Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common gastrointestinal condition that carries a significant financial and physical burden for patients due to the painful presentation and frequent need for hospitalization. Treatment varies in the type and route of analgesic used. Unmanaged pain can lead to worsening health outcomes and prolonged admissions. Further research is needed to understand current practices for managing AP.

This study was a retrospective, exploratory, single-center cohort study. Patients admitted to an internal medicine unit with AP from September 1, 2020, to December 31, 2021, were included. Our primary outcome was the change in pain scores during the first 24-hours after administration of the first pain-relieving medication. Secondary outcomes included change in pain scores within the first 12-hours, time to oral tolerance, characterization of analgesic orders, comparison of median pain scores by home analgesic usage, and specific inpatient opioid use.

One hundred sixty-nine patients were screened, and 94 were included in the study. Forty-four patients were assigned to the multimodal cohort and 50 patients to the opioid-only cohort. Changes in pain scores per unit of time, assessed by a mixed-effects model, within the first 24 hours were -0.080 (SE, 0.018) in the multimodal cohort and -0.090 (SE, 0.014) in the opioid-only cohort (P = 0.780). Morphine milligram equivalents (MME) administered in the multimodal and opioid-only cohorts were 24.50 (interquartile range [IQR], 51.75) and 52.5 (IQR, 68.5) (P = 0.001), respectively.

There was no significant difference in the change in pain scores between patients receiving multimodal therapy and those receiving opioids only. Significantly fewer MME were administered in the multimodal group, suggesting that multimodal therapy can be opioid-sparing in AP.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease that can represent a challenge for clinicians, in fact, the early determination of its severity in the first 72 h is crucial for prognosis, recognizing the etiology and carrying out risk stratification to determine a more specific therapy. No accurate early prognostic scores for disease severity have been published, so the severity of AP often cannot be properly defined in the first few hours of the disease. This initial phase represents a "no man's land", in which there is no certainty in the stratification of the damage, prognosis is difficult to establish, therapy must be started promptly, although there is still no effective medical therapy against pancreatic enzymatic activation. Therefore, it is very difficult at this stage to make the correct decisions to achieve the best outcome for the patient with AP. Literature search was carried out using the PubMed database by entering early management of acute pancreatitis [title] or therapy of acute pancreatitis [title] and selecting the most relevant articles for the diagnosis and therapy of acute pancreatitis in clinical practice. This document provides suggestions on managing the key clinical decisions for patients suffering from AP before disease severity is defined, to achieve the best outcomes for patients with AP.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) can lead to severe complications and high mortality. Previous studies suggest that epidural analgesia (EA) may improve outcomes in AP. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the efficacy of EA on in-hospital outcomes in AP patients.

Electronic databases (PubMed, Medline-Ovid, Scopus, CINAHL, Web of Science) were systematically searched until May 2024 for RCTs comparing EA with other pain strategies in AP patients. Variables were pooled using weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Data analysis employed random-effects the Mantel-Haenszel method and I 2 statistic was used for heterogeneity.

Five RCTs with 260 participants were included. Meta-analysis showed no significant differences in in-hospital mortality (RR, 0.69; 95% CI [0.29-1.65]; P  = 0.40), mechanical ventilation (RR, 0.82; 95% CI [0.61-1.10]; P  = 0.19), sepsis (RR, 0.88; 95% CI [0.42-1.86]; P  = 0.74), hospital/ICU stay (WMD, 0.49 days; 95% CI [-1.13 to 2.10]; P  = 0.55), and pain score (WMD, 1.49; 95% CI [-0.42 to 3.40]; P  = 0.13). Opioid requirements were significantly lower, with one study reporting MME of 15 mg/d compared to 52 mg/d in the control group ( P  = 0.001). Heterogeneity was low to moderate for most outcomes but high for pain score ( I2  = 92%). Small number of studies, risk of bias, and sample size limited overall certainity.

EA did not significantly improve in-hospital outcomes in AP patients. However, findings suggested potential benefits in pain management. High-quality randomized trials are needed to understand the potential benefits of EA in this population.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) represents one of the most common reasons for hospital admission and intensive care treatment in internal medicine. The incidence of AP is increasing, posing significant financial burden on healthcare systems due to the necessity for frequent medical interventions. Severe acute pancreatitis (SAP) is a potentially life-threatening condition with substantial morbidity and mortality. The management of SAP requires prolonged hospitalization and the expertise of a multidisciplinary team, comprising emergency physicians, intensivists, internists, gastroenterologists, visceral surgeons, and experts in nutrition, infectious disease, endoscopy, as well as diagnostic and interventional radiology. Effective management and beneficial patient outcomes depend on continuous interdisciplinary collaboration. This review synthesizes recent evidence guiding the practical management of SAP, with a particular focus on emergency and intensive care settings. Both established as well as new diagnostic and therapeutic paradigms are highlighted, including workup, risk stratification, fluid management, analgesia, nutrition, organ support, imaging modalities and their timing, along with anti-infective strategies. Furthermore, the review explores interventions for local and vascular complications of SAP, with particular attention to the indications, timing and selection between endoscopic (both endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) and endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)), percutaneous and surgical approaches. Similarly, the management of biliary AP due to obstructive gallstones, including the imaging, timing of ERCP and cholecystectomy, are discussed. By integrating new evidence with relevant guidance for everyday clinical practice, this review aims to enhance the interdisciplinary approach essential for improving outcomes in SAP management.

The initial management of acute pancreatitis (AP) is continually evolving. Goal-directed moderate fluid resuscitation is now preferred over more aggressive strategies. Antibiotics should be administered only when there is a proven or highly probable infection rather than for prophylactic purposes. Urgent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography would be beneficial for patients with acute cholangitis. Same-admission cholecystectomy for mild biliary PA is safe, efficiently prevents relapse, and is associated with lower costs compared with interval cholecystectomy. Ongoing research into novel pharmacologic treatments and strategies is essential for further advancements in AP management.

Acute pancreatitis is an inflammatory condition of the exocrine pancreas that is a common indication for hospital admission and has had an increasing incidence in the last few decades. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis requires the satisfaction of two out of three criteria: (1) abdominal pain radiating to the back, (2) serum lipase or amylase levels three or more times the upper limit of the normal level, and (3) findings indicating pancreatitis obtained via a computed tomography (CT) scan or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The different etiologies include gallstones, autoimmune disorders, alcohol abuse, smoking, hypertriglyceridemia, obesity, drugs, and post-endoscope retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The initial investigation includes serum amylase and lipase analysis, a lipid panel including triglycerides, analysis of immunoglobulins, a full blood count, electrolyte analysis, a hemoglobin A1c test, a complete metabolic panel, and transabdominal ultrasound. The initial therapy includes oxygen supplementation, the provision of intravenous fluids, pain control, and a nutrition regime. Early oral feeding is encouraged if tolerated; if not, liquid supplement provision or enteral tube feeding within 48 h of admission has shown better outcomes. Some complications of acute pancreatitis are necrosis, infection, insulin resistance leading to diabetes mellitus, and pancreatic exocrine insufficiency requiring enzyme supplementation. Patients need to attend regular follow-ups and abstain from alcohol and smoking (if warranted) to prevent the recurrence of acute pancreatitis. The mortality rate of acute pancreatitis has decreased in the past few decades because of better management skills, but the recent rise in acute pancreatitis episodes is concerning. Sustained endeavors through clinical trials are required to establish a broad variety of drugs that can be used for acute pancreatitis episodes.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is a common paediatric condition, yet there is little data to support optimal analgesic practice. The aim of this scoping review was to report analgesic practice, investigate trends in analgesic strategy and evaluate the impact of analgesic modality on outcomes.

A systematic search of Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, Pubmed Central and Google Scholar was performed by two independent investigators. This review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews checklist.

Three retrospective cohort studies, all conducted in North America, reported on analgesic practice in paediatric AP. The studies included 658 patients (median age, 12 years; female sex, 57%; non-biliary aetiology, 85.9%). Overall, analgesia was administered in 67% of patients, including opioids in 59.5% (43.8%-71.4%). Rates of acetaminophen (17.9% and 77.7%) and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (7.7% and 40.2%) were reported in two studies. Two studies reported reducing rates of opioid administration or reduced duration of opioid administration since 2017 and 2014, respectively. One study did not find any correlation between opioid administration and sociodemographic factors, length of stay or admission to intensive care units. No studies reported on complications or quality of life. No studies investigated non-medical modalities. There were no long-term data on analgesic use post-discharge.

Opioids are the mainstay of pain treatment in paediatric AP in North America. However, factors that influence the analgesic type, the impact of analgesic modality on the post-pancreatitis outcome and long-term analgesic use constitute a knowledge gap. Future studies are needed to inform analgesic use in paediatric AP.

Ultrasound-guided (USG) erector-spinae plane block (ESPB) may be better than intravenous opioids in treating acute hepatopancreaticobiliary (HPB) pain in the ED.

This open-label randomised controlled trial was conducted in the ED of a tertiary-care hospital between March and August 2023. All adult patients with severe HPB pain were recruited during times that a primary investigator was present. Unconsenting patients, numeric rating scale (NRS) ≤6, age ≤18 and ≥80 years, pregnant, unstable or with allergies to local anaesthetics or opioids were excluded. Patients in the intervention arm received bilateral USG ESPB with 0.2% ropivacaine at T7 level, by a trained ED consultant, and those in the control arm received 0.1 mg/kg intravenous morphine. Pain on a 10-point NRS was assessed by the investigators at presentation and at 1, 3, 5 and 10 hours after intervention by the treatment team, along with rescue analgesia requirements and patient satisfaction. Difference in NRS was analysed using analysis of co-variance (ANCOVA) and t-tests.

70 participants were enrolled, 35 in each arm. Mean age was 40.4±13.2 years, mean NRS at presentation in the intervention arm was 8.0±0.9 and 7.6±0.6 in the control arm. NRS at 1 hour was significantly lower in the ESPB group (ANCOVA p<0.001). At 1, 3, 5 and 10 hours, reduction of NRS in the intervention arm (7±1.6, 6.7±1.9, 6.6±1.8, 6.1±1.9) was significantly greater than the control arm (4.4±2, 4.6±1.8, 3.7±2.2, 3.8±1.8) (t-test, p<0.001). Fewer patients receiving ESPB required rescue analgesia at 5 (t-test, p=0.031) and 10 hours (t-test, p=0.04). More patients were 'very satisfied' with ESPB compared with receiving only morphine at each time period (p<0.001).

ESPB is a promising alternative to morphine in those with HPB pain.

CTRI/2023/03/050595.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is increasing in incidence across the world, and in all age groups. Major changes in management have occurred in the last decade. Avoiding total parenteral nutrition and prophylactic antibiotics, avoiding overly aggressive fluid resuscitation, initiating early feeding, avoiding endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in the absence of concomitant cholangitis, same-admission cholecystectomy, and minimally invasive approaches to infected necrosis should now be standard of care. Increasing recognition of the risk of recurrence of AP, and progression to chronic pancreatitis, along with the unexpectedly high risk of diabetes and exocrine insufficiency after AP is the subject of large ongoing studies. In this review, we provide an update on important changes in management for this increasingly common disease.

Gastrointestinal hospitalisations in the USA cause over US$130 billion in expenditures, and acute pancreatitis is a leading cause of these hospitalisations. Adequate pain control is one of the primary treatment goals for acute pancreatitis. Though opioids are commonly used for analgesia in these patients, there have been concerns about short-term and long-term side effects of using opioids. Recently, non-opioid medications have been studied to treat pain in patients with acute pancreatitis. This systematic review and network meta-analysis aims to assess the comparative efficacy of analgesic medication for non-severe, acute pancreatitis.

We will search multiple electronic databases for randomised controlled trials that study pain management in patients with non-severe, acute pancreatitis. The intervention will be any analgesic for acute pancreatitis in the hospital setting. The comparison group will be patients who received a placebo or other active interventions for pain management. The primary outcomes of interest include pain scores and the need for supplementary analgesia. The secondary outcomes will be serious adverse events, local complications, progression to severe pancreatitis, transfer to the intensive care unit, length of hospitalisation, time to start enteral feeds, 30-day all-cause mortality and Quality of Life Scale scores. If sufficient homogeneity exists among included studies, the findings will be pooled using a traditional pairwise and network meta-analysis. The risk of bias in randomised control trials will be evaluated using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool 2.0. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to report the certainty of evidence.

This systematic review will not involve direct contact with human subjects. The findings of this review will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. They will give healthcare providers a better awareness of the optimal analgesic medication for pain treatment in non-severe, acute pancreatitis.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) is an inflammatory disease of the pancreas, which can progress to severe AP, with a high risk of death. It is one of the most complicated and clinically challenging of all disorders affecting the abdomen. The main causes of AP are gallstone migration and alcohol abuse. Other causes are uncommon, controversial and insufficiently explained. The disease is primarily characterized by inappropriate activation of trypsinogen, infiltration of inflammatory cells, and destruction of secretory cells. According to the revised Atlanta classification, severity of the disease is categorized into three levels: Mild, moderately severe and severe, depending upon organ failure and local as well as systemic complications. Various methods have been used for predicting the severity of AP and its outcome, such as clinical evaluation, imaging evaluation and testing of various biochemical markers. However, AP is a very complex disease and despite the fact that there are of several clinical, biochemical and imaging criteria for assessment of severity of AP, it is not an easy task to predict its subsequent course. Therefore, there are existing controversies regarding diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, their effectiveness and complications in the treatment of AP. The main reason being the fact, that the pathophysiologic mechanisms of AP have not been fully elucidated and need to be studied further. In this editorial article, we discuss the efficacy of the existing diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, complications and treatment failure in the management of AP.

This review summarized the current controversies in the management of acute pancreatitis (AP). The controversies in management range from issues involving fluid resuscitation, nutrition, the role of antibiotics and antifungals, which analgesic to use, role of anticoagulation and intervention for complications in AP. The interventions vary from percutaneous drainage, endoscopy or surgery. Active research and emerging data are helping to formulate better guidelines. The available evidence favors crystalloids, although the choice and type of fluid resuscitation is an area of dynamic research. The nutrition aspect does not have controversy as of now as early enteral feeding is preferred most often than not. The empirical use of antibiotics and antifungals are gray zones, and more data is needed for conclusive guidelines. The choice of analgesic is being studied, and the recommendations are still evolving. The position of using anticoagulation is still awaiting consensus. The role of intervention is well established, although the modality is constantly changing and favoring endoscopy or percutaneous drainage rather than surgery. It is evident that more multicenter randomized controlled trials are required for establishing the standard of care in these crucial management issues of AP to improve the morbidity and mortality worldwide.

This review provides insight into the recent advancements in the management of acute pancreatitis.

Moderate fluid resuscitation and Ringer's lactate has advantages above aggressive fluid resuscitation and normal saline, respectively. A normal "on-demand" diet has a positive effect on recovery from acute pancreatitis and length of hospital stay. A multimodal pain management approach including epidural analgesia might reduce unwarranted effects of opiate use. A more targeted use of antibiotics is starting to emerge. Markers such as procalcitonin may be used to limit unwarranted antibiotic use. Conversely, many patients with infected necrotizing pancreatitis can be treated with only antibiotics, although the optimal choice and duration is unclear. Delay of drainage as much as is possible is advised since it is associated with less procedures. If drainage is required, clinicians have an expanding arsenal of interventional options to their disposal such as the lumen-apposing metal stent for transgastric drainage and (repeated) necrosectomy. Immunomodulation using removal of systemic cytokines or anti-inflammatory drugs is an attractive idea, but up to now the results of clinical trials are disappointing. No additional preventive measures beside non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can be recommended for post-endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) pancreatitis.

More treatment modalities that are less invasive became available and a trend towards less aggressive treatments (fluids, starvation, interventions, opiates) of acute pancreatitis is again emerging. Despite recent advancements, the pathophysiology of specific subgroup phenotypes is still poorly understood which reflects the disappointing results of pharmacological and immunomodulatory trials.

Acute pancreatitis (AP) has variable clinical courses. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the safety, efficacy, and impact of epidural anaesthesia (EA) use in AP.

The PubMed, EMBASE, SCOPUS and Cochrane library databases were systematically searched between 1980 and 2022 using the PRISMA guidelines, to identify observational and comparative studies reporting on EA in AP. The meta-analysis was performed in R Foundation for Statistical Computing using the meta R Package for Meta-Analysis.

A total of 9 studies with 2006 patients of which 726 (36%) patients had EA were included. All studies demonstrated high safety and feasibility of EA in AP with no reported major local or neurological complications. One randomised controlled trial demonstrated an improvement in pain severity using a 0-10 visual analogue scale (VAS) at the outset (1.6 in EA vs 3.5 in non-EA, P = 0.02) and on day 10 (0.2 in EA vs 2.33 in non-EA, P = 0.034). There was also improvement in pancreatic perfusion with EA measured with computerised tomography 13 (43%) in EA vs 2 (7%) in non-EA, P = 0.003. The need for ventilatory support and overall mortality was lower in EA patients 40 (19%) vs 285 (24%) P = 0.025 (OR: 0.49, 95% CI: 0.28-0.84) and 16 (7%) vs 214 (20%), P = 0.050 (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.15-1.00), respectively.

EA is infrequently used for pain management in AP and yet the available evidence suggests that it is safe and effective in reducing pain severity, improving pancreatic perfusion, and decreasing mortality.

Epidural anesthesia has been an established procedure in anesthesia for many years. Possibly due to its invasiveness, the associated fear of serious complications and the proliferation of alternative methods, an overall decline in its use can be observed. Several alternative procedures have been developed, especially the introduction of ultrasound into anesthesia, which are increasingly being used in clinical practice. The aim of this continuing medical education (CME) article is to shed light on the remaining range of indications for epidural anesthesia, to present the approaches and possible clinical benefits as well as to evaluate the effects that go beyond pure analgesia, according to the current evidence. In addition, potential complications and preventive approaches are discussed. This article is based on a literature search in PubMed and Google Scholar.