Kock's continent ileostomy is an option after proctocolectomy for patients not suitable for IPAA or ileorectal anastomosis. Ulcerative colitis is the most common indication for continent ileostomy.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term outcome of continent ileostomy.

Retrospective cohort register study.

Data were obtained from the Swedish National Patient Registry.

All patients with IBD and a continent ileostomy were identified. Data on demographics, diagnosis, reoperations, and excisions of the continent ileostomy were obtained. Patients with inconsistent diagnostic coding were classified as IBD-unclassified.

The main outcome measures were number of reoperations, time to reoperations, and time to excision of continent ileostomy.

We identified 727 patients, 428 (59%) with ulcerative colitis, 45 (6%) with Crohn's disease, and 254 (35%) with IBD-unclassified. After a median follow-up time of 27 (interquartile range, 21-31) years, 191 patients (26%) never had revision surgery. Some 1484 reoperations were performed on 536 patients (74%), and the median number of reoperations was 1 (interquartile range, 0-3) per patient. The continent ileostomy was excised in 77 patients (11%). Reoperation within the first year after reconstruction was associated with a higher rate of revisions (incidence rate ratio, 2.90; p < 0.001) and shorter time to excision (HR 2.38; p < 0.001). Constructing the continent ileostomy after year 2000 was associated with increased revision and excision rates (incidence rate ratio, 2.7; p < 0.001 and HR 2.74; p = 0.013). IBD-unclassified was associated with increased revisions (incidence rate ratio, 1.3; p < 0.001)' and the proportion of IBD-unclassified patients almost doubled from the 1980s (32%) to after 2000 (50%).

Retrospective design, data from a register, and no data on quality of life were available were the limitations of this study.

Continent ileostomy is associated with substantial need for revision surgery, but most patients keep their reconstruction for a long time. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C122 .

ANTECEDENTES:La ileostomía continente de Kock es una opción después de la proctocolectomía para los pacientes que no son aptos para la anastomosis ileoanal con reservorio o la anastomosis ileorrectal. La colitis ulcerativa es la indicación más común para la ileostomía continente.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar el resultado a largo plazo de la ileostomía continente.DISEÑO:Estudio de registro de cohorte retrospectivo.AJUSTES:Los datos se obtuvieron del Registro Nacional de Pacientes de Suecia.PACIENTES:Se identificaron todos los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal e ileostomía continente. Se obtuvieron datos demograficos, diagnóstico, reoperaciones y extirpaciones de la ileostomía continente. Los pacientes con codificación diagnóstica inconsistente se clasificaron como no clasificados con EII.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las principales medidas de resultado fueron el número de reoperaciones, el tiempo hasta las reoperaciones y el tiempo hasta la escisión de la ileostomía continente.RESULTADOS:Identificamos 727 pacientes, 428 (59%) con colitis ulcerativa, 45 (6%) con enfermedad de Crohn y 254 (35%) con EII no clasificada. Después de una mediana de tiempo de seguimiento de 27 (IQR 21-31) años, 191 (26%) pacientes nunca se habían sometido a una cirugía de revisión. Se realizaron 1.484 reintervenciones en 536 (74%) pacientes, la mediana de reintervenciones fue de 1 (RIC 0-3) por paciente. La ileostomía continente se extirpó en 77 (11%) pacientes. La reoperación dentro del primer año después de la reconstrucción se asoció con una mayor tasa de revisiones (IRR 2,90 p < 0,001) y un tiempo más corto hasta la escisión (HR 2,38 p < 0,001). La construcción de la ileostomía continente después del año 2000 se asoció con mayores tasas de revisión y escisión (IRR 2,7 p < 0,001 y HR 2,74 p = 0,013). La EII no clasificada se asoció con un aumento de las revisiones (IRR 1,3 p < 0,001) y la proporción de pacientes con EII no clasificada casi se duplicó desde la década de 1980 (32%) hasta después de 2000 (50%).LIMITACIONES:Diseño retrospectivo, datos de registro. No hay datos disponibles sobre la calidad de vida.CONCLUSIÓN:La ileostomía continente se asocia con una necesidad sustancial de cirugía de revisión, pero la mayoría de los pacientes logran mantener su reconstrucción durante mucho tiempo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C122 . (Traducción-Dr. Yolanda Colorado ).

The continent ileostomy (CI) was popularized by Nils Kock as a means to provide fecal continence to patients, most commonly in those with ulcerative colitis, after proctocolectomy. Although the ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) now represents the most common method to restore continence after total proctocolectomy, CI remains a suitable option for highly selected patients who are not candidates for IPAA or have uncorrectable IPAA dysfunction but still desire fecal continence. The CI has exhibited a fascinating and marked evolution over the past several decades, from the advent of the nipple-valve to a distinct pouch design, giving the so-inclined and so-trained colorectal surgeon a technique that provides the unique patient with another option to restore continence. The CI continues to offer a means for appropriately selected patients to achieve the highest possible quality of life (QOL) and functional status after total proctocolectomy.

Continent ileostomy is a solution for patients after proctocolectomy.

The aim of this study was to assess the long-term complications and failure rate alongside patient satisfaction, function, and quality of life for patients with a continent ileostomy.

This was a retrospective, descriptive cross-sectional study.

All patients were operated in 1 center between 1980 and 2016.

A total of 85 patients received a de novo continent ileostomy in our institution. Sixty-nine patients (80%) had ulcerative colitis, 12 (14%) had Crohn's disease, 2 had indeterminate colitis, and 1 each had familial adenomatous polyposis and anal atresia.

Medical charts were reviewed for reoperations and pouchitis. The 36-Item Short Form, Short Health Scale, and a local continent ileostomy questionnaire were used to assess quality of life, function, and satisfaction.

After a median follow-up of 24 years, 67 patients (79%) underwent a total of 237 reoperations, of which 15 were conversions to end ileostomies, that is, failures. Fifty patients (59%) underwent repeat laparotomies, excluding loop ileostomy closures. Nipple detachment was the most common cause for repeat laparotomy, and fistulation was the most common cause for pouch removal. IPAA before continent ileostomy was associated with an increased risk for failure. Crohn's disease was not associated with an increased risk for reoperation or failure. Forty-three patients (84%) reported that they were satisfied. Seventy patients were available for questionnaires, and 50 patients (71%) answered. There was no difference in the 36-Item Short Form between the continent ileostomy population and an age-matched control population.

The retrospective, single-center design of the study alongside <100% response rate are to be considered limitations.

Despite large numbers of complications, patients are generally satisfied with their continent ileostomies, and their quality of life is comparable to the general population. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B444.

ANTECEDENTES:La ileostomía continente es una solución para los pacientes después de una proctocolectomía.OBJETIVO:El objetivo de este estudio fue evaluar las complicaciones a largo plazo y la tasa de fracaso junto con la satisfacción del paciente, la función y la calidad de vida de los pacientes con una ileostomía continente.AJUSTES:Todos los pacientes fueron operados en un centro entre 1980 y 2016.DISEÑO:Estudio retrospectivo, descriptivo y transversal.PACIENTES:Un total de 85 pacientes recibieron una ileostomía continente de novo en nuestra institución. Sesenta y nueve (80%) pacientes tenían colitis ulcerosa, doce (14%) enfermedad de Crohn, dos, colitis indeterminada y uno de poliposis adenomatosa familiar y atresia anal respectivamente.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Se revisaron los registros médicos en busca de reintervenciones y pouchitis. Se utilizó SF-36, escala de salud corta y un cuestionario de ileostomía continente local para evaluar la calidad de vida, la función y la satisfacción.RESULTADOS:Después de una mediana de seguimiento de 24 años, 67 (79%) pacientes fueron sometidos a un total de 237 reoperaciones, de las cuales 15 fueron conversiones para terminar con ileostomías, es decir, fracasos. 50 (59%) pacientes se sometieron a laparotomías repetidas, excluyendo los cierres de ileostomía en asa. El desprendimiento del pezón fue la causa más común de repetición de laparotomía y la fistulación fue la causa más común de retiro de la bolsa. La anastomosis anal de la bolsa ileal antes de la ileostomía continente se asoció con un mayor riesgo de fracaso. La enfermedad de Crohn no se asoció con un mayor riesgo de reoperación o fracaso. 43 pacientes (84%) informaron que estaban satisfechos. 70 pacientes estuvieron disponibles para cuestionarios y 50 pacientes (71%) respondieron. No hubo diferencia en SF-36 entre la población de ileostomía continente y una población de control de la misma edad.LIMITACIONES:El diseño retrospectivo y unicéntrico del estudio junto con una tasa de respuesta inferior al 100% deben considerarse limitaciones.CONCLUSIÓN:A pesar del gran número de complicaciones, los pacientes generalmente están satisfechos con sus ileostomías continentes y su calidad de vida es comparable a la de la población general. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B444.

The Italian Society of Colorectal Surgery (SICCR) promoted the project reported here, which consists of a Position Statement of Italian colorectal surgeons to address the surgical aspects of ulcerative colitis management. Members of the society were invited to express their opinions on several items proposed by the writing committee, based on evidence available in the literature. The results are presented, focusing on relevant points. The present paper is not an alternative to available guidelines; rather, it offers a snapshot of the attitudes of SICCR surgeons about the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis. The committee was able to identify some points of major disagreement and suggested strategies to improve the quality of available data and acceptance of guidelines.

: Restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) is the surgical treatment of choice for patients with ulcerative colitis and familial polyposis who require colectomy. This surgical intervention allows for resection of colon, while offering intestinal continuity with fecal continence, discontinuation of most medications related to ulcerative colitis and reduction in the risk of colitis-associated neoplasia. As a proportion of these patients are women of childbearing age, it is important to understand the impact on reproductive health and function. Although limited data exist, restorative proctocolectomy/IPAA does not seem to adversely affect menstrual function. In general, sexual function is reported to improve postsurgery with the ability to achieve orgasm unaltered. However, dyspareunia is commonly reported post restoratively. Of concern, there are data to suggest that fertility is decreased post-IPAA. The reasons stated are pelvic adhesions and obstruction of fallopian tubes. Laparoscopic approach may improve fertility outcomes by reducing postoperative adhesions as compared with the open approach. Once achieved, pregnancy in patients with IPAA is characterized by a transient increase in stool frequency that resolves postdelivery. Whether vaginal delivery or cesarean section is preferred route of delivery in these patients is still controversial. But commonly cesarean section is advocated for patients' post-IPAA to prevent anal sphincter injury and long-term effects on pouch function. All of these issues should be included in the discussion with women who are contemplating IPAA, so they are well aware of them before deciding on the best management plan.

The continent ileostomy (CI) was first described in 1969 as an important advancement in the surgical treatment of patients with ulcerative colitis, providing an option for fecal continence to patients who would otherwise require a conventional ileostomy. The CI enjoyed a brief period of relative popularity during the 1970s before being displaced by today's gold standard for the surgical treatment of ulcerative colitis, the restorative proctocolectomy (ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]). Although the CI is only rarely performed today, it still has a role to play in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease who have failed medical treatment. Current indications are patients with failed IPAAs who are not candidates for redo-IPAA, patients who require total proctocolectomy but cannot be reconstructed with IPAA, and patients with an existing conventional ileostomy that is adversely affecting their quality of life. CI, however, is a complex procedure that carries significant risk of both postoperative complications and the need for reoperation over the long term due to slippage of the nipple valve. Patients being considered for this procedure should undergo extensive preoperative counseling and must have a thorough understanding of the associated risks and a realistic vision of anticipated benefits. In well-selected and properly motivated patients, however, CI can be durable in the majority with long-term pouch survival rates approaching 80%. Published data suggest that these patients enjoy greater quality of life than their counterparts with a conventional ileostomy and that 95% would choose to undergo the procedure again or recommend it to another.

Continent ileostomy (CI) after proctocolectomy is an alternative technique compared to an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA). The question arises as to whether this technique is valuable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the role of the continent ileostomy, by patient follow-up satisfaction and quality of life assessment.

Twenty-eight patients with a continent ileostomy operated between 1996 and 2007 were compared with patients who received an IPAA or a conventional ileostomy. SF-36 and EORTC QLC-CR38 questionnaires and a specific continent ileostomy questionnaire were used to assess differences and patient satisfaction.

The quality of life in patients with a CI is not significant better or worse than patients with either a conventional ileostomy or an IPAA. On three scales (sexual enjoyment, gastro-intestinal tract symptoms and male sexual problems) statistically significant differences were reported. Overall, nearly all patients are very satisfied with the CI. All patients would make the same decision again and would recommend this procedure to other patients.

The continent ileostomy remains to be a suitable alternative for the preservation of continence after a proctocolectomy, especially when an ileal pouch-anal anastomosis is not an option. If a choice has to be made between a CI and conventional ileostomy good preoperative counselling is necessary to make a well founded decision. To minimize complications, these procedures have to be performed in centres with specific expertise. Therefore, knowledge about the CI should be preserved for the future.

The aim of the study was to evaluate the results of Kock continent ileostomy (CI) during the same period when ileal pouch-anal anastomosis was the preferred operation for patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) or familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP).

During the period 1983-2002, 50 patients underwent CI. The surgical technique was unchanged during the period. Follow-up included all patients. Forty-eight patients had UC, two of these had the diagnosis later changed to Crohn's disease and two had FAP.

Twenty-two patients had 38 reoperations, four (8%) of whom had the pouch removed. The main causes for reoperation included leakage and difficulty in intubation due to sliding of the nipple valve (42%), fistula formation (29%) and stenosis (21%). Seventeen (45%) underwent a revision of the nipple valve and the pouch and nine (24%) a local procedure. The reoperation rate was higher among patients having a conventional ileostomy converted to CI than among those having CI. As a primary procedure (P = 0.016). The risk of a second reoperation was higher for those reoperated within the first year after having a CI, than for those reoperated later (P = 0.007).

The reoperation rate of patients with CI is high but the removal rate of the pouch is low and is not associated with a high rate of revision. CI is a good alternative to conventional ileostomy in patients not suitable for restorative proctocolectomy or where this procedure has failed.

The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons is dedicated to assuring high-quality patient care by advancing the science, prevention, and management of disorders and diseases of the colon, rectum, and anus. The Standards Committee is composed of Society members who are chosen because they have demonstrated expertise in the specialty of colon and rectal surgery. This committee was created to lead international efforts in defining quality care for conditions related to the colon, rectum, and anus. This is accompanied by developing Clinical Practice Guidelines based on the best available evidence. These guidelines are inclusive, and not prescriptive. Their purpose is to provide information on which decisions can be made, rather than dictate a specific form of treatment. These guidelines are intended for the use of all practitioners, health care workers, and patients who desire information about the management of the conditions addressed by the topics covered in these guidelines. It should be recognized that these guidelines should not be deemed inclusive of all proper methods of care or exclusive of methods of care reasonably directed to obtaining the same results. The ultimate judgment regarding the propriety of any specific procedure must be made by the physician in light of all of the circumstances presented by the individual patient.

This study describes long-term adjustment of people with a continent ileostomy.

Subjects were 68 people (25 males and 43 females) who underwent an operation for ulcerative colitis with a continent ileostomy (Kock pouch). The median number of years subjects had lived with a continent reservoir was 31 (range 29-36) at follow-up and the median subject age was 60 (40-89). Subjects completed a 36-item questionnaire designed to assess adjustment to ostomy surgery. Subjects ranked the questionnaire using a 6-point Likert scale; a response alternative "not relevant" was available. Content analysis was conducted on subjects' responses to an open-ended question covering aspects of their quality of life.

High median adjustment ratings were found for all 36 statements; the maximum median rating of 6 appeared on 28 items. Eight items with the lowest median ratings were in the following domains: embarrassing situations, activity, body image, sexuality, and good care. Five items on medical care and 3 items on sexuality were most frequently considered "not relevant" by respondents. The most frequently mentioned quality-of-life domains were family, health, friends, and employment. Content analysis indicated that respondents were self-reliant, although they indicated that they experienced considerable impediments to bowel evacuation outside of the home.

In the long-term, people with a continent ileostomy have good self-care. The quality and availability of public restrooms, however, reduces their daily activities away from home.

The principal aim of this study was to assess long-term pouch durability and health-related quality of life in an original series of patients operated on with a continent ileostomy.

Data from 68 of 88 patients who had a continent ileostomy performed at Sahlgrenska University Hospital between 1967 and 1974 were analyzed. Median age at follow-up was 60 (range, 40-89) years and median follow-up was 31 (range, 29-36) years.

Patients were sent a questionnaire on pouch function along with the Short Form-36 Health Survey 2.0. A random age-matched and gender-matched sample was drawn from the Swedish national Short Form-36 Health Survey norm database to compare with the patient group.

The majority of the patients reported good physical condition and satisfactory pouch function. Patients evacuated the pouch a median of four times every 24 hours. Twelve patients (18 percent) had leakages. Forty-four patients (65 percent) had had at least one postoperative revision to restore continence. Generally minor peristomal skin irritation occurred in seven patients (10 percent). Patients with concurrent complaints (mostly age related) reported poorer health-related quality of life. Nevertheless, 78 percent of the patients rated their overall health as good, very good, or excellent. The patients' Short Form-36 Health Survey scores were comparable to reference values.

Although revisional operations may be needed to restore continence, continent ileostomy has a good durability. Pouch function was satisfactory and patients' satisfaction was high. Health-related quality of life levels were similar to those of the general population.

To assess quality of life after continent ileal reservoir diversion in children and adolescents.

Nine boys and 9 girls (10.8-18 years old at surgery) were operated with a Kock reservoir and followed for 5-12 years. They participated in an interview using a questionnaire based on the Swedish self-esteem inventory, "I think I am". The questionnaire consisted of 76 questions that covered medical, physical, psychological, social, body image and sexual aspects.

Six of 18 patients had some difficulties on catheterization. Five complained of pain or bleeding during evacuation. Two patients had slight urinary leakage between evacuations and 6 had mucus secretion. Ten patients had diarrhea with different frequencies. Physical activities were not hampered by the operation in any patient. Instead, activities such as full day outside home, friend at home overnight, using all types of clothes, and participation in camps were increased in 8, 6, 5 and 5 patients, respectively. All patients but 2 had an excellent relation with friends and family members. More than half of patients had excellent positive self-esteem and body image and the rest had very good self-esteem. However, some patients were concerned about how they looked and felt that life was unfair to them.

The patients were satisfied with their operation. They were physically active and declared a positive perspective regarding self-esteem and body image. The medical problems related to the operation did not have any negative influence on the self-esteem or body image. The choice of the operation can only be determined on the basis of an attentive dialogue between surgeon, child and parents.

The effect of proctocolectomy and small bowel resection on working capacity has not been assessed objectively in previous research. Twenty-nine patients with Crohn's disease were investigated with cycle ergometry and a questionnaire, following proctocolectomy with and without small bowel resection. Maximal exercise load is known to correspond well with working capacity, particularly when account is taken of body composition and metabolic variables. Maximal exercise load was reduced marginally (by 9 per cent) in patients without small bowel resection and by 22 per cent in patients with moderate small bowel resection (15-30 per cent resection). Patients with extensive bowel resection (more than 50 per cent) had a 40 per cent reduction in the maximal exercise load. This reduction in maximal exercise load was greater than predicted when accounting for reduction in muscle mass. All patients had a normal oxygen uptake including resting energy expenditure. Urinary sodium and magnesium excretion was low in the group with moderate bowel resection, whereas the extensively resected patients were malnourished and had a reduced body cell mass. The authors conclude that the significantly reduced working capacity was of multifactorial origin secondary to malabsorption. However, the patients seemed unaware of the degree of their diminished working capacity. This reduced capacity makes it unlikely that they would be able to perform any labour involving high energy consumption at the level of 500-700 W, and this inability was reflected by a high rate of unemployment among the patients.

This review assesses whether the risk of ileoanal pouch construction in patients with ulcerative colitis, compared with that of 'less dangerous' operations, is compensated by a better postoperative outcome. Even though the mortality rate is not greater for pouch construction, the risk of pelvic sepsis and pouchitis increase morbidity. Bowel function after construction of the ileal pouch, although better than that before operation, is not as good as that of normal controls and does not, in itself, justify increased morbidity. Quality of life measurements suggest that the benefit of the ileal pouch procedure is not much greater than that of ileostomy, even though some dimensions of quality of life are improved. However, most patients wish to avoid an ileostomy and surgeons should respect this wish, remembering that the pouch procedure has some risks and that the gain for the patient may be small.

The patient with ulcerative colitis requiring surgery has several options from which to choose. Although the pelvic pouch procedure may be preferred by many patients, in fact, all of the operations have both their advantages and disadvantages. Thus, patients should be fully informed of the various options and participate in the surgical decision making. Surgeons performing elective operations on patients with ulcerative colitis should be experienced with all of the procedures. Only then can they be unbiased in presenting the various options to the patient. Advocates of total proctocolectomy often cite the high complication rates of the Kock and pelvic pouch procedures and condemn these operations on this basis. However, the magnitude of a total proctocolectomy cannot be minimized, and the complication rate of this procedure is significant. On the other hand, total proctocolectomy is often condemned because of the permanent ileostomy and the perceived poor quality of life. This appears to be untrue. Most patients, regardless of which operation is performed, have a high quality of life. This is likely a result of the fact that physical well-being is excellent in most patients, and this may be the primary determinant of quality of life in these patients. It must be accepted, however, that some patients do have difficulties psychologically or physically with an ileostomy. Fortunately, there are several alternatives available for these people.

We investigated the daily life and opinions of patients after total proctocolectomy and ileal J-pouch-anal anastomosis. Eighty patients answered a questionnaire, completed Cattell's anxiety scale, and recorded bowel function for one month. Both colitis and polyposis patients defecated five times daily, had 1.6 episodes of nocturnal motions weekly, and soiled twice weekly. However, colitis patients were more satisfied with their bowel function and surgical outcome than were polyposis patients. This difference had a close relationship to the personality factors of ego strength and frustration. All patients with either disease who defecated less than three times daily, had no nocturnal motions, and had no soiling showed normal ego strength and frustration and were completely satisfied with their bowel status and operation. In contrast, patients defecating more than seven times daily or more than once per week nocturnally and soiling more than four times weekly had high frustration and were dissatisfied. Thus, satisfaction with surgery correlated not only with the objective outcome but also with personality and lifestyle.

Mucosa biopsy specimens were obtained from 12 patients with continent ileostomy reservoirs constructed 15 to 19 years previously. Biopsies from normal ileal mucosa, taken from six other patients with no apparent bowel disease, served as controls. The specimens were processed for light and electron microscopy. The reservoir mucosae showed an increased amount of inflammatory cells, but there were no signs of dysplasia. In the goblet cells, sialomucins dominated over sulfomucins; in this respect no difference was found between reservoirs and controls. Morphometric studies showed an increase of mucus-storing goblet cells in the reservoir mucosae, both with regard to relative number and to volume density. The mitotic index was higher than normal in the reservoirs, but the relative number of the Paneth cells and the height of the villus epithelial cells were similar in the reservoirs and the controls. In the reservoirs, the surface amplification factors due to villi and to microvilli (near the villus tips) were reduced by some 29% and 20%, respectively, indicating villus hypotrophy. It is concluded that only minor morphologic changes appear in the ileal reservoir mucosa 15 to 19 years after construction. Morphometry provides a sensitive tool to demonstrate such changes in intestinal morphology.

Thirty-six patients were evaluated after having continent ileostomies for 16 to 20 years. Follow-up included clinical examination, response to a questionnaire, blood tests, and radiologic studies of the gallbladder. In addition, reservoir biopsies from 15 patients were examined. The patients were in excellent general health, all but one having gained weight postoperatively. There was no increased risk for gallstone formation or for urinary tract stone development. Although 11 of the 36 patients had reservoirs that were not provided with a valve, 92 percent of all patients were continent. Working capacity was normal in most patients and no harmful effects of the reservoir were revealed by morphologic or biochemical studies. In conclusion, no deleterious long-term effects were found as a result of the continent ileostomy.