Genetic neuromuscular disorders affect muscle function and control by the nervous system, presenting significant clinical challenges, particularly during pregnancy.

To systematically review the literature on the obstetric outcomes and complications in women with genetic neuromuscular disorders.

We searched PubMed/Medline, Scopus, and CINAHL Ultimate from inception till June 2024 using terms like "pregnancy", "genetic neuromuscular disorder", "myotonic dystrophy", "maternal health" etc. SELECTION CRITERIA: Pregnant women with genetic neuromuscular disorders.

Screening, selection, and data extraction were performed independently by two reviewers.

A total of 28 studies from 1978 to 2023 examined pregnancy outcomes in women with genetic neuromuscular disorders. The disorders included myotonic dystrophy, spinal muscular atrophy (SMA), Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT), and others. Common complications were polyhydramnios, preterm labor, miscarriages, and cesarean sections. Myotonic dystrophy type 1 (DM1) showed higher neonatal risks than type 2 (DM2). Women with SMA faced exacerbated muscle weakness, while CMT and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy were associated with preterm labor and cesarean deliveries. Pompe disease exacerbated symptoms, and GNE myopathy showed similar pregnancy outcomes to the general population. Non-dystrophic myotonias had higher fetal distress and postpartum complications.

Women with genetic neuromuscular disorders face increased pregnancy complications, including preterm labor, cesarean sections, and disease symptom exacerbation. Multidisciplinary care between neurologists and obstetricians is essential in managing these high-risk pregnancies effectively, ensuring better maternal and neonatal outcomes. Further research is needed to develop standardized care protocols and improve clinical management.

Background: Individuals with disabilities may require specific medications in pregnancy. The prevalence and patterns of medication use, overall and for medications with known teratogenic risks, are largely unknown. Methods: This population-based cohort study in Ontario, Canada, 2004-2021, comprised all recognized pregnancies among individuals eligible for public drug plan coverage. Included were those with a physical (n = 44,136), sensory (n = 13,633), intellectual or developmental (n = 2,446) disability, or multiple disabilities (n = 5,064), compared with those without a disability (n = 299,944). Prescription medication use in pregnancy, overall and by type, was described. Modified Poisson regression generated relative risks (aRR) for the use of medications with known teratogenic risks and use of ≥2 and ≥5 medications concurrently in pregnancy, comparing those with versus without a disability, adjusting for sociodemographic and clinical factors. Results: Medication use in pregnancy was more common in people with intellectual or developmental (82.1%), multiple (80.4%), physical (73.9%), and sensory (71.9%) disabilities, than in those with no known disability (67.4%). Compared with those without a disability (5.7%), teratogenic medication use in pregnancy was especially higher in people with multiple disabilities (14.2%; aRR 2.03, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.88-2.20). Furthermore, compared with people without a disability (3.2%), the use of ≥5 medications concurrently was more common in those with multiple disabilities (13.4%; aRR 2.21, 95% CI: 2.02-2.41) and an intellectual or developmental disability (9.3%; aRR 2.13, 95% CI: 1.86-2.45). Interpretation: Among people with disabilities, medication use in pregnancy is prevalent, especially for potentially teratogenic medications and polypharmacy, highlighting the need for preconception counseling/monitoring to reduce medication-related harm in pregnancy.

Women with disabilities experience elevated risk for adverse pregnancy outcomes. Most studies have inferred disabilities from diagnosis codes, likely undercounting disabilities. We analyzed data, including self-reported disability status, from the National Survey of Family Growth for the period 2011-19. We compared respondents with and without disabilities on these characteristics: smoking during pregnancy, delayed prenatal care, preterm birth, and low birthweight. A total of 19.5 percent of respondents who had given birth reported a disability, which is a much higher prevalence than estimates reported in US studies using diagnosis codes. Respondents with disabilities were twice as likely as those without disabilities to have smoked during pregnancy (19.0 percent versus 8.9 percent). They also had 24 percent and 29 percent higher risk for preterm birth and low birthweight, respectively. Our findings suggest that studies using diagnosis codes may represent only a small proportion of pregnancies among people with disabilities. Measurement and analysis of self-reported disability would facilitate better understanding of the full extent of disability-related disparities, per the Affordable Care Act.

Medication use during pregnancy is common, with up to 90% of pregnant women taking at least one medication. Women with congenital physical disabilities often report co-occurring conditions during pregnancy that may warrant pharmaceutical treatment, however, research is limited. We aim to describe medication use during pregnancy including: pain, psychotropic, and antibacterial medication, among women with and without congenital physical disabilities.

We used data from the Slone Birth Defects Study (1976-2015), a case-control study that collected information on pre-pregnancy health conditions and exposures among participating mothers. Women with congenital physical disabilities (n = 132) included women with spina bifida, cerebral palsy, muscular dystrophy, limb deficiencies, and other skeletal/connective tissue conditions and were matched by interview year and study site to women without congenital physical disabilities (n = 528). Proportions and difference in proportions for each medication were compared between groups. Simple proportions were also calculated for duration and multiple medication use variables.

Women with congenital physical disabilities more frequently reported use of pain (acetaminophen and opioids), psychotropic (antidepressants), and antibacterial medications during pregnancy. Women with congenital physical disabilities used pain and psychotropic medications for longer, frequent durations, and more frequently reported haven taken multiple medications during pregnancy.

Women with congenital physical disabilities report higher medication use during pregnancy compared to women without physical disabilities. Patterns may be attributable to co-occurring conditions or increased risk of pregnancy complications in this population. Further research is needed to describe the patterns of medication use for clinical decisions regarding treatment of pregnant women with disabilities.