 15.4 +/- 1 mm Hg (P <.0001). This HVPG reduction was greater than after propranolol (-20.4 +/- 2 vs. -12.7 +/- 2%, P <.05). Moreover, carvedilol decreased HVPG greater than 20% of baseline values or to </=12 mm Hg in a greater proportion of patients (64% vs. 14%, P <.05). Both drugs caused similar reductions in hepatic and azygos blood flows, suggesting that the greater HVPG decrease by carvedilol was because of reduced hepatic and portocollateral resistance. Propranolol caused greater reductions in heart rate and cardiac output than carvedilol, whereas carvedilol caused a greater decrease in mean arterial pressure (-23.1 vs. -11%, P <.05). Thus, carvedilol has a greater portal hypotensive effect than propranolol in patients with cirrhosis, suggesting a greater therapeutic potential. However, it causes arterial hypotension, which calls for careful evaluation before its long-term use.

The effects of the acute administration of arterial vasoconstrictors on renal plasma flow (RPF) and urinary sodium excretion (UNaV) in cirrhotic patients with ascites with or without hepatorenal syndrome (HRS) are still controversial. As a consequence, vasoconstrictors are not actually used in the treatment of renal sodium retention or HRS in these patients, regardless of the several lines of evidence suggesting that these renal functional abnormalities are related to a marked arterial vasodilation. The lack of an orally available effective arterial vasoconstrictor probably represents a further reason for this omission. Consequently, the present study was made to evaluate the acute effects of the oral administration of midodrine, an orally available -mimetic drug, on systemic and renal hemodynamics and on UNaV in cirrhotic patients with ascites. Mean arterial pressure (MAP), heart rate (HR), cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance (SVR), left forearm blood flow (LFBF), left leg blood flow (LLBF), RPF, glomerular filtration rate (GFR), UNaV, plasma renin activity (PRA), plasma concentration of antidiuretic hormone (ADH), and the serum levels of nitrite and nitrate (NOx) were evaluated in 25 cirrhotic patients with ascites (17 without HRS and 8 with type 2 HRS) before and during the 6 hours following the oral administration of 15 mg of midodrine. During the first 3 hours after the drug administration, a significant increase in MAP (89.6 +/- 1.7 vs. 81.80 +/- 1.3 mm Hg; P < .0001) and SVR (1, 313.9 +/- 44.4 vs. 1,121.2 +/- 60.1 dyn . sec . cm-5; P < .0001) accompanied by a decrease in HR (69 +/- 2 vs. 77 +/- 3 bpm; P < .005) and CI (2,932.7 +/- 131.4 vs. 3,152.5 +/- 131.4 mL . min-1 . m2 BSA; P < .0025) was observed in patients without HRS. No change was observed in LFBF and LLBF. The improvement in systemic hemodynamics, which was also maintained during the the 3- to 6-hour period after midodrine administration, was accompanied by a significant increase in RPF (541.5 +/- 43.1 vs. 385.7 +/- 39.9 mL . min-1; P < .005), GFR (93.1 +/- 6.5 vs. 77.0 +/- 6.7 mL . min-1; P < .025), and UNaV (92.7 +/- 16.4 vs. 72.2 +/- 10.7 microEq . min-1; P < .025). In addition, a decrease in PRA (5.33 +/- 1.47 vs. 7.74 +/- 2.17 ng . mL-1 . h; P < .05), ADH (1.4 +/- 0.2 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.2 pg . mL-1; P < .05), and NOx (33.4 +/- 5.0 vs. 49.3 +/- 7.3 micromol-1; P < .05) was found. In patients with HRS, the effects of the drug on the systemic hemodynamics was smaller and shorter. Accordingly, regardless of a significant decrease in PRA (15.87 +/- 3.70 vs. 20.70 +/- 4.82 ng . mL-1 . h; P < .0025) in patients with HRS, no significant improvement was observed in RPF, GFR, or UNaV. In conclusion, the acute oral administration of midodrine is associated with a significant improvement in systemic hemodynamics in nonazotemic cirrhotic patients with ascites. As a result, renal perfusion and UNaV also improve in these patients. By contrast, midodrine only slightly improves systemic hemodynamics in patients with type 2 HRS, with no effect on renal hemodynamics and renal function.

The introduction of pharmacological therapy has been one of the major advances in the treatment of the complications of portal hypertension. Many drugs have been shown to reduce portal hypertension in patients with cirrhosis. However, the most widely used drugs and the only ones for which there is sufficient evidence, are the beta-blockers. These drugs have been, up to now, the only accepted prophylactic therapy for oesophageal variceal bleeding and are also an alternative treatment to sclerotherapy or surgery to prevent variceal rebleeding. A reduction in portal pressure gradient by beta-blockers below 12 mmHg or by more than 20% of baseline values is associated with almost a total protection from oesophageal bleeding. Such a marked response in portal pressure is only achieved in some patients receiving propranolol. New pharmacological approaches with a greater portal pressure reducing effect may improve the beneficial effect of drugs in preventing variceal bleeding. The more promising approach is the combined administration of beta-blockers and isosorbide-5-mononitrate, which has been shown to potentiate the reduction in portal pressure and to be highly effective in initial randomized clinical trials.

Terlipressin (Glypressin), a vasopressin analog, may be administered to patients with cirrhosis receiving a beta-adrenergic antagonist. Since terlipressin alone and beta-blockers alone both decrease portal pressure, a combination of these substances may have additional portal hypotensive effects. However, the negative side effects of terlipressin may be accentuated by long-term beta-blockade. Thus, the present study examined hemodynamic and metabolic responses to terlipressin in 12 patients receiving nonselective beta-blockers (propranolol or nadolol). Hemodynamics and oxygen (O2) -derived variables were measured prior to and 30 min after the administration (intravenous bolus) of terlipressin (1 to 2 mg, according to body weight). The hepatic venous pressure gradient and azygos blood flow significantly decreased (from 15.3 +/- 1.1 to 12.5 +/- 1.1 mm Hg, and from 0.6 +/- 0.1 to 0.5 +/- 0.1 liters/min, respectively). Arterial and pulmonary wedged pressures significantly increased. Heart rate, cardiac index, and O2 consumption were not significantly affected by terlipressin. In conclusion, in patients with cirrhosis being treated with a nonselective beta-blocker, terlipressin administration decreased portal pressure. Moreover, terlipressin induced only mild systemic hemodynamic effects in these patients. These results suggest that terlipressin can be administered in patients receiving a beta-adrenergic blocker.

The goal of the present study was to compare the efficacy of locally and systemically administered propranolol in normal and prehepatic portal hypertensive rats, and to test the hypothesis that beta-adrenoceptor blockade reduces intestinal arteriolar diameter by allowing unopposed alpha-adrenergic activity.

The small intestine was prepared for in vivo microcirculatory studies and transferred to an intravital microscope where arteriolar diameter and erythrocyte velocity were continuously monitored. First order arteriolar (1A) blood flow was calculated from the product of mean velocity and microvessel cross-sectional area. In separate experiments, diameter responses of 2A and 3A were monitored. Once steady-state conditions were achieved, the preparation was challenged by topically applied doses of propranolol (0.01-100.00 microM) in the presence and absence of the alpha-receptor antagonist, phentolamine. In a separate group of experiments, the effects of systemically administered propranolol (10 mg/kg body weight) were evaluated before and after local alpha-adrenoceptor blockade.

Propranolol produced significant vasoconstriction and decreased blood flow in both normal and portal hypertensive rats. Portal hypertensive arterioles exhibited an attenuated response to propranolol. Local administration of phentolamine completely blocked the propranolol-induced diameter changes. Comparison of equivalent concentrations of local and systemic propranolol indicated that both routes of administration were equally effective.

The results of the present study suggest that the cardiovascular actions of propranolol are predominantly mediated through blockade of peripheral beta 2-adrenoceptor.

This study investigated the correlation between changes in hepatic and systemic hemodynamics and femoral blood flow (FBF), measured by dual-beam pulsed wave Doppler, in 58 portal hypertensive patients receiving propranolol (0.15 mg/Kg intravenously; n = 44) or placebo (n = 14) under double-blind conditions. Placebo administration had no effects. Propranolol caused significant reductions (P < .0001) in hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG; from 19.1 +/- 4.1 to 16.2 +/- 4.2 mm Hg), azygos blood flow (from 563 +/- 204 to 387 +/- 176 mL/min), cardiac index (CI; from 4.4 +/- 1.0 to 3.3 +/- 0.8 L/m2/min), and FBF (from 237 +/- 79 to 176 +/- 58 mL/m2/min). In 17 patients HVPG decreased below 12 mm Hg and/or more than 20% of the baseline value (good response; mean change, -26 +/- 8%); in the remaining 27 patients (poor response) the mean change in HVPG was less: -9 +/- 6%. Patients with a good response had bled less often from varices, had significantly higher FBF (272 +/- 73 vs. 215 +/- 76 mL/m2/min) and lower baseline HVPG (16.8 +/- 3.9 vs. 20.6 +/- 3.6 mm Hg) than those with poor response in HVPG. The good response was also associated with greater decreases in FBF (-33 +/- 12 vs. -19 +/- 13% in poor responders), CI (-30 +/- 9 vs. -19 +/- 12%), and heart rate (-19 +/- 5 vs. -16 +/- 6%). A decrease in FBF of > 20% predicted a good response in 16 of 28 patients (positive predictive value, 57%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

This study was aimed at investigating whether the blockade of alpha 1-adrenergic receptors could reduce portal pressure in cirrhosis. Splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics were measured in 12 cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices at baseline and 1 hr after oral administration of 2 mg of prazosin (acute study). Measurements were repeated in 10 of these 12 patients after a 3-mo course of 5 mg/12 hr of prazosin (long-term study). Short-term prazosin significantly lowered the hepatic venous pressure gradient from 20.1 +/- 1.3 to 14.4 +/- 0.9 mm Hg (-25.7%) (p < 0.01), and chronic prazosin reduced it to 16.5 +/- 1.3 mm Hg (-19.1%) (p < 0.01). Hepatic blood flow was increased, thus changes in the hepatic venous pressure gradient resulted from a reduction in the estimated hepatic vascular resistance. Reductions in hepatic venous pressure gradient achieved after short-term and long-term prazosin were not significantly different. Reductions in mean arterial pressure and systemic vascular resistance were significantly greater after short-term than after long-term prazosin. Long-term prazosin was associated with significant increases in hepatic and intrinsic hepatic clearances of indocyanine green. This therapy also led to an increase in pulmonary capillary pressure (+ 28.6%, p < 0.05) and body weight (+ 3.06%, p < 0.01) and a decrease in hematocrit (-6.1%, p < 0.05) and urinary sodium excretion (-22.6%, p < 0.05). In contrast, there were no hemodynamic changes in a group of six cirrhotic patients receiving placebo. In cirrhotic patients, short-term prazosin lowers portal pressure by decreasing hepatic vascular resistance.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

It is unknown whether beta adrenergic stress has adverse hepatic hemodynamic effects. Therefore, the authors studied the hemodynamic effects of beta adrenergic stimulation and subsequent blockade in 10 patients with cirrhosis (6 Childs A, 3 Childs B, and 1 Childs C) with known or suspected portal hypertension. Free and wedged hepatic vein pressures, hepatic venous pressure gradient, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, cardiac output, and azygos vein blood flow were measured at rest and after isoproterenol infusion (mean dose = 7.3 micrograms/min: target heart rate = 150% to 200% of resting heart rate). Esmolol, an ultra-short-acting beta blocker, was then infused (dose titrated to return heart rate to baseline), and all measurements were repeated. Based on the results, the authors conclude that beta adrenergic stress provoked by isoproterenol infusion significantly increases azygos vein blood flow and hepatic venous pressure gradient. Beta blockade with esmolol reduces azygos vein blood flow and hepatic venous pressure gradient significantly below baseline.

Systemic and portal hemodynamic parameters were evaluated in eight cirrhotic patients in basal conditions and after food intake and placebo. Following seven days of oral propranolol administration, hemodynamic parameters were reevaluated in the fasting and postprandial states under similar conditions. Cardiac output and portal blood flow were measured by Doppler technique. Intraobserver variability of repeated measurements was less than 10%. Food intake caused a significant increase of portal blood flow (+28%, P < 0.05). No significant changes were observed in the other hemodynamic parameters studied. Propranolol at doses achieving effective beta blockade (84 +/- 14 mg/day) (mean +/- SD) reduced portal blood flow (-24%, P < 0.05). Food intake caused a significant increase in portal blood flow (+35%, P < 0.05) in propranolol treated patients. However, in absolute values, postprandial portal blood flow during propranolol treatment was significantly lower (986 +/- 402 ml/min) than that obtained after the initial food intake (1214 +/- 537 ml/min, P < 0.05). Placebo administration had no significant hemodynamic effects in either group. This study demonstrates that chronic propranolol administration could protect from portal hemodynamic changes following food intake. Doppler technique is a reliable technique to evaluate changes on portal and systemic hemodynamic parameters during a short period of time in patients with cirrhosis.

In the past 10 years, it has been clearly shown that vasoactive substances reduce portal pressure in patients or animals with portal hypertension. Some of these substances act by inducing splanchnic vasoconstriction, while others reduce hepatic and porto-systemic collateral vascular resistance and, thus, induce a portal hypotensive effect. Still others induce arterial hypotension, which causes a vasoconstrictive effect in the splanchnic territory. Since these drugs act on different vascular receptors, their combination should have a more marked effect on portal hypertension. Up to now, only nonselective beta-blockers have been used in the prevention of first gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with portal hypertension and esophageal varices and in the prevention of recurrent gastrointestinal bleeding. These trials have shown that propranolol or nadolol significantly reduce either a first episode of bleeding or recurrent bleeding. This pharmacological treatment also improves the survival rate in these patients. All of these studies have helped us to understand, in part, why gastrointestinal hemorrhage occurs in certain patients. Additional studies of beta-blockers or other substances are, nevertheless, necessary to select patients who will respond to this type of treatment. Finally, it is possible that the pharmacological treatment of portal hypertension may also be used before esophageal varices occur.

This study investigated the correlation between changes in hepatic hemodynamics and esophageal variceal pressure--measured with a noninvasive, pressure-sensitive endoscopic gauge--in 37 portal-hypertensive cirrhotic patients receiving propranolol (0.15 mg/kg, intravenously; n = 21) or placebo (n = 16) under strict double-blind conditions. Placebo administration had no effect on hepatic venous pressure gradient, azygos blood flow or variceal pressure. Propranolol caused a significant reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient (from 19.6 +/- 1 to 17.3 +/- 1 mm Hg, p < 0.001), azygos blood flow (from 0.61 +/- 0.06 to 0.39 +/- 0.03 L/min, p < 0.001) and variceal pressure (from 13.1 +/- 0.9 to 10.2 +/- 0.9 mm Hg, p < 0.001). In eight patients (propranolol nonresponders) hepatic venous pressure gradient was not modified or decreased by less than 10% after propranolol (mean change, -4.1 +/- 1.6%). However, we found no significant differences between propranolol responders and nonresponders with regard to the decrease in variceal pressure (3.3 +/- 0.7 vs. 2.3 +/- 1.4 mm Hg) and azygos blood flow (0.23 +/- 0.07 vs. 0.21 +/- 0.07 L/min). As expected, in most propranolol responders (11 of 13), reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient was accompanied by a similar response in variceal pressure (> 10% decrease). However, among propranolol nonresponders, in terms of reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient, four out of eight patients had decreases greater than 10% in variceal pressure. The results of this study confirm that reduction in hepatic venous pressure gradient by propranolol is associated with a significant decrease in variceal pressure and azygos blood flow.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Tertatolol, a recently developed beta 1-beta 2-blocker has two advantages: it does not induce withdrawal syndrome after abrupt cessation, and it preserves renal function. It has been suggested that the kinetics of tertatolol in patients with hepatic dysfunction are altered. Therefore, the hemodynamic effects and pharmacokinetics following the acute administration of tertatolol were studied in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension. Systemic, splanchnic and renal hemodynamics were evaluated before and 30 min after the simultaneous administration of 2.5 mg tertatolol p.o. and 1.25 mg deuterated tertatolol i.v. in 10 cirrhotic patients with esophageal varices. The pharmacokinetics of tertatolol were evaluated over a 4-day period. Tertatolol significantly decreased heart rate (-22 +/- 10%), cardiac output (-26 +/- 8%), and hepatic blood flow (-27 +/- 23%). The hepatic venous pressure gradient decreased from 15.7 +/- 5.0 to 12.9 +/- 4.0 mmHg (-17 +/- 13%, P < 0.01). Three out of 10 patients were non-responders to tertatolol. Renal blood flow (-9 +/- 28%) and intrinsic hepatic clearance of indocyanin green (-9 +/- 25%) were not significantly modified. The duration of effective beta-blockade was far less than 12 h. Tertatolol was rapidly absorbed with a Cmax of 70 +/- 51 micrograms/l at a peak time of 0.75 +/- 0.26 h. In comparison with healthy volunteers referred to in literature sources, plasma clearance was reduced to 49 +/- 28 ml/min, bioavailability was increased to 72 +/- 20%, and the volume of distribution was increased to 50 +/- 34 l, probably due, in part, to a weaker protein binding -85%--effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The pathogenesis of portal hypertension remains poorly understood. Similarly, pharmacological manipulation for the prevention and treatment of variceal haemorrhage has not fulfilled the promise of the 1980s. This article reviews current concepts in the pathophysiology of portal hypertension and considers pharmacotherapy for the treatment of variceal bleeding.

Portal hypertension is characterized by a pathological increase in portal venous pressure that leads to the formation of portosystemic collaterals that divert portal blood to the systemic circulation, bypassing the liver. Increased vascular resistance to portal blood flow is the initiating factor in portal hypertension. Increased resistance along the hepatic and portocollateral circulation is in part modifiable by pharmacological agents. An additional factor is splanchnic vasodilatation with increased portal blood inflow, which contributes to the maintenance and aggravation of the portal hypertension. Endogenous vasodilators are thought to be responsible for the splanchnic hyperaemia of portal hypertension. Vasodilatation is also prominent in the stomach and lungs, and plays an important role in the pathophysiology of portal hypertensive gastropathy and of the hepatopulmonary syndrome. The systemic circulation is markedly hyperkinetic, with reduced arterial pressure and peripheral resistance and increased cardiac output. The plasma volume is expanded due to renal sodium retention. The expanded plasma volume enables the increase in cardiac output, and represents another mechanism contributing to the increase in portal pressure.

In patients with cirrhosis, the significance of elevated plasma catecholamine concentrations is unclear. Thus we investigated the relationship between plasma catecholamine concentrations and the hemodynamic effect of pindolol (an index of sympathetic vascular tone) in 10 patients with cirrhosis. Systemic and splanchnic hemodynamics and plasma catecholamine concentrations in the pulmonary artery and the splanchnic veins (hepatic and azygos veins) were studied before and after the oral administration of pindolol (20 mg). In basal conditions patients exhibited a hyperkinetic circulatory syndrome and elevated plasma catecholamine concentrations. Alterations in basal hemodynamics were correlated with plasma epinephrine concentrations but not with norepinephrine. Pindolol administration significantly decreased heart rate and increased right atrial pressure. After pindolol administration, individual hemodynamic changes (cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, wedged hepatic venous pressure) were significantly correlated with plasma catecholamine concentrations. In conclusion, this study shows that in cirrhotic patients epinephrine may play a role in hemodynamic alterations, and plasma catecholamine concentrations are an index of sympathetic vascular tone.

The continuous oral administration of different drugs can produce a sustained reduction in portal pressure in patients with portal hypertension. beta-Adrenergic antagonists, alpha 2-adrenergic agonists, and 5-hydroxytryptamine-receptor antagonists have been evaluated for their long-term effects on portal pressure reduction. Clinical studies show that gastrointestinal bleeding can be prevented by pharmacologic therapy. This type of treatment is efficient and safe, and, if a drug has no clinical effect, a different drug or a combination can be used. Several problems, however, need to be addressed, including patient compliance, selection of responders, and hemodynamic evaluation of the treatment and its duration. Although pharmacologic treatment of portal hypertension is known to be efficient, there are advances still to be made.

It has been suggested that glucagon contributes to the pathogenesis of portal hypertension by increasing portal blood flow. This study examined this issue by assessing the hemodynamic effects of a pharmacological dose of glucagon (1 mg, intravenously) in patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension (n = 10) and in subjects without significant liver disease (controls = n = 5). Patients with cirrhosis had much higher glucagon levels than control subjects (875 +/- 167 vs. 186 +/- 25 pg/ml, p less than 0.01) and showed blunted hemodynamic responses after glucagon administration. This occurred despite greater circulating glucagon levels, probably because of a significant prolongation of the plasma half-life of exogenously administered glucagon (4.9 +/- 0.4 vs. 2.7 +/- 0.1 min, p less than 0.1). Control subjects had marked increases in heart rate (+ 19% +/- 4%, p less than 0.01), cardiac index (+ 16% +/- 4%, p = 0.01) and arterial pressure (+ 10% +/- 3%, p less than 0.05), but corresponding changes in patients with cirrhosis (+ 7% +/- 1%, + 6% +/- 1%, and + 6% +/- 2%, respectively) were significantly less pronounced (p = 0.05), and there was a negative correlation between basal glucagon levels and the response of heart rate to glucagon injection (r = -0.804, p less than 0.001). Resistance to the systemic effects of glucagon in cirrhosis may thus be caused by a down-regulation of vascular glucagon receptors. In addition, glucagon administration caused a significant increase in portal pressure (from 18.1 +/- 1.1 to 19.0 +/- 1.2 mm Hg, p less than 0.01), as well as in azygos blood flow (from 0.54 +/- 0.03 to 0.64 +/- 0.04 L/min, + 19% +/- 4%, p less than 0.02), reflecting increased portocollateral blood flow. These findings are consistent with the hypothesis that glucagon is one of the factors contributing to the splanchnic vasodilatation and increased portal pressure of cirrhosis.

Patients with cirrhosis, especially those with decompensated disease have enhanced sympathetic nervous activity. We have investigated the effect of a single oral dose of 80 mg propranolol on circulating catecholamines and related the effect to splanchnic and systemic haemodynamics in 22 patients with cirrhosis. Plasma noradrenaline (NA) was significantly above normal average (NA: 0.52 vs. 0.23 ng/ml, p less than 0.01) and increased with the severity of the liver disease (p less than 0.01). NA was negatively correlated with liver function as estimated by ICG clearance (r = -0.74, p less than 0.01). Azygos blood flow was increased (0.75 l/min) and positively related to plasma NA (r = 0.57, p = 0.05, n = 12). After propranolol intake, plasma NA increased from 0.52 to 0.59 ng/ml (p less than 0.01). This response was found in all Child-Turcotte classes (A: 0.37 to 0.43; B: 0.49 to 0.56; C: 0.78 to 0.88 ng/ml), and in patients with as well as without ascites. Plasma adrenaline increased in the same way (p less than 0.01). Hepatic blood flow (from 1.10 to 0.93 l/min, p less than 0.01) and azygos blood flow (from 0.75 to 0.55 l/min, n = 9, p less than 0.05) decreased significantly after oral propranolol. A borderline significant correlation was observed between the decrease in azygos blood flow and the increase in NA (r = 0.64, p = 0.06). Our results suggest that besides a relationship to liver function and severity of disease, sympathetic nervous activity, as reflected by circulating NA, will further enhance during beta-adrenergic blockade, probably by a compensatory mechanism.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Propranolol decreases portal pressure by reducing portal blood inflow. Studies in rats with prehepatic portal hypertension due to portal vein stenosis (a model with extensive portosystemic shunting) have shown that propranolol increases the portocollateral resistance, which hinders the fall in portal pressure. The present study examined the effects of propranolol on splanchnic and systemic hemodynamics in rats with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis of the liver, a model which is characterized by mild portosystemic shunting. Two groups of rats with CCl4-induced cirrhosis were studied: the propranolol group (n = 8), which received a propranolol infusion of 2 mg per 15 min, and controls (n = 9), which received a placebo (saline) infusion. Hemodynamic measurements were done using radiolabeled microspheres. Propranolol-treated rats had significantly lower cardiac output (-31%) and heart rate (-26%) than controls (p less than 0.001). Hepatic artery flow was not modified by propranolol. Propranolol caused splanchnic vasoconstriction, manifested by increased splanchnic resistance (+57%) and by a significant fall in portal blood inflow (4.8 +/- 0.4 vs. 6.3 +/- 0.5 ml per min.100 gm in controls, p less than 0.05). In contrast with rats with prehepatic portal hypertension, propranolol did not increase portal resistance in cirrhotic rats [2.0 +/- 0.2 vs. 2.0 +/- 0.1 mmHg per ml per min.100 gm body weight (not significant)]. Hence, the fall in portal pressure (-19%) was expected from the decrease in portal inflow (-24%). These results suggest that increased portal resistance in rats with prehepatic portal hypertension may represent an intrinsic effect of propranolol on the portocollateral vessels, since beta-blockade does not modify portal vascular resistance in cirrhosis.

This study evaluates systemic and splanchnic haemodynamics and the effect of propranolol in 15 patients with presinusoidal portal hypertension (portal vein obstruction, n = 11; schistosomiasis, n = 4). These patients exhibited a hyperkinetic circulatory syndrome characterized by high cardiac index (4.4 +/- 1.61.min-1.m-2, mean +/- S.D.) and by low systemic vascular resistance despite normal liver function and sinusoidal pressure. Hepatic blood flow was decreased in half of the patients with portal vein obstruction. Azygos blood flow, an estimate of superior portal-systemic collateral circulation, was markedly increased in all patients (0.46 +/- 0.19 l/min, upper limit of normal: 0.19 l/min). Therefore, in these patients with normal hepatic venous pressure gradient, azygos blood flow measurement provides an index of splanchnic haemodynamic changes. Propranolol administration (15 mg, i.v.) reduced the hyperkinetic circulatory syndrome, with a significant decrease in heart rate (-17 +/- 6%), cardiac index (-25 +/- 12%) and azygos blood flow (-40 +/- 26%) and a significant increase in systemic vascular resistance (+40 +/- 40%). These results suggest that the hyperkinetic circulatory syndrome observed in these patients, could be related to an increase in beta-adrenergic activity. The decrease in azygos blood flow, after propranolol administration, was significantly correlated (r = 0.94) with the increase in right atrial pressure. This finding suggests that propranolol may act through an increase in portal-systemic collateral venous tone. These haemodynamic results justify, in patients with presinusoidal portal hypertension, clinical trials investigating the beneficial effect of beta-blockers on gastrointestinal bleeding caused by portal hypertension.

In patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension, propranolol administration reduces heart rate and cardiac output and diminishes portal pressure and collateral blood flow. However, there is little information on the possible effects of propranolol on hepatic artery blood flow. The present study addressed this question in 12 cirrhotic patients with end-to-side portacaval shunt, in whom all of the liver blood flow represents the hepatic artery blood flow. Hepatic artery blood flow (continuous infusion of indocyanine green), cardiac output (thermal dilution), heart rate and mean arterial pressure were measured before and 20 min after the intravenous infusion of 10 to 15 mg of propranolol. beta-Adrenergic blockade caused a significant reduction of cardiac output (from 9.1 +/- 2.1 to 7.1 +/- 1.4 liters per min, p less than 0.001) (mean +/- S.D.) and heart rate (from 85 +/- 10 to 71 +/- 7 beats per min, p less than 0.001), and a significant increase of systemic vascular resistance (from 9.0 +/- 2.1 to 11.7 +/- 2.7 mmHg per liter per min, p less than 0.001), whereas mean arterial pressure did not change (77 vs. 78 mmHg). Propranolol significantly reduced hepatic artery blood flow (from 0.65 +/- 0.20 to 0.55 +/- 0.14 liters per min, p less than 0.01). However, reduction of hepatic artery blood flow (-12.9 +/- 7.3%) was significantly less than reduction of cardiac output (-21.1 +/- 5.2%, p less than 0.01). As a result, the fraction of the cardiac output delivered to the liver was significantly greater after propranolol (8.0 +/- 1.7%) than before (7.3 +/- 1.7%, p less than 0.05).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Portal hypertension is a frequent syndrome characterized by a chronic increase in portal venous pressure and by the formation of portal-systemic collaterals. Its main consequence is massive bleeding from ruptured esophageal and gastric varices. Bleeding is promoted by increased portal and variceal pressure, and is favored by dilatation of the varices. The evaluation of the portal hypertensive patient should include the assessment of portal vein patency by ultrasonography, endoscopic evaluation of the presence, size, and extent of esophageal varices, and hemodynamic studies with measurements of portal pressure and of portal-collateral blood flow. The preferred techniques are hepatic vein catheterization and measurement of azygos blood flow. Endoscopic measurements of variceal pressure and estimations of portal blood velocity by the Doppler technique have recently been introduced, but are still research procedures. Acute variceal hemorrhage should be treated under intensive care. Specific therapy to arrest variceal bleeding includes balloon tamponade, vasopressin, somatostatin, sclerotherapy, and emergency surgery. Treatment of portal hypertension is aimed at preventing variceal hemorrhage and bleeding-related deaths. Pharmacologic prophylaxis is based on the use of drugs that cause a sustained reduction in portal pressure; most studies have used propranolol. Surgery and endoscopic sclerotherapy can also be used to prevent rebleeding.

The present study investigated whether, in rats with portal hypertension due to cirrhosis of the liver induced by carbon tetrachloride, blood volume restitution following a hemorrhage produces an increase of portal pressure beyond control values, as observed in rats with prehepatic portal hypertension. Since carbon tetrachloride-induced cirrhosis caused mild portal-systemic shunting, in some of the cirrhotic rats (12 of 29 rats) portal-systemic shunting was enhanced by a transient (4 days) partial constriction of the portal vein, which was removed 1 week prior to the study. After baseline measurements of portal pressure and arterial pressure, 15 ml per kg of blood were withdrawn at a rate of 0.3 ml per min and reinfused 15 min later. After blood reinfusion, portal pressure and arterial pressure were measured again, and cardiac output, regional blood flows and portal-systemic shunting were determined using radioactive microspheres. Portal-systemic shunting was 78 +/- 11% of total blood flow in the cirrhotic rats that had temporary portal vein constriction, but only 5 +/- 2% (p less than 0.001) in those that did not. Blood volume restitution in low-portal-systemic shunting rats did not produce any significant modification in splanchnic or systemic hemodynamics. However, in rats with high portal-systemic shunting, blood volume restitution produced a significant increase in portal pressure (from 9.9 +/- 0.9 to 13.5 +/- 0.9 mmHg, p less than 0.02).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

The results of a study to characterize the effects of the oral administration of isosorbide-5-mononitrate (Is-5-Mn), the active metabolite of isosorbide dinitrate, on portal hypertension in 23 patients with cirrhosis are reported. Patients received 20 mg of Is-5-Mn (n = 10), 40 mg (n = 9), or a placebo (n = 4). No significant changes were observed after the administration of the placebo. However, both doses of Is-5-Mn significantly reduced portal pressure, as evaluated by measurements of the hepatic venous pressure gradient. The fall in portal pressure averaged 10% after the 20-mg dose and 18% after 40 mg and was maintained for the 2 h of observation. Reduction of portal pressure was due to a decrease in the wedged hepatic vein pressure, with no changes in the free hepatic venous pressure. After the 20-mg dose, the decrease in portal pressure was associated with an increase in hepatic blood flow (16%), suggesting a fall in hepatic vascular resistance. However, after the 40-mg dose, a reflex splanchnic vasoconstriction elicited by the fall in arterial pressure (-19%) appeared to contribute to the greater reduction in portal pressure, as suggested by a significant decrease in azygos blood flow (-15%). These beneficial effects on portal pressure were not associated with adverse effects on liver function, as evaluated by measurements of the hepatic clearance of indocyanine green and the hepatic intrinsic clearance. Neither dose of Is-5-Mn caused significant changes in these quantitative parameters of liver function. These findings suggest that Is-5-Mn could be a potentially useful and safe agent in the treatment of portal hypertension.

The effects of increasing doses of propranolol were studied in awake portal hypertensive rats in order to elucidate the relative effects of the beta-blocker on systemic and splanchnic circulation. Hemodynamic responses to 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg per min infusions of propranolol were compared with placebo in awake rats with portal hypertension due to portal vein stenosis. Heart rate significantly and progressively decreased from 356 +/- 13 to 293 +/- 10 beats per min (mean +/- S.E.). Cardiac output significantly decreased from 54 +/- 3 to 42 +/- 3 ml per min per 100 gm body weight at the highest dose. Significant decrease in portal tributary blood flow from 27 +/- 1 to 18 +/- 1 ml per min, at 0.4 mg per min dose, was due not only to the decrease in cardiac output but also to a significant increase in portal tributary vascular resistance from 269 +/- 17 to 368 +/- 31 dyne per sec per cm5 x 10(3). However, portal pressure showed only an insignificant decrease from 14.9 +/- 1.1 to 14.1 +/- 1.4 mmHg. The reduction in portal pressure being minimal, in spite of a significant decrease in portal tributary blood flow, is explained by an increase in combined hepatic and collateral resistance from 44 +/- 2 to 66 +/- 4 dyne per sec per cm5 x 10(3), p less than 0.05, at 0.4 mg per min dose. We conclude that the systemic and splanchnic effects of propranolol show discrepancy at two levels.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)