|
1
|
Aoyagi Y, Gaudenzi F, Wakabayashi T, Teshigahara Y, Nie Y, Wakabayashi G. Robotic surgery for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma: a concise systematic review. Surg Endosc 2025; 39:2701-2710. [PMID: 40085228 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-025-11650-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2024] [Accepted: 03/02/2025] [Indexed: 03/16/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (PHC) is a challenging malignancy with a poor prognosis, and the role of robotic surgery in its management remains debated. This systematic review aims to assess the feasibility of robotic surgery for PHC. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines in Medline, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science for English-language studies on robotic surgery for PHC between 2000 and 2024. RESULTS Of the initial 405 manuscripts identified, five studies comprising 110 patients met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analysis showed that operative time ranged from 276 (170-500) to 840 (770-890) minutes, with intraoperative blood loss between 125 (50-425) and 700 (600-800) ml. The rates of overall and major morbidity were 50.0% and 13.6%, respectively. The 30-day and 90-day postoperative mortality rates were 1.8% and 1.9%, respectively. R0 resections were achieved in 78.2% of patients, with a median lymph node retrieval of 7 (8 ± 6.6) to 11 (6-31). Follow-up duration ranged from 7.5 (8.3 ± 2.3) to 15 (19 ± 16) months, recurrence was observed in 14.3% (6/42) of patients. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery for PHC demonstrates promising perioperative outcomes; however, further studies are needed to assess its long-term oncological efficacy compared with traditional approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yutaro Aoyagi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, 1-10-10 Kashiwaza, Ageo City, Saitama, 362-8588, Japan
| | - Federico Gaudenzi
- Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary and Transplant Surgery, Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Polytechnic University of Marche, 60126, Ancona, Italy
| | - Taiga Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, 1-10-10 Kashiwaza, Ageo City, Saitama, 362-8588, Japan.
| | - Yu Teshigahara
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, 1-10-10 Kashiwaza, Ageo City, Saitama, 362-8588, Japan
| | - Yusuke Nie
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, 1-10-10 Kashiwaza, Ageo City, Saitama, 362-8588, Japan
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, 1-10-10 Kashiwaza, Ageo City, Saitama, 362-8588, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
2
|
Uchida Y, Takahara T, Kawase T, Mizumoto T, Nakauchi M, Nishimura A, Mii S, Fukuoka H, Taniwaki S, Iwama H, Kojima M, Uyama I, Suda K. Robotic distal pancreatectomy using the hinotori™ surgical system: Differences in surgical techniques from the daVinci™ surgical system. Surg Oncol 2025; 59:102195. [PMID: 39970600 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2025.102195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2024] [Revised: 01/23/2025] [Accepted: 02/04/2025] [Indexed: 02/21/2025]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of the hinotori™ Surgical System (hinotori) in distal pancreatectomy (DP) is new compared to the da Vinci™ Surgical System (DVSS). The hinotori is equipped with mechanisms distinct from those of DVSS, and comprehensive reports detailing the surgical techniques and outcomes associated with hinotori in DP (hinotori-DP) are lacking. This study aimed to compare the outcomes of DP using the hinotori and DVSS (Xi system), focusing on differences in settings and techniques between the two methods. METHODS This study retrospectively investigated consecutive patients who underwent robotic DP from April 2010 (the introduction of robotic DP at our institute) to July 2024. The analysis excluded patients who underwent spleen-preserving procedures or procedures performed using robotic platform other than hinotori or daVinci Xi. The hinotori-DP cases were compared with those performed using DVSS (DVSS-DP). The techniques used in hinotori-DP were examined in more detail. RESULTS A total of 75 robotic DP cases (11 with hinotori and 64 with DVSS) were analyzed in this study. Different port configurations and techniques, including a lesser curvature approach, were used in the hinotori-DP compared to DVSS-DP. The operation time was relatively shorter in the hinotori-DP group (299 vs. 366 min, p = 0.095), and the postoperative complication rates were comparable (pancreatic fistula: 27 % vs. 30 %, p = 0.871; Clavien-Dindo Grade ≥3a complications: 18 % vs. 19 %, p = 0.964) between the two groups. CONCLUSION The hinotori-DP can be safely performed by focusing on the unique characteristics of the hinotori surgical system.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Takuya Mizumoto
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan; Department of Hepatobiliary Pancreatic Surgery, Kobe University, Japan
| | - Masaya Nakauchi
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan; Department of Advanced Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan
| | | | - Satoshi Mii
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan
| | | | | | - Hideaki Iwama
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan
| | | | - Ichiro Uyama
- Department of Advanced Laparoscopic and Robotic Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan
| | - Koichi Suda
- Department of Surgery, Fujita Health University, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
3
|
Xue HM, Chen P, Zhu XJ, Jiao JY, Wang P. Robot-assisted partial splenectomy for benign splenic tumors: Four case reports. World J Clin Oncol 2024; 15:1366-1375. [DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v15.i10.1366] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2024] [Revised: 08/19/2024] [Accepted: 09/02/2024] [Indexed: 09/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic-assisted partial splenectomy (RAPS) is a superior approach for treating splenic cysts and splenic hemangiomas, as it preserves the immune function of the spleen and reduces the risk of overwhelming post splenectomy infection. Currently, there are no standardized guidelines for performing a partial splenectomy.
CASE SUMMARY Four patients with splenic cysts or splenic hemangiomas were treated by RAPS. Critical aspects with RAPS include carefully dissecting the splenic pedicle, accurately identifying and ligating the supplying vessels of the targeted segment, and ensuring precise hemostasis during splenic parenchymal transection. Four successful RAPS cases are presented, where the tumors were removed by pretreating the splenic artery, dissecting and ligating the corresponding segmental vessels of the splenic pedicle, transecting the ischemic segment of the spleen, and using electrocautery for optimal hemostasis. Four patients underwent successful surgeries with minimal bleeding during the procedure, and there were no signs of bleeding or recurrence postoperatively.
CONCLUSION Four cases confirm the feasibility and superiority of RAPS for the treatment of benign splenic tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Min Xue
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Peng Chen
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Xiao-Jun Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Jing-Yi Jiao
- Medical School, Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China
| | - Peng Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Affiliated Hospital of Nantong University, Nantong 226001, Jiangsu Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
4
|
Kamrava B, Derakhshan A, Gadkaree SK. Ergonomics in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2024; 32:215-221. [PMID: 38695447 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/05/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Understanding effective ergonomic interventions is crucial for enhancing occupational health and career longevity. There is a paucity of clear ergonomics guidelines in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery (FPRS), placing practitioners at high risk of work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) and their consequences. RECENT FINDINGS There is mounting evidence that FPRS specialists are at increased risk of WMSDs as compared with the public and other surgical specialties. Numerous studies have demonstrated that implementation of ergonomics principles in surgery decreases WMSDs. Furthermore, WMSDs are reported as early as the first year of surgical residency, marking the importance of early intervention. SUMMARY Fatigue and physical injuries among surgeons occur more often than expected, particularly during complex, extended procedures that necessitate maintaining a constant posture. FPRS procedure often place surgeons into procrustean positions. Thus, integrating ergonomic practices into the practice of FPRS is essential for reducing WMSDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brandon Kamrava
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Adeeb Derakhshan
- Department of Otolaryngology, Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA
| | - Shekhar K Gadkaree
- Department of Otolaryngology, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
|
5
|
Zhang Y, Zhang S, Chen Q, Cai D, Luo W, Jin Y, Gao Z. Robotic-Assisted and Laparoscopic Splenectomy in Children: A Single Center Comparative Study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2024; 34:541-545. [PMID: 38190306 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2023.0221] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: To explore the safety, efficacy, advantages, and disadvantages of robotic-assisted splenectomy (RS) in children by analyzing and comparing the clinical data of RS and laparoscopic splenectomy (LS). Methods: The clinical data of 35 children who underwent laparoscopic or RS or partial splenectomy from February 2010 to October 2022 were included. A retrospective analysis based on general information, clinical data, and prognosis were performed. Results: Among 35 cases, 14 cases, and 21 cases underwent RS and LS, respectively. The average operation time was 167 (120-224) minutes in the RS group and 176 (166-188) minutes in the LS group. The intraoperative blood loss was significantly larger in LS group than RS group (P = .0009). The length of hospital stay was significantly longer in LS group than RS group (P = .0015), and the hospitalization cost was significantly higher in RS group than LS group (P < .0001). There were no cases of conversion to laparotomy in the RS group, but two cases in the LS group. In terms of postoperative complications, there were one and three cases in the RS and LS groups, respectively. Conclusion: The Robotic Surgical System was safe and feasible in pediatric splenectomy or partial splenectomy which was an alternative to laparoscopic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuebin Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shuhao Zhang
- Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Qingjiang Chen
- Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Duote Cai
- Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Wenjuan Luo
- Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Yi Jin
- Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
| | - Zhigang Gao
- Department of General Surgery, The Children's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health, Hangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
6
|
Arishi AA, Hakami IA, Mashbari HN, Hobani AH, Al-Musawa HI, Abuhadi RI, Maslouf AH, Matari MH, Albrahim HT, Algarni MA, Iskander O, Alyahyawi K. Knowledge, attitude, and perception of robotic-assisted surgery among the general population in Saudi Arabia: a cross-sectional study. J Robot Surg 2024; 18:196. [PMID: 38703278 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-024-01892-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 02/28/2024] [Indexed: 05/06/2024]
Abstract
Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has revolutionized surgical practices, with robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) significantly advancing. However, the understanding and acceptance of RAS vary, impacting its widespread adoption. This study aims to assess Saudi Arabians' attitudes and comprehension of RAS, which is crucial for promoting its integration into surgical procedures. A cross-sectional study was conducted in various Saudi Arabian cities. A total of 1449 participants were included, while participants with cognitive issues were excluded. Demographic information, knowledge, technology experience, attitudes, and perceptions about RAS were collected using an online self-administered questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics. Of the participants, 51.1% demonstrated awareness of RAS, mainly through social media (36.9%). Factors influencing awareness included gender, education, income, occupation, computer literacy, and technology comfort. Gender disparities were evident in attitudes and perceptions toward RAS. Concerns about RAS included robot malfunction (62.0%), surgical errors (45.4%), and surgeon competency (44.7%). 36.4% of the participants believe RAS is faster, 29.9% believe RAS is less painful, and 25.3% believe RAS has fewer complications. Positive perceptions encompassed the belief that robot-using surgeons are more skilled (44.5%) and hospitals offering RAS are better (54.3%). Notably, 47.7% expressed willingness to consider RAS as a treatment option. The study underscores the significance of promoting awareness and informed decisions to ensure the successful integration of RAS in surgical practices. Addressing concerns and misconceptions and enhancing public comprehension are pivotal for facilitating informed decision-making and fostering RAS acceptance within Saudi Arabia's surgical landscape.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz A Arishi
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
| | - Ibrahim A Hakami
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hassan N Mashbari
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Rana I Abuhadi
- Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Atheer H Maslouf
- Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, 45142, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | | | | | - Maram A Algarni
- Faculty of Medicine, Princess Nourah Bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Othamn Iskander
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khalid Alyahyawi
- General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
|
7
|
Ota M, Oki E, Nakanoko T, Tanaka Y, Toyota S, Hu Q, Nakaji Y, Nakanishi R, Ando K, Kimura Y, Hisamatsu Y, Mimori K, Takahashi Y, Morohashi H, Kanno T, Tadano K, Kawashima K, Takano H, Ebihara Y, Shiota M, Inokuchi J, Eto M, Yoshizumi T, Hakamada K, Hirano S, Mori M. Field experiment of a telesurgery system using a surgical robot with haptic feedback. Surg Today 2024; 54:375-381. [PMID: 37653350 DOI: 10.1007/s00595-023-02732-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/19/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To verify the usefulness of haptic feedback in telesurgery and improve the safety of telerobotic surgery. METHODS The surgeon's console was installed at two sites (Fukuoka and Beppu; 140 km apart), and the patient cart was installed in Fukuoka. During the experiment, the surgeon was blinded to the haptic feedback levels and asked to grasp the intestinal tract in an animal model. The surgeon then performed the tasks at each location. RESULTS No marked differences in task accuracy or average grasping force were observed between the surgeon locations. However, the average task completion time was significantly longer, and the system usability scale (SUS) was significantly lower rating for remote operations than for local ones. No marked differences in task accuracy or task completion time were observed between the haptic feedback levels. However, with haptic feedback, the organ was grasped with a significantly weaker force than that without it. Furthermore, with haptic feedback, experienced surgeons in robotic surgery tended to perform an equivalent task with weaker grasping forces than inexperienced surgeons. CONCLUSION The haptic feedback function is a tool that allows the surgeon to perform surgery with an appropriate grasping force, both on site and remotely. Improved safety is necessary in telesurgery; haptic feedback will thus be an essential technology in robotic telesurgery going forward.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mitsuhiko Ota
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Eiji Oki
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan.
- Committee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan.
| | - Tomonori Nakanoko
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yasushi Tanaka
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Satoshi Toyota
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Qingjiang Hu
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yu Nakaji
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Ryota Nakanishi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Koji Ando
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yasue Kimura
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Yuichi Hisamatsu
- Department of Surgery, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, Beppu, Japan
| | - Koshi Mimori
- Department of Surgery, Kyushu University Beppu Hospital, Beppu, Japan
| | - Yoshiya Takahashi
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Hajime Morohashi
- Committee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | | | - Kotaro Tadano
- RIVERFIELD Inc., Tokyo, Japan
- Laboratory for Future Interdisciplinary Research of Science and Technology, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Kenji Kawashima
- RIVERFIELD Inc., Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Information Physics and Computing School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Hironobu Takano
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Yuma Ebihara
- Committee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masaki Shiota
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | | | - Masatoshi Eto
- Department of Urology, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Tomoharu Yoshizumi
- Department of Surgery and Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1, Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka, 812-8582, Japan
| | - Kenichi Hakamada
- Committee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Hirosaki University Graduate School of Medicine, Hirosaki, Japan
| | - Satoshi Hirano
- Committee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery II, Faculty of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Masaki Mori
- Committee for Promotion of Remote Surgery Implementation, Japan Surgical Society, Tokyo, Japan
- Tokai University School of Medicine, Isehara, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
|
8
|
Pavone G, Pacilli M, Gerundo A, Quazzico A, Ambrosi A, Tartaglia N. Can robotic gastric bypass be considered a valid alternative to laparoscopy? Our early experience and literature review. Front Surg 2024; 11:1303351. [PMID: 38375411 PMCID: PMC10875057 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1303351] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2024] [Indexed: 02/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Robotic bariatric surgery serves as an alternative to laparoscopy. The technology provides the surgeon with an accurate three-dimensional view, allowing complex maneuvers while maintaining full control of the operating room. Hypothesis We report our experience with this innovative surgery compared with laparoscopy during Roux-en-Y gastric bypass to demonstrate its safety and feasibility. The aim of this study is to evaluate potential differences between the robotic and laparoscopic techniques. Materials and methods Our study retrospectively identified 153 consecutive obese patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic gastric bypass (RGB) procedures over a 2-year period at the Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia. Data on demographics, operative time, conversion rate, length of hospital stay, and mortality were collected and compared between two groups of patients: 82 patients who underwent laparoscopic procedures and 71 who underwent robotic procedures. Results We analyzed 153 patients who underwent gastric bypass with a mean age of 42.58 years, of whom 74 were female; 71 were treated with a robotic approach and 82 with a laparoscopic approach. The mean operative time was 224.75 ± 10.4 min for RGB (including docking time) and 101.22 min for laparoscopic gastric bypass (LGB) (p < 0.05), which is statistically significant. The median length of stay was 4.1 days for the RGB group and 3.9 days for the LGB group (p = 0.89). There is only one conversion to laparoscopy in the RGB group. We observed only one case of postoperative complications, specifically one episode of endoluminal bleeding in the laparoscopic group, which was successfully managed with medical treatment. No mortality was observed in either group. Conclusion The statistical analysis shows to support the robotic approach that had a lower incidence of complications but a longer operative duration. Based on our experience, the laparoscopic approach remains a technique with more haptic feedback than the robotic approach, making surgeons feel more confident.This study has been registered on ClinicalTrial.gov Protocol Registration and Results System with this ID: NCT05746936 for the Organization UFoggia (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05746936).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanna Pavone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Foggia, Foggia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
|
9
|
Velardi AM, Anoldo P, Nigro S, Navarra G. Advancements in Bariatric Surgery: A Comparative Review of Laparoscopic and Robotic Techniques. J Pers Med 2024; 14:151. [PMID: 38392584 PMCID: PMC10890254 DOI: 10.3390/jpm14020151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/27/2024] [Indexed: 02/24/2024] Open
Abstract
This article examines the evolution of bariatric surgery, with a focus on emerging technologies such as robotics and laparoscopy. In the case of gastric bypass, no significant differences have emerged between the two techniques in terms of hospitalization duration, weight loss, weight regain, or 30-day mortality. Robotic surgery, while requiring more time in the operating room, has been associated with lower rates of bleeding, mortality, transfusions, and infections. In revisional bariatric surgery, the robotic approach has shown fewer complications, shorter hospital stays, and a reduced need for conversion to open surgery. In the case of sleeve gastrectomy, robotic procedures have required more time and longer postoperative stays but have recorded lower rates of transfusions and bleeding compared to laparoscopy. However, robotic surgeries have proven to be more costly and potentially more complex in terms of postoperative complications. The review has also addressed the topic of the single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal switch (SADIS), finding comparable results between robotic and laparoscopic techniques, although robotic procedures have required more time in the operating room. Robotic technology has proven to be safe and effective, albeit with slightly longer operative times in some cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angelo Maria Velardi
- Oncologic Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Pietro Anoldo
- Department of Advanced Biomedical Sciences, University Federico II, Via Pansini 5, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Stefania Nigro
- Oncologic Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Navarra
- Oncologic Surgery, Department of Human Pathology of Adult and Evolutive Age, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
10
|
Hayashi MC, Sarri AJ, Pereira PASV, Rocha MM, Zequi SDC, Machado MT, de Souza AH, Magno LAV, Faria EF. Ergonomic risk assessment of surgeon's position during radical prostatectomy: Laparoscopic versus robotic approach. J Surg Oncol 2023; 128:1453-1458. [PMID: 37602508 DOI: 10.1002/jso.27419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2023] [Revised: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 08/02/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Radical prostatectomy (RP) is a definitive surgical therapy for localized prostate cancer. Evidence suggests that the poor ergonomics of surgeons during RP may lead to work-related musculoskeletal disorders and loss of productivity. Since each surgery modality has its physical demands, we compared the ergonomic risk between laparoscopic (LRP) and robotic-assisted (RARP) radical prostatectomy. METHODS The study assessed the posture of 10 urological surgeons during LRP and RARP surgeries with the Rapid Entire Body Assessment (REBA) scale. RESULTS We found that the RARP approach resulted in lower REBA scores over the LRP procedure. CONCLUSIONS Robotic surgery improves body posture for the urological surgeon like in other medical specialties. However, the surgeons display harmful postures in both surgeries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marcel Calegari Hayashi
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oncologia (PPGO), Fundação Pio XII, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil
| | - Almir J Sarri
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Oncologia (PPGO), Fundação Pio XII, Hospital de Câncer de Barretos, Barretos, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Luiz Alexandre Viana Magno
- INCT em Neurotecnologia Responsável (INCT-NeurotecR), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Eliney Ferreira Faria
- Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciências da Saúde (PPGCS), Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais (FCMMG), Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
|
11
|
Gantschnigg A, Koch OO, Singhartinger F, Tschann P, Hitzl W, Emmanuel K, Presl J. Short-term outcomes and costs analysis of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy-a retrospective single-center analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:299. [PMID: 37552295 PMCID: PMC10409838 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-03037-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 08/09/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Robotic-assisted surgery is an alternative technique for patients undergoing minimal invasive cholecystectomy (CHE). The aim of this study is to compare the outcomes and costs of laparoscopic versus robotic CHE, previously described as the major disadvantage of the robotic system, in a single Austrian tertiary center. METHODS A retrospective single-center analysis was carried out of all patients who underwent an elective minimally invasive cholecystectomy between January 2010 and August 2020 at our tertiary referral institution. Patients were divided into two groups: robotic-assisted CHE (RC) and laparoscopic CHE (LC) and compared according to demographic data, short-term postoperative outcomes and costs. RESULTS In the study period, 2088 elective minimal invasive cholecystectomies were performed. Of these, 220 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. One hundred ten (50%) patients underwent LC, and 110 patients RC. There was no significant difference in the mean operation time between both groups (RC: 60.2 min vs LC: 62.0 min; p = 0.58). Postoperative length of stay was the same in both groups (RC: 2.65 days vs LC: 2.65 days, p = 1). Overall hospital costs were slightly higher in the robotic group with a total of €2088 for RC versus €1726 for LC. CONCLUSIONS Robotic-assisted cholecystectomy is a safe and feasible alternative to laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Since there are no significant clinical and cost differences between the two procedures, RC is a justified operation for training the whole operation team in handling the system as a first step procedure. Prospective randomized trials are necessary to confirm these conclusions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonia Gantschnigg
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/ Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria.
| | - Oliver Owen Koch
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/ Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Franz Singhartinger
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/ Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Peter Tschann
- Department of General and Thoracic Surgery, Academic Teaching Hospital, Feldkirch, Austria
| | - Wolfgang Hitzl
- Department of Ophthalmology and Optometry, Paracelsus Medical University/ Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
- Research Program Experimental Ophthalmology and Glaucoma Research, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
- Department of Research and Innovation, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Klaus Emmanuel
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/ Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| | - Jaroslav Presl
- Department of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University/ Salzburger Landeskliniken (SALK), Salzburg, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
|
12
|
Gorce P, Jacquier-Bret J. Effect of Assisted Surgery on Work-Related Musculoskeletal Disorder Prevalence by Body Area among Surgeons: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2023; 20:6419. [PMID: 37510651 PMCID: PMC10379148 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph20146419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Revised: 06/23/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023]
Abstract
Surgeons are highly exposed to work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs). The objective of this review was to summarize the WMSD prevalence by body area with and without assistive devices. The underlying question was whether there is an effect of assistive device use (robot, video, or other) during surgery on WMSD prevalence by body area among surgeons, regardless of their specialty. The systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The Google Scholar, Pubmed/Medline, and ScienceDirect databases were scanned to identify relevant studies. The article selection, review, critical appraisal, and data extraction were performed by two authors independently. Among the 34,854 unique identified records, 77 studies were included. They were divided into two groups: 35 focused on robotic- and video-assisted surgery (RVAS) and 48 concerning surgery without video/robotic assistance (WAS) (6 studies evaluated the prevalence for both groups). WMSD prevalence was reported for 13 body areas: the neck, back, upper back, mid-back, lower back, shoulders, elbows, wrists, fingers, thumbs, hips, knees, and ankles. The results showed that WMSD prevalence was significantly higher (unpaired t-test, p < 0.05) for RVAS in the shoulders (WAS: 28.3% vs. RVAS: 41.9%), wrists (WAS: 20.9% vs. RVAS: 31.5%), and thumbs (WAS: 9.9% vs. RVAS: 21.8%). A meta-analysis was performed for 10 body areas (with 4 areas including more than 25 studies). No sufficient data were available for the mid-back, thumbs, or hips. A high heterogeneity (Cochran's Q test and I2 statistic) was observed. A random-effects model revealed that the highest worldwide prevalence was in the neck (WAS: 41% and RVAS: 45.3%), back (WAS: 37.7% and RVAS: 49.9%), lower back (WAS: 40.0% and RVAS: 37.8%), and shoulders (WAS: 27.3% and RVAS: 41.4%). Future work could focus on work environment design, particularly the positioning and adjustment of equipment, and on postural analysis to reduce the appearance of WMSDs. Recommendations are proposed for future reviews and meta-analyses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Gorce
- International Institute of Biomechanics and Occupational Ergonomics, ErBio, Avenue du Dr Marcel Armanet, 83400 Hyères, France
- Université de Toulon, CS60584, CEDEX 9, 83041 Toulon, France
| | - Julien Jacquier-Bret
- International Institute of Biomechanics and Occupational Ergonomics, ErBio, Avenue du Dr Marcel Armanet, 83400 Hyères, France
- Université de Toulon, CS60584, CEDEX 9, 83041 Toulon, France
| |
Collapse
|
|
13
|
Masuda H, Kotecha K, Gall T, Gill AJ, Mittal A, Samra JS. Transition from open to robotic distal pancreatectomy in a low volume pancreatic surgery country: a single Australian centre experience. ANZ J Surg 2023; 93:151-159. [PMID: 36511144 DOI: 10.1111/ans.18199] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Advances in technology and techniques have allowed for robotic distal pancreatectomies to be readily performed in patients at high volume centres. This study describes the experience of a single surgeon during the learning curve and transition from open to robotic distal pancreatectomy in Australia, a traditionally low volume pancreatic surgery country. METHODS All patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy at an Australian-based tertiary referral centre between 2010 and 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Demographic, clinicopathologic and survival data were analysed to compare perioperative and oncological outcomes between patients who underwent open, laparoscopic and robotic distal pancreatectomies. RESULTS A total of 178 distal pancreatectomies were identified for analysis during the study period. Ninety-one open distal pancreatectomies (ODP), 48 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDP), and 39 robotic distal pancreatectomies (RDP) were performed. Robotic distal pancreatectomy was non-inferior with respect to perioperative outcomes and yielded statistically non-significant advantages over LDP and ODP. CONCLUSION RDP is feasible and can be performed safely in well-selected patients during the learning phase at large pancreatic centres in a traditionally low-volume country like Australia. Referral to large pancreatic centres where access to the robotic platform and surgeon experience is not a barrier, and where a robust multidisciplinary team meeting can take place, remains pivotal in the introduction and transition toward the robotic approach for management of patients with pancreatic body or tail lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiro Masuda
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Krishna Kotecha
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tamara Gall
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anthony J Gill
- Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,NSW Health Pathology, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Cancer Diagnosis and Pathology Group, Kolling Institute of Medical Research, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Anubhav Mittal
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, University of Notre Dame, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Jaswinder S Samra
- Department of Upper Gastrointestinal Surgery, Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Northern Clinical School, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
14
|
Wang G, Badal A, Jia X, Maltz JS, Mueller K, Myers KJ, Niu C, Vannier M, Yan P, Yu Z, Zeng R. Development of metaverse for intelligent healthcare. NAT MACH INTELL 2022; 4:922-929. [PMID: 36935774 PMCID: PMC10015955 DOI: 10.1038/s42256-022-00549-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The metaverse integrates physical and virtual realities, enabling humans and their avatars to interact in an environment supported by technologies such as high-speed internet, virtual reality, augmented reality, mixed and extended reality, blockchain, digital twins and artificial intelligence (AI), all enriched by effectively unlimited data. The metaverse recently emerged as social media and entertainment platforms, but extension to healthcare could have a profound impact on clinical practice and human health. As a group of academic, industrial, clinical and regulatory researchers, we identify unique opportunities for metaverse approaches in the healthcare domain. A metaverse of 'medical technology and AI' (MeTAI) can facilitate the development, prototyping, evaluation, regulation, translation and refinement of AI-based medical practice, especially medical imaging-guided diagnosis and therapy. Here, we present metaverse use cases, including virtual comparative scanning, raw data sharing, augmented regulatory science and metaversed medical intervention. We discuss relevant issues on the ecosystem of the MeTAI metaverse including privacy, security and disparity. We also identify specific action items for coordinated efforts to build the MeTAI metaverse for improved healthcare quality, accessibility, cost-effectiveness and patient satisfaction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ge Wang
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
| | - Andreu Badal
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability, OSEL, CDRH, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Xun Jia
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Molecular Radiation Sciences, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jonathan S. Maltz
- Molecular Imaging and Computed Tomography, GE Healthcare, Waukesha, WI, USA
| | - Klaus Mueller
- Computer Science Department, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | | | - Chuang Niu
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
| | | | - Pingkun Yan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, NY, USA
| | - Zhou Yu
- Canon Medical Research USA, Vernon Hills, IL, USA
| | - Rongping Zeng
- Division of Imaging, Diagnostics and Software Reliability, OSEL, CDRH, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
15
|
Younes MM, Larkins K, To G, Burke G, Heriot A, Warrier S, Mohan H. What are clinically relevant performance metrics in robotic surgery? A systematic review of the literature. J Robot Surg 2022; 17:335-350. [PMID: 36190655 PMCID: PMC10076398 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-022-01457-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2022] [Accepted: 09/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/10/2022]
Abstract
A crucial element of any surgical training program is the ability to provide procedure-specific, objective, and reliable measures of performance. During robotic surgery, objective clinically relevant performance metrics (CRPMs) can provide tailored contextual feedback and correlate with clinical outcomes. This review aims to define CRPMs, assess their validity in robotic surgical training and compare CRPMs to existing measures of robotic performance. A systematic search of Medline and Embase databases was conducted in May 2022 following the PRISMA guidelines. The search terms included Clinically Relevant Performance Metrics (CRPMs) OR Clinically Relevant Outcome Measures (CROMs) AND robotic surgery. The study settings, speciality, operative context, study design, metric details, and validation status were extracted and analysed. The initial search yielded 116 citations, of which 6 were included. Citation searching identified 3 additional studies, resulting in 9 studies included in this review. Metrics were defined as CRPMs, CROMs, proficiency-based performance metrics and reference-procedure metrics which were developed using a modified Delphi methodology. All metrics underwent both contents and construct validation. Two studies found a strong correlation with GEARS but none correlated their metrics with patient outcome data. CRPMs are a validated and objective approach for assessing trainee proficiency. Evaluating CRPMs with other robotic-assessment tools will facilitate a multimodal metric evaluation approach to robotic surgery training. Further studies should assess the correlation with clinical outcomes. This review highlights there is significant scope for the development and validation of CRPMs to establish proficiency-based progression curricula that can be translated from a simulation setting into clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melissa M Younes
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Kirsten Larkins
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia. .,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Gloria To
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Grace Burke
- International Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Alexander Heriot
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,International Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Satish Warrier
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,International Medical Robotics Academy, North Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Helen Mohan
- The University of Melbourne, 305 Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.,Austin Health, Heidelberg, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
|
16
|
Bankar GR, Keoliya A. Robot-Assisted Surgery in Gynecology. Cureus 2022; 14:e29190. [PMID: 36259016 PMCID: PMC9572807 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.29190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2022] [Accepted: 09/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
The advancement of robotics-based procedures in the medical industry is the subject of this review article. The purpose of the surgical robot is to increase surgical abilities and address human shortcomings. The robot's success has been predicated on its ability to accurately and consistently repeat tasks. The following are a few objectives and quantifiable benefits of robotic technology improving surgical maneuverability and physical capabilities. In 2005, the FDA granted gynecological surgery approval for the Da Vinci surgical system. It has been quickly embraced and has already taken on a significant role at many of the locations where it is offered. It consists of a cart with robotic branches next to the patient and a high-resolution three-dimensional (3D) vision system. This study covers laparoscopy via robots in benign gynecological surgeries, myomectomy surgery, hysterectomies, endometriosis, tubal anastomosis, and sacrocolpopexy. The appropriate published studies were evaluated after a PubMed search was conducted. Additionally, procedures that may be used in the future are highlighted. In benign gynecological illness, most currently available research does not show a substantial benefit over traditional laparoscopic surgery. Robotics, however, does provide help in more complicated operations. Compared to laparoscopy, robotic assistance has a lower conversion rate to open procedures. Endo wrist movement of an automated machine during myomectomy surgery can perform proper and better suturing than traditional laparoscopy. The automated program is a noticeable improvement over laparoscopic surgery and, if price issues are resolved, can gain popularity among gynecological surgeons around the globe.
Collapse
|
|
17
|
Erdemir A, Rasa K. Robotic Adrenalectomy: An Initial Experience in a Turkish Regional Hospital. Front Surg 2022; 9:847472. [PMID: 35846974 PMCID: PMC9277301 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2022.847472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the technical advantages and the convenience it provides to surgeons, "robotic adrenalectomy" is a widely used procedure for adrenal surgeries. In this study, we aim to evaluate our robotic adrenalectomy experience and delineate the factors that have a substantial impact on surgical outcomes. METHODS Successive 0 transperitoneal robotic operations using the daVinci SI® platform were grouped according to the surgery side, malignant or benign pathologies, for adenoma or non-adenoma lesions, tumor size of less than 4 cm or above, body mass index below or above 30 kg/m2, and with or without laparotomy history. Groups were compared in terms of duration of the operations, amount of bleeding, and the duration of hospitalization. RESULTS Morbidity developed in 5 patients (16.6%), and no mortality was observed. We had only one conversion to perform open surgery (3.3%). Operations performed for adenoma significantly last longer when compared with the non-adenoma group (p < 0.05). In the malignant group, the amount of bleeding during surgery was found to be significantly higher (p < 0.05). The blood loss during the surgery was also found to be higher in the adenoma group than in the non-adenoma match (p < 0.05). Phenomenally, operative blood loss was found to be lesser in the bigger tumor size group (>4 cm) than in the smaller size group (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION Our results corroborate that robotic adrenalectomy may be more challenging for malignant pathologies and adenomas, but we can claim that it is an effective and safe option for all adrenal gland pathologies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kemal Rasa
- Department of General Surgery, Anadolu Medical Center Hospital Kocaeli, Kocaeli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
|
18
|
Kutana S, Bitner DP, Addison P, Chung PJ, Talamini MA, Filicori F. Objective assessment of robotic surgical skills: review of literature and future directions. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:3698-3707. [PMID: 35229215 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09134-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Evaluation of robotic surgical skill has become increasingly important as robotic approaches to common surgeries become more widely utilized. However, evaluation of these currently lacks standardization. In this paper, we aimed to review the literature on robotic surgical skill evaluation. METHODS A review of literature on robotic surgical skill evaluation was performed and representative literature presented over the past ten years. RESULTS The study of reliability and validity in robotic surgical evaluation shows two main assessment categories: manual and automatic. Manual assessments have been shown to be valid but typically are time consuming and costly. Automatic evaluation and simulation are similarly valid and simpler to implement. Initial reports on evaluation of skill using artificial intelligence platforms show validity. Few data on evaluation methods of surgical skill connect directly to patient outcomes. CONCLUSION As evaluation in surgery begins to incorporate robotic skills, a simultaneous shift from manual to automatic evaluation may occur given the ease of implementation of these technologies. Robotic platforms offer the unique benefit of providing more objective data streams including kinematic data which allows for precise instrument tracking in the operative field. Such data streams will likely incrementally be implemented in performance evaluations. Similarly, with advances in artificial intelligence, machine evaluation of human technical skill will likely form the next wave of surgical evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Saratu Kutana
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 186 E. 76th Street, 1st Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Daniel P Bitner
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 186 E. 76th Street, 1st Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - Poppy Addison
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 186 E. 76th Street, 1st Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA
| | - Paul J Chung
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 186 E. 76th Street, 1st Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.,Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Mark A Talamini
- Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| | - Filippo Filicori
- Intraoperative Performance Analytics Laboratory (IPAL), Department of General Surgery, Northwell Health, Lenox Hill Hospital, 186 E. 76th Street, 1st Floor, New York, NY, 10021, USA.,Donald and Barbara Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Hempstead, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
19
|
Dobke MK, Kolb FG. Invited Discussion on: "Video-Assisted Transaxillary Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Implant-Based Breast Reconstruction: A Novel and Promising Method". Aesthetic Plast Surg 2022; 46:99-100. [PMID: 34559282 DOI: 10.1007/s00266-021-02574-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 09/02/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marek K Dobke
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92103-8890, USA.
| | - Frederic G Kolb
- Division of Plastic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego, 200 West Arbor Drive, San Diego, CA, 92103-8890, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
20
|
Kanji F, Cohen T, Alfred M, Caron A, Lawton S, Savage S, Shouhed D, Anger JT, Catchpole K. Room Size Influences Flow in Robotic-Assisted Surgery. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:7984. [PMID: 34360275 PMCID: PMC8345669 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph18157984] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Revised: 07/22/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of surgical technology into existing operating rooms (ORs) can place novel demands on staff and infrastructure. Despite the substantial physical size of the devices in robotic-assisted surgery (RAS), the workspace implications are rarely considered. This study aimed to explore the impact of OR size on the environmental causes of surgical flow disruptions (FDs) occurring during RAS. Fifty-six RAS procedures were observed at two academic hospitals between July 2019 and January 2021 across general, urologic, and gynecologic surgical specialties. A multiple regression analysis demonstrated significant effects of room size in the pre-docking phase (t = 2.170, df = 54, β = 0.017, p = 0.035) where the rate of FDs increased as room size increased, and docking phase (t = -2.488, df = 54, β = -0.017, p = 0.016) where the rate of FDs increased as room size decreased. Significant effects of site (pre-docking phase: p = 0.000 and docking phase: p = 0.000) were also demonstrated. Findings from this study demonstrate hitherto unrecognized spatial challenges involved with introducing surgical robots into the operating domain. While new technology may provide benefits towards patient safety, it is important to consider the needs of the technology prior to integration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Falisha Kanji
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (T.C.); (A.C.); (D.S.); (J.T.A.)
| | - Tara Cohen
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (T.C.); (A.C.); (D.S.); (J.T.A.)
| | - Myrtede Alfred
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; (M.A.); (S.L.); (K.C.)
| | - Ashley Caron
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (T.C.); (A.C.); (D.S.); (J.T.A.)
| | - Samuel Lawton
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; (M.A.); (S.L.); (K.C.)
| | - Stephen Savage
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA;
| | - Daniel Shouhed
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (T.C.); (A.C.); (D.S.); (J.T.A.)
| | - Jennifer T. Anger
- Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA; (T.C.); (A.C.); (D.S.); (J.T.A.)
| | - Ken Catchpole
- Department of Anesthesia and Perioperative Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 29425, USA; (M.A.); (S.L.); (K.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
|
21
|
Ouyang Q, Wu J, Sun S, Pensa J, Abiri A, Dutson E, Bisley J. Bio-inspired Haptic Feedback for Artificial Palpation in Robotic Surgery. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2021; 68:3184-3193. [PMID: 33905321 DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2021.3076094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Adding haptic feedback has been reported to improve the outcome of minimally invasive robotic surgery. In this study, we seek to determine whether an algorithm based on simulating responses of a cutaneous afferent population can be implemented to improve the performance of presenting haptic feedback for robot-assisted surgery. We propose a bio-inspired controlling model to present vibration and force feedback to help surgeons localize underlying structures in phantom tissue. A single pair of actuators was controlled by outputs of a model of a population of cutaneous afferents based on the pressure signal from a single sensor embedded in surgical forceps. We recruited 25 subjects including 10 expert surgeons to evaluate the performance of the bio-inspired controlling model in an artificial palpation task using the da Vinci surgical robot. Among the control methods tested, the bio-inspired system was unique in allowing both novices and experts to easily identify the locations of all classes of tumors and did so with reduced contact force and tumor contact time. This work demonstrates the utility of our bio-inspired multi-modal feedback system, which resulted in superior performance for both novice and professional users, in comparison to a traditional linear and the existing piecewise discrete algorithms of haptic feedback.
Collapse
|
|
22
|
Tang W, Qiu JG, Deng X, Liu SS, Cheng L, Liu JR, Du CY. Minimally invasive versus open radical resection surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Comparable outcomes associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0248534. [PMID: 33705481 PMCID: PMC7951922 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0248534] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/27/2021] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) provides a new approach for patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCA). However, whether it can achieve similar outcomes to traditional open surgery (OS) remains controversial. Methods To assess the safety and feasibility of MIS for HCCA, a systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcomes of MIS with OS. Seventeen outcomes were assessed. Results Nine studies involving 382 patients were included. MIS was comparable in blood transfusion rate, R0 resection rate, lymph nodes received, overall morbidity, severe morbidity (Clavien–Dindo classification > = 3), bile leakage rate, wound infection rate, intra-abdominal infection rate, days until oral feeding, 1-year overall survival, 2-year overall survival and postoperative mortality with OS. Although operation time was longer (mean difference (MD) = 93.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 64.10 to 122.91, P < 0.00001) and hospital cost (MD = 0.68, 95% CI = 0.03 to 1.33, P = 0.04) was higher in MIS, MIS was associated with advantages of minimal invasiveness, that was less blood loss (MD = -81.85, 95% CI = -92.09 to -71.62, P < 0.00001), less postoperative pain (MD = -1.21, 95% CI = -1.63 to -0.79, P < 0.00001), and shorter hospital stay (MD = -4.22, 95% CI = -5.65 to -2.80, P < 0.00001). Conclusions The safety and feasibility of MIS for HCCA is acceptable in selected patients. MIS is a remarkable alternative to OS for providing comparable outcomes associated with a benefit of minimal invasiveness and its application should be considered more.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jian-Guo Qiu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Xin Deng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Shan-Shan Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Luo Cheng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Jia-Rui Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Cheng-You Du
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
|
23
|
Saaia SB, Rabtsun AA, Popova IV, Gostev AA, Cheban AV, Ignatenko PV, Starodubtsev VB, Karpenko AA. [Robotic-assisted operations for pathology of the aortoiliac segment: own experience]. ANGIOLOGII︠A︡ I SOSUDISTAI︠A︡ KHIRURGII︠A︡ = ANGIOLOGY AND VASCULAR SURGERY 2020; 26:90-96. [PMID: 33332311 DOI: 10.33529/angio2020409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
AIM The present study was aimed at assessing the results of a total of 40 vascular operations carried out using the robotic-assisted da Vinci surgical system. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 2013 and September 2019, a total of 40 robotic-assisted vascular operations were performed at the Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies of the Centre of Vascular and Hybrid Surgery. Of these, 31 interventions were carried out for occlusion of the aortoiliac segment and 9 for removal of an aneurysm of the infrarenal portion of the abdominal aorta. The patients were arbitrarily divided into 2 groups: the first group included those subjected to aortofemoral bypass grafting procedures for atherosclerotic steno-occlusive lesions of the aorta and iliac arteries, whereas the second group comprised the patients who underwent aneurysmoectomies with linear prosthetic repair of the abdominal aorta. RESULTS Altogether, elective robotic-assisted operations were successfully performed in 38 (95%) cases. Conversion to a laparotomic approach was required in 2 (5%) patients. The mean time of creating an anastomosis with the abdominal aorta amounted to 51 minutes (range 30-90), being 42±4.75 min for aortofemoral bypass grafting and 83±5.00 min for aneurysmoectomies with linear prosthetic repair of the abdominal artery. The average blood loss was 316 (range 50-1000) ml, amounting to 280±209 ml and 438±322 ml for group I and group II, respectively. With the exception of one case, all patients spent 24 hours in the intensive care unit to be then transferred to the specialized ward. The average length of hospital stay amounted to 9.8 days. One patient experienced haemorrhage from the central anastomosis in the early postoperative period and was emergently operated on from a laparotomic approach. Four (10%) patients developed nonlethal complications which were treated conservatively. During the 30-day follow-up period, no lethal outcomes, thromboses, nor infections of the prostheses were observed. CONCLUSION From a practical point of view, the major advantages of using the robotic-assisted complex include minimal surgical trauma, reduced blood loss, a wide range of high-precision movements of the manipulators, 3-D visualization with a 5-fold magnification, thus making it possible to create a vascular anastomosis sufficiently fast in very tight spaces in the body. Our experience with laparoscopic robotic-assisted surgery demonstrated feasibility of using this technique for treatment of pathology of the aortoiliac segment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sh B Saaia
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - A A Rabtsun
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - I V Popova
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - A A Gostev
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - A V Cheban
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - P V Ignatenko
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - V B Starodubtsev
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| | - A A Karpenko
- Cardiosurgical Department of Vascular Pathology and Hybrid Technologies, National Medical Research Centre named after Academician E.N. Meshalkin under the RF Ministry of Public Health, Novosibirsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
|
24
|
Wu C, Cha J, Sulek J, Zhou T, Sundaram CP, Wachs J, Yu D. Eye-Tracking Metrics Predict Perceived Workload in Robotic Surgical Skills Training. HUMAN FACTORS 2020; 62:1365-1386. [PMID: 31560573 PMCID: PMC7672675 DOI: 10.1177/0018720819874544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2018] [Accepted: 08/05/2019] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study is to assess the relationship between eye-tracking measures and perceived workload in robotic surgical tasks. BACKGROUND Robotic techniques provide improved dexterity, stereoscopic vision, and ergonomic control system over laparoscopic surgery, but the complexity of the interfaces and operations may pose new challenges to surgeons and compromise patient safety. Limited studies have objectively quantified workload and its impact on performance in robotic surgery. Although not yet implemented in robotic surgery, minimally intrusive and continuous eye-tracking metrics have been shown to be sensitive to changes in workload in other domains. METHODS Eight surgical trainees participated in 15 robotic skills simulation sessions. In each session, participants performed up to 12 simulated exercises. Correlation and mixed-effects analyses were conducted to explore the relationships between eye-tracking metrics and perceived workload. Machine learning classifiers were used to determine the sensitivity of differentiating between low and high workload with eye-tracking features. RESULTS Gaze entropy increased as perceived workload increased, with a correlation of .51. Pupil diameter and gaze entropy distinguished differences in workload between task difficulty levels, and both metrics increased as task level difficulty increased. The classification model using eye-tracking features achieved an accuracy of 84.7% in predicting workload levels. CONCLUSION Eye-tracking measures can detect perceived workload during robotic tasks. They can potentially be used to identify task contributors to high workload and provide measures for robotic surgery training. APPLICATION Workload assessment can be used for real-time monitoring of workload in robotic surgical training and provide assessments for performance and learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jackie Cha
- Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | - Jay Sulek
- Indiana University, Indianapolis, USA
| | - Tian Zhou
- Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| | | | | | - Denny Yu
- Purdue University, West Lafayette, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
25
|
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Recent studies reported that laparoscopic pancreatoduodenectomy (LPD) is associated with superior perioperative outcomes compared to the open approach. However, concerns have been raised about the safety of LPD, especially during the learning phase. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) has been reported to be associated with a shorter learning curve compared to LPD. We herein present our initial experience with RPD. METHODS A retrospective review of a single-institution prospective robotic hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) surgery database of 70 patients identified seven consecutive RPDs performed by a single surgeon in 2016-2017. These were matched at a 1:2 ratio with 14 open pancreatoduodenectomies (OPDs) selected from 77 consecutive pancreatoduodenectomies performed by the same surgeon between 2011 and 2017. RESULTS Seven patients underwent RPD, of which five were hybrid procedures with open reconstruction. There were no open conversions. Median operative time was 710.0 (range 560.0-930.0) minutes. Two major morbidities (> Grade 2) occurred: one gastrojejunostomy bleed requiring endoscopic haemostasis and one delayed gastric emptying requiring feeding tube placement. There were no pancreatic fistulas, reoperations or 90-day/in-hospital mortalities in the RPD group. Comparison between RPD and OPD demonstrated that RPD was associated with a significantly longer operative time. Compared to open surgery, there was no significant difference in estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative stay, pancreatic fistula rates, morbidity and mortality rates, R0 resection rates, and lymph node harvest rates. CONCLUSION Our initial experience demonstrates that RPD is feasible and safe in selected patients. It can be safely adopted without any compromise in patient outcomes compared to the open approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tze-Yi Low
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ye-Xin Koh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian KP Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
26
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Current bariatric surgical practice has developed from early procedures, some of which are no longer routinely performed. This review highlights how surgical practice in this area has developed over time. RECENT FINDINGS This review outlines early procedures including jejuno-colic and jejuno-ileal bypass, initial experience with gastric bypass, vertical banded gastroplasty and biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch. The role laparoscopy has played in the widespread utilization of surgery for treatment of obesity will be described, as will the development of procedures which form the mainstay of current bariatric surgical practice including gastric bypass, sleeve gastrectomy and adjustable gastric banding. Endoscopic therapies for the treatment of obesity will be described. By outlining how bariatric surgical practice has developed over time, this review will help practicing surgeons understand how individual procedures have evolved and also provide insight into potential future developments in this field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Wiggins
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London, E9 6SR, UK
| | - M S Majid
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London, E9 6SR, UK
| | - S Agrawal
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Homerton University Hospital, Homerton Row, London, E9 6SR, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
|
27
|
Watson MD, Baimas-George MR, Thompson KJ, Iannitti DA, Ocuin LM, Baker EH, Martinie JB, Vrochides D. Improved oncologic outcomes for minimally invasive left pancreatectomy: Propensity-score matched analysis of the National Cancer Database. J Surg Oncol 2020; 122:1383-1392. [PMID: 32772366 DOI: 10.1002/jso.26147] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/14/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/25/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES Minimally invasive (MIS) left pancreatectomy (LP) is increasingly used to treat pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Despite improved short-term outcomes, no studies have demonstrated long-term benefits over open resection. METHODS The National Cancer Database was queried between 2010 and 2016 for patients with PDAC, grouped by surgical approach (MIS vs open). Demographics, comorbidities, clinical staging, and pathologic staging were used for propensity-score matching. Perioperative, short-term oncologic, and survival outcomes were compared. RESULTS After matching, both cohorts included 805 patients. There were no differences in baseline characteristics, staging, or preoperative therapy between cohorts. The MIS cohort had a shorter length of stay (6.8 ± 5.5 vs 8.5 ± 7.3 days; P < .0001) with the trend toward improved time to chemotherapy (53.9 ± 26.1 vs 57.9 ± 29.9 days; P = .0511) and margin-positive resection rate (15.3% vs 18.9%; P = .0605). Lymph node retrieval and receipt of chemotherapy were similar. The MIS cohort had higher median overall survival (28.0 vs 22.1 months; P = .0067). Subgroup analysis demonstrated the highest survival for robotic compared with laparoscopic and open LP (41.9 vs 26.6 vs 22.1 months; P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the safety of MIS LP and favorable long-term oncologic outcomes. The improved survival after MIS LP warrants further study with prospective, randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael D Watson
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Maria R Baimas-George
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Kyle J Thompson
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - David A Iannitti
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Lee M Ocuin
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Erin H Baker
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - John B Martinie
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| | - Dionisios Vrochides
- Department of Surgery, Division of HPB Surgery, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina
| |
Collapse
|
|
28
|
Paradiso FV, Giannico S, La Milia D, Lohmeyer FM, Nanni L. Applicability and Effectiveness of Laparoscopic Procedures in Pediatrics. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2020; 30:1040-1043. [PMID: 32716272 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgery in pediatrics is still uncommon and few studies assessed in clinical practice advantages and disadvantages. Applicability and effectiveness of 3D versus two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic procedures in congenital and acquired conditions in children are still unknown. We assessed applicability and effectiveness of 3D compared with 2D laparoscopic procedures in a pediatric setting. Methods: Two groups of patients who underwent 3D or 2D laparoscopic surgical procedures between May 2016 and April 2018 were compared. Each 3D/2D laparoscopic procedure was assessed with a surgeon/assistant questionnaire. Results: The 3D group included 30 patients and the 2D group 32 patients. The analysis of the 3D/2D questionnaire showed statistically significant superiority of 3D technical aspects (P = .0000), allowing a better spatial orientation and depth perception, reducing manipulation and trauma to tissues. Moreover, no difference was reported in physical complaints (P = .7084), but decreased visual fatigue was highlighted by surgeon (P = .000). Conclusions: In pediatric patients, 3D laparoscopic procedures prove to be more effective facilitating the surgeon's performance, while maintaining the benefits of minimally invasive surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Filomena Valentina Paradiso
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Scienze Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Serena Giannico
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Scienze Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Daniele La Milia
- UOC Igiene Ospedaliera, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Lorenzo Nanni
- Division of Pediatric Surgery, Scienze Salute della Donna e del Bambino, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Direzione Scientifica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.,Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
29
|
De Crea C, Arcuri G, Pennestrì F, Paolantonio C, Bellantone R, Raffaelli M. Robotic adrenalectomy: evaluation of cost-effectiveness. Gland Surg 2020; 9:831-839. [PMID: 32775276 DOI: 10.21037/gs.2020.03.44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) is the preferred treatment option for adrenal lesions, considering the improved patients outcomes, due to the reduced postoperative morbidity and postoperative pain, the faster recovery and the shorter length of hospital stay. The widespread diffusion of robotic technology led to the development and standardization of robot-assisted approach to adrenalectomy. However, to date, no clear benefit from the use of the robot-assisted approach has been found. The higher costs remain an important drawback and limit the implementation of robot-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) programs. This review summarizes the current available data regarding RA including its operative outcomes, advantages and drawbacks in comparison with conventional LA, evaluating its cost-effectiveness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carmela De Crea
- Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Giovanni Arcuri
- UOC Tecnologie Sanitarie, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Pennestrì
- UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Chiara Paolantonio
- UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Rocco Bellantone
- Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Marco Raffaelli
- Dipartimento Universitario di Medicina e Chirurgia Traslazionale, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.,UOC Chirurgia Endocrina e Metabolica, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Roma - Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
|
30
|
Liu R, Wakabayashi G, Palanivelu C, Tsung A, Yang K, Goh BKP, Chong CCN, Kang CM, Peng C, Kakiashvili E, Han HS, Kim HJ, He J, Lee JH, Takaori K, Marino MV, Wang SN, Guo T, Hackert T, Huang TS, Anusak Y, Fong Y, Nagakawa Y, Shyr YM, Wu YM, Zhao Y. International consensus statement on robotic pancreatic surgery. Hepatobiliary Surg Nutr 2019; 8:345-360. [PMID: 31489304 DOI: 10.21037/hbsn.2019.07.08] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The robotic surgical system has been applied to various types of pancreatic surgery. However, controversies exist regarding a variety of factors including the safety, feasibility, efficacy, and cost-effectiveness of robotic surgery. This study aimed to evaluate the current status of robotic pancreatic surgery and put forth experts' consensus and recommendations to promote its development. Based on the WHO Handbook for Guideline Development, a Consensus Steering Group* and a Consensus Development Group were established to determine the topics, prepare evidence-based documents, and generate recommendations. The GRADE Grid method and Delphi vote were used to formulate the recommendations. A total of 19 topics were analyzed. The first 16 recommendations were generated by GRADE using an evidence-based method (EBM) and focused on the safety, feasibility, indication, techniques, certification of the robotic surgeon, and cost-effectiveness of robotic pancreatic surgery. The remaining three recommendations were based on literature review and expert panel opinion due to insufficient EBM results. Since the current amount of evidence was low/meager as evaluated by the GRADE method, further randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed in the future to validate these recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rong Liu
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgical Oncology, Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) General Hospital, Beijing 100853, China
| | - Go Wakabayashi
- Center for Advanced Treatment of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Diseases, Ageo Central General Hospital, Ageo, Japan
| | - Chinnusamy Palanivelu
- Division of Gastrointestinal Surgery and Minimal Access Surgery, GEM Hospital and Research Centre, Coimbatore, India
| | - Allan Tsung
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Gastrointestinal Disease Specific Research Group, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center Department of Surgery, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Kehu Yang
- Evidence-Based Medicine Center, School of Basic Medical Sciences, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou 730000, China
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Charing Ching-Ning Chong
- Department of Surgery, Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Division of HBP Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chenghong Peng
- Pancreatic Disease Centre, Ruijin Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Eli Kakiashvili
- Department of General Surgery, Galilee Medical Center, Nahariya, Israel
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hong-Jin Kim
- Department of Surgery, Yeungnam University Hospital, Daegu, Korea
| | - Jin He
- Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary & Pancreas Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyoichi Takaori
- Department of Surgery, Kyoto University Hospital, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Marco Vito Marino
- Department of General Surgery, Azienda Ospedaliera, Ospedali Riuniti Villa Sofia-Cervello, Palermo, Italy
| | - Shen-Nien Wang
- Division of General and Digestive Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung
| | - Tiankang Guo
- Department of General Surgery, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou 730030, China
| | - Thilo Hackert
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Ting-Shuo Huang
- Division of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Keelung
| | - Yiengpruksawan Anusak
- Minimally Invasive Surgery Division, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Yuman Fong
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope Medical Center, Duarte, CA, USA
| | - Yuichi Nagakawa
- Department of Gastrointestinal and Pediatric Surgery, Tokyo Medical University, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Yi-Ming Shyr
- Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital and National Yang Ming University, Taipei
| | - Yao-Ming Wu
- Department of Surgery, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei
| | - Yupei Zhao
- Department of General Surgery, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China
| |
Collapse
|
|
31
|
Low TY, Goh BKP. Initial experience with minimally invasive extended pancreatectomies for locally advanced pancreatic malignancies: Report of six cases. J Minim Access Surg 2019; 15:204-209. [PMID: 30416147 PMCID: PMC6561074 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_69_18] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Recently, there have been several reports on minimally-invasive surgery for extended pancreatectomy (MIEP) in the literature. However, to date, only a limited number of studies reporting on the outcomes of MIEP have been published. In the present study, we report our initial experience with MIEP defined according to the latest the International Study Group for Pancreatic Surgery (ISPGS) guidelines. METHODS Over a 14-month period, a total of 6 consecutive MIEP performed by a single surgeon at a tertiary institution were identified from a prospectively maintained surgical database. EP was defined as per the 2014 ISPGS consensus. Hybrid pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) was defined as when the entire resection was completed through minimally-invasive surgery, and the reconstruction was performed open through a mini-laparotomy incision. RESULTS Six cases were performed including 2 robotic extended subtotal pancreatosplenectomies with gastric resection, 1 laparoscopic-assisted (hybrid) extended PD with superior mesenteric vein wedge resection, 2 robotic-assisted (hybrid) PD with portal vein resection (1 interposition Polytetrafluoroethylene graft reconstruction and 1 wedge resection) and 1 totally robotic PD with wedge resection of portal vein. Median estimated blood loss was 400 (250-1500) ml and median operative time was 713 (400-930) min. Median post-operative stay was 9 (6-36) days. There was 1 major morbidity (Grade 3b) in a patient who developed early post-operative intestinal obstruction secondary to port site herniation necessitating repeat laparoscopic surgery. There were no open conversions and no in-hospital mortalities. CONCLUSION Based on our initial experience, MIEP although technically challenging and associated with long operative times, is feasible and safe in highly selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tze-Yi Low
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Brian K. P. Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
- Duke-Nus Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
32
|
McDermott H, Choudhury N, Lewin-Runacres M, Aemn I, Moss E. Gender differences in understanding and acceptance of robot-assisted surgery. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:227-232. [PMID: 31049775 PMCID: PMC7000495 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00960-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Accepted: 04/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Robot-assisted surgery has numerous patient benefits compared to open surgery including smaller incisions, lower risk of infection, less post-operative pain, shorter hospital stays and a quicker return to the workforce. As such, it has become the first-choice surgical modality for several surgical procedures with the most common being prostatectomy and hysterectomy. However, research has identified that the perceptions of robot-assisted surgery among surgical patients and medical staff often do not accurately reflect the real-world situation. This study aimed to understand male and female perceptions of robot-assisted surgery with the objective of identifying the factors that might inhibit or facilitate the acceptance of robotic surgery. Semi-structured interviews were undertaken with 25 men/women from diverse social/ethnic backgrounds. The interviews were transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. The majority of female participants expressed concerns in relation to the safety and perception of new technology in surgery, whereas many male participants appeared to be unfazed by the notion of robotic surgery. There were clear differences in how males and females understood and conceptualised the robot-assisted surgical process. Whilst male participants tended to humanise the process, female participants saw it as de-humanising. There is still a discrepancy between the public perceptions of robotic surgery and the clinical reality perceived by healthcare professionals. The findings will educate medical staff and support the development of current informative techniques given to patients prior to surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hilary McDermott
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK.
| | - Nazmin Choudhury
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK
| | - Molly Lewin-Runacres
- School of Sport, Exercise and Health Sciences, Loughborough University, Loughborough, Leicestershire, LE11 3TU, UK
| | - Ismail Aemn
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK
| | - Esther Moss
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, University Hospitals of Leicester, Leicester, Leicestershire, UK.,Leicester Cancer Research Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE2 7LX, UK
| |
Collapse
|
|
33
|
Connelly TM, Malik Z, Sehgal R, Byrnes G, Coffey JC, Peirce C. The 100 most influential manuscripts in robotic surgery: a bibliometric analysis. J Robot Surg 2019; 14:155-165. [PMID: 30949890 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-019-00956-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2019] [Accepted: 03/28/2019] [Indexed: 01/18/2023]
Abstract
Since the first robotic assisted surgery in 1985, the number of procedures performed annually has steadily increased. Bibliometric analysis highlights the key studies that have influenced current practice in a field of interest. We use bibliometric analysis to evaluate the 100 most cited manuscripts on robotic surgery and discuss their content and influence on the evolution of the platform. The terms 'robotic surgery,' 'robot assisted surgery' and 'robot-assisted surgery' were used to search Thomson Reuters Web of Science database for full length, English language manuscripts. The top 100 cited manuscripts were analyzed by manuscript type, surgical specialty, first and last author, institution, year and journal of publication. 14,980 manuscripts were returned. Within the top 100 cited manuscripts, the majority featured urological surgery (n = 28), followed by combined results from multiple surgical subspecialties (n = 15) and colorectal surgery (n = 13). The majority of manuscripts featured case series/reports (n = 42), followed by comparative studies (n = 24). The most cited paper authored by Nelson et al. (432 citations) reviewed technological advances in the field. The year and country with the greatest number of publications were 2009 (n = 15) and the USA (n = 68). The Johns Hopkins University published the most top 100 manuscripts (n = 18). The 100 most cited manuscripts reflect the progression of robotic surgery from a basic instrument-holding platform to today's articulated instruments with 3D technology. From feasibility studies to multicenter trials, this analysis demonstrates how robotic assisted surgery has gained acceptance in urological, colorectal, general, cardiothoracic, orthopedic, maxillofacial and neuro surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tara M Connelly
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland.
| | - Zoya Malik
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Rishabh Sehgal
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Gerrard Byrnes
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
| | - J Calvin Coffey
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| | - Colin Peirce
- Department of Colorectal Surgery, University Hospital Limerick, Dooradoyle, Limerick, Ireland
- Graduate Entry Medical School, University of Limerick, Limerick, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
|
34
|
Goh BKP, Low TY, Kam JH, Lee SY, Chan CY. Initial experience with laparoscopic and robotic surgery for the treatment of periampullary tumours: single institution experience with the first 30 consecutive cases. ANZ J Surg 2019; 89:E137-E141. [PMID: 30805992 DOI: 10.1111/ans.15033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2018] [Revised: 11/24/2018] [Accepted: 11/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Concerns have been raised about the safety of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) during the early learning phase. In this study, we present our initial experience with MIS for periampullary tumours. METHODS Retrospective review of the first 30 consecutive patients who underwent laparoscopic (LS)/robotic surgery (RS) for periampullary tumours between 2014 and 2017. RESULTS Twenty-seven patients underwent PD, including three total pancreatectomies (TPs) and three underwent palliative bypasses. Twenty underwent LS, of which 18 were hybrid PDs, including two TPs and two bypasses. Ten patients underwent RS, of which nine were PDs, including one TP and one bypass. Five of 10 RSs were totally MIS procedures. There were four PDs with venous resection, of which three were by RS. There were four (13.3%) open conversions all in the LS cohort. There were five (16.7%) major (>grade 2) morbidities, including three pancreatic fistulas (two grade B and one grade C). There was no 30-day and one (3.3%) 90-day mortality. Comparison between RS and LS demonstrated that RS had a higher likelihood of being completed via totally MIS (five (50%) versus 0, P = 0.002), tended to have a shorter post-operative stay (eight (range 6-36) versus 14.5 (range 6-62) days, P = 0.058) but tended to be associated with a longer operation time (670 (range 500-930) versus 577 (range 235-715) min, P = 0.056). CONCLUSION Our initial experience demonstrated that both LS and RS can be safely adopted for the treatment of periampullary tumours. The learning curve for RS seemed to be shorter than LS as we could transition more quickly from hybrid PDs to totally MIS safely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Tze-Yi Low
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Juinn-Huar Kam
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Ser-Yee Lee
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| | - Chung-Yip Chan
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore.,Duke-NUS Medical School, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
|
35
|
Andolfi C, Kumar R, Boysen WR, Gundeti MS. Current Status of Robotic Surgery in Pediatric Urology. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2019; 29:159-166. [DOI: 10.1089/lap.2018.0745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Ciro Andolfi
- Pediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Rana Kumar
- Pediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - William R. Boysen
- Pediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Mohan S. Gundeti
- Pediatric Urology, Section of Urology, Department of Surgery, Comer Children's Hospital, The University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
|
36
|
Laparoscopic versus robotic adrenalectomy: a review of the national inpatient sample. J Robot Surg 2018; 13:69-75. [PMID: 29696591 DOI: 10.1007/s11701-018-0808-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/26/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Laparoscopic adrenalectomy (LA) has become the standard treatment of adrenal lesions. Recently, robotic-assisted adrenalectomy (RA) has become an option, however, short-term outcomes for RA have not been well studied and benefits over LA are debatable. The aim of this study was to explore differences in short-term outcomes between LA and RA using the national inpatient sample (NIS) database. METHODS Patient data were collected from the NIS. All patients undergoing LA or RA from January 2009 to December 2012 were included. Univariate analysis and propensity matching were performed to look for differences between the groups. RESULTS A total of 1006 patients (66.4% in LA group and 33.6% in RA group) were identified. Patient age group, gender, race, risk of mortality, severity of illness or indication for adrenalectomy did not differ significantly between the LA or RA cohorts. Insurance type predicted procedure type (45% of medicare patients underwent RA versus 29% of patients with private insurance, p < 0.0001). Patients living in the highest income areas were more likely to receive the laparoscopic approach (31.7 versus 17.4%, p < 0.0001). Hospital volume, bed size and teaching status of the hospital were not significant factors in the decision of RA versus LA. There was no difference in complication and conversion rates between RA versus LA. The mean length of stay was shorter in the RA group (2.2 versus 1.9 days, p = 0.03). Total charges were higher in the RA group ($42,659 versus $33,748, p < 0.0001). There was a significant trend towards more adrenalectomies being performed robotic assisted by year. Only 22% of adrenalectomies were performed robotic-assisted in 2009 compared with 48% in 2012. CONCLUSIONS The overall benefit for RA remains small and higher total charges for RA may currently outweigh the benefits. These findings may change as more cases are performed robotically assisted and robotic technology improves.
Collapse
|
|
37
|
Smeenk RM, van 't Hof G, Elsten E, Feskens PGBM. The Results of 100 Robotic Versus 100 Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass Procedures: a Single High Volume Centre Experience. Obes Surg 2018; 26:1266-73. [PMID: 26467691 DOI: 10.1007/s11695-015-1933-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The introduction of robotics in bariatric surgery is a novel development since the beginning of this century. The aim of this study is to compare surgical outcome of the robotic gastric bypass with the laparoscopic counterpart. METHODS A retrospective study was conducted to compare the results of 100 fully robotic gastric bypasses (RGB) and 100 laparoscopic gastric bypasses (LGB) performed by a single surgeon. Surgical outcome was analysed by evaluating operation room time and surgical time, morbidity and mortality, and length of hospital stay. RESULTS In the RGB and LGB group, respectively, 92 and 80 % of operated patients were female (p = 0.024). Mean age was 39 (range 20-62, SD 10.21) and 42 years (range 18-65, SD 11.87), respectively (p = 0.158). Mean BMI was 40 (range 35-47, SD 2.66) and 42 (range 35-56, SD 4.75), respectively (p < 0.05). Mean surgical time was 67 (range 39-210, SD 22.46) and 31 min (range 18-62, SD 9.12), respectively (p < 0.05). Mean operation room time was 117 (range 80-257, SD 30.13) and 66 min (range 38-101, SD 12.68), respectively (p < 0.05). The surgery-related 30-day morbidity rate was 5 % in both groups. Major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo class 3-4) was 3 and 1 %, respectively (p = 0.62). There was no mortality. Median hospital stay was two postoperative days in both groups. A learning curve developed after 25 procedures. CONCLUSIONS The RGB is a feasible procedure. Although more time is needed, a standardized technique results in fair operation times in the hands of an experienced surgeon.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R M Smeenk
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Bariatric Centre South-West Netherlands, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands.
| | - G van 't Hof
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Bariatric Centre South-West Netherlands, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
| | - E Elsten
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Bariatric Centre South-West Netherlands, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
| | - P G B M Feskens
- Department of Bariatric Surgery, Bariatric Centre South-West Netherlands, Bravis Hospital, Bergen op Zoom, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
|
38
|
|
|
39
|
Xourafas D, Ashley SW, Clancy TE. Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes between Open, Laparoscopic, and Robotic Distal Pancreatectomy: an Analysis of 1815 Patients from the ACS-NSQIP Procedure-Targeted Pancreatectomy Database. J Gastrointest Surg 2017; 21:1442-1452. [PMID: 28573358 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-017-3463-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 56] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robotic surgery is gaining acceptance for distal pancreatectomy (DP). Nevertheless, no multi-institutional data exist to demonstrate the ideal clinical circumstances for use and the efficacy of the robot compared to the open or laparoscopic techniques, in terms of perioperative outcomes. METHODS The 2014 ACS-NSQIP procedure-targeted pancreatectomy data for patients undergoing DP were analyzed. Demographics and clinicopathological and perioperative variables were compared between the three approaches. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to evaluate outcomes. RESULTS One thousand eight hundred fifteen DPs comprised 921 open distal pancreatectomies (ODPs), 694 laparoscopic distal pancreatectomies (LDPs), and 200 robotic distal pancreatectomies (RDPs). The three groups were comparable with respect to demographics, ASA score, relevant comorbidities, and malignant histology subtype. Compared to the ODP group, patients undergoing RDP had lower T-stages of disease (P = 0.0192), longer operations (P = 0.0030), shorter hospital stays (P < 0.0001), and lower postoperative 30-day morbidity (P = 0.0476). Compared to the LDP group, RDPs were longer operations (P < 0.0001) but required fewer concomitant vascular resections (P = 0.0487) and conversions to open surgery (P = 0.0068). On multivariable analysis, neoadjuvant therapy (P = 0.0236), malignant histology (P = 0.0124), pancreatic reconstruction (P = 0.0006), and vascular resection (P = 0.0008) were the strongest predictors of performing an ODP. CONCLUSIONS The open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches to distal pancreatectomy offer particular advantages for well-selected patients and specific clinicopathological contexts; therefore, clearly demonstrating the most suitable use and superiority of one technique over another remains challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dimitrios Xourafas
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Stanley W Ashley
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Thomas E Clancy
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis St, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
40
|
Buzzi J, Gatti C, Ferrigno G, De Momi E. Analysis of Joint and Hand Impedance During Teleoperation and Free-Hand Task Execution. IEEE Robot Autom Lett 2017. [DOI: 10.1109/lra.2017.2678546] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|
|
41
|
Hernandez D, Garimella R, Eltorai AEM, Daniels AH. Computer-assisted Orthopaedic Surgery. Orthop Surg 2017; 9:152-158. [PMID: 28589561 PMCID: PMC6584434 DOI: 10.1111/os.12323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2015] [Accepted: 07/28/2016] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Nowadays, operating rooms can be inefficient and overcrowded. Patient data and images are at times not well integrated and displayed in a timely fashion. This lack of coordination may cause further reductions in efficiency, jeopardize patient safety, and increase costs. Fortunately, technology has much to offer the surgical disciplines and the ongoing and recent operating room innovations have advanced preoperative planning and surgical procedures by providing visual, navigational, and mechanical computerized assistance. The field of computer-assisted surgery (CAS) broadly refers to surgical interface between surgeons and machines. It is also part of the ongoing initiatives to move away from invasive to less invasive or even noninvasive procedures. CAS can be applied preoperatively, intraoperatively, and/or postoperatively to improve the outcome of orthopaedic surgical procedures as it has the potential for greater precision, control, and flexibility in carrying out surgical tasks, and enables much better visualization of the operating field than conventional methods have afforded. CAS is an active research discipline, which brings together orthopaedic practitioners with traditional technical disciplines such as engineering, computer science, and robotics. However, to achieve the best outcomes, teamwork, open communication, and willingness to adapt and adopt new skills and processes are critical. Because of the relatively short time period over which CAS has developed, long-term follow-up studies have not yet been possible. Consequently, this review aims to outline current CAS applications, limitations, and promising future developments that will continue to impact the operating room (OR) environment and the OR in the future, particularly within orthopedic and spine surgery.
Collapse
MESH Headings
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/instrumentation
- Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction/methods
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/instrumentation
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/instrumentation
- Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee/methods
- Equipment Design
- Forecasting
- Fractures, Bone/surgery
- Humans
- Orthopedic Procedures/instrumentation
- Orthopedic Procedures/methods
- Prosthesis Design
- Robotic Surgical Procedures/instrumentation
- Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods
- Spinal Diseases/surgery
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted/instrumentation
- Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Hernandez
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Roja Garimella
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Adam E M Eltorai
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| | - Alan H Daniels
- Department of Orthopaedic SurgeryWarren Alpert Medical School of Brown UniversityProvidenceRhode IslandUSA
| |
Collapse
|
|
42
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES We hypothesized that high school students can be subjected to the same laparoscopic surgical training curriculum used by surgeons and successfully complete it. The goal of this study was to evaluate the appropriateness of early training in minimally invasive surgical techniques. METHODS Thirteen high school students, ages 15-18, participated in the validated Top Gun Surgeon Laparoscopic Skills and Suturing program. The students performed 3 preparatory drills 10 times each. The students' scores were then compared to a database of 393 surgeons. Performance graphs were prepared to allow comparison of skills acquisition between the 2 training groups. RESULTS All 13 students successfully completed the tasks. The Students' performance (expressed as time/percentile range/average percentile) for each task were as follows: rope pass 101.8 seconds/3.8-47.1/11.8; bean drop 149.5 seconds/18.7-96.0/59.4; triangle transfer 303.2 seconds/1.3-16.0/5.8. The students started each drill with slower times, but their average improvement (decreased time to complete tasks) was more rapid than that of the surgeons between the first and second trials for each drill (-83 seconds vs -25 seconds, -120 seconds vs -53 seconds, -100 seconds vs -60 seconds). Average student times compared to average surgeon times during the last trials measured were not significantly different in the triangle transfer and rope pass drills (P = .40 and .18, respectively). Students' times were significantly faster than surgeons' in the last measured trial of the bean drop (P = .039). CONCLUSIONS Despite the small sample size, this investigation suggests that high school students can successfully complete skill-building programs in minimally invasive surgery. Further study is needed to evaluate the appropriateness of starting surgical training of future residents at an earlier stage of their careers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Scott Furer
- UCF College of Medicine. Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - Sarah Alam
- University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida, USA
| | - James Rosser
- Florida Hospital Celebration Health, Celebration, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
|
43
|
“Plug and Play”: a novel technique utilising existing technology to get the most out of the robot. J Robot Surg 2017; 11:235-238. [DOI: 10.1007/s11701-016-0670-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 12/24/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
|
44
|
Kozlov Y, Kovalkov K, Nowogilov V. 3D Laparoscopy in Neonates and Infants. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26:1021-1027. [PMID: 27926352 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study focuses on the successful application of three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic surgeries in the treatment of congenital anomalies and acquired diseases in the young pediatric population. The purpose of this scientific work consists in highlighting the spectrum, indications, applicability, and effectiveness of 3D endosurgery in children. METHODS Our experience is based on 110 endosurgical procedures performed in neonates and infants in the 3D format between January 2014 and May 2015. Depending on the type of operations, all patients were divided into the following groups: (1) inguinal herniorrhaphy (IH)-63 patients; (2) Nissen fundoplication (NF)-22 patients; (3) pyeloureteral anastomosis (PUA)-15 patients; (4) nephrectomy (NE)-5 patients; and (5) ovarian cystectomy (OC)-5 patients. The patients of the first three groups were compared with babies who underwent standard laparoscopic surgery, performed in the two-dimensional (2D) format during the same time period. The groups were organized according to patient demographics, operative report, and postoperative parameters. RESULTS The patients were similar in terms of demographics and other preoperative parameters. There were significant differences in mean operative time between 3D and 2D procedures in the groups of patients with hydronephrosis and gastroesophageal reflux, which used manipulation with internal sutures (NF-37.95 minutes versus 48.42 minutes, P = .014; PUA-61.31 minutes versus 78.75 minutes, P = .019), but not in group after IH (15.88 minutes versus 15.57 minutes, P = .681). Postoperative parameters such as length of hospital stay and the number of complications were equivalent between groups. CONCLUSION In this study, we demonstrated the success of 3D laparoscopy in small babies with inguinal hernia, gastroesophageal reflux, hydronephrosis, ovarian cyst, and multicystic kidney. Laparoscopy in 3D format lessens the duration of complex procedures, which utilize the use of the suture technique into the abdominal cavity. The perception of depth and the presence of tactile feedback make 3D laparoscopic surgery more acceptable when compared to traditional laparoscopy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yury Kozlov
- 1 Department of Neonatal Surgery, Municipal Pediatric Hospital , Irkutsk, Russia .,2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Continuing Education (IGMAPO) , Irkutsk, Russia .,3 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Irkutsk State Medical University , Irkutsk, Russia
| | | | - Vladimir Nowogilov
- 1 Department of Neonatal Surgery, Municipal Pediatric Hospital , Irkutsk, Russia .,2 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Irkutsk State Medical Academy of Continuing Education (IGMAPO) , Irkutsk, Russia .,3 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Irkutsk State Medical University , Irkutsk, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
|
45
|
Munawar A, Fischer G. A Surgical Robot Teleoperation Framework for Providing Haptic Feedback Incorporating Virtual Environment-Based Guidance. Front Robot AI 2016. [DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2016.00047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
|
|
46
|
Calin ML, Sadiq A, Arevalo G, Fuentes R, Flanders VL, Gupta N, Nasri B, Singh K. The First Case Report of Robotic Multivisceral Resection for Synchronous Liver Metastasis from Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumor: A Case Report and Literature Review. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2016; 26:816-824. [PMID: 27454160 DOI: 10.1089/lap.2016.0342] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Surgery for liver metastases in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor (PNET) improves overall survival rate. We present the first case report for robotic multivisceral resection of distal pancreas, spleen, and left liver for metastatic PNET. MATERIALS AND METHODS We present a case of 52-year-old female diagnosed with PNET in the pancreatic neck metastatic to the liver, responding to somatostatin and bland embolization, who underwent surgical debulking using da Vinci robotic platform. Intraoperative Doppler ultrasound was used to define the vascular distribution and tumor extension. The parenchymal liver transection was performed with vessel sealer. The distal pancreas and the spleen were approached medial to lateral and resected in an en-bloc fashion. The left liver inflow, outflow, and splenic artery and vein were transected with vascular stapler device. RESULTS Da Vinci robot-assisted multivisceral resection has been performed with good postoperative outcome. Operative time was 369 minutes and the estimated blood loss was 100 mL. The patient had a short hospital stay with quick recovery and good outcome at 5 months follow-up after the surgery. DISCUSSION Liver metastases in PNETs are considered an adverse factor. Aggressive surgical management is a mainstay. The laparoscopic approach to pancreatic or hepatic surgery is difficult in inexperienced hands with steep learning curve. The recent robotic system seems to overcome many limitations. This is the first case of robotic multivisceral resection for synchronous liver metastasis from PNET. Concurrent primary tumor resection with hepatectomy offers potential curative intention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marius L Calin
- 1 Department of General Surgery, Saint Vincent Hospital Indianapolis , Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Aziz Sadiq
- 1 Department of General Surgery, Saint Vincent Hospital Indianapolis , Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Gabriel Arevalo
- 1 Department of General Surgery, Saint Vincent Hospital Indianapolis , Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Rocio Fuentes
- 1 Department of General Surgery, Saint Vincent Hospital Indianapolis , Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Vincent L Flanders
- 2 Department of Interventional Radiology, Saint Vincent Hospital Indianapolis , Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Niraj Gupta
- 3 Department of Oncology, Saint Vincent Hospital Indianapolis , Indianapolis, Indiana
| | - Baongoc Nasri
- 4 Department of Surgery, Tokyo Metropolitan Matsuzawa Hospital , Tokyo, Japan
| | - Kirpal Singh
- 1 Department of General Surgery, Saint Vincent Hospital Indianapolis , Indianapolis, Indiana
| |
Collapse
|
|
47
|
Štádler P, Dvořáček L, Vitásek P, Matouš P. Robot assisted Aortic and Non-aortic Vascular Operations. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 2016; 52:22-8. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2016.02.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2015] [Accepted: 02/21/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
Xu Y, Wang H, Ji W, Tang M, Li H, Leng J, Meng X, Dong J. Robotic radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: perioperative and long-term outcomes of an initial series. Surg Endosc 2016; 30:3060-70. [PMID: 27194255 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-016-4925-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2016] [Accepted: 04/04/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Radical resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCa) is one of the most challenging abdominal procedures. Robotic-assisted approach is gaining popularity in hepatobiliary surgery but scarcely tried in the management of HCa. We herein report our initial experience of robotic radical resection for HCa. METHODS Between May 2009 and October 2012, 10 patients underwent fully robotic-assisted radical resection for HCa in a single institute. The perioperative and long-term outcomes were analyzed and compared with a contemporaneous 32 patients undergoing traditional open surgery. RESULTS The 10 patients presented one of Bismuth-Corlette type II, four of IIIa, one of IIIb and four of IV. There was no significant clinicopathological disparity between the robotic and open groups. The robotic radical resection involves hemihepatectomy plus caudate lobectomy or trisectionectomy, extrahepatic bile duct resection, radical lymphadenectomy and Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy. No conversion to laparotomy occurred. Robotic resection compared unfavorably to traditional open resection in operative time (703 ± 62 vs. 475 ± 121 min, p < 0.001) and morbidity [90 (9/10) vs. 50 %, p = 0.031]. No significant difference was found in blood loss, mortality and postoperative hospital stay. Major complications (≥Clavien-Dindo III) occurred in three patients of robotic group. One patient died of posthepatectomy liver failure on postoperative day 18. The hospital expenditure was much higher in robotic group (USD 27,427 ± 21,316 vs. 15,282 ± 5957, p = 0.018). The tumor recurrence-free survival was inferior in robotic group (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS Fully robotic-assisted radical resection for HCa is technically achievable in experienced hands and should be limited to highly selective patients. Our current results do not support continued practice of robotic surgery for HCa, until significant technical and instrumental refinements are demonstrated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yinzhe Xu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Hongguang Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Webin Ji
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Maosheng Tang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Hao Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Jianjun Leng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Xuan Meng
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China
| | - Jiahong Dong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital, 28 Fuxing Road, Haidian, Beijing, 100853, China.
- Center for Hepatopancreatobiliary Diseases, Beijing Tsinghua Changgung Hospital, Tsinghua University Medical Center, 168 Litang Road, Changping, Beijing, 102218, China.
| |
Collapse
|
|
50
|
Franasiak J, Craven R, Mosaly P, Gehrig PA. Feasibility and acceptance of a robotic surgery ergonomic training program. JSLS 2016; 18:JSLS.2014.00166. [PMID: 25489213 PMCID: PMC4254477 DOI: 10.4293/jsls.2014.00166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Assessment of ergonomic strain during robotic surgery indicates there is a need for intervention. However, limited data exist detailing the feasibility and acceptance of ergonomic training (ET) for robotic surgeons. This prospective, observational pilot study evaluates the implementation of an evidence-based ET module. Methods: A two-part survey was conducted. The first survey assessed robotic strain using the Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire (NMQ). Participants were given the option to participate in either an online or an in-person ET session. The ET was derived from Occupational Safety and Health Administration guidelines and developed by a human factors engineer experienced with health care ergonomics. After ET, a follow-up survey including the NMQ and an assessment of the ET were completed. Results: The survey was sent to 67 robotic surgeons. Forty-two (62.7%) responded, including 18 residents, 8 fellows, and 16 attending physicians. Forty-five percent experienced strain resulting from performing robotic surgery and 26.3% reported persistent strain. Only 16.6% of surgeons reported prior ET in robotic surgery. Thirty-five (78%) surgeons elected to have in-person ET, which was successfully arranged for 32 surgeons (91.4%). Thirty-seven surgeons (88.1%) completed the follow-up survey. All surgeons participating in the in-person ET found it helpful and felt formal ET should be standard, 88% changed their practice as a result of the training, and 74% of those reporting strain noticed a decrease after their ET. Conclusion: Thus, at a high-volume robotics center, evidence-based ET was easily implemented, well-received, changed some surgeons' practice, and decreased self-reported strain related to robotic surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jason Franasiak
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Science, Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ. USA
| | - Renatta Craven
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Prithima Mosaly
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Paola A Gehrig
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|