Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) are treated with corticosteroids and food allergen elimination. However, treatment for refractory cases is not standardized. We demonstrate the efficacy of vedolizumab, an anti-α4β7 integrin agent, in 2 children with duodenal ulcers developed by non-eosinophilic esophagitis EGIDs. In both, vedolizumab was used continuously without side effects, and long-term remission has been durable. Duodenal ulcers associated with EGIDs are increasing. Vedolizumab has potential as a treatment for even upper gastrointestinal lesions in refractory EGIDs.

Biologics against interleukin-5 were administered to five patients with eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) and bronchial asthma (BA). BA and abdominal symptoms as well as changes in steroid dose and the blood eosinophil count were examined. The man-to-woman ratio was 1:4. The average age of onset was 63 years old. The duration of the disease was three to nine years. Four patients showed improved BA symptoms with mepolizumab or benralizumab, and three successfully discontinued steroids. Regarding abdominal symptoms, mepolizumab was effective in one of three cases, while benralizumab improved symptoms in three of four cases. Biologics targeting interleukin-5 are effective in some patients with EGE accompanied by BA.

Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy is an efficacious immunotherapy with known multi-organ toxicities, including gastrointestinal adverse events (GI-AEs). Eosinophilic colitis (EoC) is the inflammation of the intestine with diffuse eosinophilic infiltration. We present the case of a 66-year-old male who presented with diarrhea and biopsy-proven EoC two months after CART therapy for recurrent multiple myeloma (MM) and achieved a favorable response following corticosteroids and infliximab. A 66-year-old male with a past medical history of MM presented with watery stools 5-6 times per day. The patient was diagnosed with MM 10 years ago and achieved remission following an autologous stem cell transplant and maintenance chemotherapy. Three years ago, the patient developed recurrent MM, received CART therapy, and achieved cancer remission. Two months following CART therapy, he presented to the local emergency department (ED) for several weeks of diarrhea with a negative infectious workup. This disease course was associated with several ED visits and hospital admissions. He was started on budesonide without a significant response. Subsequent colonoscopy and resultant histology were consistent with EoC. The patient was started on an IV steroid with infliximab and a prednisone taper for refractory EoC. Following his third dose of infliximab and completing his prednisone taper, he reported a return to baseline symptomatically. CART is an immunotherapy associated with GI-AEs and requires corticosteroids or other immunosuppressants in select cases. EoC has been associated with cancer and cancer therapy and may require biological agents. Early recognition and treatment of immunotherapy toxicities are essential for successful management of gastrointestinal adverse events.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) is divided into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (non-EoE-EGID), based on the involved gastrointestinal organs. The present survey was performed to provide an overview of the current status of the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of EGID in Asia.

Responses to the questionnaire were obtained from 228 doctors at various institutions in eight Asian countries. The questionnaire consisted of 52 questions on EoE and non-EoE EGID.

Responses to questionnaire were obtained from 228 doctors from eight countries. The most common participation facilities were university hospitals, followed by public hospitals, private hospitals, and private clinics. 1-10 were the most frequent patients per year in each institution for both EoE and non-EoE-EGID. The 30s and 40s are common age groups for both EoE and non-EoE-EGID. Although endoscopic findings vary among countries, 15 or more eosinophil infiltrations in high-power fields as a diagnostic criterion are used in all countries for EoE. As treatments, the prescription rates of Proton pump inhibitor, diet, topical and systemic steroids, and biologics were similar among the eight countries in EoE. Non-EoE-EGID showed a similar trend to EoE in epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment.

The questionnaire survey partially revealed the current status of the epidemiology, symptoms, diagnosis, and treatment of EGID in Asian countries.

Biologic therapies have revolutionized the treatment of severe allergic diseases, including asthma, atopic dermatitis (AD), chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), and allergic rhinitis (AR). These molecularly targeted agents provide significant benefits for patients unresponsive to conventional treatments by addressing underlying immune mechanisms, particularly type 2 inflammation driven by cytokines such as IL-4, IL-5, and IL-13. Recent advancements include biologics targeting alarmins like thymic stromal lymphopoietin (TSLP) and IL-33, which may address both type 2 and non-type 2 inflammation, broadening their therapeutic scope. Despite their effectiveness, biologics remain expensive, posing socioeconomic challenges, and there are concerns regarding long-term safety and inter-individual variability in responses. Promising innovations such as bispecific antibodies and ultra-long-acting agents are under investigation, alongside digital health tools like remote biomarker monitoring and AI-driven decision support systems, which aim to enhance personalized care. However, disparities in access, particularly for underserved populations, underscore the need for policy reforms and affordable biosimilars. This review synthesizes recent findings and emerging trends, highlighting the evolving role of biologics in transforming allergic disease management and offering insights into future research directions.

A 47-year-old man with over 10 years' duration of ulcerative colitis treated by 5-aminosalicylic acid and intermittent topical steroids complained of acute epigastric pain. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy revealed diffuse mucosal edema with patchy redness, multiple erosions and nodularity of the stomach. Bioptic examination revealed marked eosinophilic infiltration, confirming the diagnosis of eosinophilic gastroenteritis. Systemic steroid therapy was initiated, whereas his ulcerative colitis and eosinophilia recurred when tapering the steroid. Addition of azathioprine was ineffective, and we subsequently started vedolizumab for eosinophilic gastroenteritis and ulcerative colitis. The medication effectively improved his abdominal symptoms and esophagogastroduodenoscopy and ileocolonoscopy 1 year later revealed endoscopic improvement of both diseases with histologically decreased level of eosinophilic infiltration. Considering that eosinophils also express α4β7 integrins, vedolizumab can be a possible therapeutic candidate for eosinophilic gastroenteritis as well as ulcerative colitis.

Eosinophilic ascites, a rare manifestation of eosinophilic gastroenteritis, is characterized by eosinophilic infiltration in the gastrointestinal tract and ascitic fluid. In this case, a 60-year-old male presented with abdominal pain and vomiting, with diagnostic challenges due to non-specific symptoms. The diagnosis was made based on history and eosinophil-rich ascites. Treatment with corticosteroids resulted in symptom improvement. This case emphasizes the importance of early recognition and prompt treatment to avoid unnecessary surgical intervention in patients with unexplained ascites.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) encompass a group of disorders characterized by an abnormal accumulation of eosinophils in various parts of the gastrointestinal tract. EGIDs present with a wide range of symptoms such as abdominal pain, vomiting, diarrhea, difficulty swallowing, and food impaction. Monoclonal antibodies, targeting inflammatory cytokines or eosinophils, are the next emerging therapy for EGIDs. The only Food and Drug Administration-approved monoclonal antibody is dupilumab, and it has been approved for the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). In this article, the authors will discuss biologics that have been used in the treatment of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Background and aim: Basic differentiation between an inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-type colitis and a non-IBD type of colitis is the essential histological pre-requisite before further subclassifications are made. The combination of mucosal prominent eosinophilic cell infiltrate along with basal plasmacytosis is supposed to be a useful histological feature that can differentiate between IBD-type and non-IBD-type colitis. Hence, this systematic review and metaanalysis aimed to assess the reliability of mucosal basal plasmacytosis and eosinophilia for histological differentiation of IBD-type versus non-IBD-type colitis. Methods: We searched the PROSPERO, PubMed, Embase, and Scopus from January 1, 2000 to July 30, 2022 for all types of studies (prospective, cross-sectional, or retrospective studies) having histological features (including mucosal basal plasmacytosis, eosinophilia, and neutrophilic infiltration) in IBD and/or non-IBD colitis cases. Two reviewers extracted data, which were aggregated using random-effects models. Results: The 59 selected articles were evaluated for the predecided parameters. Both basal plasmacytosis and lamina propria plasmacytosis did not show any significant correlation between IBD-type and non-IBD-type colitis. The proportions for basal plasmacytosis with 95% CI were 0.50 (0.19-0.82) in IBD-type colitis and 0.46 (0.40-0.52) in non-IBD-type colitis, with a P value of .79. The proportion of lamina propria plasmacytosis with 95% CI was 0.67 (0.42-0.92) in IBD and 0.60 (0.35-0.85) in non-IBD-type colitis, with a P value being .7. Conclusions: This systematic review documented the dearth of published data on key histological features such as basal plasmacytosis and mucosal eosinophilia which are believed to differentiate between IBD-type and non-IBD-type colitis.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis is a rare, chronic inflammatory disease with eosinophil infiltration in the digestive tract. Treatment typically involves corticosteroids, but new therapies, including vedolizumab, are under evaluation. Vedolizumab inhibits lymphocyte migration to intestinal tissue, impacting eosinophil activity. We report a 34-year-old male with eosinophilic colitis, dependent on corticosteroids, who showed clinical improvement with vedolizumab. Despite a mild flare-up, intensifying vedolizumab resulted in prolonged stability and reduced steroid use over seventeen months. Although corticosteroids are the primary treatment, vedolizumab shows promise in some cases, warranting further investigation to confirm its effectiveness.

It is unknown whether concomitant esophageal involvement or anatomic location of eosinophilic infiltration affects the natural history of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID).

A retrospective cohort study was performed using the University of North Carolina EGID Clinicopathologic Database. Patients were adults and children with a prior EGID diagnosis based on clinicopathologic features. Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment information, and procedural data were extracted from medical records. Clinical course and flare history were characterized.

Among 97 patients, 43% had EGID + esophageal involvement and 57% had EGID only. Patients with esophageal involvement had a longer diagnostic delay preceding diagnosis (36.6 vs 11.6 months, P = 0.001), more dysphagia (50% vs 18%; P = 0.001), required more chronic therapy (77% vs 52%, P = 0.016), and exhibited more progressive disease (25% vs 6%, P = 0.027). A continuous disease course was most common in eosinophilic gastritis (78%) while patients with eosinophilic gastritis + eosinophilic enteritis (29%) and eosinophilic enteritis + eosinophilic colitis (50%) had the highest proportion of progressive and relapsing disease, respectively ( P = 0.045). A continuous disease course occurred more frequently in children (71%, P = 0.03) and those with single organ involvement (65%), whereas adults had more relapsing (39%) or progressive disease (18%).

EGIDs with and without esophageal involvement display many similarities, although patients with esophageal involvement more frequently had dysphagia, had progressive disease courses, and required more chronic therapy. Location of involvement and age of onset affected the natural history with higher proportions of relapsing or progressive disease seen in adults and patients with small bowel or multiorgan involvement while a continuous disease course was more common in children and patients with gastric-only involvement.

Joint ESPGHAN/NASPGHAN Guidelines on Childhood Eosinophilic Gastrointestinal Disorders Beyond Eosinophilic Esophagitis RELEASE DATE: July 4, 2023 (e-publication ahead of print) PRIOR VERSION(S): None DEVELOPER: European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the North American Society for Pediatrics Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) FUNDING SOURCE: ESPGHAN and NASPGHAN TARGET POPULATION: Children with eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders beyond eosinophilic esophagitis.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are complex, multifactorial chronic inflammatory disorders affecting the gastrointestinal tract. Their epidemiology, particularly for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), is increasing worldwide, with a rise in the co-diagnosis of IBD and EGIDs. Both disorders share common risk factors, such as early exposure to antibiotics or specific dietary habits. Moreover, from a molecular perspective, eosinophilic infiltration is crucial in the diagnosis of eosinophilic disorders, and it also plays a pivotal role in IBD histological diagnosis. Indeed, recent evidence highlights the significant role of eosinophils in the health of the intestinal mucosal barrier and as mediators between innate and acquired immunity, even indicating a potential role in IBD pathogenesis. This narrative review aims to summarize the current evidence regarding the common clinical and molecular aspects of EGIDs and IBD and the current state of knowledge regarding overlap conditions and their pathogenesis.

Pubmed was searched until May 2023 to assess relevant studies describing the epidemiology, pathophysiology, and therapy of EGIDs in IBD.

The immune pathways and mechanisms underlying both EGIDs and IBD remain partially known. An improved understanding of the role of eosinophils in overlapping conditions could lead to enhanced diagnostic precision, the development of more effective future therapeutic strategies, and a more accurate prediction of patient response. Consequently, the identification of red flags indicative of an eosinophilic disorder in IBD patients is of paramount importance and must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.

Eosinophilic gastritis (EoG) and duodenitis (EoD) are rare conditions that are poorly understood. Our aim was to describe the natural history of children with varying degrees of gastric or duodenal eosinophilia with respect to disease complications and histologic and endoscopic longitudinal trajectories.

The electronic medical record at a tertiary children's hospital was queried to identify patients with EoG, EoD, or EoG + EoD who were cared for between January 2010 and 2022. Multiple logistic regression was performed to explore associations between baseline features and persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia or complications remote from diagnosis.

We identified 151 patients: 92 with EoG, 24 with EoD, 12 with EoG + EoD, and 23 with tissue eosinophilia but did not meet histologic criteria for EoG or EoD (low grade). The average age at diagnosis was 10.6 years, and average follow-up was 5.8 years. Twenty-five percent of patients with EoG or EoD had persistence/recurrence of eosinophilia; this was associated with increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.34, confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.74) on diagnostic endoscopy. Eighteen percent suffered from disease complications, and development of late complications was associated with presenting with a complication (aOR 9.63, CI 1.09-85.20), severity of duodenal endoscopic abnormalities (aOR 8.74, CI 1.67-45.60), and increases in the EoG Endoscopic Reference Score (aOR 1.70, CI 1.11-2.63).

Patients with gastric and duodenal eosinophilia should be followed closely to monitor for recurrence and complications, especially those presenting with endoscopic abnormalities or complications.

A 79-year-old man underwent operative drainage and 2-week cephalosporin treatment due to a maxillofacial space infection (bilateral submaxillaris, submentum, and left face). However, he experienced anorexia, nausea, vomiting, and emaciation in the following 2 months. It was initially considered that a malignancy might be present, thus a series of examinations were performed. Laboratory investigations showed increases in inflammatory markers and a significant eosinophilia, which seemed to be a hematological system disease. Combined with the gastrointestinal endoscopes and histology examination, the patient was diagnosed with eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE). After cessation of antibiotic treatment and administration of corticosteroid, our patient experienced a rapid progress in his clinical condition. Despite the low incidence, EGE should be considered in patients with unknown cause of gastrointestinal disorder, elevated eosinophilia, and so on.

Data for pharmacologic treatments for non-eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are limited. Nevertheless, because of the increasing understanding of EGID pathogenesis, a number of medications are used to treat EGIDs, though all are currently off-label. Initial therapy generally starts with corticosteroids, and "topical" delivery is preferred over systemic due to long-term side effects. A number of other small molecules could potentially be used, ranging from allergy medications to immunosuppressants. Biologics are also being used and investigated for EGIDs and represent promising targeted therapies. Multiple therapeutic targets have also been identified, many of which overlap with EoE targets.

The clinical presentation of eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases beyond eosinophilic esophagitis (non-EoE EGIDs) varies depending on the gastrointestinal segments affected by the eosinophilic inflammation, the extent of eosinophilic inflammation within the gastrointestinal tract and its depth through the bowel wall. Non-EoE EGIDs with mucosal involvement tend to present with diarrhea, malabsorption, and sometimes bleeding, those with muscular involvement may present with symptoms of obstruction or pseudo-obstruction, intussusception, and even perforation, whereas those with serosal involvement may present with eosinophilic ascites. Here we describe the differences in symptoms experienced by children with non-EoE EGIDs with varying degrees of eosinophilic inflammation through the bowel wall.

Endoscopic evaluation with biopsies is a mainstay of the diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs). Increasing knowledge has resulted in the development of 2 standardized scoring systems: the Endoscopic REFerence Score (EREFS) for EoE and the EG-REFS for eosinophilic gastritis, although the latter has not been validated. In EGIDs, diagnosis and follow-up focus on eosinophil infiltration in biopsies. In this article, we will discuss the most commonly used endoscopic scores in EoE and non-EoE EGIDs, their validity for the diagnosis and follow-up of disease activity, as well as endoscopic interventions and areas of uncertainty.

To explore the clinical manifestations, endoscopic findings, histopathological changes, treatment, and prognosis of eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) in children, with the aim of enhancing awareness among pediatricians about this condition.

Data of 267 children with EGID were prospectively collected from January 2019 to July 2022 at Jiangxi Children's Hospital, Hunan Children's Hospital, and Henan Children's Hospital. The age of onset, symptoms, physical signs, laboratory examination results, endoscopic findings, histopathological changes, and treatment outcomes were observed.

Among the 267 children with EGID, the majority had mild (164 cases, 61.4%) or moderate (96 cases, 35.6%) clinical severity. The disease occurred at any age, with a higher prevalence observed in school-age children (178 cases). The main symptoms in infants were vomiting and hematemesis, while in toddlers, vomiting and bloody stools were prominent. Abdominal pain and vomiting were the primary symptoms in preschool and school-age children. Nearly half (49.4%) of the affected children showed elevated platelet counts on hematological examination, but there was no significant difference in platelet counts among children with mild, moderate, and severe EGID (P>0.05). Endoscopic findings in EGID children did not reveal significant specificity, and histopathological examination showed no specific structural damage. Among them, 85.0% (227 cases) received acid suppression therapy, 34.5% (92 cases) practiced dietary avoidance, 20.9% (56 cases) received anti-allergic medication, and a small proportion (24 cases, 9.0%) were treated with prednisone. Clinical symptoms were relieved in all patients after treatment, but three cases with peptic ulcers experienced recurrence after drug discontinuation.

Mild and moderate EGID are more common in children, with no specific endoscopic findings. Dietary avoidance, acid suppression therapy, and anti-allergic medication are the main treatment methods. The prognosis of EGID is generally favorable in children.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are chronic, immune-mediated disorders characterised clinically by gastrointestinal symptoms and histologically by a pathologic increase in eosinophil-predominant inflammation in the gastrointestinal tract, in the absence of secondary causes of eosinophilia.

To highlight emerging insights and research efforts into the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnostic and therapeutic aspects of eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs, and discuss key remaining knowledge gaps.

We selected and reviewed original research, retrospective studies, case series, randomised controlled trials, and meta-analyses.

Standardised nomenclature classifies EGIDs as EoE, eosinophilic gastritis (EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). Incidence and prevalence of EoE are rising, emphasising the need to better understand how environmental risk factors and genetic features interact. Advances in understanding EoE pathophysiology have led to clinical trials of targeted therapy and the approval (in the United States) of dupilumab for EoE. Several therapies that are under investigation hope to satisfy both histologic and clinical targets. For non-EoE EGIDs, efforts are focused on better defining clinical and histopathologic disease determinants and natural history, as well as establishing new therapies.

Unmet needs for research are dramatically different for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs. In EoE, non-invasive diagnostic tests, clinicopathologic models that determine the risk of disease progression and therapeutic failure, and novel biologic therapies are emerging. In contrast, in non-EoE EGIDs, epidemiologic trends, diagnostic histopathologic thresholds, and natural history models are still developing for these more rare disorders.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are increasing in prevalence, but understanding of their causes and effective treatments remain elusive, especially in adults. We present a case of eosinophilic gastroenteritis and colitis with extraintestinal manifestations that was successfully treated with a tumor necrosis factor α inhibitor, adalimumab.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a chronic recurrent disease with abnormal eosinophilic infiltration in the gastrointestinal tract. Glucocorticoids remain the most common treatment method. However, disease relapse and glucocorticoid dependence remain notable problems. To date, few studies have illuminated the prognosis of EGE and risk factors for disease relapse.

To describe the clinical characteristics of EGE and possible predictive factors for disease relapse based on long-term follow-up.

This was a retrospective cohort study of 55 patients diagnosed with EGE admitted to one medical center between 2013 and 2022. Clinical records were collected and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank tests were conducted to reveal the risk factors for long-term relapse-free survival (RFS).

EGE showed a median onset age of 38 years and a slight female predominance (56.4%). The main clinical symptoms were abdominal pain (89.1%), diarrhea (61.8%), nausea (52.7%), distension (49.1%) and vomiting (47.3%). Forty-three (78.2%) patients received glucocorticoid treatment, and compared with patients without glucocorticoid treatments, they were more likely to have elevated serum immunoglobin E (IgE) (86.8% vs 50.0%, P = 0.022) and descending duodenal involvement (62.8% vs 27.3%, P = 0.046) at diagnosis. With a median follow-up of 67 mo, all patients survived, and 56.4% had at least one relapse. Six variables at baseline might have been associated with the overall RFS rate, including age at diagnosis < 40 years [hazard ratio (HR) 2.0408, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.0082-4.1312, P = 0.044], body mass index (BMI) > 24 kg/m2 (HR 0.3922, 95%CI: 0.1916-0.8027, P = 0.014), disease duration from symptom onset to diagnosis > 3.5 mo (HR 2.4725, 95%CI: 1.220-5.0110, P = 0.011), vomiting (HR 3.1259, 95%CI: 1.5246-6.4093, P = 0.001), total serum IgE > 300 KU/L at diagnosis (HR 0.2773, 95%CI: 0.1204-0.6384, P = 0.022) and glucocorticoid treatment (HR 6.1434, 95%CI: 2.8446-13.2676, P = 0.003).

In patients with EGE, younger onset age, longer disease course, vomiting and glucocorticoid treatment were risk factors for disease relapse, whereas higher BMI and total IgE level at baseline were protective.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders beyond eosinophilic esophagitis (non-EoE EGIDs) are rare chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Diagnosis is based on clinical symptoms and histologic findings of eosinophilic inflammation after exclusion of a secondary cause or systemic disease. Currently, no guidelines exist for the evaluation of non-EoE EGIDs. Therefore, the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) formed a task force group to provide consensus guidelines for childhood non-EoE EGIDs.

The working group was composed of pediatric gastroenterologists, adult gastroenterologists, allergists/immunologists, and pathologists. An extensive electronic literature search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases was conducted up to February 2022. General methodology was used in the formulation of recommendations according to the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) system to meet current standards of evidence assessment.

The guidelines provide information on the current concept of non-EoE EGIDs, disease pathogenesis, epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostic and disease surveillance procedures, and current treatment options. Thirty-four statements based on available evidence and 41 recommendations based on expert opinion and best clinical practices were developed.

Non-EoE EGIDs literature is limited in scope and depth, making clear recommendations difficult. These consensus-based clinical practice guidelines are intended to assist clinicians caring for children affected by non-EoE EGIDs and to facilitate high-quality randomized controlled trials of various treatment modalities using standardized, uniform disease definitions.

The role of type 2 inflammation has been progressively associated with many diseases, including severe asthma, atopic dermatitis, nasal polyposis, eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis, and, recently, eosinophilic esophagitis. Despite this, the association between asthma and esophagitis is still poorly known, and this is probably because of the low prevalence of each disease and the even lower association between them. Nonetheless, observations in clinical trials and, subsequently, in real life, have allowed researchers to observe how drugs acting on type 2 inflammation, initially developed and marketed for severe asthma, could be effective also in treating eosinophilic esophagitis. For this reason, clinical trials specifically designed for the use of drugs targeted to type 2 inflammation were also developed for eosinophilic esophagitis. The results of clinical trials are presently promising and envisage the use of biologicals that are also likely to be employed in the field of gastroenterology in the near future. This review focuses on the use of biologicals for type 2 inflammation in cases of combined severe asthma and eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (EGID) is divided into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal disease (non-EoE-EGID) based on the involved gastrointestinal segments. Reports regarding non-EoE-EGID are limited, in part because of its rarity. The present study was performed to review non-EoE-EGID, including its pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis. Additionally, details regarding 28 cases of non-EoE-EGID recently diagnosed at our Japanese tertial medical center are presented and compared with 20 EoE cases diagnosed during the same period at the same medical center. Comparisons of the two groups clarified differences regarding age- and gender-dependent prevalence between the two conditions, and also showed that systemic involvement and disease severity were greater in the non-EoE-EGID patients. Notably, diagnosis of non-EoE-EGID is difficult because of its lack of specific or characteristic symptoms and endoscopic findings. The clinical characteristics of EoE and non-EoE-EGID differ in many ways, while they also share several genetic, clinical, laboratory, and histopathological features.

Eosinophilic gastritis/gastroenteritis (EoG/EoGE) are rare disorders with pathologic gastric and/or small intestinal eosinophilia lacking an approved therapy. An allergic mechanism is postulated but underexplored mechanistically and therapeutically.

We evaluated the effectiveness of a food allergen-free diet (elemental formula) in controlling gastrointestinal eosinophilia in adult EoG/EoGE.

Adults aged 18 to 65 years with histologically active EoG/EoGE (≥30 eosinophils per high-power field) in the stomach and/or duodenum and gastrointestinal symptoms within the month preceding enrollment were prospectively enrolled onto a single-arm clinical trial to receive elemental formula for 6 consecutive weeks. The primary end point was percentage of participants with complete histologic remission (<30 eosinophils per high-power field in both stomach and duodenum). Exploratory outcomes were improvement in symptoms, endoscopy results, blood eosinophilia, quality of life, Physician Global Assessment score, and EoG-relevant gastric transcriptome and microbiome.

Fifteen adults (47% male, average age 37.7 years, average symptom duration 8.8 years) completed the trial. Multi-gastrointestinal segment involvement affected 87%. All subjects had complete histologic remission in the stomach (P = .002) and duodenum (P = .001). Scores improved in overall PhGA (P = .002); EGREFS (P = .003); EGDP (P = .002); SODA pain intensity (P = .044), non-pain (P = .039), and satisfaction (P = .0024); and PROMIS depression (P = .0078) and fatigue (P = .04). Food reintroduction reversed these improvements. The intervention was well tolerated in 14 subjects, with 1 serious adverse event reported in 1 subject.

An amino acid-based elemental diet improves histologic, endoscopic, symptomatic, quality-of-life, and molecular parameters of EoG/EoGE; these findings and disease recurrence with food trigger reintroduction support a dominant role for food allergens in disease pathogenesis.

gov Identifier: NCT03320369.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders are a group of rare diseases characterized by the infiltration of eosinophils in the gastrointestinal wall in a greater amount than in homeostatic conditions. 'Non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders' is the umbrella term for all eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders outside of the well known eosinophilic esophagitis. This includes eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis and eosinophilic colitis. The clinical presentation is atypical and not very different for the three disorders. The depth of infiltration has a bigger influence on the presenting symptoms than the disease location. Although the frequency of diagnosis and research in this subject is increasing over time, non-esophageal eosinophilic disorders are rare and high quality evidence is limited to date. In this narrative review, we provide an overview of the latest insights in the pathophysiology, diagnostic approach and available treatment options. Transcriptome studies have found the pathogenesis to be T helper type 2 driven. Various laboratory findings can be used to trigger raised suspicion and investigation with endoscopy. As the endoscopic appearance of the mucosa is normal in most cases, multiple biopsies in each segment are needed to quantify the amount of eosinophils in the tissue. Eosinophilic cut-offs for diagnosis are a controversial topic and a consensus is still lacking. A recently developed tissue based diagnostic platform which measures differentially expressed genes might be available in the future to classify patients with intermediate eosinophilic tissue levels under the cut-off. For the treatment, corticosteroids are still the cornerstone of treatment but promising research suggests a role of biologicals, such as Lirentelimab (anti-siglec 8) in particular.

Non-esophageal eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (non-EoE EGIDs) are rare, but their prevalence has recently increased. Although it has been reported that one-half of patients with non-EoE EGIDs have intractable clinical courses, their clinical features are not fully understood.

This is a multicenter retrospective study in which 10 institutions in Japan participated. Clinical databases from January 1998 to December 2020 were reviewed to identify patients with non-EoE EGIDs. A total of 44 patients were identified; they were divided into two groups based on their clinical course: an intractable group and a non-intractable group. The clinical features were compared between the two groups by a logistic regression analysis. Remarkable eosinophilic infiltration (REI) was defined histologically when the maximal counts of mucosal eosinophils reached a threshold level in the respective area of biopsy.

Prevalence of drug allergy and eosinophil counts more than 500/μL (EOS), vomiting symptoms, abnormalities of the stomach, duodenum, and jejunum on computed tomography (upper gastrointestinal abnormality on computed tomography [UACT]), and REI were significantly different between the two groups. Among the factors that were potentially associated with an intractable clinical course, logistic regression revealed that REI, EOS, and UACT were significant factors. Based on an analysis of the area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, a combination of REI and EOS had the lowest Akaike's information criterion, indicating the best model to predict an intractable clinical course.

REI may predict an intractable course in patients with non-EoE EGIDs. In addition, the combination of REI and EOS was a better predictor than REI alone.

Eosinophilic gastroenteritis (EGE) is a gastrointestinal disorder of unclear etiology that is characterized by eosinophilic infiltration of the stomach and small intestine, and consists of mucosal, muscular, and serosal subtypes. Eosinophilic infiltration of the gastrointestinal tract is a fundamental histopathological characteristic of EGE and is driven by several T-helper type 2 (Th2)-dependent cytokines and induced by food allergy. Due to the lack of a diagnostic gold standard, EGE has a high rate of delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis. However, several new diagnostic strategies have been developed, such as novel genetic biomarkers and imaging tests. Although dietary therapy and corticosteroids remain the common choices for EGE treatment, recent decades have seen the emergence of novel treatment alternatives, such as biologics that target particular molecules involved in the pathogenic process. Preliminary investigations and clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of biologics and provided additional insights for the era of refractory or corticosteroid-dependent EGE biologics.

A recent report showed that most pediatric cases of non-eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGIDs) (non-EoE EGIDs) are persistent and severe compared with those of EoE, thus requiring further effective therapeutic approaches. In this study, we present the first case based on a systematic search of non-EoE EGID for which tolerance to causative foods and histological and symptomatic improvements were achieved following dupilumab administration, after elimination diets and omalizumab and mepolizumab treatments. Driven by this case, we investigated the efficacies of biological treatments in non-EoE EGID cases based on the patient studied herein, and other patients identified in the conducted systematic review. Seven articles, including five different biologics, were reviewed. Both clinical efficacies and impact differences among the targeted molecules are demonstrated in this study. Our findings show that dupilumab may affect mechanisms that can suppress symptoms induced by offending foods that are different from those induced by other biologics as identified in the conducted systematic review. Additional studies are required to address the unmet needs of non-EoE EGID treatments.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are delayed-type chronic allergic disorders that show gastrointestinal eosinophil dense infiltration, with an exaggerated Th2-type immune reaction considered to be an important mechanism. These diseases can be roughly divided into two types: eosinophilic esophagitis, mainly found in young and middle-aged men, and eosinophilic gastroenteritis, which is found in both genders equally. A diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis is suspected when characteristic endoscopic findings, including longitudinal furrows and rings, are noted. However, characteristic endoscopic abnormalities are rarely found in cases with eosinophilic gastroenteritis, so multiple biopsy sampling from the apparently normal gastrointestinal mucosal surface is important for making an accurate diagnosis. The administration of systemic glucocorticoid is the standard treatment for eosinophilic gastroenteritis, while acid inhibitors and topical glucocorticoid swallowing therapy are effective for eosinophilic esophagitis. Anti-cytokine therapies for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are currently under development.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) outside of the esophagus have been previously enigmatic and rare diagnoses. Fortunately, increasing research over the past few decades has led to an improved understanding of disease pathophysiology and epidemiology. This has been foundational for developing accurate nomenclature, diagnostic criteria, and therapeutics.

This article will review recent updates in nonesophageal EGIDs. Accurate disease classification and nomenclature developed from international consensus are now available, as well as data challenging the notion that abnormal endoscopic findings are rare in this population. Studies on natural history, outcomes, and impact on patient quality of life are reviewed. Lastly, retrospective studies and clinical trials on EGID therapies are summarized.

With a standardized nomenclature system for EGIDs now established, formal diagnostic guidelines and criteria for nonesophageal EGIDs are in active development. While management remains challenging compared with eosinophilic esophagitis, research and development of effective, steroid-sparing therapies (primarily through biologics and dietary therapy) remain underway. In eosinophilic colitis, the rarest EGID, research remains focused on illuminating pathophysiology. Ongoing research will continue to improve understanding of natural history, outcomes, and therapeutic options for these diseases.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are a constellation of conditions categorized by the location of eosinophilic infiltration in the gastrointestinal tract. Symptoms vary based on location of eosinophils and age of the patient. There are no approved medications at the current time with individuals using off-label steroids or dietary therapy. Translational research has identified potential pathways to target in the treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), gastritis (EoG), and enteritis (EoN), including type 2 pathways, mast cells, and eosinophils. Preliminary studies found cendakimab (anti-interleukin [IL]-13) and dupilumab (anti-IL-4 receptor alpha) to have an effect on eosinophil count and symptoms with dupilumab recently approved. In addition, mepolizumab (anti-IL-5), reslizumab (anti-IL-5), and lirentelimab (anti-Siglec 8) were found to have reduction in eosinophils without reduction of symptoms. For EoG and EoN, both benralizumab (anti-IL-5 receptor) and lirentelimab were found to have histologic and symptom improvement. There are no agents studied for eosinophilic colitis. Results of ongoing phase 3 trials in EoE and EoG/EoN are also anticipated.

Eosinophilic gastritis and eosinophilic duodenitis (EoG/EoD) are often misdiagnosed as functional gastrointestinal (GI) disorders. Consequently, patients with GI symptoms of EoG/EoD may not undergo the necessary steps for diagnosis. We studied gastroenterologists' evaluations of patients with chronic, unexplained, moderate-to-severe GI symptoms that were unresponsive to over-the-counter medications.

We performed a cross-sectional online survey of 202 board-certified gastroenterologists at office-based practices, community hospitals, or academic institutions. Respondents had been in active clinical practice for 3-35 years post-residency training, spent most of their time on direct patient care, managed ≥1 patient with irritable bowel syndrome and/or functional dyspepsia, and performed ≥1 endoscopy per month. Responses were analyzed to identify barriers to EoG/EoD diagnosis and management.

Respondents managed a mean of 1880 patients per year; the most common diagnoses were functional dyspepsia (36%) and gastroesophageal reflux disease (19%). Mean proportions of patients who underwent upper endoscopy ranged from 42% to 84%. Biopsies were collected from >90% of patients with visible endoscopic mucosal abnormalities vs 42%-72% of patients with normal-appearing mucosae. Approximately 20% of respondents collected only 1-2 biopsies from each site of the GI tract. Only 30% routinely requested pathologists to count eosinophils, and nearly 40% had no histologic threshold for EoG/EoD diagnosis.

Gastroenterologists vary in their evaluation of patients with chronic, unexplained moderate-to-severe GI symptoms. Limited gastric and duodenal biopsy collection, particularly from normal-appearing mucosae, and failure to request tissue eosinophil counts might contribute to underdiagnosis of EoG/EoD. Availability and awareness of EoG/EoD diagnostic guidelines should improve detection in clinical practice.

Substantial heterogeneity in terminology used for eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs), particularly the catchall term "eosinophilic gastroenteritis," limits clinical and research advances. We aimed to achieve an international consensus for standardized EGID nomenclature.

This consensus process utilized Delphi methodology. An initial naming framework was proposed and refined in iterative fashion, then assessed in a first round of Delphi voting. Results were discussed in 2 consensus meetings, and the framework was updated and reassessed in a second Delphi vote, with a 70% threshold set for agreement.

Of 91 experts participating, 85 (93%) completed the first and 82 (90%) completed the second Delphi surveys. Consensus was reached on all but 2 statements. "EGID" was the preferred umbrella term for disorders of gastrointestinal (GI) tract eosinophilic inflammation in the absence of secondary causes (100% agreement). Involved GI tract segments will be named specifically and use an "Eo" abbreviation convention: eosinophilic gastritis (now abbreviated EoG), eosinophilic enteritis (EoN), and eosinophilic colitis (EoC). The term "eosinophilic gastroenteritis" is no longer preferred as the overall name (96% agreement). When >2 GI tract areas are involved, the name should reflect all of the involved areas.

This international process resulted in consensus for updated EGID nomenclature for both clinical and research use. EGID will be the umbrella term, rather than "eosinophilic gastroenteritis," and specific naming conventions by location of GI tract involvement are recommended. As more data are developed, this framework can be updated to reflect best practices and the underlying science.