Mycophenolic acid (MPA) is an immunosuppression agent for the prophylaxis of organ rejection in patients receiving allogeneic transplants. The drug is administered based in 2 formulations, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) and enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium (EC-MPS). MPA acts by specific, reversible, uncompetitive inhibition of inosine monophosphate dehydrogenase (IMPDH) and thus blocks the proliferation of both T- and B-activated lymphocytes. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) constitutes an important part of immunosuppressive treatment because of the demonstrated significant intraindividual and interindividual variability of its pharmacokinetic behavior. TDM is required to optimize immunosuppressive efficacy. We present the analytical validation of a homogeneous particle-enhanced turbidimetric inhibition immunoassay (PETINIA) technique for determination of MPA in human plasma, and compare with a homogeneous enzyme immunoassay technique (EMIT; reference method), both methods adapted on a Dimension analyzer (Siemens). We examined 50 human plasma samples from kidney transplant recipients treated with MMF or EC-MPA, which were analyzed simultaneously by both methods. The interassay precision was 5.95% at a concentration of 1.0 μg/mL, 3.47% at 7.5 μg/mL, and 3.75% at 12.0 μg/mL. The bias of PETINIA-MPA for each of the 3 quality control sample was <3.0%. Least squares linear regression yielded an r-value of 0.994 with the following linear regression equation: PETINIA = 0.939 * EMIT - 0.063. Bland-Altman comparison presented a mean negative difference of -0.312 μg/mL (standard deviation [SD], 0.441), namely, -7.6% for PETINIA-MPA. The PETINIA assay for monitoring MPA concentrations is an acceptable method for routine clinical use, with interassay imprecision (% coefficient of variation) ranging from 5.9% to 3.7% below and above the therapeutic concentration range, respectively. In conclusion, MPA-EMIT and PETINIA-MPA methods on Dimension analyzer have a good correlation (r = 0.994), but PETINIA-MPA method demonstrates a negative average difference of -7.6% in comparison with EMIT-MPA method.

To characterize the population pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) and evaluate dose regimens using a simulation approach and accepted therapeutic drug monitoring targets in children and young people undergoing blood or marrow, kidney and liver transplantation.

MPA concentration-time data were collected using an age specific sampling protocol over 12h. Some patients provided randomly timed but accurately recorded blood samples. Total and unbound MPA were measured by HPLC. NONMEM was employed to analyze MPA pharmacokinetic data. Simulations (n= 1000) were conducted to assess the suitability of the MPA dose regimens to maintain total MPA AUC(0,12h) within the range 30 and 60mg l(-1) h associated with optimal outcome.

A two-compartment pharmacokinetic model with first-order elimination best described MPA concentration-time data. Population mean estimates of MPA clearance, inter-compartmental clearance, volumes of distribution in the central and peripheral compartments, absorption rate constant and bioavailability were 6.42 l h(-1) , 3.74 l h(-1) , 7.24 l, 16.8l, 0.39h(-1) and 0.48, respectively. Inclusion of bodyweight and concomitant ciclosporin reduced the inter-individual variability in CL from 54.3% to 31.6%. Children with a bodyweight of 10kg receiving standard MPA dose regimens achieve an MPA AUC below the target range suggesting they may be at a greater risk of acute rejection.

The population pharmacokinetic model for MPA can be used to explore dosing guidelines for safe and effective immunotherapy in children and young people undergoing transplantation.

This study sought to define the pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in Korean living donor liver transplant recipients.

Thirty-two liver transplant recipients (29 males, 3 females) were administered 750 mg mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) twice daily with concomitant tacrolimus. Plasma MPA concentrations were measured by liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry detection assay from samples drawn before dosing (C0) and after dosing at 0.5 hours (C1/2) and 2 hours (C2), providing a total of 114 pharmacokinetic profiles at various periods from 3 days to 6 months posttransplantation (D3, D7, D14, M1, M3, and M6).

The mean area-under-the-curve from 0 to 2 hours (AUC0-2) was 30.0+/-11.6 microg.h/mL (range, 7.8-60.7). Of 114 pharmacokinetic profiles, 40 (35%) AUC and 7 (6.1%) trough values were within the target value (30-60 microg.h/mL and 1.7-4.0 microg/mL, respectively). The C0, C1/2, and C2 concentrations showed large interindividual variability: C0 (0.01-4.46 microg/mL), C1/2 (0.14-36.86 microg/mL), and C2 (0.79-18.19 microg/mL). A positive correlation was observed between AUC and C0 (r=.6374; P<.0001), and C2 (r=.7460; P<.0001). When analyzed according to the date posttransplant, a positive correlation between AUC and C0 was shown on day 7, day 14, and at month 1. There was no difference in any pharmacokinetic parameter relative to age, weight, or albumin level.

This study demonstrated that C0 values on day 7, day 14, and at month 1 provided valuable information for MPA monitoring. C0 was shown to be the most reliable monitoring time in relation to AUC. However, results from a larger randomized trial with more time intervals are eagerly awaited.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was found to be beneficial in preventing acute rejection after kidney transplantation. The aim of this pilot prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy of MMF dose adjustment in de novo liver transplant patients receiving MMF at fixed versus concentration-controlled doses [ie, adapted to mycophenolic acid (MPA) AUC0-12h] and tacrolimus during the first 12 months posttransplant. Twenty-nine patients received steroids only up to day 10, induction therapy by lymphoglobulins followed by tacrolimus and MMF. In all patients, MPA AUC0-12h were measured on posttransplant days 7 and 14 and at months 1, 2, 3, 6, and 12. From March 2006 to March 2007, 15 patients received MMF at a fixed dose of 1 g twice a day for 12 months. From April 2007 to December 2007, MMF was given to 14 patients at a dose of 1 g twice a day until day 7 and was then adapted to reach an MPA AUC0-12h target of 30-60 mg x h/L. The proportion of MPA AUC0-12h values within the target range was similar in both groups. The proportion of patients with MPA AUC0-12h below 30 mg x h/L tended to be higher in the fixed dose group within the first month posttransplant. However, MMF dose did not differ significantly between the 2 groups at any period except month 1. MPA AUC0-12h tended to be higher in the concentration-controlled group at day 14 and month 2 and was significantly so at month 1. Tacrolimus trough concentrations tended to be lower in the concentration-controlled group at all study periods and was significantly so at month 3. At 12 months posttransplant, patient and graft survivals, acute rejection rate, and adverse events were similar in both groups. We concluded that adapting the dose of MMF resulted in a significant increase in MPA AUC0-12h at month 1. There was a trend toward a lower proportion of patients with MPA AUC0-12h below 30 mg x h/L in the concentration-controlled group. No difference in outcome was found between both groups.

An enzyme multiplied immunoassay technique (EMIT) provides convenient and accurate measurements of mycophenolic acid (MPA) concentrations for determination of immunosuppression during treatment with mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). No abbreviated model for estimating the full 12-hour MPA AUC using an EMIT assay in liver transplant recipients has been described previously.

This study was conducted to determine the best model for predicting the MPA AUC using the EMIT method and a limited-sampling strategy in Chinese patients undergoing liver transplantation.

The study enrolled consecutive liver transplant patients who were receiving MMF 1 g BID along with tacrolimus. A complete MPA pharmacokinetic profile was obtained for each patient on a single day, 7 to 14 days after transplantation. The EMIT method was used to determine MPA concentrations before dosing and at 0.5, 1, 1.5, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours after dosing on the sampling day. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to evaluate potential models for estimating the full 12-hour MPA AUC. The accuracy and robustness of the models were evaluated using bootstrap analysis. Prediction error and prediction bias were calculated. Agreement between the estimated MPA AUC(0-12) and the full 12-hour MPA AUC was investigated using Bland-Altman analysis.

The study enrolled 48 Chinese liver transplant recipients (45 male, 3 female) with a mean (SD) age of 50 (12) years, mean weight of 64 (12) kg, and mean height of 169 (6) cm. Twenty-four models that included blood sampling at 1 through 4 time points were developed (r(2) = 0.015-0.950). Four models with the highest r(2) values were selected; the lack of significant differences from the original dataset on bootstrap analysis indicated acceptable accuracy and robustness. The best model for predicting the MPA AUC(0-12) employed concentrations at 1, 2, 4, and 8 hours; 40 of 48 (83.3%) MPA AUC(0-12) values estimated using this model were within 15% of the full 12-hour MPA AUC. This model had a minimal mean prediction error (mean [SD], 0.27% [1.79%]) and mean absolute prediction error (8.83% [1.24%]). On Bland-Altman analysis, this model also had the best agreement between the estimated MAP AUC(0-12) and the full 12-hour MPA AUC, with a mean error of 9.02 mg . h/L.

In this small group of Chinese liver transplant patients receiving MMF and concomitant tacrolimus, models for estimating the MPA AUC(0-12) were developed using the EMIT method and a limited-sampling strategy. The best model for prediction of the full 12-hour MPA AUC was 4.46 + 0.81 . C1 + 1.78 . C(2)+2.51.C(4)+4.94.C8.

There are few pharmacokinetic data for mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) when used in combination with cyclosporine (CsA) in pediatric liver transplant recipients. The aim of this study was to assess the pharmacokinetics of MMF in stable pediatric liver transplant patients and estimate the dose of MMF required to provide a mycophenolic acid (MPA) exposure similar to that observed in adult liver transplant recipients receiving the recommended dose of MMF (target area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours [AUC(0-12)] for MPA of 29 mug.hour/mL in the immediate posttransplantation period and 58 microg x hour/mL after 6 months). A 12-hour pharmacokinetic profile was collected for 8 pediatric patients (mean age 20.9 months) on stable doses of MMF and CsA who had received a liver transplant > or = 6 months prior to entry and who had started on MMF within 2 weeks of transplantation. Mean MMF dosage was 285 mg/m(2) (range, 200-424 mg/m(2)). Of 8 patients, 7 had a MPA AUC(0-12) (range, 11.0-37.2 microg x hour/mL) well below the target. One patient had an AUC(0-12) > or = 58 microg x hour/mL but was considered an outlier and was excluded from analyses. Mean MPA AUC(0-12) and maximum plasma concentration values were 22.7 +/- 10.5 microg x hour/mL and 7.23 +/- 3.27 microg/mL, respectively; values normalized to 600 mg/m(2) (the approved pediatric dose in renal transplantation) were 47.0 +/- 21.8 microg x hour/mL and 14.5 +/- 4.21 microg/mL. In conclusion, assuming that MPA exhibits linear pharmacokinetics, when used in combination with CsA, a MMF dose of 740 mg/m(2) twice daily would be recommended in pediatric liver transplant recipients to achieve MPA exposures similar to those observed in adult liver transplant recipients. This finding should be confirmed by a prospective trial.

This study aimed to: (i) define the clinical pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid (MPA) in Chinese liver transplant recipients; and (ii) develop a regression model best fitted for the prediction of MPA area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to 12 hours (AUC(12)) by abbreviated sampling strategy.

Forty liver transplant patients received mycophenolate mofetil 1g as a single dose twice daily in combination with tacrolimus. MPA concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography before dose (C(0)) and at 0.5 (C(0.5)), 1 (C(1)), 1.5 (C(1.5)), 2 (C(2)), 4 (C(4)), 6 (C(6)), 8 (C(8)), 10 (C(10)) and 12 (C(12)) hours after administration on days 7 and 14. A total of 72 pharmacokinetic profiles were obtained. MPA AUC(12) was calculated with 3P97 software. The trough concentrations (C(0)) of tacrolimus and hepatic function were also measured simultaneously. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to establish the models for estimated MPA AUC(12). The agreement between predicted MPA AUC(12) and observed MPA AUC(12) was investigated by Bland-Altman analysis.

The pattern of MPA concentrations during the 12-hour interval on day 7 was very similar to that on day 14. In the total of 72 profiles, the mean maximum plasma concentration (C(max)) and time to reach C(max) (t(max)) were 9.79 +/- 5.26 mg/L and 1.43 +/- 0.78 hours, respectively. The mean MPA AUC(12) was 46.50 +/- 17.42 mg . h/L (range 17.99-98.73 mg . h/L). Correlation between MPA C(0) and MPA AUC(12) was poor (r(2) = 0.300, p = 0.0001). The best model for prediction of MPA AUC(12) was by using 1, 2, 6 and 8 hour timepoint MPA concentrations (r(2) = 0.921, p = 0.0001). The regression equation for estimated MPA AUC(12) was 5.503 + 0.919 . C(1) + 1.871 . C(2) + 3.176 . C(6) + 3.664 . C(8). This model had minimal mean prediction error (1.24 +/- 11.19%) and minimal mean absolute prediction error (8.24 +/- 7.61%). Sixty-three of 72 (88%) estimated MPA AUC(12) were within 15% of MPA AUC(12). Bland-Altman analysis also revealed the best agreement of this model compared with the others and a mean error of +/-9.89 mg . h/mL.

This study showed the wide variability in MPA AUC(12) in Chinese liver transplant recipients. Single timepoint MPA concentration during the 12-hour dosing interval cannot reflect MPA AUC(12). MPA AUC(12) could be predicted accurately using 1, 2, 6 and 8 hour timepoint MPA concentrations by abbreviated sampling strategy.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is widely and successfully used in immunosuppressive regimens for the prophylaxis of organ rejection following transplantation. Conventionally, it is administered at a fixed dose without serial measurements of plasma concentrations of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite. Recently, there has been an increased interest in therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of MMF therapy to optimize the benefit/risk index of the drug. Predose trough samples of MPA are considered most convenient and economic, thereby allowing an increased use of TDM in the transplant setting. However, the added value of TDM for MMF therapy is still under debate.

This paper reviews (based on a systematic PubMed and EMBASE search, 1995-June 2006) the current evidence of the usefulness and clinical relevance of MPA trough level monitoring during MMF therapy in solid organ transplantation.

Based on data available in the public domain, the contribution of MPA trough level monitoring during MMF therapy in solid organ transplant recipients remains unproven. Available studies have limitations and report conflicting results. There is a lack of prospective randomized trials, particularly in pediatric renal transplant recipients and in cardiac and liver transplantation. While there is a suggestion that there may be a relationship between efficacy and MPA trough levels, the majority of studies showed no correlation between MPA plasma concentrations and adverse effects. Based on current evidence, the adherence to presently recommended target ranges for MPA troughs in solid organ transplantation cannot assure an improved clinical outcome with MMF therapy. Whether MPA trough level monitoring leads to improved efficacy and less toxicity is currently subject to a large randomized trial; final results are eagerly awaited.

Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) has conventionally been administered at a fixed dose without routinely monitoring blood levels of mycophenolic acid (MPA), the active metabolite. The contribution of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during MMF therapy remains controversial. A literature review was performed to explore the usefulness of TDM for MPA in solid organ transplantation. In addition, emphasis was placed on the potential clinical benefits and limitations of TDM for MPA. Available studies have limitations and report conflicting results. Although early after transplantation MPA area under the curve might have predictive value for the risk of acute rejection, predose levels appear less reliable. With regard to MPA toxicity, most studies showed no correlation between MPA pharmacokinetics and adverse effects. TDM is hampered by several factors such as the considerable intra-subject variability of MPA pharmacokinetics and the increasing number of different drug combinations. Proposed target ranges are restricted to the early posttransplant period when MMF is used in combination with cyclosporine. The current review of the literature indicates no clear support for a substantial clinical benefit of TDM and more data from prospective randomized trials are needed.

In liver transplantation, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) is habitually administered using fixed doses. We assessed whether mycophenolic acid (MPA) monitoring could be advisable in liver transplant patients.

In 15 liver transplant patients receiving tacrolimus, daclizumab and MMF (1 g bid, orally), we determined the 12-hour plasma MPA pharmacokinetic profile after one dose of MMF at days 6, 10, and 16, and months 3 and 6. The inhibitory capacity of serum MPA on proliferation of CEM cells, a cell line insensitive to other immunosuppressants, was also determined.

A large interindividual variability in MPA profiles was observed at any time. Regardless of a gradual increase in individual MPA AUC and C(0) over time following transplantation, a substantial proportion of patients had these parameters below the ranges recommended in other organ transplantations throughout the study. When MPA AUC and C(0) were within the recommended ranges, CEM proliferation was inhibited by almost all serum samples, but when these pharmacokinetic parameters were below the recommended ranges, CEM proliferation was very variable and, therefore, unpredictable. No relationship between MPA pharmacokinetics and the efficacy of MMF could be established (only one patient developed rejection), probably due to the concomitant administration of tacrolimus and daclizumab. Gastrointestinal symptoms were the only adverse events with a significant relationship with MPA levels.

During the first postoperative months, exposure to MPA is low in a considerable proportion of liver transplant patients receiving MMF at a fixed dose of 1 g bid. MPA monitoring appears necessary in these patients.