The ¹³C-urea breath test (¹³C-UBT) is a kind of safe, noninvasive, and reliable measure for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection diagnosis in patients with complete stomach. Nevertheless, the test has not indicated fully precision in people who have had a gastrectomy. So, we made the use of a systematic review of plentiful published resources and research and meta-analysis. There are prominent research achievements regarding of utilizing ¹³C-UBT for H. pylori infection patients diagnosis with the residual stomach.

We searched publications available on Cochrane, PubMed, and Embase databases, and on the web of science. The last search was performed in May 2021. The basis model for this meta-analysis was fixed-effect through Metadisc Beta 1.4 software (Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain). When measuring the precision of ¹³C-urea breath test, we utilized the ratio analysis such as Ratio of diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and its corresponding 95% confidence interval (95%CI).

Ten associated researches were analyzed with a total of 1065 patients. In general, the sensitivity of included studies ranged from 0.40 to 1.00 (I² = 81.2%), whereas the specificity ranged from 0.59 to 1.00 (I² = 90.1%). The pooled sensitivity, specificity were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.86; P < 0.001), 0.79 (95% CI, 0.76-0.83; P < 0.001) respectively. The accuracy ranged from 71 to 99. The positive predictive values ranged from 45 to 100. The negative predictive values ranged from 53 to 100. The combined DOR was 36.02 (95%CI 15.65-82.92; I² = 65.8%; P = 0.0018). The corresponding AUC for the SROC curve was 0.92 and the Q value was 0.85.

In conclusion, the outcomes of meta-analysis indicate that during the period of patients' diagnosis in H. pylori infection, who undergoes partial gastrectomy, has high accuracy.

Helicobacter pylori (H pylori) infection has been implicated in a number of malignancies and non-malignant conditions including peptic ulcers, non-ulcer dyspepsia, recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding, unexplained iron deficiency anaemia, idiopathic thrombocytopaenia purpura, and colorectal adenomas. The confirmatory diagnosis of H pylori is by endoscopic biopsy, followed by histopathological examination using haemotoxylin and eosin (H & E) stain or special stains such as Giemsa stain and Warthin-Starry stain. Special stains are more accurate than H & E stain. There is significant uncertainty about the diagnostic accuracy of non-invasive tests for diagnosis of H pylori.

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of urea breath test, serology, and stool antigen test, used alone or in combination, for diagnosis of H pylori infection in symptomatic and asymptomatic people, so that eradication therapy for H pylori can be started.

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, the Science Citation Index and the National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment Database on 4 March 2016. We screened references in the included studies to identify additional studies. We also conducted citation searches of relevant studies, most recently on 4 December 2016. We did not restrict studies by language or publication status, or whether data were collected prospectively or retrospectively.

We included diagnostic accuracy studies that evaluated at least one of the index tests (urea breath test using isotopes such as 13C or 14C, serology and stool antigen test) against the reference standard (histopathological examination using H & E stain, special stains or immunohistochemical stain) in people suspected of having H pylori infection.

Two review authors independently screened the references to identify relevant studies and independently extracted data. We assessed the methodological quality of studies using the QUADAS-2 tool. We performed meta-analysis by using the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic (HSROC) model to estimate and compare SROC curves. Where appropriate, we used bivariate or univariate logistic regression models to estimate summary sensitivities and specificities.

We included 101 studies involving 11,003 participants, of which 5839 participants (53.1%) had H pylori infection. The prevalence of H pylori infection in the studies ranged from 15.2% to 94.7%, with a median prevalence of 53.7% (interquartile range 42.0% to 66.5%). Most of the studies (57%) included participants with dyspepsia and 53 studies excluded participants who recently had proton pump inhibitors or antibiotics.There was at least an unclear risk of bias or unclear applicability concern for each study.Of the 101 studies, 15 compared the accuracy of two index tests and two studies compared the accuracy of three index tests. Thirty-four studies (4242 participants) evaluated serology; 29 studies (2988 participants) evaluated stool antigen test; 34 studies (3139 participants) evaluated urea breath test-13C; 21 studies (1810 participants) evaluated urea breath test-14C; and two studies (127 participants) evaluated urea breath test but did not report the isotope used. The thresholds used to define test positivity and the staining techniques used for histopathological examination (reference standard) varied between studies. Due to sparse data for each threshold reported, it was not possible to identify the best threshold for each test.Using data from 99 studies in an indirect test comparison, there was statistical evidence of a difference in diagnostic accuracy between urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology and stool antigen test (P = 0.024). The diagnostic odds ratios for urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test were 153 (95% confidence interval (CI) 73.7 to 316), 105 (95% CI 74.0 to 150), 47.4 (95% CI 25.5 to 88.1) and 45.1 (95% CI 24.2 to 84.1). The sensitivity (95% CI) estimated at a fixed specificity of 0.90 (median from studies across the four tests), was 0.94 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.97) for urea breath test-13C, 0.92 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.94) for urea breath test-14C, 0.84 (95% CI 0.74 to 0.91) for serology, and 0.83 (95% CI 0.73 to 0.90) for stool antigen test. This implies that on average, given a specificity of 0.90 and prevalence of 53.7% (median specificity and prevalence in the studies), out of 1000 people tested for H pylori infection, there will be 46 false positives (people without H pylori infection who will be diagnosed as having H pylori infection). In this hypothetical cohort, urea breath test-13C, urea breath test-14C, serology, and stool antigen test will give 30 (95% CI 15 to 58), 42 (95% CI 30 to 58), 86 (95% CI 50 to 140), and 89 (95% CI 52 to 146) false negatives respectively (people with H pylori infection for whom the diagnosis of H pylori will be missed).Direct comparisons were based on few head-to-head studies. The ratios of diagnostic odds ratios (DORs) were 0.68 (95% CI 0.12 to 3.70; P = 0.56) for urea breath test-13C versus serology (seven studies), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.14 to 5.56; P = 0.84) for urea breath test-13C versus stool antigen test (seven studies). The 95% CIs of these estimates overlap with those of the ratios of DORs from the indirect comparison. Data were limited or unavailable for meta-analysis of other direct comparisons.

In people without a history of gastrectomy and those who have not recently had antibiotics or proton ,pump inhibitors, urea breath tests had high diagnostic accuracy while serology and stool antigen tests were less accurate for diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection.This is based on an indirect test comparison (with potential for bias due to confounding), as evidence from direct comparisons was limited or unavailable. The thresholds used for these tests were highly variable and we were unable to identify specific thresholds that might be useful in clinical practice.We need further comparative studies of high methodological quality to obtain more reliable evidence of relative accuracy between the tests. Such studies should be conducted prospectively in a representative spectrum of participants and clearly reported to ensure low risk of bias. Most importantly, studies should prespecify and clearly report thresholds used, and should avoid inappropriate exclusions.

We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy plus postural change after dosing for Helicobacter pylori eradication in gastrectomized patients. We compared 76 gastric stump patients with H. pylori infection (GS group) with 50 non-gastrectomized H. pylori-positive patients who met the treatment indication (controls). The GS group was divided into GS group 1 and GS group 2. All groups were administered bismuth potassium citrate (220 mg), esomeprazole (20 mg), amoxicillin (1.0 g), and furazolidone (100 mg) twice daily for 14 days. GS group 1 maintained a left lateral horizontal position for 30 min after dosing. H. pylori was detected using rapid urease testing and histologic examination of gastric mucosa before and 3 months after therapy. Mucosal histologic manifestations were evaluated using visual analog scales of the updated Sydney System. GS group 1 had a higher prevalence of eradication than the GS group 2 (intention-to-treat [ITT]: P=0.025; per-protocol [PP]: P=0.030), and the control group had a similar prevalence. GS group 2 had a lower prevalence of eradication than controls (ITT: P=0.006; PP: P=0.626). Scores for chronic inflammation and activity declined significantly (P<0.001) 3 months after treatment, whereas those for atrophy and intestinal metaplasia showed no significant change. Prevalence of adverse reactions was similar among groups during therapy (P=0.939). A bismuth-containing quadruple therapy regimen plus postural change after dosing appears to be a relatively safe, effective, economical, and practical method for H. pylori eradication in gastrectomized patients.

The Maastricht IV/Florence Consensus Report and the Second Asia-Pacific Consensus Guidelines strongly recommend eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) in patients with previous gastric neoplasia who have undergone gastric surgery. However, the guidelines do not mention optimal timing, eradication regimens, diagnostic tools, and follow-up strategies for patients undergoing gastrectomy and do not indicate if eradication of H. pylori reduces the risk of marginal ulcer or stump cancer in the residual stomach after gastrectomy. The purpose of this review is to provide an update which may help physicians to properly manage H. pylori infection in patients who have undergone gastric surgery. This review focuses on (1) the microenvironment change in the stomach after gastrectomy; (2) the phenomenon of spontaneous clearance of H. pylori after gastrectomy; (3) the effects of H. pylori on gastric atrophy and intestinal metaplasia after gastrectomy; (4) incidence and clinical features of ulcers developing after gastrectomy; (5) does eradication of H. pylori reduce the risk of gastric stump cancer in the residual stomach? (6) does eradication of H. pylori reduce the risk of secondary metachronous gastric cancer in the residual stomach? and (7) optimal timing and regimens for H. pylori eradication, diagnostic tools and follow-up strategies for patients undergoing gastrectomy.

Helicobacter pylori infection has been implicated in the pathogenesis of gastroduodenal diseases such as recurrent peptic ulceration and particularly residual stomach cancer in the postoperative stomach.

To determine the performance of different commonly used tests for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection in patients after partial gastrectomy.

A systematic literature search was conducted by searching the PubMed, EMBASE and ScienceDirect databases with relevant key words. Data extraction was independently performed by two reviewers. Meta-analyses were performed for the performance of the different tests including the sensitivities, specificities, likelihood ratios (LRs), diagnostic odds ratio diagnostic odds ratio, and the summary receiver operating characteristic summary receiver operating characteristic curve. The meta-analysis was performed by Meta-DiSc software.

Studies showed a high degree of heterogeneity. Pooled sensitivity, specificity, LR+, LR- and diagnostic odds ratio for the different methods were: Urea breath test (9 studies): 0.77 (95% CI, 0.72-0.82), 0.89 (95% CI, 0.85-0.93), 6.32 (95% CI, 3.22-12.42), 0.27 (95% CI, 0.17-0.43), and 27.86 (95% CI, 13.27-58.49). Rapid urease test (7 studies): 0.79 (95% CI, 0.72-0.84), 0.94 (95% CI, 0.90-0.97), 10.21 (95% CI, 5.94-17.54), 0.28 (95% CI, 0.22-0.36) and 49.02 (95% CI, 24.24-99.14). Histology (3 studies): 0.93 (95% CI, 0.88-0.97), 0.85 (95% CI, 0.73-0.93), 5.88 (95% CI, 3.26-10.60), 0.09 (95% CI, 0.05- 0.15), and 97.28 (95% CI, 34.30-275.95). The corresponding summary receiver operating characteristic curves showed areas under the curves of 0.91, 0.93 and 0.96 and Q* values of 0.84, 0.86 and 0.91, respectively

Among the three commonly used tests, histological examination performs the best, followed by the rapid urease test, for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection after partial gastrectomy. Thus, histology, preferably after the rapid urease test, is recommended for the diagnosis of H. pylori infection after partial gastrectomy.

Before the development of efficient medications for peptic ulcer disease many patients were treated surgically by partial gastrectomy. The pathogenetic role of Helicobacter pylori was also not known yet. Some of these patients may therefore still harbor H. pylori in their remnant stomach as a carcinogenic agent for gastric cancer. This could be even more relevant for patients who were operated for tumors in the stomach. The efficacy of the urea breath test (UBT) is not clear in this population.

To study the prevalence of H. pylori and to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of the continuous UBT (BreathID) in postgastrectomized patients in Israel. In this system, the pH of the stomach is lowered by the addition of citric acid that may be beneficial in the smaller and more alkalic stomach.

We compared retrospectively the results of our continous UBT with a rapid urease test (RUT) and the histology in all our patients who underwent gastroscopy for any clinical indication, and had a history of partial gastrectomy during the years 2002 to 2010. Only patients in whom H. pylori was tested by all the 3 methods during the same day were included in the study. We identified 76 such patients older than 18 years and performed a statistical analysis of all possibly related clinical data. The 3 methods were compared with each other.

H. pylori was positive in 14/76 (18.4%) patients when histology was considered as the gold standard method. The positive predictive value of the continuous UBT and the RUT was 0.64 and 0.35, respectively. The negative predictive value was high by both the methods, 0.92 and 0.95, respectively. Weight loss was correlated with positivity for H. pylori (P=0.032) and a longer gastric stump was marginally related to H. pylori (P=0.071). There was no difference for H. pylori positivity between patients with Billroth I or Billroth II operations. Prevalence of H. pylori was not lower in patients who had partial gastrectomy several years earlier.

The prevalence of H. pylori is considerable even several years after partial gastrectomy. The BreathID is reliable to exclude H. pylori after partial gastrectomy. The positive predictive value of the UBT is not very high but better than the RUT. We suggest that all positive patients found by the breath test should be treated. Our results support the view that alternative noninvasive methods, such as the stool antigen test should be further studied and compared with the BreathID in larger populations.

The Updated Sydney System (USS) is used to evaluate chronic gastritis and chronic atrophic gastritis (CAG) due to H. pylori infection. Here, we investigated USS scores and gastric juice pH levels in H. pylori infection-positive or -eradicated patients with remnant stomach after surgery.

Gastric juice pH levels were measured using pH test-tape in 197 patients (112 H. pylori-positive and 85 H. pylori-negative after eradication) who had undergone distal gastrectomy and conventional H. pylori eradication therapy.

In H. pylori infection-positive remnant stomach cases, gastric juice pH showed a reverse correlation with pepsinogen I/II ratio, and H. pylori infection-negative patients following eradication showed associations with the degree of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia at both the anastomosis and in the corpus. Further, pH levels in these patients were normalized time depending after the eradication in the remnant stomach.

Eradication therapy for the remnant stomach contributes to the possible improvement of stomach conditions by controlling the pH level of gastric juice. This effect will be protective against the risk of secondary stomach carcinogenesis in the remnant stomach.

The role of Helicobacter pylori (HP) in patients scheduled and undergoing laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has not been previously evaluated.

Included were obese patients presenting to our institution for LSG over 24 months. All patients had presurgical HP breath test, and the symptomatic ones received triple therapy with symptom follow-up. Post surgery, all excluded stomachs were evaluated for HP, and those that were positive performed a second 13C-urea breath test (UBT) 3 months later.

Forty patients underwent LSG. Male to female sex ratio was 1:3; mean age-42 years; mean weight-122 kg; and mean BMI of 43.4 kg/m2. Presurgical HP was positive in 15 (37.5%) patients (11 symptomatic and four asymptomatic). Only these 11 patients were given HP eradication therapy and all experienced complete subsequent symptom resolution. HP was detected in 17 out of the 40 (42.5%) cases of excluded stomachs. All performed a 13C-UBT 3 months post operation and only three (17.6%) tested positive.

HP infection is frequent in biopsies from patients with previous LSG and the majority of follow-up 13C-UBT were negative. In our small initial sample, we treated only symptomatic patients preoperatively. Routine screening for HP for all LSG patients and/or treatment for all positive ones would subject patients to expensive and unnecessary investigations. We propose that this stomach-reducing, pylorus-preserving surgery might even lead to HP eradication. The clinical implications of HP and this gastrectomy for a non-neoplastic, non-peptic indication deserve further study.

A growing interest in non-invasive tests for the detection of Helicobacter pylori has been observed recently, reflecting a large number of studies published this year. New tests have been validated, and the old ones have been used in different clinical situations or for different purposes. Stool antigen tests have been extensively evaluated in pre- and post-treatment settings both in adults and children, and the urea breath test has been studied as a predictor of bacterial load, severity of gastric inflammation, and response to eradication treatment. Several studies have also explored the usefulness of some serologic markers as indicators of the gastric mucosa status. With regard to invasive tests, molecular methods are being used more and more, but the breakthrough this year was the direct in vivo observation of H. pylori during endoscopy.