1
|
Franzè MS, Vigneron P, Sessa A, Saitta C, Chalaye J, Tacher V, Luciani A, Regnault H, Bejan A, Rhaiem R, Sommacale D, Leroy V, Brustia R, Raimondo G, Amaddeo G. Prognostic factors influencing outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients undergoing selective internal radiation therapy. Ann Hepatol 2024; 30:101539. [PMID: 39179159 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2024.101539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/06/2024] [Indexed: 08/26/2024]
Abstract
Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has emerged as a viable endovascular treatment strategy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). According to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification, SIRT is currently recommended for early- and intermediate-stage HCC that is unsuitable for alternative locoregional therapies. Additionally, SIRT remains a recommended treatment for patients with advanced-stage HCC and portal vein thrombosis (PVT) without extrahepatic metastasis. Several studies have shown that SIRT is a versatile and promising treatment with a wide range of applications. Consequently, given its favourable characteristics in various scenarios, SIRT could be an encouraging treatment option for patients with HCC across different BCLC stages. Over the past decade, an increasing number of studies have focused on better understanding the prognostic factors associated with SIRT to identify patients who derive the most benefit from this treatment or to refine the optimal technical procedures of SIRT. Several variables can influence treatment decisions, with a growing emphasis on a personalised approach. This review, based on the literature, will focus on the prognostic factors associated with the effectiveness of radioembolization and related complications. By comprehensively analysing these factors, we aimed to provide a clearer understanding of how to optimise the use of SIRT in managing HCC patients, thereby enhancing outcomes across various clinical scenarios.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Stella Franzè
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Paul Vigneron
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Anna Sessa
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Carlo Saitta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Julia Chalaye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Vania Tacher
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Alain Luciani
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Medical Imaging, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Hélène Regnault
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Ancuta Bejan
- Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Rami Rhaiem
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatobiliary, Pancreatic and Digestive Surgery, Robert Debré University Hospital, Reims, France; University Reims Champagne-Ardenne, France
| | - Daniele Sommacale
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Vincent Leroy
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Raffaele Brustia
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Digestive and Hepatobiliary Surgery, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Giovanni Raimondo
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Giuliana Amaddeo
- Université Paris-Est Créteil, UPEC, Créteil, France; INSERM, U955, Team "Virus Hépatologie Cancer", Créteil, France; Department of Hepatology, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Henri Mondor-Albert Chenevier University Hospital, Créteil, France.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Han JW, Lee SK, Kwon JH, Nam SW, Yang H, Bae SH, Kim JH, Nam H, Kim CW, Lee HL, Kim HY, Lee SW, Lee A, Chang UI, Song DS, Kim SH, Song MJ, Sung PS, Choi JY, Yoon SK, Jang JW. A Machine Learning Algorithm Facilitates Prognosis Prediction and Treatment Selection for Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res 2024; 30:2812-2821. [PMID: 38639918 DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-23-3978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2023] [Revised: 02/29/2024] [Accepted: 04/16/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Given its heterogeneity and diverse clinical outcomes, precise subclassification of Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C (BCLC-C) hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is required for appropriately determining patient prognosis and selecting treatment. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN We recruited 2,626 patients with BCLC-C HCC from multiple centers, comprising training/test (n = 1,693) and validation cohorts (n = 933). The XGBoost model was chosen for maximum performance among the machine learning (ML) models. Patients were categorized into low-, intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk subgroups based on the estimated prognosis, and this subclassification was named the CLAssification via Machine learning of BCLC-C (CLAM-C). RESULTS The areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the CLAM-C for predicting the 6-, 12-, and 24-month survival of patients with BCLC-C were 0.800, 0.831, and 0.715, respectively-significantly higher than those of the conventional models, which were consistent in the validation cohort. The four subgroups had significantly different median overall survivals, and this difference was maintained among various patient subgroups and treatment modalities. Immune-checkpoint inhibitors and transarterial therapies were associated with significantly better survival than tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) in the low- and intermediate-risk subgroups. In cases with first-line systemic therapy, the CLAM-C identified atezolizumab-bevacizumab as the best therapy, particularly in the high-risk group. In cases with later-line systemic therapy, nivolumab had better survival than TKIs in the low-to-intermediate-risk subgroup, whereas TKIs had better survival in the high- to very high-risk subgroup. CONCLUSIONS ML modeling effectively subclassified patients with BCLC-C HCC, potentially aiding treatment allocation. Our study underscores the potential utilization of ML modeling in terms of prognostication and treatment allocation in patients with BCLC-C HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji W Han
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon K Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Jung H Kwon
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon W Nam
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Incheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun Yang
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Si H Bae
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Eunpyeong St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji H Kim
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | - Heechul Nam
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang W Kim
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Republic of Korea
| | - Hae L Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Hee Y Kim
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung W Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Bucheon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Bucheon, Republic of Korea
| | - Ahlim Lee
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - U I Chang
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Do S Song
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Republic of Korea
| | - Seok-Hwan Kim
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Myeong J Song
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, Republic of Korea
| | - Pil S Sung
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jong Y Choi
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seung K Yoon
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong W Jang
- The Catholic University Liver Research Center, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bellendorf A, Mader N, Mueller SP, Ezziddin S, Bockisch A, Grafe H, Best J, Goebel J, Pöppel TD, Sabet A. Safety and Efficacy of Selective Internal Radionuclide Therapy with 90Y Glass Microspheres in Patients with Progressive Hepatocellular Carcinoma after the Failure of Repeated Transarterial Chemoembolization. Pharmaceuticals (Basel) 2024; 17:101. [PMID: 38256934 PMCID: PMC10819448 DOI: 10.3390/ph17010101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) is currently the standard of care in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and selective internal radionuclide therapy (SIRT) with 90Y microspheres is mainly used as an alternative modality in patients considered poor candidates for TACE. Treatment with sorafenib is the recommended option for patients with progressive disease after TACE. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of SIRT with glass microspheres in patients with progressive HCC after repeated TACE who are not eligible for treatment with sorafenib. Forty-seven patients with progressive HCC after a median of three TACE sessions (range 2-14) underwent SIRT (3.5 ± 1.5 GBq; liver target dose 110-120 Gy). Toxicity was recorded 4 and 12 weeks after treatment and reported according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. Treatment response was assessed three months after SIRT using multiphase computed tomography and modified criteria in solid tumors (mRECIST). Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier curves and a Cox proportional hazards model for uni- and multivariate analyses. Significant but reversible hepatotoxicity (≥grade 3) occurred in five patients (11%). No radioembolization-induced liver disease (REILD) was observed. The number of previous TACE sessions and cumulative administered activity did not predict the incidence of post-SIRT significant hepatotoxicity. Treatment responses consisted of partial responses in 26 (55%), stable disease in 12 (26%), and progressive disease in 9 (19%) patients. The median overall survival (OS) was 11 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 9-13), and objective responses to SIRT were associated with a longer OS (p = 0.008). Significant hepatotoxicity (≥grade 3) after SIRT was a contributor to impaired survival (median OS 6 months (95% CI, 4-8) vs. 12 months (95% CI, 10-14), p < 0.001). SIRT with glass microspheres is a safe and effective salvage treatment for patients with progressive HCC refractory to TACE who are considered poor candidates for sorafenib treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Bellendorf
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
- MVZ Radiologie, Nuklearmedizin und Strahlentherapie Essen GmbH, Ruüttenscheider Str. 191, 45131 Essen, Germany
| | - Nicolai Mader
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| | - Stefan P. Mueller
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
| | - Samer Ezziddin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Saarland University Medical Center, Kirrberger Straße, 66421 Homburg, Germany;
| | - Andreas Bockisch
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
| | - Hong Grafe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
| | - Jan Best
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ruhr-University Bochum, In der Schornau 23-25, 44892 Bochum, Germany;
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany
| | - Juliane Goebel
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology and Neuroradiology, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany;
| | - Thorsten D. Pöppel
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
- MVZ CDT Strahleninstitut GmbH, Turiner Straße 2, 50668 Cologne, Germany
| | - Amir Sabet
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45147 Essen, Germany; (A.B.); (S.P.M.); (A.B.); (H.G.)
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Clinic for Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, Goethe University Frankfurt, Theodor-Stern-Kai 7, 60590 Frankfurt am Main, Germany;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zeng H, Zhou C, Chen X, Hu L, Su K, Guo L, Han Y. Comparison of the efficacy and safety of selective internal radiotherapy and sorafenib alone or combined for hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis. Clin Exp Med 2023; 23:2141-2150. [PMID: 36737488 PMCID: PMC10543878 DOI: 10.1007/s10238-023-00997-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/26/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is a developing technique and its efficacy and modality of application in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are still controversial. This network meta-analysis aims to determine whether the efficacy and safety of SIRT alone and in combination are superior to that of sorafenib. METHODS Four databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched before August 2022. Cochrane Randomized Trial Risk of Bias Assessment Tool and the Newcastle-Ottawa scale were used to assess the quality. The outcomes of interest included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). RESULTS A total of 9 eligible trials involving 1954 patients were included, and SIRT ranked first among the three treatment modalities in terms of both OS (probability, 52.3%) and PFS (probability, 68.6%). The combination of SIRT and sorafenib did not improve OS or PFS in patients with HCC. Although the combination of SIRT and sorafenib did not raise the risk of grade 3 or higher AEs, it may have introduced more AEs than either alone. CONCLUSIONS SIRT alone was found to be superior to sorafenib and the combination of the two in improving OS or PFS in patients with non-surgical HCC, especially in patients with combined portal vein tumor thrombus. The AEs induced by SIRT were different from those of sorafenib, but the overall toxicity was manageable, the combination of the two may cause an increase in the types of AEs that occur.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hao Zeng
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | | | - Xiaojing Chen
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Lanxin Hu
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Ke Su
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Lu Guo
- Department of Ophthalmology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China
| | - Yunwei Han
- Department of Oncology, The Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University, Luzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Hu Z, Yang Z, Wang J, Fu Y, Hu Z, Zhou Z, Chen M, Zhang Y. Survival benefit of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy followed by hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus. Front Pharmacol 2023; 14:1223632. [PMID: 37799969 PMCID: PMC10549930 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2023.1223632] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2023] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background/purpose: The prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) is generally poor and hepatectomy is optional for these patients. This study aims to explore the survival benefits of neoadjuvant hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) for resectable HCC with PVTT. Methods: This retrospective study included 120 resectable HCC patients with PVTT who underwent hepatectomy, from January 2017 to January 2021 at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. Of these patients, the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 55 patients who received hepatectomy alone (Surgery group) and 65 patients who received neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy (HAIC-Surgery group) were compared. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to develop a model predicting the response to neoadjuvant HAIC. Results: The OS rates for the HAIC-Surgery group at 1, 3, and 5 years were 94.9%, 78%, and 66.4%, respectively, compared with 84.6%, 47.6%, and 37.2% in the Surgery group (p < 0.001). The RFS rates were 88.7%, 56.2%, and 38.6% versus 84.9%, 38.3%, and 22.6% (p = 0.002). The subgroup analysis revealed that the survival benefit of neoadjuvant HAIC was limited to patients who responded to it. The logistic model, consisting of AFP and CRP, that predicted the response to neoadjuvant HAIC performed well, with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.756. Conclusion: Neoadjuvant HAIC followed by hepatectomy is associated with a longer survival outcome than hepatectomy alone for HCC patients with PVTT and the survival benefit is limited to patients who respond to neoadjuvant FOLFOX-HAIC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zili Hu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhenyun Yang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jiongliang Wang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yizhen Fu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiwen Hu
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhongguo Zhou
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Minshan Chen
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yaojun Zhang
- Department of Liver Surgery, Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, State Key Laboratory of Oncology in South China, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ballı HT, Aikimbaev K, Burak İG, Pişkin FC. Short-term changes of angiogenesis factors after transarterial radioembolization in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. Diagn Interv Radiol 2023; 29:704-709. [PMID: 36994546 PMCID: PMC10679548 DOI: 10.4274/dir.2021.211255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To analyze changes in angiogenesis factors after transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with Yttrium- 90-loaded resin microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. METHODS Interleukin-6, interleukin-8, hepatocyte growth factor, platelet-derived growth factor, fibroblast growth factor, vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A), and angiopoietin-2 levels in 26 patients were measured before TARE and on day 1, 7, 14, and 30 after TARE and evaluated regarding radiological response. RESULTS In the sixth month of follow-up, 11 (42.30%) patients had a complete or partial response to treatment, while progressive disease was found in 15 (57.69%) patients. The percentage changes in VEGF-A in the non-responders on day 30 (P = 0.034) after TARE were significantly more obvious. Peak formation rates of VEGF-A were higher in non-responders (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION Short-term changes in angiogenesis factors in HCC patients after TARE with Yttrium-90-loaded resin microspheres fluctuate with different amplitudes at different times. The upregulation of growth factors has a prognostic capacity. Changes in VEGF-A after TARE may be helpful for the early recognition of non-responders.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hüseyin Tuğsan Ballı
- Department of Radiology, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - Kairgeldy Aikimbaev
- Department of Radiology, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - İsa Güney Burak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| | - Ferhat Can Pişkin
- Department of Radiology, Çukurova University Faculty of Medicine, Balçalı Hospital Health Application and Research Center, Adana, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu X, Lokken RP, Mehta N. Optimal treatment for small HCC (<3 cm): Resection, liver transplantation, or locoregional therapy? JHEP Rep 2023; 5:100781. [PMID: 37456674 PMCID: PMC10339255 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2023.100781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains the most common form of liver cancer, accounting for 90% of all primary liver cancers. Up to 30% of HCC cases could be small (2-3 cm in diameter) at the time of diagnosis with advances in imaging techniques and surveillance programmes. Treating patients with early-stage HCC can be complex and often requires interdisciplinary care, owing to the wide and increasing variety of treatment options, which include liver resection, liver transplantation, and various locoregional therapies offered by interventional radiology and radiation oncology. Decisions regarding the optimal management strategy for a patient involve many considerations, including patient- and tumour-specific characteristics, as well as socioeconomic factors. In this review, we aim to comprehensively summarise the commonly used therapies for single, small HCC (<3 cm), with a focus on the impact of tumour size (<2 cm vs. 2-3 cm), as well as a brief discussion on the cost-effectiveness of the different treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao Wu
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ryan Peter Lokken
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- Department of General Hepatology and Liver Transplantation, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tampaki M, Papatheodoridis GV, Cholongitas E. Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Decompensated Cirrhotic Patients: A Comprehensive Overview. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:1310. [PMID: 36831651 PMCID: PMC9954723 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15041310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2023] [Revised: 02/14/2023] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary liver cancer is the sixth most common cancer and the fourth leading cause of cancer-related death. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75% of primary liver cancer cases, mostly on the basis of cirrhosis. However, the data and therapeutic options for the treatment of HCC in patients with decompensated cirrhosis are rather limited. This patient category is often considered to be in a terminal stage without the possibility of a specific treatment except liver transplantation, which is restricted by several criteria and liver donor shortages. Systemic treatments may provide a solution for patients with Child Pugh class B or C since they are less invasive. Although most of the existing trials have excluded patients with decompensated cirrhosis, there are increasing data from real-life settings that show acceptable tolerability and satisfying efficacy in terms of response. The data on the administration of locoregional treatments in such patients are also limited, but the overall survival seems to be potentially prolonged when patients are carefully selected, and close adverse event monitoring is applied. The aim of this review is to analyze the existing data regarding the administration of treatments in decompensated patients with HCC, evaluate the effect of therapy on overall survival and highlight the potential risks in terms of tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maria Tampaki
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Athens “Laiko”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - George V. Papatheodoridis
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, General Hospital of Athens “Laiko”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelos Cholongitas
- First Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital of Athens “Laiko”, Medical School, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 11527 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Salem R, Padia SA, Lam M, Chiesa C, Haste P, Sangro B, Toskich B, Fowers K, Herman JM, Kappadath SC, Leung T, Sze DY, Kim E, Garin E. Clinical, dosimetric, and reporting considerations for Y-90 glass microspheres in hepatocellular carcinoma: updated 2022 recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:328-343. [PMID: 36114872 PMCID: PMC9816298 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05956-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2022] [Accepted: 08/23/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE In light of recently published clinical reports and trials, the TheraSphere Global Dosimetry Steering Committee (DSC) reconvened to review new data and to update previously published clinical and dosimetric recommendations for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS The TheraSphere Global DSC is comprised of health care providers across multiple disciplines involved in the treatment of HCC with yttrium-90 (Y-90) glass microsphere-based transarterial radioembolization (TARE). Literature published between January 2019 and September 2021 was reviewed, discussed, and adjudicated by the Delphi method. Recommendations included in this updated document incorporate both the results of the literature review and the expert opinion and experience of members of the committee. RESULTS Committee discussion and consensus led to the expansion of recommendations to apply to five common clinical scenarios in patients with HCC to support more individualized efficacious treatment with Y-90 glass microspheres. Existing clinical scenarios were updated to reflect recent developments in dosimetry approaches and broader treatment paradigms evolving for patients presenting with HCC. CONCLUSION Updated consensus recommendations are provided to guide clinical and dosimetric approaches for the use of Y-90 glass microsphere TARE in HCC, accounting for disease presentation, tumor biology, and treatment intent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 800, Chicago, IL, USA.
| | - Siddharth A Padia
- Department of Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Carlo Chiesa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Paul Haste
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit, Clinica Universidad de Navarra and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| | - Beau Toskich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - Kirk Fowers
- Boston Scientific Corporation, Marlborough, MA, USA
| | - Joseph M Herman
- Department of Radiation Medicine, Northwell Health, New Hyde Park, NY, USA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Leung
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Daniel Y Sze
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Edward Kim
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Mount Sinai, New York City, NY, USA
| | - Etienne Garin
- INSERM, INRA, Centre de Lutte Contre Le Cancer Eugène Marquis, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition Metabolisms and Cancer), Univ Rennes, 35000, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Fang F, Qiu B, Zhen P, Wang J. Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Palliation of Main Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:882272. [PMID: 35574374 PMCID: PMC9092647 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.882272] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Hypofractionated radiotherapy delivered for portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) located in the main portal vein is rarely exploited. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy as palliative treatment for PVTT in cirrhotic patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. Methods From March 2016 to July 2020, 16 patients (mean age, 59.1 ± 6.3 years; 15 men) with hepatocellular carcinoma and hepatitis virus-related cirrhosis who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy for PVTT (located in the main portal vein) in our institute were retrospectively reviewed. Results Complete response of the PVTT was observed in 4 cases (25%) with partial response in 7 cases (43.75%) and stable disease in 5 cases (31.25%). Symptom relief was observed in all 7 patients suffering from ventosity. The median time to progression was 6 months (interquartile range, IQR: 6–12 months). Eight patients (50%) failed due to primary cancer progression, 7 patients failed due to extrahepatic metastasis, and only 1 patient failed due to PVTT progression. The median overall survival was 17.4 months (IQR: 8–25 months). Grade I/II anorexia/nausea was observed in 14 patients (87.5%) and Grade I/II leukopenia was observed in 14 patients (87.5%). No complications ≥ Grade III were observed. Conclusions Hypofractionated radiotherapy as palliative treatment appears effective and safe for PVTT located in the main portal vein in cirrhotic patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, yielding a high rate of tumor response. Further study is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Fang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chifeng Tumor Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Bin Qiu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Zhen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Chifeng Tumor Hospital, Chifeng, China
| | - Junjie Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
D'Avola D, Granito A, Torre-Aláez MDL, Piscaglia F. The importance of liver functional reserve in the non-surgical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2022; 76:1185-1198. [PMID: 34793869 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2021] [Accepted: 11/05/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The aim of any oncological treatment is not just to eliminate the tumour, but to maximise patient survival and quality of life. Since the liver has a vital function, any radical treatment that severely compromises liver function will result in a shortening of life expectancy, rather than a prolongation. Furthermore, even non-severe liver damage may prevent the delivery of further effective therapies. This is particularly important in the case of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), as it is associated with underlying cirrhosis in most patients - cirrhosis itself is not only a potentially lethal disease and independent prognostic factor in HCC, but it also makes liver function fragile. Accordingly, some information about liver dysfunction is included in most staging systems for HCC and can be used to guide the selection of treatments that the functional liver reserve can tolerate. Unfortunately, the prediction of functional damage to the liver in the case of antitumor treatments is very challenging and still suboptimal in any given patient. Moreover, while the assessment of functional reserve can now be used to avoid postoperative liver failure in the surgical setting, its use has been less well clarified for non-surgical therapies, which is of particular relevance today, as several lines of effective non-surgical treatments, including systemic therapies, have become available. The present article will a) critically review the implications of the assessment of liver functional reserve in patients with HCC, b) illustrate the available tools to assess liver functional reserve and c) discuss the role of functional assessment for each type of non-surgical therapy for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Delia D'Avola
- Liver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona and Madrid, Spain; Centro de Investigación Bio Medica en Red de Enfermedades Hepáticas y Digestivas (Ciberehd), Pamplona, Spain
| | - Alessandro Granito
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy
| | - Manuel de la Torre-Aláez
- Liver Unit, Internal Medicine Department, Clinica Universidad de Navarra, Pamplona and Madrid, Spain
| | - Fabio Piscaglia
- Division of Internal Medicine, Hepatobiliary and Immunoallergic Diseases, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Italy; Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Bologna, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Facciorusso A, Paolillo R, Tartaglia N, Ramai D, Mohan BP, Cotsoglou C, Chandan S, Ambrosi A, Bargellini I, Renzulli M, Sacco R. Efficacy of combined transarterial radioembolization and sorafenib in the treatment of hepatocarcinoma: A meta-analysis. Dig Liver Dis 2022; 54:316-323. [PMID: 34193367 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/07/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant sorafenib may further enhance the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. AIMS To evaluate the efficacy and safety of radioembolization plus sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. METHODS With a literature search through October 2020, we identified 9 studies (632 patients). Primary outcome was overall survival. Results were expressed as pooled median, odds ratio, or hazard ratio and 95% confidence intervals. RESULTS Pooled overall survival after radioembolization plus sorafenib was 10.79 months (95% confidence interval 9.19-12.39) and it was longer in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B (14.47 months, 9.07-19.86) as compared to BCLC C patients (10.22 months, 7.53-12.9). No difference between combined therapy versus radioembolization alone was observed in terms of overall survival (hazard ratio 1.07, 0.89-1.30). Pooled median progression-free survival was 6.32 months (5.68-6.98), with 1-year progression-free survival pooled rate of 38.5% (12.7%-44.2%). No difference in progression-free survival (hazard ratio 0.94, 0.79-1.12) between the two treatments was observed. Pooled rate of severe adverse events was 48.9% (26.7%-71.2%), again with no difference between the two treatment regimens (odds ratio 1.52, 0.15-15.02). CONCLUSIONS The association of sorafenib does not seem to prolong survival nor delay disease progression in patients treated with radioembolization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy.
| | - Rosa Paolillo
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Nicola Tartaglia
- Surgical Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Daryl Ramai
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Brooklyn Hospital Center, Brooklyn, NY, United States
| | - Babu P Mohan
- Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Utah Health, Salt Lake City, UT, United States
| | | | - Saurabh Chandan
- Division of Gastroenterology, CHI Creighton University Medical Center, Omaha, NE, United States
| | - Antonio Ambrosi
- Surgical Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa 56124, Italy
| | - Matteo Renzulli
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Gastroenterology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia 71122, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Guiu B, Garin E, Allimant C, Edeline J, Salem R. TARE in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: From the Right to the Left of BCLC. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2022; 45:1599-1607. [PMID: 35149884 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-022-03072-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 01/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) system is the most commonly used staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Western countries. BCLC aims to categorize patients into five stages with different prognoses and to allocate treatment according to these stages based on the best possible contemporary evidence. Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has recently entered at the left of the BCLC algorithm (i.e., BCLC 0-A), mainly because of negative phase III trials in BCLC C stage. TARE has shown a steady increase in nationwide studies over the past 20 years and has even been adopted in some tertiary centers as the primary HCC treatment across all BCLC stages. We aimed to review the history of TARE in HCC, starting from advanced HCC and gradually expanding to earlier stages at the left of the BCLC system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boris Guiu
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier, France.
| | - Etienne Garin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Carole Allimant
- Department of Radiology, St-Eloi University Hospital, 80 Avenue Augustin Fliche, 34295, Montpellier, France
| | - Julien Edeline
- Department of Oncology, Centre de Lutte Contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, 35000, Rennes, France
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mabey JG, Cornman-Homonoff J, Madoff DC. Balloon-assisted radioembolization via the proper hepatic artery to treat a left liver hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus with an inaccessible left hepatic artery: A case report. Clin Imaging 2022; 82:244-250. [PMID: 34920388 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2021.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2021] [Revised: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 11/22/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Although yttrium-90 (90Y) transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is an effective treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), inability to cannulate tumor-feeding vessels can preclude its use. In this case we demonstrate the feasibility of employing balloon occlusion within the proper hepatic artery to treat a left lobar HCC and PVTT with an inaccessible left hepatic artery. Vessel angulation prevented subselection of the left hepatic artery, and subsequent mapping studies indicated significant non-target radiotracer activity. Through occlusion of the proper hepatic artery by a balloon microcatheter, flow alterations were created that led to uptake of the 90Y microspheres by the tumor while sparing the non-diseased liver parenchyma. Thus, this innovative approach may permit the use of TARE in patients when proximal tumor vessels are inaccessible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob G Mabey
- Department of Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joshua Cornman-Homonoff
- Department of Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - David C Madoff
- Department of Radiology, Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Section of Interventional Radiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA; Department of Internal Medicine, Section of Medical Oncology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Ricke J, Schinner R, Seidensticker M, Gasbarrini A, van Delden OM, Amthauer H, Peynircioglu B, Bargellini I, Iezzi R, De Toni EN, Malfertheiner P, Pech M, Sangro B. Liver function after combined selective internal radiation therapy or sorafenib monotherapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. J Hepatol 2021; 75:1387-1396. [PMID: 34454995 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2021.07.037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2021] [Revised: 07/09/2021] [Accepted: 07/29/2021] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS SORAMIC is a previously published randomised controlled trial assessing survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who received sorafenib with or without selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT). Based on the per-protocol (PP) population, we assessed whether the outcome of patients receiving SIRT+sorafenib vs. sorafenib alone was affected by adverse effects of SIRT on liver function. METHODS The PP population consisted of 109 (SIRT+sorafenib) vs. 173 patients (sorafenib alone). Comparisons were made between subgroups who achieved a significant survival benefit or trend towards improved survival with SIRT and the inverse group without a survival benefit: <65 years-old vs. ≥65 years-old, Child-Pugh 5 vs. 6, no transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) vs. prior TACE, no cirrhosis vs. cirrhosis, non-alcohol- vs. alcohol-related aetiology. The albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) score was used to monitor liver function over time during follow-up. RESULTS ALBI scores increased in all patient groups during follow-up. In the PP population, ALBI score increases were higher in the SIRT+sorafenib than the sorafenib arm (p = 0.0021 month 4, p <0.0001 from month 6). SIRT+sorafenib conferred a survival benefit compared to sorafenib alone in patients aged <65 years-old, those without cirrhosis, those with Child-Pugh 5, and those who had not received TACE. A higher increase in ALBI score was observed in the inverse subgroups in whom survival was not improved by adding SIRT (age ≥65 years-old, p <0.05; cirrhosis, p = 0.07; Child-Pugh 6, p <0.05; prior TACE, p = 0.08). CONCLUSION SIRT frequently has a negative, often subclinical, effect on liver function in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, which may impair prognosis after treatment. Careful patient selection for SIRT as well as prevention of clinical and subclinical liver damage by selective treatments, high tumour uptake ratio, and medical prophylaxis could translate into better efficacy. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER EudraCT 2009-012576-27, NCT01126645 LAY SUMMARY: This study of treatments in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma found that selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) has an adverse effect on liver function that may affect patient outcomes. Patients should be carefully selected before they undergo SIRT and the treatment technique should be optimised for maximum protection of non-target liver parenchyma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jens Ricke
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany.
| | - Regina Schinner
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Max Seidensticker
- Department of Radiology, Ludwig Maximilan University Munich, München, Germany
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Medicina interna e gastroenterologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Otto M van Delden
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Holger Amthauer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, UOC di Radiologia, Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Roma, Italy
| | - Enrico N De Toni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Department of Radiology and Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maciej Pech
- Departments of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - Bruno Sangro
- Liver Unit and HPB Oncology Area, Clinica Universidad de Navarra-IDISNA and CIBEREHD, Pamplona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Blaise L, Pereira H, Vilgrain V, Sutter O, Gigante E, Walter A, Ganne-Carrié N, Nahon P, Bouattour M, Dioguardi Burgio M, Grando V, Nkontchou G, Seror O, Nault JC. Percutaneous ablation for locally advanced hepatocellular carcinoma with tumor portal invasion. Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 2021; 45:101731. [PMID: 34139320 DOI: 10.1016/j.clinre.2021.101731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2021] [Revised: 05/27/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We aim to assess the outcomes of percutaneous ablation of locally advanced HCC in a tertiary center, which is usually not indicated. We compared to sorafenib or trans-arterial radioembolization (TARE). METHODS We included 272 patients with HCC and tumor portal invasion treated by percutaneous ablation (n = 44) assessed retrospectively from one center compared to a control group from the SARAH trial including patients treated with sorafenib (n = 123) or TARE (n = 105). A propensity-score matching was performed in a subgroup of patients with similar baselines characteristics. RESULTS 84% of patients treated by ablation were male with a unique nodule (median size 50 mm) in 72.7% of the case. Complete tumor ablation was achieved in 75% of the patients with 20% Dindo-Clavien III-V adverse events including 6.8% of 90-days mortality. Sum of tumor size ≥70 mm was associated with incomplete ablation (p = 0.0239) and a higher risk of death (p = 0.0375). Patients in control group had a higher tumor burden, and more Vp3/4 compared to ablation group. Median overall survival was similar in the ablation and in the control group (16.4 and 14.0 months respectively, p = 0.48). The median progression-free survival was 6.6 months in ablation group compared to 4.2 months in the control group (p = 0.12). CONCLUSION Percutaneous ablation for locally advanced HCC was feasible and associated with similar long-term outcomes to sorafenib or TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lorraine Blaise
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Helena Pereira
- Hôpital Européen Georges-Pompidou, Unité de Recherche Clinique, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France; INSERM, Centre d'Investigation Clinique 1418 (CIC1418), Paris, France
| | - Valérie Vilgrain
- Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France; Université de Paris et CRI, INSERM 1149, F-75018, Paris, France
| | - Olivier Sutter
- Unité de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Elia Gigante
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Aurélie Walter
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Nathalie Ganne-Carrié
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France; Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris, INSERM UMR 1138 Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Nahon
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France; Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris, INSERM UMR 1138 Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France
| | - Mohamed Bouattour
- Service d'Oncologie Digestive et Médicale, Hôpital Beaujon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France
| | - Marco Dioguardi Burgio
- Service de Radiologie, Hôpital Beaujon, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris Nord Val de Seine, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Clichy, France; Université de Paris et CRI, INSERM 1149, F-75018, Paris, France
| | - Véronique Grando
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Gisèle Nkontchou
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France
| | - Olivier Seror
- Unité de Radiologie Interventionnelle, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France; Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris, INSERM UMR 1138 Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France.
| | - Jean-Charles Nault
- Service d'Hépatologie, Hôpital Avicenne, Hôpitaux Universitaires Paris-Seine-Saint-Denis, Assistance-Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Bobigny, France; Unité de Formation et de Recherche Santé Médecine et Biologie Humaine, Université Paris 13, Paris, France; Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, Sorbonne Université, Université Paris, INSERM UMR 1138 Functional Genomics of Solid Tumors laboratory, F-75006, Paris, France.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Kim GH, Kim JH, Kim PH, Chu HH, Gwon DI, Ko HK. Emerging Trends in the Treatment of Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Radiological Perspective. Korean J Radiol 2021; 22:1822-1833. [PMID: 34431250 PMCID: PMC8546136 DOI: 10.3348/kjr.2021.0229] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Revised: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 06/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
This is a narrative review of various treatment modalities for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a focus on recent updates in radiological treatments, as well as novel treatment concepts related to immune checkpoint inhibitors and combination therapies with locoregional treatments. Interventional radiologists have made efforts toward developing alternative and/or combination treatments for first-line systemic treatment of patients with advanced HCC. Locoregional treatments with or without systemic therapy may be considered in the selected patients. Various treatment modalities for advanced HCC are emerging, and several randomized controlled trials, including those of combination treatments with immunotherapy, are ongoing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gun Ha Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Hyoung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Pyeong Hwa Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hee Ho Chu
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Il Gwon
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Heung-Kyu Ko
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Swersky A, Kulik L, Kalyan A, Grace K, Caicedo JC, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. Contemporary Algorithm for the Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2021: The Northwestern Approach. Semin Intervent Radiol 2021; 38:432-437. [PMID: 34629710 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1735528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer and a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality around the world. Frequently, concurrent liver dysfunction and variations in tumor burden make it difficult to design effective and standardized treatment pathways. Contemporary treatment guidelines designed for an era of personalized medicine should consider these features in a more clinically meaningful way to improve outcomes for patients across the HCC spectrum. Given the heterogeneity of HCC, we propose a detailed clinical algorithm for selecting optimal treatment using an evidence-based and practical approach, incorporating liver function, tumor burden, the extent of disease, and ultimate treatment intent, with the goal of individualizing clinical decision making.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam Swersky
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Laura Kulik
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Aparna Kalyan
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Karen Grace
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Juan Carlos Caicedo
- Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Riad Salem
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Northwestern Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Miller FH, Lopes Vendrami C, Gabr A, Horowitz JM, Kelahan LC, Riaz A, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Evolution of Radioembolization in Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Pictorial Review. Radiographics 2021; 41:1802-1818. [PMID: 34559587 DOI: 10.1148/rg.2021210014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) with yttrium 90 has increasingly been performed to treat hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). TARE was historically used as a palliative lobar therapy for patients with advanced HCC beyond surgical options, ablation, or transarterial chemoembolization, but recent advancements have led to its application across the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer staging paradigm. Newer techniques, termed radiation lobectomy and radiation segmentectomy, are being performed before liver resection to facilitate hypertrophy of the future liver remnant, before liver transplant to bridge or downstage to transplant, or as a definite curative treatment. Imaging assessment of therapeutic response to TARE is challenging as the intent of TARE is to deliver local high-dose radiation to tumors through microembolic microspheres, preserving blood flow to promote radiation injury to the tumor. Because of the microembolic nature, early imaging assessment after TARE cannot rely solely on changes in size. Knowledge of the evolving methods of TARE along with the tools to assess posttreatment imaging and response is essential to optimize TARE as a therapeutic option for patients with HCC. ©RSNA, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank H Miller
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Camila Lopes Vendrami
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Ahmed Gabr
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Jeanne M Horowitz
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Linda C Kelahan
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Ahsun Riaz
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Riad Salem
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- From the Department of Radiology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, 676 N St. Clair St, Ste 800, Chicago, IL 60611
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Kim SJ, Kim JM. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis. JOURNAL OF LIVER CANCER 2021; 21:105-112. [PMID: 37383081 PMCID: PMC10035684 DOI: 10.17998/jlc.2021.03.17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Revised: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 03/17/2021] [Indexed: 06/30/2023]
Abstract
Traditionally, liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis is not recommended. However, with recent developments in locoregional therapies for hepatocellular carcinoma, more aggressive treatments have been attempted for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Recently, various studies on locoregional therapies for downstaging followed by living donor liver transplantation reported inspiring overall survival and recurrence-free survival of patients. These downstaging procedures included three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, trans-arterial chemoembolization, stereotactic body radiation therapy, trans-arterial radioembolization, hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and combinations of these therapies. Selection of the optimal downstaging protocol should depend on tumor location, biology and background liver status. The risk factors affecting outcome include pre-downstaging alpha-fetoprotein values, delta alpha-fetoprotein values, disappearance of portal vein tumor thrombosis on imaging and meeting the Milan criteria or not after downstaging. For hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombosis, downstaging procedure with liver transplantation in mind would be helpful. If the reaction of the downstaged tumor is good, liver transplantation may be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sang Jin Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliopancreas and Transplant Surgery, Korea University Ansan Hospital, Ansan, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Man Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Shehta A, Lee JM, Suh KS, Kim HC, Hong SK, Cho JH, Yi NJ, Lee KW. Bridging and downstaging role of trans-arterial radio-embolization for expected small remnant volume before liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2020; 24:421-430. [PMID: 33234744 PMCID: PMC7691198 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2020.24.4.421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims To evaluate our initial experience of bridging role of trans-arterial radio-embolization (TARE) before major hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in risky patients with small expected remnant liver volume (ERLV). Methods We reviewed the data of patients with HCC who underwent major hepatectomy after TARE during the period between March and December 2017. Patients included had uni-lobar large HCC (>5 cm) requiring major hepatectomy with small ERLV. Results Five patients were included in our study. All patients were Child Pugh class A. A single session of TARE was applied in all patients. None developed any adverse events related to irradiation. The mean tumor size at baseline was 8.4 cm and 6.1 cm after TARE (p=0.077). The mean % of tumor shrinkage was 24.5%. ERLV improved from 354.6 ml at baseline to 500.8 ml after TARE (p=0.012). ERLV percentage improved from 27.2% at baseline to 38.1% after TARE (p=0.004). The mean % of ERLV was 39.5%. The mean interval time between TARE and resection was 99.6 days. Four patients (80%) underwent right hemi-hepatectomy and one patient (20%) underwent extended right hemi-hepatectomy. The mean operation time was 151 minutes, and mean blood loss was 56 ml. The mean hospital stay was 13.8 days, and one patient (20%) developed postoperative morbidity. After a mean follow-up of 15 months, all patients were alive with no recurrence. Conclusions Yttrium-90 TARE can play a bridging role before major hepatectomy for borderline resectable HCC in risky patients with small ERLV.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Shehta
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Liver Transplantation Unit, Gastrointestinal Surgery Center, College of Medicine, Mansoura University, Mansoura, Egypt
| | - Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo-Cheol Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Suk Kyun Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae-Hyung Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Seidensticker M, Schütte K, Seidensticker R, Mühlmann M, Schulz C. Multi-modal and sequential treatment of liver cancer and its impact on the gastrointestinal tract. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 2020; 48-49:101709. [PMID: 33317790 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpg.2020.101709] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/06/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
Hepatic tumors include hepatocellular cancer (HCC) and cholangiocarcinoma (CC), a small subgroup of tumors (approx. 1%) are classified as combined hepatocellularcholangiocellular carcinomas. Different stage-dependent therapeutic approaches comprise resection, local ablative techniques, locoregional therapies, systemic treatment, liver transplantation in selected cases and possible combination of these treatment modalities. This review summarizes current knowledge on multi-modal treatment strategies for liver cancer focusing on gastrointestinal side effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Max Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany.
| | - Kerstin Schütte
- Department of Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Niels-Stensen-Kliniken, Marienhospital, Osnabrück, Germany
| | - Ricarda Seidensticker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Marc Mühlmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Radiologie, Klinikum der Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Schulz
- Medical Department II, University Hospital, LMU, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Ghosn M, Derbel H, Kharrat R, Oubaya N, Mulé S, Chalaye J, Regnault H, Amaddeo G, Itti E, Luciani A, Kobeiter H, Tacher V. Prediction of overall survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma treated with Y-90 radioembolization by imaging response criteria. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 102:35-44. [PMID: 33012693 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.09.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2020] [Revised: 08/20/2020] [Accepted: 09/07/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the potential of imaging criteria in predicting overall survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after a first transcatheter arterial yttrium-90 radioembolization (TARE) MATERIALS AND METHODS: From October 2013 to July 2017, 37 patients with HCC were retrospectively included. There were 34 men and 3 women with a mean age of 60.5±10.2 (SD) years (range: 32.7-78.9 years). Twenty-five patients (68%) were Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) C and 12 (32%) were BCLC B. Twenty-four primary index tumors (65%) were>5cm. Three radiologists evaluated tumor response on pre- and 4-7 months post-TARE magnetic resonance imaging or computed tomography examinations, using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1, modified RECIST (mRECIST), European Association for Study of the Liver (EASL), volumetric RECIST (vRECIST), quantitative EASL (qEASL) and the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System treatment response algorithm. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to compare responders and non-responders for each criterion. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard ratio (HR) analysis were used to identify covariates associated with overall survival. Fleiss kappa test was used to assess interobserver agreement. RESULTS At multivariate analysis, RECIST 1.1 (HR: 0.26; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.09-0.75; P=0.01), mRECIST (HR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.08-0.59; P=0.003), EASL (HR: 0.22; 95% CI: 0.07-0.63; P=0.005), and qEASL (HR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.12-0.80; P=0.02) showed a significant difference in overall survival between responders and nonresponders. RECIST 1.1 had the highest interobserver reproducibility. CONCLUSION RECIST and mRECIST seem to be the best compromise between reproducibility and ability to predict overall survival in patients with HCC treated with TARE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Ghosn
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France.
| | - H Derbel
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Unité Inserm 955, équipe 18, IMRB, University of Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - R Kharrat
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - N Oubaya
- Public Health Department, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - S Mulé
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Unité Inserm 955, équipe 18, IMRB, University of Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - J Chalaye
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du-Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - H Regnault
- Department of Hepatology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Unité Inserm 955, équipe 18, IMRB, University of Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - G Amaddeo
- Department of Hepatology, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Unité Inserm 955, équipe 18, IMRB, University of Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - E Itti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du-Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - A Luciani
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Unité Inserm 955, équipe 18, IMRB, University of Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - H Kobeiter
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Unité Inserm 955, Équipe 8, IMRB, University of Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| | - V Tacher
- Department of Medical Imaging, Henri-Mondor Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, 51, avenue du Maréchal-de-Lattre-de-Tassigny, 94010 Créteil, France; Unité Inserm 955, équipe 18, IMRB, University of Paris Est Créteil, 94010 Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lee JM, Lee KW, Kim HC, Yi NJ, Suh KS. No touch isolation technique for the prevention of postoperative recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma after liver transplantation-combined with trans-arterial radioembolization. Surg Oncol 2020; 35:189-190. [PMID: 32890956 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2020.08.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/06/2019] [Revised: 05/06/2020] [Accepted: 08/19/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is recently emerging treatment modality using radiation from Yttrium-90 through the transarterial approach. It usually is used in the intermediate stage and unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). No touch isolation technique is a way to prevent the spread of tumors by pre-ligating the vessels around the tumor with minimal touch during surgery. We hoped that if we were to use these techniques, we would be able to control all viable tumors before liver transplantation. Then we could get better outcomes even in the advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients. METHODS We performed living donor liver transplantation using no touch isolation technique in the patients who had multinodular hepatocellular carcinoma and extremely high AFP, PIVKA-II level after TARE and conventional TACE. RESULTS 36 years old female patient had liver cirrhosis with hepatitis B virus infection and multiple hepatocellular carcinoma in both lobes. Hepatologist decided to do TARE and additional conventional TACE for viable tumors. After that treatment, AFP and PIVKA-II level were dramatically decreased, we decided to proceed of living donor liver transplantation because the patient's treatment response was extremely good. CONCLUSIONS No touch isolation technique combined with TARE for recipient hepatectomy might be helpful in advanced stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeong-Moo Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kwang-Woong Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Hyo-Cheol Kim
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Nam-Joon Yi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Kyung-Suk Suh
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Piñero F, Tanno M, Aballay Soteras G, Tisi Baña M, Dirchwolf M, Fassio E, Ruf A, Mengarelli S, Borzi S, Fernández N, Ridruejo E, Descalzi V, Anders M, Mazzolini G, Reggiardo V, Marciano S, Perazzo F, Spina JC, McCormack L, Maraschio M, Lagues C, Gadano A, Villamil F, Silva M, Cairo F, Ameigeiras B. Argentinian clinical practice guideline for surveillance, diagnosis, staging and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Ann Hepatol 2020; 19:546-569. [PMID: 32593747 DOI: 10.1016/j.aohep.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 06/05/2020] [Accepted: 06/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The A.A.E.E.H has developed this guideline for the best care of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from Argentina. It was done from May 2018 to March 2020. Specific clinical research questions were systematically searched. The quality of evidence and level of recommendations were organized according to GRADE. HCC surveillance is strongly recommended with abdominal ultrasound (US) every six months in the population at risk for HCC (cirrhosis, hepatitis B or hepatitis C); it is suggested to add alpha-feto protein (AFP) levels in case of inexeperienced sonographers. Imaging diagnosis in patients at risk for HCC has high specificity and tumor biopsy is not mandatory. The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer algorithm is strongly recommended for HCC staging and treatment-decision processes. Liver resection is strongly recommended for patients without portal hypertension and preserved liver function. Composite models are suggested for liver transplant selection criteria. Therapies for HCC with robust clinical evidence include transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and first to second line systemic treatment options (sorafenib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, cabozantinib and ramucirumab). Immunotherapy with nivolumab and pembrolizumab has failed to show statistical benefit but the novel combination of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab has recently shown survival benefit over sorafenib in frontline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Federico Piñero
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina.
| | - Mario Tanno
- Hospital Centenario de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | | | - Matías Tisi Baña
- Internal Medicine and Epidemiology Department, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Andrés Ruf
- Hospital Privado de Rosario, Santa Fe, Argentina
| | | | - Silvia Borzi
- Instituto Rossi, La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | - Ezequiel Ridruejo
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina; Centro de Educación Médica e Investigaciones Clínicas (CEMIC), Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Guillermo Mazzolini
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Cecilia Lagues
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | | - Marcelo Silva
- Hepatology and Liver Unit, Hospital Universitario Austral, School of Medicine, Austral University, B1629HJ Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gabr A, Entezari P, Riaz A, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Contemporary Techniques and Applications of Radioembolization in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.yacr.2020.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
|
27
|
Facciorusso A, Bargellini I, Cela M, Cincione I, Sacco R. Comparison between Y90 Radioembolization Plus Sorafenib and Y90 Radioembolization alone in the Treatment of Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Propensity Score Analysis. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:897. [PMID: 32272656 PMCID: PMC7226318 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12040897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2020] [Revised: 04/05/2020] [Accepted: 04/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adjuvant sorafenib may enhance the efficacy of transarterial radioembolization with yttrium-90 in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of radioembolization plus sorafenib in comparison to radioembolization alone. METHODS Out of 175 hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients treated with radioembolization between 2011 and 2018, after propensity score matching, two groups were compared: a group of 45 patients that underwent radioembolization while being on sorafenib (Group 1) and a second group of 90 patients that underwent radioembolization alone (Group 2). RESULTS Baseline characteristics of the two groups were well balanced concerning liver function and tumor burden. No significant differences in survival outcomes were identified (median overall survival 10 vs. 10 months; p = 0.711), median progression-free survival 6 vs. 7 months (p = 0.992) in Group 1 and Group 2). The objective response rate in Group 1 vs. Group 2 was 45.5% vs. 42.8% (p = 1) according to mRECIST. No differences in toxicity nor in liver decompensation rates were registered. CONCLUSIONS The association of sorafenib does not prolong survival nor delay progression in patients treated with radioembolization. Liver toxicity does not differ among the two therapeutic schemes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Facciorusso
- Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy; (M.C.); (R.S.)
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Pisa University Hospital, 56124 Pisa, Italy;
| | - Marina Cela
- Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy; (M.C.); (R.S.)
| | - Ivan Cincione
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Foggia, 711000 Foggia, Italy;
| | - Rodolfo Sacco
- Gastroenterology Unit, University of Foggia, 71100 Foggia, Italy; (M.C.); (R.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Embolization with microspheres alone for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor: analysis of outcome and liver function at disease progression. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:588-594. [PMID: 31474455 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.08.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/16/2019] [Revised: 07/08/2019] [Accepted: 08/07/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This retrospective study reviews long-term outcome of hepatic artery embolization (HAE) using microspheres alone in patients presenting with Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor (PVT). METHODS From 2005 to 2015, 43 patients with HCC and PVT underwent HAE. Response to treatment, time-to-progression (TTP), local-tumor-progression (LTP), distant-hepatic-progression (DHP), PVT-progression (PVTP), and/or the development of extra-hepatic progression (EHP) were assessed on pre-HAE CT/MRI scans, within 4 weeks post-HAE and at quarterly intervals thereafter, along with liver function (Child-Pugh score, CP). RESULTS Forty (40/43) patients progressed during a median follow-up of 10 months with a median TTP of 2.9 months. Eleven of the 40 patients (27.5%) developed EHP, with only 2 patients (5%) demonstrating solely LTP. Six patients (15%) developed PVTP only. At progression, 27 patients (27/40, 77%) maintained their initial CP status, including all 5 CP-B patients. Median survival was 12.5 (95% CI 8-23) months for the entire group; 17.3 (95% CI 10-33) months for the patients with segmental/lobar PVT, compared with 8.4 (95% CI 6-13) months for the patients with main PVT (p = 0.02). CONCLUSION HAE can be used to treat patients with HCC and PVT with median survival of approximately a year and preserved liver function.
Collapse
|
29
|
Jeyarajah DR, Doyle MBM, Espat NJ, Hansen PD, Iannitti DA, Kim J, Thambi-Pillai T, Visser BC. Role of yttrium-90 selective internal radiation therapy in the treatment of liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer: an evidence-based expert consensus algorithm. J Gastrointest Oncol 2020; 11:443-460. [PMID: 32399284 DOI: 10.21037/jgo.2020.01.09] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Surgical resection of colorectal liver metastases is associated with greater survival compared with non-surgical treatment, and a meaningful possibility of cure. However, the majority of patients are not eligible for resection and may require other non-surgical interventions, such as liver-directed therapies, to be converted to surgical eligibility. Given the number of available therapies, a general framework is needed that outlines the specific roles of chemotherapy, surgery, and locoregional treatments [including selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) with Y-90 microspheres]. Using a data-driven, modified Delphi process, an expert panel of surgical oncologists, transplant surgeons, and hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) surgeons convened to create a comprehensive, evidence-based treatment algorithm that includes appropriate treatment options for patients stratified by their eligibility for surgical treatment. The group coined a novel, more inclusive phrase for targeted locoregional tumor treatment (a blanket term for resection, ablation, and other emerging locoregional treatments): local parenchymal tumor destruction therapy. The expert panel proposed new nomenclature for 3 distinct disease categories of liver-dominant metastatic colorectal cancer that is consistent with other tumor types: (I) surgically treatable (resectable); (II) surgically untreatable (borderline resectable); (III) advanced surgically untreatable (unresectable) disease. Patients may present at any point in the algorithm and move between categories depending on their response to therapy. The broad intent of therapy is to transition patients toward individualized treatments where possible, given the survival advantage that resection offers in the context of a comprehensive treatment plan. This article reviews what is known about the role of SIRT with Y-90 as neoadjuvant, definitive, or palliative therapy in these different clinical situations and provides insight into when treatment with SIRT with Y-90 may be appropriate and useful, organized into distinct treatment algorithm steps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - N Joseph Espat
- Department of Surgery, Roger Williams Medical Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Providence, RI, USA
| | - Paul D Hansen
- HPB Surgery, Providence Portland Center, Portland, OR, USA
| | - David A Iannitti
- HPB Surgery, Atrium Health, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, NC, USA
| | - Joseph Kim
- Department of Surgery, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Thavam Thambi-Pillai
- Department of Surgery, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA
| | - Brendan C Visser
- Department of Surgery, Stanford University Medical Center, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for BCLC Stage C Hepatocellular Carcinoma Comparing Child-Pugh A Versus B7 Patients: Are the Outcomes Equivalent? Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43:721-731. [PMID: 32140840 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-020-02434-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2019] [Accepted: 02/14/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization outcomes across Child-Pugh scores in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). MATERIALS AND METHODS From April 2005 to December 2018, 106 consecutive patients with BCLC Stage C HCC who underwent Y90 radioembolization were retrospectively analyzed. Exclusion criteria included additional malignancy (n = 7), death unrelated to liver disease (n = 2), metastases (n = 2), or lack of follow-up data (n = 4). Ninety-one patients were analyzed. Overall survival (OS) was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between groups with the log-rank test. Cox regression modeling was used to evaluate the prognostic factors for survival. RESULTS Mean age was 63 years and 85.7% were male. HCV infection was the most common etiology of liver disease (58.2%). Sixty-four (70.3%) patients were Child-Pugh A, 19 (20.9%) patients were B7, and eight (8.8%) patients were B8-9. Median OS after radioembolization was 20.2 [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.0-27.4], 6.0 (95% CI 4.4-7.6), and 5.5 (95% CI 2.5-8.5) months for Child-Pugh A, B7, and B8/9 groups, respectively (P < 0.001 for B7 vs. A; P = 0.537 for B7 vs. B8/9). The multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score (P < 0.001), Child-Pugh class (P = 0.005), tumor morphology pattern (P = 0.012), and Y90 delivery location (P = 0.020) were significant independent predictors of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS Outcomes from Y90 for BCLC C HCC for Child-Pugh B7 patients were equivalent to B8/9 patients and significantly worse compared to Child-Pugh A patients. Although further research is warranted, these results suggest continued cautious patient selection for radioembolization in advanced HCC.
Collapse
|
31
|
Cardarelli-Leite L, Chung J, Klass D, Marquez V, Chou F, Ho S, Walton H, Lim H, Tae Wan Kim P, Hadjivassiliou A, Liu DM. Ablative Transarterial Radioembolization Improves Survival in Patients with HCC and Portal Vein Tumor Thrombus. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2020; 43:411-422. [PMID: 31909439 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-019-02404-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2019] [Accepted: 12/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus have a poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. We sought to compare survival, tolerability, and safety in such patients treated with conventional yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization dosimetric techniques or ablative transarterial radioembolization. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective, single-center cohort study included patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and right, left, and/or main portal vein tumor thrombus, preserved liver function (Child-Pugh class ≤ B7), and good performance status (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score ≤ 1) treated with yttrium-90 microspheres from 2011 to 2018 with ablative intent transarterial radioembolization (A-TARE), or conventional technique (cTARE). Statistical models were used to compare overall survival, post-treatment survival, toxicities, and prognosticators of response. RESULTS Fifty-seven patients were included (21 [36.8%] ablative and 36 [63.2%] conventional intent). Median overall survival was 15.7 months. Compared to conventional treatment, ablative radioembolization was associated with longer median overall survival (45.3 vs 18.2 months; P = 0.003), longer post-treatment survival (19.1 vs 4.9 months; P = 0.005), a 70% lower risk of death (hazard ratio 0.30; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.70; P = 0.005), and improved 4-year survival (53.9% vs 11.2%). Overall survival did not differ significantly between treatment with resin and glass microspheres (27.5 vs 22.2 months; P = 0.62). Acceptable hepatic toxicities were observed after yttrium-90 administration, without statistical differences between the groups. CONCLUSION In patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumor thrombus, A-TARE is associated with longer survival than cTARE. Neither modality is associated with deleterious effects on liver function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leandro Cardarelli-Leite
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada.
| | - John Chung
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Darren Klass
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Vladimir Marquez
- Division of Gastroenterology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Frank Chou
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Stephen Ho
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Henry Walton
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Howard Lim
- British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter Tae Wan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Anastasia Hadjivassiliou
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - David M Liu
- Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, 855 W 12th Ave, JP Pavilion G873, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Lu J, Zhang XP, Zhong BY, Lau WY, Madoff DC, Davidson JC, Qi X, Cheng SQ, Teng GJ. Management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and portal vein tumour thrombosis: comparing east and west. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019; 4:721-730. [PMID: 31387735 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-1253(19)30178-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 125] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2019] [Revised: 04/07/2019] [Accepted: 04/08/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Portal vein tumour thrombosis is common among patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma. Tremendous differences exist in the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis between the east and the west, which derive from heterogeneities in its epidemiology, causes, pathology, comorbidities, prognosis, and other demographics. These divergences between the east and the west are not only caused by hepatocellular carcinoma itself, but are also affected by many variables including social factors, physician preferences, accessibility to costly or novel treatments, and reimbursement schemes. In this Review, we compare and contrast the management of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumour thrombosis in the east and in the west in terms of systemic and surgical treatments, radiotherapy, transcatheter arterial therapies, and portal vein revascularisation. We conclude that a personalised, data-driven approach to care with active management from a multidisciplinary team, as well as increased communication and collaboration between clinicians and researchers based in east and the west, could help to reduce the differences in management and optimise treatment strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian Lu
- Centre of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
| | - Xiu-Ping Zhang
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Bin-Yan Zhong
- Department of Interventional Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China
| | - Wan Yee Lau
- Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Prince of Wales Hospital, Shatin, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - David C Madoff
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, New York-Presbyterian Hospital/Weill Cornell Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Jon C Davidson
- Section of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Xiaolong Qi
- CHESS Frontier Center, First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China
| | - Shu-Qun Cheng
- Department of Hepatic Surgery VI, Eastern Hepatobiliary Surgery Hospital, Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China
| | - Gao-Jun Teng
- Centre of Interventional Radiology and Vascular Surgery, Department of Radiology, Zhongda Hospital, Medical School, Southeast University, Nanjing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cerrito L, Annicchiarico BE, Iezzi R, Gasbarrini A, Pompili M, Ponziani FR. Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with portal vein tumor thrombosis: Beyond the known frontiers. World J Gastroenterol 2019; 25:4360-4382. [PMID: 31496618 PMCID: PMC6710186 DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v25.i31.4360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma is one of the most frequent malignant tumors worldwide: Portal vein tumor thrombosis (PVTT) occurs in about 35%-50% of patients and represents a strong negative prognostic factor, due to the increased risk of tumor spread into the bloodstream, leading to a high recurrence risk. For this reason, it is a contraindication to liver transplantation and in several prognostic scores sorafenib represents its standard of care, due to its antiangiogenetic action, although it can grant only a poor prolongation of life expectancy. Recent scientific evidences lead to consider PVTT as a complex anatomical and clinical condition, including a wide range of patients with different prognosis and new treatment possibilities according to the degree of portal system involvement, tumor biological aggressiveness, complications caused by portal hypertension, patient's clinical features and tolerance to antineoplastic treatments. The median survival has been reported to range between 2.7 and 4 mo in absence of therapy, but it can vary from 5 mo to 5 years, thus depicting an extremely variable scenario. For this reason, it is extremely important to focus on the most adequate strategy to be applied to each group of PVTT patients.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/complications
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/mortality
- Carcinoma, Hepatocellular/therapy
- Chemoembolization, Therapeutic/methods
- Contrast Media/administration & dosage
- Disease-Free Survival
- Hepatectomy
- Humans
- Hypertension, Portal/etiology
- Hypertension, Portal/mortality
- Hypertension, Portal/therapy
- Liver Neoplasms/complications
- Liver Neoplasms/mortality
- Liver Neoplasms/therapy
- Liver Transplantation
- Neoadjuvant Therapy/methods
- Neoplasm Invasiveness/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/prevention & control
- Patient Selection
- Portal Vein/diagnostic imaging
- Portal Vein/pathology
- Prognosis
- Survival Analysis
- Thrombectomy
- Time Factors
- Ultrasonography/methods
- Venous Thrombosis/etiology
- Venous Thrombosis/mortality
- Venous Thrombosis/therapy
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucia Cerrito
- Division of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Brigida Eleonora Annicchiarico
- Division of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Roberto Iezzi
- Department of Bioimaging and Radiological Sciences, Institute of Radiology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Antonio Gasbarrini
- Division of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Maurizio Pompili
- Division of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| | - Francesca Romana Ponziani
- Division of Internal Medicine, Gastroenterology and Hepatology Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome 00168, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Salem R, Padia SA, Lam M, Bell J, Chiesa C, Fowers K, Hamilton B, Herman J, Kappadath SC, Leung T, Portelance L, Sze D, Garin E. Clinical and dosimetric considerations for Y90: recommendations from an international multidisciplinary working group. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2019; 46:1695-1704. [PMID: 31098749 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-019-04340-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 95] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2019] [Accepted: 04/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
The TheraSphere Global Dosimetry Steering Committee was formed in 2017 by BTG International to review existing data and address gaps in knowledge related to dosimetry. This committee is comprised of health care providers with diverse areas of expertise and perspectives on radiation dosimetry. The goal of these recommendations is to optimize glass microspheres radiation therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma while accounting for variables including disease presentation, tumour vascularity, liver function, and curative/palliative intent. The recommendations aim to unify glass microsphere users behind standardized dosimetry methodology that is simple, reproducible and supported by clinical data, with the overarching goal of improving clinical outcomes and advancing the knowledge of dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Northwestern University, 676 N. St. Clair, Suite 800, Chicago, IL, 60611, USA.
| | - Siddharth A Padia
- Department of Radiology, University of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marnix Lam
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jon Bell
- Department of Radiology, The Christie, Manchester, UK
| | - Carlo Chiesa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumouri, Milan, Italy
| | - Kirk Fowers
- BTG International, West Conshohocken, PA, USA
| | | | - Joseph Herman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - S Cheenu Kappadath
- Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Thomas Leung
- Comprehensive Oncology Centre, Hong Kong Sanatorium and Hospital, Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | | | - Daniel Sze
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Palo Alto, CA, USA
| | - Etienne Garin
- Univ Rennes, INSERM, INRA, Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer Eugène Marquis, Institut NUMECAN (Nutrition Metabolisms and Cancer), F-35000, Rennes, France
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Golfieri R, Bargellini I, Spreafico C, Trevisani F. Patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer Stages B and C Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Time for a Subclassification. Liver Cancer 2019; 8:78-91. [PMID: 31019899 PMCID: PMC6465743 DOI: 10.1159/000489791] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2018] [Accepted: 04/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) intermediate and advanced stages (BCLC B and C) of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) both include heterogeneous populations. Patients classified as BCLC stage B present with different tumour burdens, and the recommended treatment is transarterial chemoembolization (TACE). A similar heterogeneity of tumour burden and liver function can be found among patients classified as BCLC stage C, which includes diverse clinical features (performance status [PS] 1-2), macrovascular invasion (MVI) including portal vein tumour (PVT) thrombosis, and/or extra-hepatic spread. Nonetheless, the anti-tumoural treatment formally recommended by Western guidelines is systemic therapy with sorafenib. SUMMARY Several proposals of subclassification for both these stages have been suggested in recent years, differentiating the more appropriate treatments for each substage. In particular, for BCLC stage C patients with PVT, therapeutic indications, clinical outcomes, and response to locoregional therapy are notably different in the presence of subsegmental, segmental or main PVT. Accordingly, liver resection and transarterial therapies, such as TACE or transarterial embolization (TAE) and 90Y-radioembolization (TARE), can be performed in locally advanced HCC with intrahepatic MVI according to its extent. In fact, surgery and TACE/TAE/TARE have no contraindications in the presence of PVT limited to the subsegmental or segmental branches in Child-Pugh class A patients, whereas only TARE should be utilized when there is lobar branch involvement. The presence of PS 1 should not be sufficient to allocate patients to the advanced stage since this would preclude any potential treatment for HCC. Patients should be properly classified as BCLC C only in cases of main portal trunk PVT, and treated according to the guidelines, provided that they belong to Child-Pugh class A. KEY MESSAGES Subclassifications of BCLC B and C stages are urgently needed and require validation in order to guide clinicians towards the most effective treatment option.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rita Golfieri
- Radiology Unit, Department of Diagnostic and Preventive Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi Hospital, Alma Mater Studiorum – University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Irene Bargellini
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Pisa University Hospital, Pisa, Italy
| | - Carlo Spreafico
- Interventional Radiology Unit, Department of Radiology, Istituto Tumori of Milan IRCCS Foundation, Milan, Italy
| | - Franco Trevisani
- Division of Semeiotics, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Mähringer-Kunz A, Steinle V, Düber C, Weinmann A, Koch S, Schmidtmann I, Schotten S, Hinrichs JB, Graafen D, Pinto Dos Santos D, Galle PR, Kloeckner R. Extent of portal vein tumour thrombosis in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: The more, the worse? Liver Int 2019; 39:324-331. [PMID: 30318826 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13988] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Revised: 10/03/2018] [Accepted: 10/04/2018] [Indexed: 02/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Portal vein tumour thrombosis (PVTT) has a significant impact on the prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The degree of PVTT varies from sub-/segmental invasion to complete occlusion of the main trunk. Aim of this study was to evaluate whether the degree of PVTT correlates with prognosis. METHODS A total of 1317 patients with HCC treated at our tertiary referral centre between January 2005 and December 2016 were included. PVTT was diagnosed by contrast-enhanced computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. The extent of PVTT was documented according to the Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan classification: Vp0 = no PVTT, Vp1 = segmental portal vein invasion, Vp2 = right anterior/posterior portal vein, Vp3 = right/left portal vein and Vp4 = main trunk. Median overall survival (OS) was calculated for each group. RESULTS Portal vein tumour thrombosis was present in 484 (36.8%) patients. Median OS without PVTT was 35.7 months, significantly longer than in patients with PVTT (7.2 months, P < 0.001). The patients with PVTT were subclassified as follows: 103 Vp1, 87 Vp2, 143 Vp3 and 151 Vp4. The corresponding median OS yielded 14.6, 9.4, 5.8 and 4.8 months for Vp1-Vp4, respectively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS Portal vein tumour thrombosis in patients with HCC is associated with a dismal prognosis. The results indicate an association between the extent of PVTT and OS. However, the extent of PVTT is not that decisive, as even minor PVTT leads to a very poor prognosis. Therefore, meticulous evaluation of cross-sectional imaging is crucial for the clinical management of patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aline Mähringer-Kunz
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Verena Steinle
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Christoph Düber
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Arndt Weinmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.,Clinical Registry Unit (CRU), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sandra Koch
- Clinical Registry Unit (CRU), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Irene Schmidtmann
- Institute of Medical Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Schotten
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Jan B Hinrichs
- Department of Interventional and Diagnostic Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Dirk Graafen
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Peter R Galle
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Roman Kloeckner
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Saini A, Wallace A, Alzubaidi S, Knuttinen MG, Naidu S, Sheth R, Albadawi H, Oklu R. History and Evolution of Yttrium-90 Radioembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2019; 8:jcm8010055. [PMID: 30621040 PMCID: PMC6352151 DOI: 10.3390/jcm8010055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2018] [Revised: 12/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common form of primary liver cancer and affects millions worldwide. Due to the lack of effective systemic therapies for HCC, researchers have been investigating the use of locoregional tumor control with Yttrium-90 (Y90) radioembolization since the 1960s. Following the development of glass and resin Y90 microspheres in the early 1990s, Y90 radioembolization has been shown to be a safe and efficacious treatment for patients with HCC across Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stages. By demonstrating durable local control, good long term outcomes, and equivalent if not superior tumor responses and tolerability when compared to alternative therapies including transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and sorafenib, Y90 radioembolization is being increasingly used in HCC treatment. More recently, investigations into variations in Y90 radioembolization technique including radiation segmentectomy and radiation lobectomy have further expanded its clinical utility. Here, we discuss the history and evolution of Y90 use in HCC. We outline key clinical trials that have established the safety and efficacy of Y90 radioembolization, and also summarize trials comparing its efficacy to existing HCC treatments. We conclude by reviewing the techniques of radiation segmentectomy and lobectomy, and by discussing dosimetry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aman Saini
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Alex Wallace
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Sadeer Alzubaidi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - M Grace Knuttinen
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Sailendra Naidu
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Rahul Sheth
- Department of Interventional Radiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77054, USA.
| | - Hassan Albadawi
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| | - Rahmi Oklu
- Division of Vascular and Interventional Radiology, Laboratory for Minimally Invasive Therapeutics, Mayo Clinic, Phoenix, AZ 85054, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Toesca DAS, Barry A, Sapisochin G, Beecroft R, Dawson L, Owen D, Mouli S, Lewandowski R, Salem R, Chang DT. Clinical Case Panel: Treatment Alternatives for Inoperable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Semin Radiat Oncol 2018; 28:295-308. [PMID: 30309640 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2018.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Surgical resection or liver transplantation offers the best chance of cure for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Unfortunately, most patients are not good candidates for liver resection due to locally advanced disease or compromised liver function. Moreover, liver transplantation waiting lists are long. For those cases not amenable for resection, a variety of local treatment modalities are available, such as image-guided ablative procedures, transarterial chemoembolization, and radioembolization, as well as external beam radiation. HCC presentation can vary considerably in size, number, and location of lesions. The management of inoperable HCC is, therefore, quite complex, and there is a lack of consensus on the best local treatment modality for each type tumor presentation. Here, we present 4 clinical case scenarios representative of commonly seen cases in the clinical setting, with different therapeutic perspectives from institutions with high expertise in the management of HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diego A S Toesca
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA
| | - Aisling Barry
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Gonzalo Sapisochin
- Multi-Organ Transplant, Toronto General Surgery, Department of General Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Robert Beecroft
- Division of Interventional Radiology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Dawn Owen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Samdeep Mouli
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Robert Lewandowski
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL
| | - Daniel T Chang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, CA.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Kim JH, Shim JH, Yoon HK, Ko HK, Kim JW, Gwon DI. Chemoembolization related to good survival for selected patients with hepatocellular carcinoma invading segmental portal vein. Liver Int 2018; 38:1646-1654. [PMID: 29436101 DOI: 10.1111/liv.13719] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS We evaluated survival outcomes and prognostic factors associated with survival after TACE in a large cohort of 331 patients with HCC with segmental PVTT. METHODS From 1997 to 2015, a total of 331 patients were included in this study from among 507 patients who underwent TACE as a first-line treatment for HCC with segmental PVTT. RESULTS After TACE, the median survival of the whole cohort was 10.7 months, and the 1-year, 3-year and 5-year survival rates were 44.9%, 16% and 12% respectively. Objective tumour response after TACE was achieved in 53.8% of patients. Multivariable Cox regression analyses confirmed that up-to-11 criteria, extrahepatic metastasis, Child-Pugh class, and tumour response to TACE were independent prognostic factors for patient survival. The expected median survival times among patients with 0, 1 and 2-4 risk factors were 29.1, 15.1 and 5.3 months respectively. The 30-day mortality and major complications rates after TACE were 0.9% and 5.4% respectively. CONCLUSIONS TACE was well-tolerated and effective in selected patients with HCC with segmental PVTT. We found that four risk factors were associated with decreased length of patient survival after TACE: a major tumour burden (up-to-11 criteria out), extrahepatic spread, Child-Pugh class B liver function and nonregression to TACE. TACE may not be recommended for HCC patients with segmental PVTT with 2-4 risk factors because of poor survival outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Hyoung Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ju Hyun Shim
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun-Ki Yoon
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Heung-Kyu Ko
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong Woo Kim
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Il Gwon
- Department of Radiology and Research Institute of Radiology, Asan Liver Center, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Spreafico C, Sposito C, Vaiani M, Cascella T, Bhoori S, Morosi C, Lanocita R, Romito R, Chiesa C, Maccauro M, Marchianò A, Mazzaferro V. Development of a prognostic score to predict response to Yttrium-90 radioembolization for hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein invasion. J Hepatol 2018; 68:724-732. [PMID: 29331342 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.12.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 113] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2017] [Revised: 12/18/2017] [Accepted: 12/20/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) has shown promising efficacy in the treatment of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), associated with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). The aim of this study is to identify prognostic factors for survival in patients with HCC and PVTT undergoing TARE, and build a prognostic classification for these patients. METHODS This is a single center retrospective study conducted over six years (2010-2015), on consecutive patients undergoing TARE. Patients were included if they met the following criteria: presence of at least one measurable HCC, presence of PVTT not occluding the main portal trunk, absence of extrahepatic metastases, Child-Pugh score within B7, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-1. Uni- and multivariable analysis was used to explore the variables that showed an independent relationship with survival. A prognostic score was then derived, and three prognostic categories were identified. RESULTS A total of 120 patients were included in the study. Median overall survival (OS) was 14.1 months (95% CI 10.7-17.5) and median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.5 months (95% CI 3.8-9.2). The only variables independently correlated with OS were bilirubin, extension of PVTT and tumor burden. Three prognostic categories were identified: favourable prognosis (0 points), intermediate prognosis (2-3 points) and dismal prognosis (>3 points). Median OS in the three categories was 32.2 months, 14.9 months and 7.8 months respectively (p <0.0001). PFS (p = 0.045) and the risk of liver decompensation (p <0.0001) also significantly differed along the same prognostic categories. CONCLUSIONS Radioembolization with Yttrium-90 is an effective therapy for patients with HCC and PVTT. The proposed prognostic stratification may help to better identify good candidates for the treatment, and those for whom TARE may be futile. LAY SUMMARY Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization (TARE) is a microembolic procedure that minimizes alterations to hepatic arterial flow, and thus can be safely performed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT). In this study, we retrospectively evaluated the independent predictors of long-term outcomes in patients with HCC and PVTT treated with TARE. Bilirubin level, extension of PVTT and tumor burden were independently related to post-treatment survival: the combination of these factors allowed us to build a prognostic stratification that may help to better identify good candidates for the treatment, and those for whom TARE may be futile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlo Spreafico
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Sposito
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Vaiani
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Tommaso Cascella
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Sherrie Bhoori
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Morosi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Rodolfo Lanocita
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Raffaele Romito
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Chiesa
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Maccauro
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alfonso Marchianò
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Mazzaferro
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Liver Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy; University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Yang Y, Si T. Yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization versus conventional transarterial chemoembolization for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancer Biol Med 2018; 15:299-310. [PMID: 30197797 PMCID: PMC6121048 DOI: 10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2017.0177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective: To compare the effects and safety of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) and yttrium-90 transarterial radioembolization [TARE (90Y)] for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) Methods: Nine high-quality observational studies, one low bias-risk randomized controlled trial (RCT), and one moderate bias-risk RCT included 1,652 patients [cTACE, 1,124; TARE (90Y), 528], from whom data were extracted for this systematic review and meta-analysis. Results: The extracted study outcomes included 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates, objective responses (ORs), and serious adverse events (AEs). 1-year OS rates: OR = 0.939, 95 % CI: 0.705-1.251, P = 0.66. 2-year OS rates: overall pooled OR = 0.641, 95% CI: 0.382-1.075, P = 0.092; observational study subgroup OR = 0.575, 95% CI: 0.336-0.984, P = 0.043; RCT subgroup OR* = 0.641, 95% CI: 0.382-1.075, P = 0.346. OR: overall pooled OR = 0.781, 95% CI: 0.454-1.343, P = 0.371; mRECIST subgroup OR = 0.584, 95 % CI: 0.349-0.976, P = 0.040; WHO subgroup OR = 1.065; 95% CI: 0.500-2.268, P = 0.870. Serious AEs: overall pooled RR = 1.477, 95% CI: 0.864-2.526, P = 0.154; RCT subgroup RR = 0.680, 95% CI: 0.325-1.423, P = 0.306; observational study subgroup RR = 1.925; 95 % CI: 0.978-3.788, P = 0.058.
Conclusions: TARE (90Y) increased 2-year OS rates in the observational subgroup and resulted in better OR rates, according to mRECIST criteria, in comparison with cTACE. Furthermore, a lower risk of AEs was observed for TARE (90Y) than for cTACE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi Yang
- School of Medical Imaging, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin 300203, China.,Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| | - Tongguo Si
- Department of Interventional Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, National Clinical Research Center for Cancer; Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin; Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Tianjin 300060, China
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Abouchaleh N, Gabr A, Ali R, Al Asadi A, Mora RA, Kallini JR, Mouli S, Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Salem R. 90Y Radioembolization for Locally Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma with Portal Vein Thrombosis: Long-Term Outcomes in a 185-Patient Cohort. J Nucl Med 2017; 59:1042-1048. [DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.117.199752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
|
43
|
Kirstein MM, Schweitzer N, Winter T, Lappas K, Graen N, Kunstmann I, Voigtländer T, Reineke-Plaaß T, Manns MP, Lehner F, Rodt T, Vogel A. Patterns and challenges of treatment sequencing in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: Experience from a German referral center. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2017; 32:1730-1738. [PMID: 28185302 DOI: 10.1111/jgh.13761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2016] [Revised: 01/11/2017] [Accepted: 02/08/2017] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers. Several local and systemic therapies are available for patients with HCC depending on the stage of the disease. In clinical practice, treatment decision-making, and sequencing may be very heterogeneous. METHODS In this study, we retrospectively analyzed treatment algorithms in 2101 patients with HCC treated from 2000 to 2015 at Hannover Medical School, Germany. RESULTS Transarterial chemoembolization was the most common initial treatment (n = 545; 25.9%), followed by resection (n = 435, 20.7%), local-ablative procedures (n = 283, 13.5%), systemic therapies (n = 275, 13.1%), and liver transplantation (n = 52; 2.5%). Most patients were treated only once (n = 960; 59.6%). A total of 433 (26.9%) and 160 (9.9%) patients received a second line and third line treatment after recurrent or progressive disease. Patients with more than one treatment line were diagnosed at significantly earlier disease stages (P < 0.001). Using binary logistic regression, AFP ≤ 200 μg/L, albumin > 36 g/L, and small tumor size (≤50 mm) were identified as predictors of achieving more than one treatment line. Subsequent treatment stage migration to a therapy suggested for the next advanced stage occurred only in 56.9%, whereas 43.1% received treatments suggested for earlier disease stages. Only 16% of all treated patients received systemic therapy in the salvage setting. CONCLUSION Most patients were treated only once, and only a minority of patients received systemic treatment. The high dropout rate for subsequent therapies needs to be considered within therapy decision-making. There is an urgent need for prospective studies to define the best time point when to switch patients from local to systemic therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martha M Kirstein
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nora Schweitzer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Theresa Winter
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Katerina Lappas
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Nathalie Graen
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Isabell Kunstmann
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Torsten Voigtländer
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Michael P Manns
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Frank Lehner
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Thomas Rodt
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Pretransplant Intra-arterial Liver-Directed Therapy Does Not Increase the Risk of Hepatic Arterial Complications in Liver Transplantation: A Single-Center 10-Year Experience. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 41:231-238. [PMID: 28900709 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1793-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2017] [Accepted: 09/05/2017] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the association between pretransplant intra-arterial liver-directed therapy (IAT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and hepatic arterial complications (HAC) in orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) [namely hepatic artery thrombosis (HAT) and/or the need for hepatic arterial conduit]. METHODS A total of 175 HCC patients (mean age: 60 years) underwent IAT with either transarterial chemoembolization or yttrium-90 (90Y) transarterial radioembolization prior to OLT between 2003 and 2013. A matched control cohort of 159 HCC patients who underwent OLT without prior IAT was selected. Incidence of HAC in both cohorts was investigated. The categorical differences between both cohorts were calculated by chi-square test. RESULTS Among the 175 patients (chemoembolization, n = 82; radioembolization, n = 93), 8 (5%) required conduits due to HA disease (chemoembolization, n = 6; radioembolization, n = 2), 3 (2%) developed HAT (chemoembolization, n = 2; radioembolization, n = 1). Eleven of 175 patients (6.7%) had HAC. Of the 159 control patients, 6 (4%) needed conduits for HA disease and 3 (2%) developed HAT. Nine of 159 patients (5.7%) had HAC. Chi-square analysis between the IAT cohort and the control group yielded a p value of 0.810. When comparing chemoembolization to radioembolization, p = 0.076 (not significant at p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Although aggressive pretransplant radioembolization and chemoembolization are both utilized in most liver transplant centers, neither appears to increase the risk of peri-transplant hepatic arterial complications in HCC patients.
Collapse
|
45
|
Hepatectomy after down-staging of hepatocellular carcinoma with portal vein tumor thrombus using chemoradiotherapy: A retrospective cohort study. Int J Surg 2017; 44:223-228. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.06.082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/20/2017] [Accepted: 06/27/2017] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
|
46
|
Kokudo T, Hasegawa K, Matsuyama Y, Takayama T, Izumi N, Kadoya M, Kudo M, Kubo S, Sakamoto M, Nakashima O, Kumada T, Kokudo N. Liver resection for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with hepatic vein invasion: A Japanese nationwide survey. Hepatology 2017; 66:510-517. [PMID: 28437844 DOI: 10.1002/hep.29225] [Citation(s) in RCA: 138] [Impact Index Per Article: 17.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2017] [Revised: 04/04/2017] [Accepted: 04/18/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Because of the rarity of hepatic vein tumor thrombus (HVTT) compared with portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma, little is known about this disease entity. The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognosis of each treatment modality for HVTT through an analysis of data collected in a Japanese nationwide survey. We analyzed data for 1,021 Child-Pugh A hepatocellular carcinoma patients with HVTT without inferior vena cava invasion registered between 2000 and 2007. Of these patients, 540 who underwent liver resection (LR) and 481 who received other treatments were compared. Propensity scores were calculated, and we successfully matched 223 patients (49.0% of the LR group). The median survival time in the LR group was 2.89 years longer than that in the non-LR group (4.47 versus 1.58 years, P < 0.001) and 1.61 years longer than that in the non-LR group (3.42 versus 1.81 years, P = 0.023) in a propensity score-matched cohort. After curative resection, median survival times were similar between patients with HVTT in the peripheral hepatic vein and those with HVTT in the major hepatic vein (4.85 versus 4.67 years, P = 0.974). In the LR group, the postoperative 90-day mortality rate was 3.4% (16 patients). In patients without PVTT, the median survival time was significantly better than that in patients with PVTT (5.67 versus 1.88 years, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION LR is associated with a good prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma patients with HVTT, especially in patients without PVTT. (Hepatology 2017;66:510-517).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Kokudo
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan.,Division of Gastroenterological Surgery, Saitama Cancer Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Kiyoshi Hasegawa
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yutaka Matsuyama
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Tadatoshi Takayama
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Nihon University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Namiki Izumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Musashino Red Cross Hospital, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Masumi Kadoya
- Department of Radiology, Shinshu University School of Medicine, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - Masatoshi Kudo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kinki University School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Shoji Kubo
- Department of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Michiie Sakamoto
- Department of Pathology, Keio University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Osamu Nakashima
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Kurume University Hospital, Kurume, Japan
| | - Takashi Kumada
- Department of Gastroenterology, Ogaki Municipal Hospital, Ogaki, Japan
| | - Norihiro Kokudo
- Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
Gabr A, Abouchaleh N, Ali R, Vouche M, Atassi R, Memon K, Asadi AA, Baker T, Caicedo JC, Desai K, Fryer J, Hickey R, Abeccassis M, Habib A, Hohlastos E, Ganger D, Kulik L, Lewandowski RJ, Riaz A, Salem R. Comparative study of post-transplant outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with chemoembolization or radioembolization. Eur J Radiol 2017; 93:100-106. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2017] [Revised: 05/18/2017] [Accepted: 05/19/2017] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
48
|
Kollmann D, Selzner N, Selzner M. Bridging to liver transplantation in HCC patients. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2017; 402:863-871. [PMID: 28755240 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-017-1609-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2017] [Accepted: 07/19/2017] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Liver transplantation (LT) is the only cure for patients diagnosed with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and HCC has become the leading indication for LT in the USA. The shortage of liver grafts results in a significant waiting time for LT with the risk of tumour progression. Treating HCCs during the waiting time prior to transplantation (bridging therapy) is an attractive strategy to reduce the risk of exceeding the tumour criteria for transplantation. Studies on bridging therapy are heterogenous and due to ethical issues, mostly of retrospective design. PURPOSE We summarize the main studies and methods that have been reported on bridging therapies for patients with HCC waiting for a LT. CONCLUSION During the waiting period for LT, patients with HCC at risk for tumour progression and therefore bridging therapy is recommended for patients with an estimated waiting time of ≥6 months. Bridging therapy for patients with HCC prior to LT mainly include locoregional therapies (LRTs), with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) being the most common, followed by radio frequency ablation (RFA). Because of a continuous enhancement of therapy options, including a more precise adjustment of external radiotherapy, further possibilities for an individualized bridging therapy for patients with HCC have been developed. Patients with compensated liver cirrhosis and small tumour size are preferably treated with RFA, whereas patients with larger tumour size but compensated liver function are treated with TACE/TARE. Patients with uncompensated liver cirrhosis and larger tumour size can nowadays be successfully bridged to LT with external radiotherapy without increasing the risk for further deterioration of liver function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dagmar Kollmann
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nazia Selzner
- Department of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada
| | - Markus Selzner
- Multi Organ Transplant Program, Department of Surgery, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Canada. .,General Surgery and Multi-Organ Transplant Program, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 585 University Avenue, 11 PMB 178, Toronto, ON, M5G 2N2, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Galle PR, Tovoli F, Foerster F, Wörns MA, Cucchetti A, Bolondi L. The treatment of intermediate stage tumours beyond TACE: From surgery to systemic therapy. J Hepatol 2017; 67:173-183. [PMID: 28323121 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2017.03.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 178] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2017] [Revised: 03/01/2017] [Accepted: 03/09/2017] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is dependent on the stage of the disease. Intermediate stage HCC encompasses the largest subgroup of patients with the disease, and is characterized by substantial heterogeneity. The standard therapeutic approach, transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), is probably over-used and may not be appropriate for all patients with intermediate stage HCC. In patients with extensive tumour bulk, multi-nodular spread or impaired liver function, TACE may not be optimal and other treatments can be considered as a first-line treatment. These include surgery, percutaneous ablation, radioembolization or systemic treatment. In addition, patients who do not achieve complete or partial necrosis (TACE failure) and patients with early recurrence after TACE, should be managed individually, considering systemic treatments usually reserved for advanced disease. In selected cases and in patients who achieve downstaging, radical approaches such as hepatic resection or even liver transplantation can be considered. In this review, we evaluate the current literature for the treatment strategies for patients with intermediate Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) B stage HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter R Galle
- University Medical Centre Mainz, I. Dept. of Internal Medicine, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany.
| | - Francesco Tovoli
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Unità di Medicina Interna, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Friedrich Foerster
- University Medical Centre Mainz, I. Dept. of Internal Medicine, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Marcus A Wörns
- University Medical Centre Mainz, I. Dept. of Internal Medicine, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Alessandro Cucchetti
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Unità di Chirurgia generale e Trapianti, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Luigi Bolondi
- Dipartimento di Scienze Mediche e Chirurgiche, Unità di Medicina Interna, Alma Mater Studiorum-Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
|