The development of novel microspheres for the combination of sonodynamic therapy (SDT) with transarterial embolization (TAE) therapy to amplify their efficacy has received increasing attention. Herein, a novel strategy for encapsulating sonosensitizers (e.g., oxygen-deficient manganese tungstate (MnWOX) nanodots) with gelatin microspheres was proposed. The obtained MnWOX-encapsulated microspheres (abbr. Mn-GMSs) facilitated efficient sonodynamic-embolization-metalloimmune therapy via the immune effects of metal ions on orthotopic liver cancer tumor after transarterial embolization (TAE). Due to the strong cavitation effect caused by the porous structure, Mn-GMSs exhibited a greater reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation rate than the free MnWOX nanodots under US irradiation. Efficient SDT revealed robust cell-killing effects and triggered strong immunogenic cell death (ICD). Moreover, the Mn ions released from the bioactive Mn-GMSs further stimulated the dendritic cells (DCs) maturation and triggered the activation of the cGAS/STING pathway to enhance the immunological effect. Thus, Mn-GMSs achieved significant SDT therapeutic outcomes in H22 tumors in mice, and the combination of the Mn-GMSs triggered SDT with programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibodies could further enhance therapeutic outcomes. The Mn-GMSs exhibited high ROS generation efficacy under US irradiation, significant immune activation, good efficacy in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitor, and great potential for artery embolization-assisted drug delivery, thus enabling effective destruction of liver tumors in rats and rabbits. Therefore, this work provides a strategy for applying SDT in deep tumors and highlights a promising sonodynamic-embolization therapy for combating liver cancers.

The introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) based therapies has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the variable treatment response and the uncertain benefit in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis emphasise the urgent need for prognostic and predictive biomarkers guiding patient selection. The soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) is strongly associated with inflammation, liver cirrhosis and various types of cancer. In this study, we investigated suPAR as a potential novel biomarker in patients with unresectable HCC.

This multicenter retrospective study, conducted at three German tertiary care centers, included 90 patients with unresectable HCC and suPAR measurements prior to and during atezolizumab/bevacizumab therapy. Patients with liver cirrhosis without HCC (n = 235) and non-cirrhotic patients with other gastrointestinal tumours (n = 155) were selected as control cohorts.

Median suPAR levels were significantly higher in patients with liver cirrhosis compared to non-cirrhotic cancer patients. A strong association with parameters of liver function, but not with HCC characteristics, was observed. In patients with HCC receiving atezolizumab/bevacizumab, suPAR was the most accurate independent predictor of hepatic decompensation and overall survival (OS). In addition, suPAR was able to stratify the risk of hepatic decompensation within the different Child-Pugh classes.

SuPAR represents a promising novel biomarker in patients with HCC treated with ICI-based therapies and bears the potential to guide the selection of antitumoral systemic therapies in patients with advanced liver cirrhosis.

The development of systemic therapy, including targeted drugs and immune checkpoint inhibitors, has significantly improved the prognosis of patients with advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) has been gradually applied to the treatment of advanced uHCC, showing good potential as conversion therapy. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC combined with camrelizumab and apatinib as conversion therapy for uHCC.

This study was a single-arm exploratory trial (NCT05099848) in patients with uHCC. Eligible patients received apatinib 250 mg once daily, camrelizumab 200 mg on day 3, and HAIC with FOLFOX regimen (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 at hours 0-2, leucovorin 400 mg/m2 at hours 2-3, and fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 at hour 3, followed by fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 for 46 h) on days 4-5 of each 21-day cycle for up to 8 cycles. Primary endpoints were conversion rate and margin-free (R0) resection rate.

Between March 2021 and July 2023, 19 patients were enrolled. Median follow-up was 14.9 months (interquartile range, 10.9-21.1). Disease became resectable in 14 (73.7%) of 19 patients; nine (47.4%) patients received R0 resection, while five (26.3%) refused surgery and opted for observation. Three (33.3%) of nine patients with surgery achieved major pathological response, including two (22.2%) with pathological complete response. Objective response and disease control rates were 47.4% (9/19) and 89.5% (17/19) per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 and both 89.5% (17/19) per modified RECIST. Survival data were immature. Fourteen (73.7%) of 19 patients had grade 3 or higher treatment-related adverse events, with the most common being increased alanine aminotransferase or aspartate aminotransferase (seven [36.8%]) and increased lymphocyte count (six [31.6%]). No treatment-related deaths occurred.

The combination of HAIC, camrelizumab, and apatinib as conversion therapy shows promising clinical benefits and a manageable safety profile in patients with uHCC. Future randomized controlled trials are warranted.

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05099848. Registered on October 13, 2021.

The gut microbiota is often altered in chronic liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and increasing evidence suggests that it may influence response to cancer immunotherapy. Strategies to modulate the gut microbiome (i.e., fecal microbiota transplant (FMT)) may help to improve efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or even overcome resistance to ICIs. Here, we describe the design and rationale of FAB-HCC, a single-center, single-arm, phase II pilot study to assess safety, feasibility, and efficacy of FMT from patients with HCC who responded to PD-(L)1-based immunotherapy or from healthy donors to patients with HCC who failed to achieve or maintain a response to atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.

In this single-center, single-arm, phase II pilot study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05750030), we plan to include 12 patients with advanced HCC who failed to achieve or maintain a response to atezolizumab/bevacizumab. Patients will receive a single FMT via colonoscopy from donors with HCC who responded to PD-(L)1-based immunotherapy or from healthy individuals, followed by atezolizumab/bevacizumab every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint is safety, measured by incidence and severity of treatment-related adverse events. The main secondary endpoint is efficacy, as assessed by best radiological response according to RECISTv1.1 and mRECIST. Additional exploratory endpoints include data on the effect of FMT on recipient gut microbiota, as well as metagenomic analysis of stool samples, analyses of circulating immune cells and serum and stool proteomic, metabolomic and lipidomic signatures.

The results of this study will help to define the potential of FMT as add-on intervention in the systemic treatment of advanced HCC, with the potential to improve efficacy of immunotherapy or even overcome resistance.

EudraCT Number: 2022-000234-42 Clinical trial registry & ID: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05750030 (Registration date: 16.01.2023).

Liver cancer is one of the major causes of cancer-related death in the world. As a breakthrough therapy, immunotherapy had significantly improved the prognosis of patients. However, the current research status and research hotspots in the field of liver cancer immunotherapy still lack systematic review. Based on the bibliometric analysis of highly cited papers, this study intended to reveal the current research status, research hotspots and future research trends in this field.

The purpose of this study was to analyze the national/regional contributions, authors and institutions cooperation network, keywords clustering and keywords burst analysis of highly cited papers on liver cancer immunotherapy through bibliometrics, so as to clarify the research frontier and development direction, and provide objective data support for future research direction and clinical practice.

The highly cited papers on liver cancer immunotherapy from the Web of Science core collection up to February 23, 2025 were retrieved, and 232 studies were included. CiteSpace was used to build a knowledge map, analyze the distribution of years, countries, authors, institutions and cooperation networks, and identify research hotspots and emerging trends through keyword clustering and burst detection.

The number of highly cited papers continued to increase from 2014 and reached a peak in 2022. China and the United States had the highest number of publications and the centrality of cooperation networks. The author with the highest number of papers was Llovet, Josep M, whose research direction mainly focused on immune checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy and molecular typing. The author with the highest cooperation network centrality was Duda, Dan G, whose research team focused on tumor microenvironment regulation. Harvard University and the University of Barcelona played an important central role in the institutional collaboration. Keywords analysis showed that immune checkpoint inhibitors, tumor microenvironment and combination therapy were the core of liver cancer immunotherapy. Burst keywords such as cell lung cancer, pembrolizumab, advanced melanoma, blockade, lymphocytes, etc. had revealed the research frontier of liver cancer immunotherapy research.

The research on liver cancer immunotherapy had made multi-dimensional progress, with China and the United States leading the global cooperation. The main research directions were the combination strategy of immunization, the regulation of tumor microenvironment and the exploration of novel targets. In the future, it is necessary to optimize treatment resistance solutions, integrate interdisciplinary resources, and promote the development of precision and personalized treatment.

Over the past years, there has been a remarkable advance in the systemic treatment options for advanced HCC. The overall survival has gradually increased over time, with larger benefits for patients with sensitive tumors and preserved liver function, the latter being an essential condition for the delivery of sequential lines of treatment and optimization of clinical outcomes. With the approval of new first-line agents and the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitor-based therapies, the treatment landscape of advanced HCC is becoming wider than ever. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab and, more recently, durvalumab plus tremelimumab have entered the clinical practice and are the current standard of care for treatment-naïve patients, surpassing sorafenib and lenvatinib monopoly. As no head-to-head comparisons are available among all the first-line treatment options, the recommendation for the most appropriate choice and sequence is patient-driven and integrates efficacy data with clinical comorbidities, background liver disease, and the safety profile of available drugs. In addition, predictive biomarkers for successful patients' stratification are yet to be available and constitute the focus of ongoing research. The treatment algorithm is likely to become even more complex since systemic therapeutic approaches are now being translated into earlier stages of the disease, with an impact on the evolution of the sequential treatment of patients with HCC.

Immune cells within the tumor microenvironment impact cancer progression, resistance, response to treatments. Despite remarkable outcomes for some cancer patients, immunotherapies remain unsatisfactory for others. Here, we designed an experimental setting using the Alb-R26 Met "inside-out" mouse model, faithfully recapitulating molecular features of liver cancer patients, to explore the effects of distinct anticancer targeted therapies on the tumor immune landscape. Using two treatments in clinical trials for different cancer types, Decitabine and MEK+BCL-XL blockage, we show their capability to trigger tumor regression in Alb-R26 Met mice and to superimpose distinct profiles of immune cell types and immune-checkpoints, impacting immunotherapy response. A machine learning approach processing tumor imaging and immune profile data identified a putative signature predicting tumor treatment response in mice and patients. Outcomes exemplify how the tumor immune microenvironment is differentially reshaped by distinct anticancer agents and highlight the importance of measuring its modulation during treatment to optimize oncotherapy and immunotherapy combinations.

Hepatocellular carcinoma remains a significant cause of mortality worldwide, particularly among patients with liver cirrhosis. In most cases, surveillance in cirrhotic patients is neglected, leading to a diagnosis when the neoplasm is at an advanced stage. Within this context, Zhou et al carried out a network meta-analysis to demonstrate the effectiveness of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy, concluding that it is a superior approach compared to sorafenib and transarterial chemoembolization in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Unfortunately, the meta-analysis in question lacks methodological rigor, preventing the authors from making more definitive assertions. Additionally, we understand that transarterial chemoembolization, when properly indicated, is a highly effective therapeutic option, and that sorafenib, given the results of new therapies based on immune checkpoint inhibitors, is no longer the recommended drug for the treatment of these patients. Therefore, we believe the use of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy is increasingly limited and lacks strong scientific support.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) presents unique challenges in both the elderly and adolescent/young adult (AYA) populations, requiring distinct management approaches. Recent epidemiological data show an increasing incidence of HCC in both age groups, with elderly cases rising significantly and AYA cases showing trends in specific regions. The clinical characteristics and treatment considerations vary substantially among these populations. Elderly patients with HCC typically present with hepatitis C virus infection, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, well-differentiated tumors, and multiple comorbidities. In contrast, AYA patients with HCC often present with more aggressive tumor characteristics and predominantly with hepatitis B virus-related diseases. Treatment decisions for elderly patients with HCC require careful consideration of physiological reserves, comprehensive geriatric assessments, and potential complications. Recent studies have demonstrated that elderly patients can achieve outcomes comparable to younger patients across various treatment modalities when properly selected. While surgical outcomes are comparable to those of younger patients with proper selection, less-invasive options such as radiofrequency ablation or transarterial therapies may be more appropriate for some elderly patients. The treatment approach for AYA HCC emphasizes curative intent while considering long-term effects. AYA patients require specialized attention to their psychosocial needs, fertility preservation, and long-term health maintenance. Although data on AYA patients remain limited, they are known to have relatively favorable prognoses despite exhibiting more aggressive tumor characteristics. Management of HCC in both the elderly and AYA populations requires individualized approaches that consider age-specific factors. Both groups benefit from multidisciplinary team involvement and careful consideration of quality of life.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common malignant tumors worldwide. Unfortunately, the effective targeted therapies for HCC are lacking at present. While the regulation of microRNA-1246 (miR-1246) has been identified in HCC, its specific mechanism in exosomes derived from HCC remains elusive. This study aimed to explore the regulation of tumor-derived exosome miR-1246 in HCC cell invasion, migration, proliferation, and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT).

Exosomes secreted by HepG2 cells were characterized via Western blotting, nanoparticle tracking analysis, and transmission electron microscopy, followed by transfection with a miR-1246 inhibitor. RT-qPCR was employed for measuring the miR-1246 levels. Also, the impacts of the exosome miR-1246 inhibitor on HepG2 cell migration, invasion, proliferation, and EMT were evaluated.

The findings revealed elevated miR-1246 levels in HCC tissues relative to adjacent non-cancerous tissues, with a greater enrichment of miR-1246 in HepG2-derived exosomes than in HepG2 cells. HCC cell invasion, migration, proliferation, and EMT were significantly enhanced by HCC-derived exosomes, while exosomes loaded with miR-1246 inhibitor inhibited these biological functions. Further mechanistic studies illustrated an association of the regulatory role of miR-1246 with FSTL5 and ERK/p38 MAPK signaling.

In conclusion, tumor-derived miR-1246 enters hepatocellular carcinoma cells in the form of exosomes and promotes cancer cell invasion, EMT, and migration. The potential mechanism of miR-1246 is potentially relevant to the targeted gene FSTL5 as well as the ERK/p38 signaling.

This study aimed to quantitatively evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line systemic therapies for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC).

The study included clinical trials of first-line systemic therapies for aHCC since the approval of sorafenib in 2007. Hazard function models were used to describe changes in overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) over time. Monte Carlo simulation was used to compare OS and PFS for different treatments, including sorafenib, antiangiogenic therapies (AATs) (except sorafenib), immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy, AAT + targeted therapy, AAT + chemotherapy, AAT + ICIs, and ICIs + ICIs. Furthermore, the objective response rate (ORR) and incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events were analyzed.

Fifty studies comprising 12,918 participants were included. AAT + ICIs demonstrated a significant benefit in median OS (mOS), median PFS (mPFS), and ORR (20.5 [95% CI 17.5-24] months, 7.5 [95% CI 6.5-8.8] months, and 24% [95% CI 17%-30%], respectively). ICIs + ICIs and ICI monotherapy ranked second and third, respectively with an mOS of 20 (95% CI 18.5-21.5) months and 14.5 (95% CI 13.5-16) months, respectively. The OS, PFS, and ORR of patients treated with AAT, AAT + targeted therapy, and AAT + chemotherapy were similar to those of patients treated with sorafenib. A higher proportion of patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage C had a shorter OS. OS was associated with publication year, and PFS was associated with the proportion of patients with BCLC stage C. The incidence of grade ≥ 3 adverse events in the ICIs and ICIs + ICIs treatment groups was low.

The study results provide valuable information from which to base rational clinical drug use and serves as a reliable external control for evaluating new treatments for aHCC.

The incidence and mortality rates of liver cancer in China remain elevated. Although early-stage liver cancer is amenable to surgical resection, a significant proportion of patients are diagnosed at advanced stages. Currently, in addition to surgical resection for hepatocellular carcinoma, the primary treatment modalities predominantly include chemotherapy. The widespread use of chemotherapy, which non-selectively targets both malignant and healthy cells, often results in substantial immunosuppression. Simultaneously, the accumulation of chemotherapeutic agents can readily induce drug resistance upon reaching the physiological threshold, thereby diminishing the efficacy of these treatments. Besides chemotherapy, there exist targeted therapy, immunotherapy and other therapeutic approaches. Nevertheless, the development of drug resistance remains an inevitable challenge. To address these challenges, we turn to nanomedicine, an emerging and widely utilized discipline that significantly influences medical imaging, antimicrobial strategies, drug delivery systems, and other related areas. Stable and safe nanomaterials serve as effective carriers for delivering anticancer drugs. They enhance the precision of drug targeting, improve bioavailability, and minimize damage to healthy cells. This review focuses on common nanomaterial carriers used in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treatment over the past five years. The following is a summary of the three drugs: Sorafenib, Gefitinib, and lenvatinib. Each drug employs distinct nanomaterial delivery systems, which result in varying levels of bioavailability, drug release rates, and therapeutic efficacy.

In recent years, the standard treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has changed dramatically due to the emergence of potent systemic treatment options. These advanced therapies have led to increased survival benefits for patients with advanced or intermediate-stage HCC. Advancements in HCC treatments also offer the possibility of conversion therapy for initially unresectable HCC. However, the treatment of HCC is becoming increasingly complex, due to the expanding availability of systemic therapies, their use in combination with locoregional therapies, and their perioperative applications. Patient characteristics such as liver function, esophageal and gastric variceal status, and treatment goal (downstaging resection or long-term maintenance treatment), are the most critical factors when selecting a systemic treatment strategy. Consequently, the necessity to tailor a personalized and comprehensive treatment strategy for individual patients is growing. This review briefly summarizes the current systemic treatment regimens for HCC from a surgeon's perspective. It is based on results from clinical studies as well as personal experience and introduces the concept of a patient-centered, treatment goals-driven, individualized systemic treatment strategy for managing HCC.

The CRAFITY score is mainly utilized for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients receiving atezolizumab and bevacizumab, with little investigation in its predictive capacity for alternative regimens, such as lenvatinib and programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors, which are widely utilized in Chinese clinical practice.

To look at the predictive significance of the CRAFITY score in HCC patients taking lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors.

The retrospective investigation consisted of 192 patients with incurable HCC who received lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors between January 2018 and January 2022. Patients were stratified according to CRAFITY score (based on baseline alpha-fetoprotein and C-reactive protein levels) into CRAFITY-low, CRAFITY-intermediate, and CRAFITY-high groups. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis, and independent prognostic factors were identified through Cox regression analysis. Nomograms were created to forecast survival for a year.

The median PFS and OS were the longest for patients in the CRAFITY-low group, followed by those in the CRAFITY-intermediate and CRAFITY-high groups (median PFS: 8.4 months, 6.0 months, and 3.1 months, P < 0.0001; median OS: 33.4 months, 19.2 months, and 6.6 months, P < 0.0001). Both the objective response rate (5%, 19.6%, and 22%, P = 0.0669) and the disease control rate (50%, 76.5%, and 80%, P = 0.0023) were considerably lower in the CRAFITY-high group. The findings from the multivariate analysis showed that a nomogram which included the tumor number, prior transarterial chemoembolization history, and CRAFITY score predicted 12-month survival with an area under the curve of 0.788 (95% confidence interval: 0.718-0.859), which was in good agreement with actual data.

The CRAFITY score is a valuable predictor of survival and treatment outcomes in patients receiving lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors.

We aimed to compare the early responder rates, defined as complete or partial responders, using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST) 1.1, modified RECIST (mRECIST), and Choi criteria in advanced HCC patients treated with atezolizumab-bevacizumab (atezo-bev), and to correlate them with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

This retrospective study included advanced HCC patients treated with ≥ 3 cycles of atezo-bev. Two reviewers assessed responses using RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, and Choi criteria at 1st follow-up imaging. Kaplan-Meier curves with log-rank tests evaluated and compared PFS and OS. Cox proportional hazard models identified survival outcome predictors. Kappa statistics assessed inter-reader agreement.

We evaluated 77 patients (65 men; mean age, 62.8 ± 12.3 years). Choi's criteria revealed the highest early responders rate (53.2%), exceeding mRECIST (32.5-33.8%) and RECIST 1.1 (24.7-26.0%), with an excellent agreement in all criteria (κ, 0.85-0.95). Across criteria, a consistent number of patients progressed (23-26) and was associated with significantly poor OS (ps ≤ 0.049). Responders by any criteria showed longer PFS (ps ≤ 0.009), and 1-year OS (ps ≤ 0.01). Choi criteria linked to significantly better OS without landmark (p = 0.003), with 1-year OS rates at 76.9% for responders vs 38.1% for non-responders. Cox analysis identified responders by Choi criteria as a significant OS predictor.

Choi criteria identified more early responders than RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, significantly correlating with improved OS. Choi criteria could be considered as a formal response assessment criterion for the emerging atezo-bev systemic treatment.

For atezo-bev treatment of advanced HCC, more comprehensive response criteria, such as Choi criteria, could be effective in identifying early responders and predicting survival outcomes along with RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST.

Choi criteria identified a higher rate of early responders compared to mRECIST and RECIST1.1 following atezo-bev treatment. Responders by all criteria had longer PFS and 1-year OS, and only those by Choi criteria experienced longer OS without landmark time. Choi criteria, with RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST, is an effective response assessment tool for atezo-bev treatment.

Body mass index (BMI) is associated with the prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) receiving immunotherapy. Body compositions are considered to account for this association, but this hypothesis has yet to be verified conclusively.

Our study included 305 patients received immunotherapy at 3 centers between August 2018 and February 2022. We calculated skeletal muscle index (SMI), mean skeletal muscle density (SMD), subcutaneous adipose tissue index (SATI), visceral adipose tissue index (VATI), and visceral to subcutaneous adipose tissue area ratio (VSR) at lumbar 3 level. The influences of BMI and body compositions on overall survival (OS) were comprehensively described.

Sarcopenia (Low SMI, HR = 2.203, 95% CI:1.425-3.405, P < 0.001), myosteatosis (low SMD, HR = 2.013, 95% CI:1.246-3.252, P = 0.004) and visceral adipose deposition (high VATI, HR = 0.658, 95% CI:0.453-0.957, P = 0.028) were independent predictors of OS, while BMI was not. The prognosis of underweight (BMI < 20.0 kg/m2, P = 0.009) and obesity (BMI ≥ 25.0 kg/m2, P = 0.003) were significantly worse than normal weight (20.0 ≤ BMI ≤ 24.9 kg/m2), which might attribute to the differences in body compositions. High VATI had significantly improved OS than low VATI (P = 0.002), and the difference remained significant after propensity score matching (P = 0.017).

In HCC receiving immunotherapy, sarcopenia, myosteatosis, and visceral adipose deposition independently predicted OS, and visceral adipose was protective in OS. The effects of BMI on OS depended on body compositions.

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (A/B) is now a standard first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the optimal second-line regimen is not known. We evaluated real-world treatment patterns and outcomes to investigate factors associated with post-progression survival (PPS).

In this multicenter, international, retrospective study, we examined clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced HCC who progressed on first-line A/B. The primary outcome of PPS was defined as time from first radiographic progression on A/B to death.

A total of 406 patients alive after progression on first-line A/B were included in the final analysis, of whom 45.3% (n = 184) received best supportive treatment (BST) and 54.7% (n = 222) continued active systemic treatment. In the second line, 155 patients were treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), 45 with immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO)-based regimens, and 3 had missing data. Median PPS of the whole cohort (mPPS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 5.2-7.2). On multivariate Cox regression analysis, absence of portal vein tumor thrombus, ECOG <2, and continued active treatment were predictors of better PPS. mPPS was significantly longer for patients who continued active treatment vs. BST (9.7 vs. 2.6 months; HR 0.41, p <0.001). In the second-line setting, patients treated with TKIs had a numerically shorter mPPS compared to those treated with IO (8.4 vs. 14.9 months; HR 1.37, p = 0.256).

Continuation of active therapy after A/B progression was independently associated with better survival even after adjusting for baseline disease characteristics. mPPS with IO-based therapy exceeded a year, suggesting that IO continuation post-progression may retain benefit. The precise sequencing of TKI and IO regimens warrants further investigation.

There is currently a lack of level 1 data on second-line treatment options for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who progress after frontline atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, as all second-line approvals were established during the frontline sorafenib era. Our study aims to fill in some of the knowledge gap by investigating real-world patient outcomes in the second-line treatment setting. Findings from this study show that patients who continued active treatment had improved post-progression survival compared to those who received best supportive care, and medication regimens incorporating tyrosine kinase inhibitors as well as immunotherapy agents were active. These results can help inform clinicians of possible treatment options for patients who progress after frontline atezolizumab plus bevacizumab while we await maturing data from randomized-controlled trials.

This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of the psoas muscle index (PMI) as an independent predictor of survival after systemic targeted therapy initiation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).

In total, 214 patients with HCC who underwent systemic targeted therapy at the Gifu University Hospital were enrolled. The correlation between the PMI and the skeletal muscle index (SMI) was assessed using Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC). The Cox proportional hazards model was employed to determine whether the PMI, along with the α-fetoprotein (AFP) level and the ALBI score, influenced survival; these variables were considered time-dependent covariates. The optimal PMI cut-off value that yielded the most significant differences in survival was determined using maximally selected statistics.

The PMI was significantly correlated with the SMI (PCC = 0.38 and p < 0.001 for women; PCC = 0.62 and p < 0.001 for men). The PMI independently influenced survival (hazard ratio: 0.852; 95% confidence interval: 0.755-0.962; and p < 0.001), along with established prognostic factors such as the AFP and the ALBI score. The optimal PMI cut-off values that yielded the most significant differences in survival were 2.86 cm2/m2 for women and 3.55 cm2/m2 for men, and these values significantly stratified patient outcomes for both sexes (p < 0.001).

The PMI serves as a reliable surrogate for the SMI in assessing skeletal muscle mass and predicting survival.

To investigate the association of skeletal muscle mass and quality with survival outcomes in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with lenvatinib (LEN).

In this retrospective study, LEN-treated patients with HCC were enrolled. Sarcopenia and myosteatosis were evaluated on the basis of baseline skeletal muscle index and mean muscle attenuation, respectively, on computed tomography at the L3 level. Low skeletal muscle mass (LSMM) was determined on the basis of index value, and bioinformatics tools were used to determine reliable cutoff values. Myosteatosis was defined on the basis of mean Hounsfield unit values and predefined cutoff values. A logrank test and Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

A total of 81 patients were included. Patients with LSMM exhibited significantly lower PFS (p = 0.003) and OS (p = 0.010) than did patients without LSMM. Patients with myosteatosis exhibited significantly lower PFS (p = 0.012) and OS (p < 0.001) than did patients without myosteatosis. In multivariate analysis adjusted for tumor extent and liver function reserve, LSMM and myosteatosis remained independent predictors of low PFS (p = 0.028, p = 0.031) and OS (p = 0.027, p = 0.001), respectively.

LSMM and myosteatosis are independent prognostic factors for PFS and OS in advanced patients with HCC who received LEN and may exert synergistic effects on these survival outcomes.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a particularly aggressive form of cancer, characterized by its rapid progression and a complex interplay with the surrounding immune cellular environment. The primary objective of this study was to comprehensively investigate the role of ANGPTL4 in the context of HCC, utilizing RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) techniques to explore its impact on the M2 polarization of tumor-associated macrophages (TAM) and to uncover potential mechanisms driving HCC progression. To achieve this, we performed a transcriptome analysis of HCC cell lines, alongside cells obtained after co-culturing these lines with macrophages. By comparing gene expression profiles between the experimental groups exposed to ANGPTL4 and control groups, we aimed to identify specific molecular pathways associated with ANGPTL4's function. In addition to gene expression analysis, we employed flow cytometry to assess the polarization status of TAM. Furthermore, we utilized immunohistochemistry to evaluate the distribution of macrophages within HCC tissues and to quantify the expression levels of M2 macrophage markers. The results derived from RNA-seq analysis were particularly revealing; treatment with ANGPTL4 led to a significant upregulation of genes linked to M2 polarization, notably including CD206 and Arg1. In subsequent experimental observations, it became evident that ANGPTL4 not only facilitated the M2 polarization of macrophages but also enhanced the proliferation and migratory capacity of HCC cells through the upregulation of these same cytokines.

It is critical to predict early recurrence (ER) after percutaneous thermal ablation (PTA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We aimed to develop and validate a delta-radiomics nomogram based on multi-phase contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to preoperatively predict ER of HCC after PTA.

We retrospectively enrolled 164 patients with HCC and divided them into training, temporal validation, and other-scanner validation cohorts (n = 110, 29, and 25, respectively). The volumes of interest of the intratumoral and/or peritumoral regions were delineated on preoperative multi-phase MR images. Original radiomics features were extracted from each phase, and delta-radiomics features were calculated. Logistic regression was used to train the corresponding radiomics models. The clinical and radiological characteristics were evaluated and combined to establish a clinical-radiological model. A fusion model comprising the best radiomics scores and clinical-radiological risk factors was constructed and presented as a nomogram. The performance of each model was evaluated and recurrence-free survival (RFS) was assessed.

Child-Pugh grade B, high-risk tumor location, and an incomplete/absent tumor capsule were independent predictors of ER. The optimal radiomics model comprised 12 delta-radiomics features with areas under the curve (AUCs) of 0.834, 0.795, and 0.769 in the training, temporal validation, and other-scanner validation cohorts, respectively. The nomogram showed the best predictive performance with AUCs as 0.893, 0.854, and 0.827 in the three datasets. There was a statistically significant difference in RFS between the risk groups calculated using the delta-radiomics model and nomogram.

The nomogram combined with the delta-radiomic score and clinical-radiological risk factors could non-invasively predict ER of HCC after PTA.

This study aims to examine the possible relationship between body composition parameters, sarcopenia, and clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment.

Three online databases, including Embase, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library, were thoroughly searched for literature describing the relationship between body composition parameters, sarcopenia, and outcomes of ICI-treated HCC patients from the start of each database to 21 January 2024. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to rate the quality of the studies. The assessed outcomes included hazard ratio (HR) for OS and PFS, as well as odds ratio (OR) for ORR and DCR.

This analysis included a total of 15 articles with a combined patient cohort of 1543 individuals. The results demonstrated that HCC patients with low skeletal muscle index (SMI) had significantly inferior OS (HR: 1.68, p < 0.001), PFS (HR: 1.45, p < 0.001), ORR (OR: 0.64, p = 0.044), and DCR (OR: 0.58, p = 0.009) compared to those with high SMI. The presence of sarcopenia in HCC patients was significantly related to poorer OS (HR: 1.63, p < 0.001) and PFS (HR: 1.48, p < 0.001), as well as a lower ORR (OR: 0.64, p = 0.020) and DCR (OR: 0.58, p = 0.007) in comparison to those without sarcopenia. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that these findings were consistent with the multivariate analysis. Moreover, high subcutaneous adipose index (SAI) levels were associated with better OS (HR: 0.46, p = 0.001) and PFS (HR: 0.68, p = 0.021) than those with low SAI levels.

The presence of sarcopenia and low SMI in HCC patients undergoing treatment with ICIs was found to be related to inferior treatment response and reduced long-term effectiveness.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and the development of effective treatment strategies remains a significant challenge in the management of advanced HCC patients. The emergence of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has been a significant advancement in the treatment of HCC, as these targeted therapies have shown promise in prolonging the survival of patients with advanced disease. Although immunotherapy is currently considered as the first line of treatment for advanced HCC patients, many such patients do not meet the clinical criteria to be eligible for immunotherapy, and in many parts of the world there is still lack of accessibility to immunotherapy. As such, TKIs still serve as the first line of treatment and play a major role in the treatment repertoire for advanced HCC patients. However, the development of resistance to these agents is a major obstacle that must be overcome. In this review, we explore the underlying mechanisms of resistance to TKIs in HCC, the clinical implications of this resistance, and the potential strategies to overcome or prevent the emergence of resistance.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) ranks the sixth most common malignancy but the third leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. Significant breakthroughs have been made in systemic treatment for HCC over the past two decades, which have improved treatment outcomes. In addition to multiple tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mTKIs), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antiangiogenic drugs are increasingly being applied. The combination of ICI and antiangiogenic or dual ICIs has become the new standard of care due to remarkable response rates. However, currently available systemic regimens are primarily reserved for certain patients in the intermediate and advanced stages who will not benefit from locoregional treatments. Evidence supporting the use of systemic treatment as neoadjuvant or adjuvant therapies in patients with early-stage HCC, especially the high risk of recurrence after curative treatments, remains limited. This review identified recent developments in systemic therapy, including mTKIs and ICIs, considering results on first- and second-line treatment, role of neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings, and combination with loco-regional therapy. Various ongoing clinical trials regarding the role of systemic therapies and potential novel targets in patients with early-, intermediate-, and advanced-stage HCC were also summarized and revealed that systemic therapy is no longer limited to advanced-stage HCC. Moreover, the introduction of T-cell redirecting strategies, including bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T cells, has revolutionized the treatment landscape for HCC. Future research should focus on an in-depth exploration of the mechanisms governing the establishment of tumor barriers.

Sorafenib is a recommended first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, when used as monotherapy in patients in advanced stages, the prognosis remains suboptimal. This study aimed to evaluate the impact of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) on survival outcomes in patients with advanced HCC treated with sorafenib, as well as to identify which subgroups may benefit most from the addition of TACE. This single-institution retrospective study included 92 patients diagnosed with Barcelona Clinic liver cancer (BCLC) stage C HCC who received sorafenib between August 2011 and December 2016. We assessed the influence of different treatment modalities on prognosis using multivariable regression analysis. Patients were categorized into three subgroups: those with vascular invasion, those with distant metastasis, and those with both risk factors. Baseline comparisons indicated no significant differences in clinical characteristics among the three groups. Survival analysis showed no statistically significant difference in overall survival (OS) between the subgroups. However, in the overall cohort of patients with BCLC stage C, multifactorial Cox regression analysis identified pre-treatment alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels (p = 0.020), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) levels (p = 0.034), and the absence of combination TACE therapy (p = 0.008) as independent risk factors affecting OS. Further subgroup Cox analyses revealed that the lack of combination TACE therapy was an independent risk factor for OS in both the vascular invasion group and the group with both risk factors. In conclusion, for patients with advanced HCC receiving sorafenib, the addition of TACE may enhance long-term survival, particularly in those with vascular invasion.

Autoimmune liver diseases (AILD) are rare causes hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and data on the efficacy and tolerability of anti-tumor therapies are scarce. This pan-European study aimed to assess outcomes in AILD-HCC patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) or transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) compared with patients with more common HCC etiologies, including viral, alcoholic or non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

107 patients with HCC-AILD (AIH:55; PBC:52) treated at 13 European centres between 1996 and 2020 were included. 65 received TACE and 28 received TKI therapy. 43 (66 %) were female (median age 73 years) with HCC tumor stage BCLC A (34 %), B (46 %), C (9 %) or D (11 %). For each treatment type, propensity score matching was used to match AILD to non-AILD-HCC on a 1:1 basis, yielding in a final cohort of 130 TACE and 56 TKI patients for comparative analyses of median overall survival (mOS) and treatment tolerability.

HCC-AILD patients showed comparable mOS to controls for both TACE (19.5 vs. 22.1 months, p = 0.9) and TKI (15.4 vs. 15.1 months, p = 0.5). Adverse events were less frequent in AILD-HCC patients than controls (33 % % vs. 62 %, p = 0.003). For TKIs, there were no significant differences in adverse events (73% vs. 86%, p = 0.2) or interruption rates (44% vs. 36 %, p = 0.7).

In summary, this study demonstrates comparable mOS for AILD-HCC patients undergoing local and systemic treatments, with better tolerability than HCC of other causes. TKIs remain important therapeutic options for AILD-HCC patients, particularly given their exclusion from recent immunotherapy trials.

As the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents a significant global health challenge. This paper provides an introduction and comprehensive review of transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium-90 (Y90), a widely performed transcatheter procedure for HCC patients who are not suitable candidates for surgery. TARE involves the targeted delivery of radioactive microspheres to liver tumors, offering a promising treatment option for managing HCC across various stages of the disease. By evaluating Y90 TARE outcomes across early, intermediate, and advanced stages of HCC, the review aims to present a thorough understanding of its efficacy and safety. Additionally, this paper highlights future research directions focusing on the potential of combination therapies with systemic and immunotherapies, as well as personalized treatments. The exploration of these innovative approaches aims to improve treatment outcomes, reduce adverse events, and provide new therapeutic opportunities for HCC patients. The review underscores the importance of ongoing research and clinical trials to optimize TARE further and integrate it into comprehensive HCC treatment paradigms.

The combination of anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors has revolutionized the management of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). While an early-phase study demonstrated promising outcomes for lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (L+P) in treating uHCC, the LEAP-002 trial did not meet its primary endpoint. However, the comparative efficacy between L+P and atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) as first-line treatment remains a topic of uncertainty. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of L+P in contrast to A+B among patients diagnosed with uHCC.

We conducted a retrospective analysis of enrolled patients with uHCC who received L+P or A+B as initial systemic treatment at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from June 2019 to December 2022. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and disease control rate (DCR) by modified RECIST were compared.

121 patients were recruited, with 37 receiving L+P and 84 receiving A+B. Among them, 95 (78.5%) patients were BCLC stage C, and 99 (81.8%) patients had viral etiology for HCC, predominantly chronic HBV (68.6%). Both the L+P and the A+B groups demonstrated comparable OS (18.2 months versus 14.6 months, p = 0.35) and PFS (7.3 months versus 8.9 months, p = 0.75). The ORR and DCR were similar. After propensity score matching, the results remained consistent between the matched patients. Treatment-related adverse events of any grade occurred in 30 (81.1%) in the L+P group and 62 (73.8%) in the A+B group.

Our findings suggest that L+P and A+B exhibit comparable efficacy and safety profiles in real-world settings.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in Taiwan. The Taiwan Liver Cancer Association and the Gastroenterological Society of Taiwan established HCC management consensus guidelines in 2016 and updated them in 2023. Current recommendations focus on addressing critical issues in HCC management, including surveillance, diagnosis, systemic treatment, and posttreatment monitoring. For surveillance and diagnosis, we updated the guidelines to include the role of protein induced by vitamin K absence or antagonist II (PIVKA-II) and gadoxetic acid (Gd-EOB-DTPA)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in detecting HCCs. For systemic treatment, the updated guidelines summarize the multiple choices available for targeted therapy, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and a combination of both, especially for those carcinomas refractory to or unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization. We have added a new section, posttreatment monitoring, that describes the important roles of PIVKA-II and EOB-MRI after HCC therapy, including surgery, locoregional therapy, and systemic treatment. Through this update of the management consensus guidelines, patients with HCC may benefit from optimal diagnosis, therapeutic modalities, and posttreatment monitoring.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) progresses through multiple stages of hepatocarcinogenesis, with each stage characterized by specific changes in vascular supply, drainage, and microvascular structure. These vascular changes significantly influence the imaging findings of HCC, enabling non-invasive diagnosis. Vascular changes in HCC are closely related to aggressive histological characteristics and treatment responses. Venous drainage from the tumor toward the portal vein in the surrounding liver facilitates vascular invasion, and the unique microvascular pattern of vessels that encapsulate the tumor cluster (known as a VETC pattern) promotes vascular invasion and metastasis. Systemic treatments for HCC, which are increasingly being used, primarily target angiogenesis and immune checkpoint pathways, which are closely intertwined. By understanding the complex relationship between histopathological vascular changes in hepatocarcinogenesis and their implications for imaging findings, radiologists can enhance the accuracy of imaging diagnosis and improve the prediction of prognosis and treatment response. This, in turn, will ultimately lead to better patient care.

Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC).

This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS).

Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded.

The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.

This study aimed to assess the effect of adjuvant therapy with different durations in patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) after conversion surgery.

This study included 85 patients with initially uHCC who received conversion surgery between May 2019 and November 2022. They were divided into the long duration group (n = 57) and short duration group (n = 28) based on postoperative medication duration. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed and compared between the cohorts.

No significant difference in RFS or OS was found between the two groups [RFS: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.486; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.229-1.034, P = 0.061; OS: HR = 0.377; 95% CI, 0.119-1.196, P = 0.098]. Patients without major pathologic response (MPR) in the long duration group had better RFS and OS results compared to those in the short duration group (RFS: HR = 0.242; 95% CI, 0.092-0.634, P = 0.004; OS: HR = 0.264; 95% CI, 0.079-0.882, P = 0.031). No significant difference was detected in RFS or OS between the two groups in patients with MPR (RFS: HR = 1.250; 95% CI, 0.373-4.183, P = 0.718; OS: HR = 7.389; 95% CI, 0.147-372.4, P = 0.317). After propensity score matching, 25 pairs of patients were selected and the results remained consistent.

At least 6 months of adjuvant therapy may be beneficial for patients without MPR after conversion surgery. However, in patients with MPR, the effect of adjuvant therapy remains unclear. Further studies are needed to confirm the optimal duration of adjuvant therapy.

To assess the impact of adverse event (AE) severity, caused by targeted therapy, on overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), a total of 183 patients with HCC treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (40), lenvatinib (57), sorafenib (79), cabozantinib (3), ramucirumab (3), and regorafenib (1) were included in this study. Age-, AFP-, and ALBI score-adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of AE grades 1 to 3 versus grade 0 for OS and PFS were calculated using Cox proportional hazards models. The linear trend of the HRs was assessed by calculating the p values for this trend. The most common AEs were appetite loss (AE grade 0/1/2/3 = 97/23/55/12), general fatigue (102/31/44/6), hypertension (120/6/40/17), hand-foot syndrome (HFS) (135/21/24/3), proteinuria (140/13/16/14), and hypothyroidism (148/12/23/0). The adjusted HRs for OS of these AEs were 0.532-1.450-2.361 (p for trend 0.037), 1.057-1.691-3.364 (p for trend 0.004), 1.176-0.686-0.281 (p for trend 0.002), 0.639-0.759-1.820 (p for trend 0.462), 1.030-0.959-0.147 (p for trend 0.011), and 0.697-0.609 (p for trend 0.119), respectively. Those for PFS of the corresponding AEs were 0.592-1.073-2.811 (p for trend 0.255), 1.161-1.282-4.324 (p for trend 0.03), 0.965-0.781-0.655 (p for trend 0.095), 0.737-0.623-2.147 (p for trend 0.153), 1.061-0.832-0.800 (p for trend 0.391), and 1.412-0.560 (p for trend 0.081), respectively. Appetite loss and general fatigue negatively affected clinical outcomes, whereas hypertension, HFS, proteinuria, and hypothyroidism had positive effects.

The five-year survival rate for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is only 20 %, highlighting the urgent need to identify new therapeutic targets and develop potential therapeutic options to improve patient prognosis. One promising approach is inhibiting autophagy as a strategy for HCC treatment. In this study, we established a virtual docking conformation of the autophagy promoter ULK1 binding XST-14 derivatives. Based on this conformation, we designed and synthesized four series of derivatives. By evaluating their affinity and anti-HCC effects, we confirmed that these compounds exert anti-HCC activity by inhibiting ULK1. The structure-activity relationship was summarized, with derivative A4 showing 10 times higher activity than XST-14 and superior efficacy to sorafenib against HCC. A4 has excellent effect on reducing tumor growth and enhancing sorafenib activity in HepG2 and HCCLM3 cells. Moreover, we verified the therapeutic effect of A4 in sorafenib-resistant HCC cells both in vivo and in vitro. These results suggest that inhibiting ULK1 to regulate autophagy may become a new treatment method for HCC and that A4 will be used as a lead drug for HCC in further research. Overall, A4 shows good drug safety and efficacy, offering hope for prolonging the survival of HCC patients.

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab (atezo-bev) is the first-line chemotherapy for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) can be used as an alternative. Our aim was to compare the prognosis of HAIC treatment between newly diagnosed patients and patients treated after failure of atezo-bev.

We retrospectively assessed 73 patients with HCC treated with HAIC between January 2022 and September 2023. Fifty-seven patients were treated with HAIC at initial diagnosis, while 16 were treated with HAIC after first-line atezo-bev combination chemotherapy. We evaluated tumor responses, such as overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and objective response rate (ORR).

No significant difference was observed in either OS or PFS between patients with HCC treated with HAIC at the initial diagnosis and those treated after atezo-bev treatment failure. However, the ORR of the initial HAIC group was 19.6% and that of the HAIC group after atezo-bev therapy failure was 43.6%, which was a statistically significantly difference.

Although no significant difference was observed for OS and PFS, the ORR of patients in the HAIC group after the failure of atezo-bev therapy was superior to that of newly diagnosed patients. HAIC may prolong survival in patients with HCC after atezo-bev treatment failure.