Among patients with cirrhosis and pre-malignant or early malignant mucosal lesions, surgical intervention carries a much higher bleeding risk. When such lesions are discovered, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) may offer curative therapy with lower risks than surgery and improved outcomes compared to traditional endoscopic resection.

To evaluate the outcomes of ESD in patients with cirrhosis.

Patients with cirrhosis undergoing ESD between July 2015 and August 2022 were retrospectively matched in 1:2 fashion to controls based on lesion location, size, and anticoagulation use. Procedural outcomes were compared between groups.

A total of 64 Lesions from 59 patients were included (16 cirrhosis, 43 control). There were no differences in patient or lesion characteristics between groups. En bloc and curative resection was achieved in 84.21%, 78.94% of the cirrhosis group and 88.89%, 68.89% of controls, respectively, with no significant differences. Cirrhotic patients had significantly higher rates of intra-procedural coagulation grasper use for control of bleeding (47.37% vs 20%; P = 0.02). There were otherwise no significant differences in adverse event rates. In the 29 patients with follow up, we found higher rates of recurrence in the cirrhosis group compared to controls (40% vs 5.26%; P = 0.019), however this effect did not persist on multivariable analysis controlling for known confounders.

ESD may be safe and effective in patients with cirrhosis. Most procedure related outcomes were not significantly different between groups. Intra-procedural bleeding requiring use of the coagulation grasper use was expectedly higher in the cirrhosis group given the known effects of liver disease on hemostasis.

An increasing number of patients are undergoing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with active prescriptions of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs). Only a few reports have described the effects of DOAC intake on postoperative bleeding. We aimed to investigate the bleeding risk associated with DOACs after gastric ESD.

Clinical studies published up to April 2022 showing bleeding rates after gastric ESD in patients taking DOACs were identified using electronic searches. The primary outcome was the rate of bleeding after gastric ESD in patients receiving DOACs compared to those not receiving antithrombotic therapy. In this meta-analysis, odds ratios (ORs) were calculated and pooled using a random effects model. The secondary outcome was the difference in the bleeding rate between patients treated with DOACs and those treated with warfarin and antiplatelet drugs.

Seven studies were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled analysis showed that DOACs had a higher bleeding rate than non-thrombotic therapy (17.0% vs. 3.4%; OR 5.72; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.33-7.54; I2 = 0%). The bleeding risk associated with DOAC administration was similar to that associated with warfarin (17.0% vs. 20.0%; OR 0.83; 95% CI 0.59-1.18; I2 = 0%), whereas it was higher than that associated with antiplatelet administration (16.9% vs. 11.0%; OR 1.63; 95% CI 1.14-2.34; I2 = 8%).

This meta-analysis reveals that the bleeding risk of DOACs is higher than that of non-antithrombotics and antiplatelets, whereas it is comparable to that of warfarin. Gastric ESD in patients on anticoagulants requires careful postoperative management.

A number of studies have been conducted to explore the survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients, while studies about non-cancer causes of death in patients with GC are not well-conducted. The aim of this study was to deeply investigate the causes of death (COD) in GC patients, especially non-cancer ones. The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database was used to extract information including demographics, tumor characteristics and causes of death of GC patients meeting the inclusion criteria. The patients were stratified by demographic and clinical parameters. Standardized mortality ratios (SMRs) were calculated for all causes of death at different follow-up periods. A total of 116,437 patients with GC diagnosed between 2000 and 2020 were retrieved from the SEER database. Of these, 85,827 deaths occurred during the follow-up period, most of which occurred within 1 year after GC diagnosis. GC (n = 49,746; 58%) was the leading COD, followed by other cancer (n = 21,135; 25%) and non-cancer causes (n = 14,946; 17%). Diseases of heart were the most common non-cancer cause of death, accounting for 30%, followed by cerebrovascular diseases (n = 917; 6%) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (n = 900; 6%). Although gastric cancer remains the most common cause of death in gastric cancer patients, it should not be ignored that the risk of non-cancer causes tends to increase with the length of the latency period. These findings may provide important insights into the healthcare management of gastric cancer patients at various follow-up intervals.

(1) Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely accepted as the standard method for treating early-stage cancer or precancerous lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract; however, it may be difficult in patients with liver cirrhosis due to clinical challenges such as coagulation dysfunction, presence of gastroesophageal varices, etc. We aimed to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of ESD in these populations. (2) Methods: The clinical data of patients were retrospectively collected and analyzed. Inclusion criteria of the study were: a. patients with liver cirrhosis; b. patients who underwent ESD; c. patients who were diagnosed with early-stage cancer or precancerous lesions in the upper gastrointestinal tract. (3) Results: Eight patients were enrolled from April 2019 to April 2023, of whom three were male and five were female, with ages ranging from 43 to 70 years old. Seven lesions were located in the stomach and one other lesion was in the esophagus. ESD was performed successfully in all eight patients, and the resected lesion size ranged from 2 to 6 cm. Only one patient encountered postoperative complications, namely, chest pain and fever. No recurrence was noticed during a follow-up of 3 to 45 months. (4) Conclusions: ESD may serve as a safe and effective method for treating upper gastrointestinal early-stage cancer or precancerous lesions in patients with liver cirrhosis.

Treatment strategies for early cancers or precancerous lesions of the upper GI tract in patients with cirrhosis and esophagogastric varices (EGVs) are complicated and risky. The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in the treatment of such patients and explore optimal treatment strategies.

We retrospectively enrolled 15 patients with cirrhosis and EGV who underwent ESD for early cancers or precancerous lesions of the upper GI tract from January 2012 to December 2021 at our center. Clinical features, endoscopic findings, treatment methods, adverse events, and follow-up data were analyzed.

Of the 15 patients, 1 had a platelet count <30 × 1000/mm3. Five were untreated for EGV, 1 was treated after ESD, 6 were treated before ESD, 1 was treated before and during ESD, and 2 were treated during ESD. The R0 resection rate was 100%. Of the 16 mucosal lesions, 15 were endoscopic resection bleeding (ERB)-0 or ERB-c1, and 1 was ERB-c2. No patient experienced deterioration in liver function. The only adverse events were fever in 2 patients and postoperative bleeding in 2 patients. During a median follow-up of 27 months, 1 patient's esophageal high-grade dysplasia recurred at 19 months. No death resulted from the ESD procedure, liver function injury, or GI tumor itself.

ESD is an effective and safe treatment for early cancers or precancerous lesions of the upper GI tract in patients with cirrhosis and EGV. The incidence of severe adverse events is very low due to the development of individualized clinical treatment strategies.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to explore whether liver cirrhosis (LC) influences short-term and long-term outcomes in gastric neoplasm patients who undergo endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Materials and Methods: Eligible studies were identified in three databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library on December 18, 2022. Clinical characteristics, short-term outcomes, and long-term outcomes were compared between an LC group and a no liver cirrhosis (NLC) group. For continuous variables, the mean difference (MD) and standard deviation (SD) were pooled. For discontinuous variables, raw data from the 2 × 2 tables or odds ratio (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled. Forest plots were used to show the results, and a funnel plot was used to evaluate publication bias. Data analyses were performed by STATA SE 16.0 software. Results: Six retrospective studies involving 1616 gastric neoplasm patients were included in the study. Clinical characteristics, including age, gender, location, macroscopic type, invasion depth, differentiation, and ulceration, were found to be not significantly different between the LC group and the NLC group (P > .05). Moreover, LC was not a risk factor for short-term outcomes, including operative time (MD = 0.15, 95% CI = -0.02 to 0.32, I² = 0.00%, P = .09), en bloc resection (OR = 0.87, 95% CI = 0.43-1.75, I² = 0.00%, P = .69), R0 resection (OR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.42-1.43, I² = 8.97%, P = .41), bleeding (OR = 1.10, 95% CI = 0.62-1.93, I² = 0.00%, P = .75), and perforation (OR = 1.62, 95% CI = 0.45-5.84, I² = 0.00%, P = .46). However, gastric cancer patients with LC exhibited a higher recurrence rate (OR = 3.40, 95% CI = 1.09-10.61, I² = 0.00%, P = .04) after ESD. Conclusion: Surgeons performing ESD in gastric neoplasm patients should pay more attention to long-term effects.

The management of gastrointestinal tumors with decompensated cirrhosis is extremely challenging. Patients often present with poor basic condition and coagulation function, and nutritional deficiency. Furthermore, postoperative recovery is difficult and so the majority of patients refuse surgery. The present study reports the case of a 73-year-old man with decompensated cirrhosis and early esophageal cancer. At the discretion of the patient and their family, a simultaneous approach was used to treat esophagogastric varices and perform a mucosal dissection of the early esophageal cancer via endoscopy. Post-surgery, multiple polyglycolic acid sheets were attached to the esophageal dissection wound. At >2 months post-surgery, an endoscopic re-examination of the patient showed that the esophageal mucosa had healed well, and there was no resistance detected via ordinary endoscopy. The main objective of the present study was to highlight the feasibility and safety of endoscopic treatment for patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis complicated with early esophageal cancer, and to provide a new treatment strategy for patients at high risk of esophageal stenosis after endoscopic mucosal dissection.

While safety and effectiveness of advanced endoscopic resection techniques such as endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been well established in general population, data regarding their utility in patients with cirrhosis is limited.

We searched multiple databases from inception through July 2021 to identify studies that reported on outcomes of EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis. Meta-analysis was performed to determine pooled rates of immediate and delayed bleeding, perforation, death as well as rates of successful en bloc and R0 resection. Pooled relative risk (RR) was calculated for each outcome between patients with and without cirrhosis.

Ten studies with a total of 3244 patients were included in the final analysis. Pooled rates of immediate & delayed bleeding, perforation, and death during EMR and/or ESD in patients with cirrhosis were 9.5% (CI 4.0-21.1), 6.6% (CI 4.2-10.3), 2.1% (CI 1.1-3.9) and 0.6% (CI 0.2-1.7), respectively. Pooled rates of successful en bloc and R0 resection were 93% (CI 85.9-96.7) and 90.8% (CI 86.5-93.8), respectively. While incidence of immediate bleeding was higher in patients with cirrhosis, there was no statistically significant difference in any of the other outcomes between the patient groups.

Our study shows that performing EMR and ESD for gastrointestinal lesions in patients with cirrhosis is both safe and effective. The risks of procedural complications parallel those reported in general population.

The safety and efficacy have always been a concern, when patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis (DLC) receive endoscopic treatments.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of common endoscopic treatments including endoscopic resection (ER) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) applying to patients with DLC, we performed a retrospective study finally including 81 patients receiving ER (43 endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and 38 endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)) and 131 patients treated by ERCP.

There were no significant differences in the rate of degeneration and invariability of Child-Pugh (CP) class and the overall rate of adverse events between two groups (93.8%/8.6% ER vs. 96.2%/15.3% ERCP). Both the degeneration rate of CP class (35.4%) and the rate of adverse events (27.1%) in subgroup CP class C of ERCP group were significantly higher (P=0). The rate of poor outcomes was higher in ERCP group (12.2%) than that in ER group (2.5%) (P=0.02). And subgroup CP class C of ERCP group had a higher poor outcome rate (27.1%) (P=0).

ER and ERCP could remove focal lesions or relieve symptoms induced by targeted diseases without significant changes of CP class. Significant benefits and risks coexisted in CP class C patients with DLC when receiving ERCP.

Liver cirrhosis tends to increase the risk in the management of gastrointestinal tumors. Patients with gastrointestinal cancers and liver cirrhosis often have serious postoperative complications and poor prognosis after surgery. Multiple studies have shown that the stage of gastrointestinal cancers and the grade of cirrhosis can influence surgical options and postoperative complications. The higher the stage of cancer and the poorer the degree of cirrhosis, the less the surgical options and the higher the risk of postoperative complications. Therefore, in the treatment of patients with gastrointestinal cancer and liver cirrhosis, clinicians should comprehensively consider the cancer stage, cirrhosis grade, and possible postoperative complications. This review summarizes the treatment methods of patients with different gastrointestinal cancer complicated with liver cirrhosis.

Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is now established as the first option to manage early gastric neoplasms, but its efficacy may vary according to diverse factors. We aimed to systematically identify risk factors for poor short-term outcomes of gastric ESD with the purpose to improve patients' selection and management.

Three online databases (MEDLINE, ISI Web of Knowledge and Scopus) were searched (last search on June 2018) for poor outcomes of gastric ESD (deep submucosal invasion, piecemeal/incomplete resection, noncurative resection and local recurrence).

One hundred five studies were included referring to 52.126 ESDs. Undifferentiated histology and upper location (vs lower) were associated with submucosal invasion [odds ratio (OR) = 2.42 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.62-3.61] and OR = 3.20 (1.04-9.86), respectively] and deep submucosal invasion [OR = 2.98 (2.02-4.39) and OR = 2.35 (1.45-3.81), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm and ulceration were associated with piecemeal resection [OR = 2.78 (1.17-6.60) and OR = 2.76 (1.23, 6.20), respectively]. Lesion size greater than 30 mm, ulceration, upper location and fibrosis were risk factors for incomplete resection [OR = 3.83 (2.68-5.49), OR = 4.06 (1.62-10.16), OR = 3.71 (2.49-5.54) and OR = 4.46 (1.66-11.96), respectively]. A noncurative resection was more often observed for lesions located in the upper third of the stomach [OR = 1.49 (1.24-1.79)], depressed morphology [OR = 1.49 (1.04-2.12)] and those outside standard criteria [OR = 3.56 (2.31-5.48)]. Older age was significantly linked with local recurrence rates [OR = 3.08 (1.13-5.02)].

Several risk factors influence poor efficacy short-term outcomes of gastric ESD that may be used to inform both patients and health providers about the expected efficacy.

Antithrombotic (AT) therapy has been known to increase post-endoscopic resection (ER) bleeding risk; however, there are few studies quantifying the effect of AT agents. This study aimed to analyze the incidence of delayed bleeding (DB) based on AT agents administered and to identify the proper timing of drug cessation.

Between January 2011 and March 2017, 7752 patients with 8242 lesions underwent ER for single gastric neoplasm. After a 2:1 propensity score matching using age, sex, specimen size, tumor location, diagnosis, chronic kidney disease, and liver cirrhosis, 798 and 399 lesions were classified as belonging to the matched control (MC) group and AT group, respectively. The clinical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups.

The DB rate of the MC and AT groups was 6.3% and 10.0%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the early DB rate between the 2 groups; however, the late DB rate of the AT group was higher than the MC group. The continuation group of the AT group had a higher incidence of DB than their matched control subjects (15.9% vs 5.1%; odds ratio, 3.55; 95% confidence interval, 1.24-10.14; P = .018). In patients taking anticoagulants, heparin bridging therapy (HBT) increased the incidence of DB compared with non-HBT (35.7% vs 10.0%; odds ratio, 5.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.11-22.50; P = .036). No thromboembolic events were observed in patients taking AT agents.

Patients receiving AT therapy had a higher incidence of DB than those not receiving AT therapy, especially with the continued administration of AT agents and HBT.