1
|
Abdelmalak J, Lubel JS, Sinclair M, Majeed A, Kemp W, Roberts SK. Quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma-A critical review. Hepatol Commun 2025; 9:e0595. [PMID: 39665645 PMCID: PMC11637749 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000595] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/02/2024] [Accepted: 10/16/2024] [Indexed: 12/13/2024] Open
Abstract
There is significant variation in HCC management across different centers with poor adherence to evidence-based clinical practice guidelines as assessed in prior studies. In Australia, quality indicators (QIs) have recently been proposed by a multidisciplinary group of experts to help provide a framework to assess and monitor the quality of HCC care. In this review, we discuss the many areas where real-world practice deviates from evidence-based medicine, the role that QI sets play in addressing this gap, and the similarities and differences between Australian QIs and other leading treatment guidelines and QI sets from around the world. We focus on the utility of QI sets to identify opportunities for targeted improvement in the real-world clinical environment. We conclude with a discussion about the formation of a national clinical quality registry as a long-term measure to facilitate continual improvements in patient care within and across sites in order to optimize patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Abdelmalak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
| | - John S. Lubel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Marie Sinclair
- Victorian Liver Transplant Unit, Austin Health, Heidelberg, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Medicine, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ammar Majeed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - William Kemp
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Stuart K. Roberts
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
- School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ho C, Ghabril M, Kuo A, Serper M, Tapper EB, Asrani SK. Operationalizing multidisciplinary liver tumor boards for hepatocellular carcinoma. Liver Transpl 2024; 30:972-975. [PMID: 38381072 DOI: 10.1097/lvt.0000000000000352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Chanda Ho
- Department of Transplantation, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore
| | - Marwan Ghabril
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Alexander Kuo
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marina Serper
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Elliot B Tapper
- Department of Medicine, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Sumeet K Asrani
- Baylor University Medical Center, Baylor Scott and White, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Brahmania M, Kuo A, Tapper EB, Volk ML, Vittorio JM, Ghabril M, Morgan TR, Kanwal F, Parikh ND, Martin P, Mehta S, Winder GS, Im GY, Goldberg D, Lai JC, Duarte-Rojo A, Paredes AH, Patel AA, Sahota A, McElroy LM, Thomas C, Wall AE, Malinis M, Aslam S, Simonetto DA, Ufere NN, Ramakrishnan S, Flynn MM, Ibrahim Y, Asrani SK, Serper M. Quality measures in pre-liver transplant care by the Practice Metrics Committee of the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases. Hepatology 2024; 80:742-753. [PMID: 38536021 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2024] [Accepted: 03/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/19/2024]
Abstract
The liver transplantation (LT) evaluation and waitlisting process is subject to variations in care that can impede quality. The American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) Practice Metrics Committee (PMC) developed quality measures and patient-reported experience measures along the continuum of pre-LT care to reduce care variation and guide patient-centered care. Following a systematic literature review, candidate pre-LT measures were grouped into 4 phases of care: referral, evaluation and waitlisting, waitlist management, and organ acceptance. A modified Delphi panel with content expertise in hepatology, transplant surgery, psychiatry, transplant infectious disease, palliative care, and social work selected the final set. Candidate patient-reported experience measures spanned domains of cognitive health, emotional health, social well-being, and understanding the LT process. Of the 71 candidate measures, 41 were selected: 9 for referral; 20 for evaluation and waitlisting; 7 for waitlist management; and 5 for organ acceptance. A total of 14 were related to structure, 17 were process measures, and 10 were outcome measures that focused on elements not typically measured in routine care. Among the patient-reported experience measures, candidates of LT rated items from understanding the LT process domain as the most important. The proposed pre-LT measures provide a framework for quality improvement and care standardization among candidates of LT. Select measures apply to various stakeholders such as referring practitioners in the community and LT centers. Clinically meaningful measures that are distinct from those used for regulatory transplant reporting may facilitate local quality improvement initiatives to improve access and quality of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mayur Brahmania
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | - Alexander Kuo
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Elliot B Tapper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Michael L Volk
- Department of Medicine, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, Texas, USA
| | - Jennifer M Vittorio
- Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, New York University (NYU) Langone Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Marwan Ghabril
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Timothy R Morgan
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, Irvine, California, USA
- Medical Service, VA Long Beach Healthcare System, Long Beach, California, USA
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Neehar D Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Paul Martin
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Shivang Mehta
- Department of Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Gene Y Im
- Division of Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, USA
| | - David Goldberg
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, Florida, USA
| | - Jennifer C Lai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Andres Duarte-Rojo
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Angelo H Paredes
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of San Antonio, San Antonio, Texas, USA
| | - Arpan A Patel
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Amandeep Sahota
- Department of Transplant Hepatology, Southern California Permanente Medical Group, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lisa M McElroy
- Department of Surgery, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charlie Thomas
- Banner University Medical Center Phoenix Transplant Program, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Anji E Wall
- Department of Surgery, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Maricar Malinis
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Saima Aslam
- Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Douglas A Simonetto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Nneka N Ufere
- Department of Medicine, Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Mary Margaret Flynn
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Sumeet K Asrani
- Department of Medicine, Baylor University Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Marina Serper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abdelmalak J, Strasser SI, Ngu NL, Dennis C, Sinclair M, Majumdar A, Collins K, Bateman K, Dev A, Abasszade JH, Valaydon Z, Saitta D, Gazelakis K, Byers S, Holmes J, Thompson AJ, Howell J, Pandiaraja D, Bollipo S, Sharma S, Joseph M, Sawhney R, Nicoll A, Batt N, Tang MJ, Riordan S, Hannah N, Haridy J, Sood S, Lam E, Greenhill E, Lubel J, Kemp W, Majeed A, Zalcberg J, Roberts SK. Initial Trans-Arterial Chemo-Embolisation (TACE) Is Associated with Similar Survival Outcomes as Compared to Upfront Percutaneous Ablation Allowing for Follow-Up Treatment in Those with Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) ≤ 3 cm: Results of a Real-World Propensity-Matched Multi-Centre Australian Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:3010. [PMID: 39272868 PMCID: PMC11394053 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16173010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2024] [Revised: 08/24/2024] [Accepted: 08/27/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Percutaneous ablation is recommended in Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage 0/A patients with HCC ≤3 cm as a curative treatment modality alongside surgical resection and liver transplantation. However, trans-arterial chemo-embolisation (TACE) is commonly used in the real-world as an initial treatment in patients with single small HCC in contrast to widely accepted clinical practice guidelines which typically describe TACE as a treatment for intermediate-stage HCC. We performed this real-world propensity-matched multi-centre cohort study in patients with single HCC ≤ 3 cm to assess for differences in survival outcomes between those undergoing initial TACE and those receiving upfront ablation. Patients with a new diagnosis of BCLC 0/A HCC with a single tumour ≤3 cm first diagnosed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020 who received initial TACE or ablation were included in the study. A total of 348 patients were included in the study, with 147 patients receiving initial TACE and 201 patients undergoing upfront ablation. After propensity score matching using key covariates, 230 patients were available for analysis with 115 in each group. There were no significant differences in overall survival (log-rank test p = 0.652) or liver-related survival (log-rank test p = 0.495) over a median follow-up of 43 months. While rates of CR were superior after ablation compared to TACE as a first treatment (74% vs. 56%, p < 0.004), there was no significant difference in CR rates when allowing for further subsequent treatments (86% vs. 80% p = 0.219). In those who achieved CR, recurrence-free survival and local recurrence-free survival were similar (log rank test p = 0.355 and p = 0.390, respectively). Our study provides valuable real-world evidence that TACE when offered with appropriate follow-up treatment is a reasonable initial management strategy in very early/early-stage HCC, with similar survival outcomes as compared to those managed with upfront ablation. Further work is needed to better define the role for TACE in BCLC 0/A HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Abdelmalak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Simone I. Strasser
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.L.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Natalie L. Ngu
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.L.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Claude Dennis
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.L.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Marie Sinclair
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Avik Majumdar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Kate Collins
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Katherine Bateman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Anouk Dev
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (A.D.); (J.H.A.)
| | - Joshua H. Abasszade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (A.D.); (J.H.A.)
| | - Zina Valaydon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Daniel Saitta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Kathryn Gazelakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Susan Byers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Jacinta Holmes
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (J.H.); (D.P.)
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Alexander J. Thompson
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (J.H.); (D.P.)
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Jessica Howell
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (J.H.); (D.P.)
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Dhivya Pandiaraja
- Department of Gastroenterology, St. Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (J.H.); (D.P.)
| | - Steven Bollipo
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Suresh Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Merlyn Joseph
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Rohit Sawhney
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (R.S.); (A.N.); (N.B.)
- Department of Medicine, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Amanda Nicoll
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (R.S.); (A.N.); (N.B.)
- Department of Medicine, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Nicholas Batt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (R.S.); (A.N.); (N.B.)
| | - Myo J. Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
| | - Stephen Riordan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia;
| | - Nicholas Hannah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (S.S.)
| | - James Haridy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (S.S.)
| | - Siddharth Sood
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (S.S.)
| | - Eileen Lam
- Department of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - Elysia Greenhill
- Department of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - John Lubel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| | - William Kemp
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| | - Ammar Majeed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| | - John Zalcberg
- School of Public Health and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Stuart K. Roberts
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, School of Translational Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gujarathi R, Franses JW, Pillai A, Liao CY. Targeted therapies in hepatocellular carcinoma: past, present, and future. Front Oncol 2024; 14:1432423. [PMID: 39267840 PMCID: PMC11390354 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1432423] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2024] [Accepted: 08/13/2024] [Indexed: 09/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Targeted therapies are the mainstay of systemic therapies for patients with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. Several therapeutic targets, such as c-Met, TGF-β, and FGFR, have been evaluated in the past, though results from these clinical studies failed to show clinical benefit. However, these remain important targets for the future with novel targeted agents and strategies. The Wnt/β-catenin signaling pathway, c-Myc oncogene, GPC3, PPT1 are exciting novel targets, among others, currently undergoing evaluation. Through this review, we aim to provide an overview of previously evaluated and potentially novel therapeutic targets and explore their continued relevance in ongoing and future studies for HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rushabh Gujarathi
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Joseph W Franses
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Chih-Yi Liao
- Section of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sanchez JI, Fontillas AC, Kwan SY, Sanchez CI, Calderone TL, Lee JL, Elsaiey A, Cleere DW, Wei P, Vierling JM, Victor DW, Beretta L. Metabolomics biomarkers of hepatocellular carcinoma in a prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis. JHEP Rep 2024; 6:101119. [PMID: 39139459 PMCID: PMC11321296 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhepr.2024.101119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2024] [Revised: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 05/08/2024] [Indexed: 08/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Background & Aims The effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis is limited, due to inadequate risk stratification and suboptimal performance of current screening modalities. Methods We developed a multicenter prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis undergoing surveillance with MRI and applied global untargeted metabolomics to 612 longitudinal serum samples from 203 patients. Among them, 37 developed HCC during follow-up. Results We identified 150 metabolites with significant abundance changes in samples collected prior to HCC (Cases) compared to samples from patients who did not develop HCC (Controls). Tauro-conjugated bile acids and gamma-glutamyl amino acids were increased, while acyl-cholines and deoxycholate derivatives were decreased. Seven amino acids including serine and alanine had strong associations with HCC risk, while strong protective effects were observed for N-acetylglycine and glycerophosphorylcholine. Machine learning using the 150 metabolites, age, gender, and PNPLA3 and TMS6SF2 single nucleotide polymorphisms, identified 15 variables giving optimal performance. Among them, N-acetylglycine had the highest AUC in discriminating Cases and Controls. When restricting Cases to samples collected within 1 year prior to HCC (Cases-12M), additional metabolites including microbiota-derived metabolites were identified. The combination of the top six variables identified by machine learning (alpha-fetoprotein, 6-bromotryptophan, N-acetylglycine, salicyluric glucuronide, testosterone sulfate and age) had good performance in discriminating Cases-12M from Controls (AUC 0.88, 95% CI 0.83-0.93). Finally, 23 metabolites distinguished Cases with LI-RADS-3 lesions from Controls with LI-RADS-3 lesions, with reduced abundance of acyl-cholines and glycerophosphorylcholine-related lysophospholipids in Cases. Conclusions This study identified N-acetylglycine, amino acids, bile acids and choline-derived metabolites as biomarkers of HCC risk, and microbiota-derived metabolites as contributors to HCC development. Impact and implications The effectiveness of surveillance for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with cirrhosis is limited. There is an urgent need for improvement in risk stratification and new screening modalities, particularly blood biomarkers. Longitudinal collection of paired blood samples and MRI images from patients with cirrhosis is particularly valuable in assessing how early blood and imaging markers become positive during the period when lesions are observed to obtain a diagnosis of HCC. We generated a multicenter prospective cohort of patients with cirrhosis under surveillance with contrast MRI, applied untargeted metabolomics on 612 serum samples from 203 patients and identified metabolites associated with risk of HCC development. Such biomarkers may significantly improve early-stage HCC detection for patients with cirrhosis undergoing HCC surveillance, a critical step to increasing curative treatment opportunities and reducing mortality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica I. Sanchez
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Antoine C. Fontillas
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Suet-Ying Kwan
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Caren I. Sanchez
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Tiffany L. Calderone
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jana L. Lee
- Margaret M. and Albert B. Alkek Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ahmed Elsaiey
- Department of Gastroenterology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Darrel W. Cleere
- Department of Gastroenterology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Peng Wei
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - John M. Vierling
- Margaret M. and Albert B. Alkek Department of Medicine, Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - David W. Victor
- Department of Gastroenterology, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Laura Beretta
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Tapper EB, Warner MA, Shah RP, Emamaullee J, Dunbar NM, Sholzberg M, Poston JN, Soto RJ, Sarwar A, Pillai A, Reyner K, Mehta S, Ghabril M, Morgan TR, Caldwell S. Management of coagulopathy among patients with cirrhosis undergoing upper endoscopy and paracentesis: Persistent gaps and areas of consensus in a multispecialty Delphi. Hepatology 2024; 80:488-499. [PMID: 38557474 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2024] [Accepted: 02/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Patients with cirrhosis have abnormal coagulation indices such as a high international normalized ratio and low platelet count, but these do not correlate well with periprocedural bleeding risk. We sought to develop a consensus among the multiple stakeholders in cirrhosis care to inform process measures that can help improve the quality of the periprocedural management of coagulopathy in cirrhosis. We identified candidate process measures for periprocedural coagulopathy management in multiple contexts relating to the performance of paracentesis and upper endoscopy. An 11-member panel with content expertise was convened. It included nominees from professional societies for interventional radiology, transfusion medicine, and anesthesia as well as representatives from hematology, emergency medicine, transplant surgery, and community practice. Each measure was evaluated for agreement using a modified Delphi approach (3 rounds of rating) to define the final set of measures. Out of 286 possible measures, 33 measures made the final set. International normalized ratio testing was not required for diagnostic or therapeutic paracentesis as well as diagnostic endoscopy. Plasma transfusion should be avoided for all paracenteses and diagnostic endoscopy. No consensus was achieved for these items in therapeutic intent or emergent endoscopy. The risks of prophylactic platelet transfusions exceed their benefits for outpatient diagnostic paracentesis and diagnostic endosopies. For the other procedures examined, the risks outweigh benefits when platelet count is >20,000/mm 3 . It is uncertain whether risks outweigh benefits below 20,000/mm 3 in other contexts. No consensus was achieved on whether it was permissible to continue or stop systemic anticoagulation. Continuous aspirin was permissible for each procedure. Clopidogrel was permissible for diagnostic and therapeutic paracentesis and diagnostic endoscopy. We found many areas of consensus that may serve as a foundation for a common set of practice metrics for the periprocedural management of coagulopathy in cirrhosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elliot B Tapper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Matthew A Warner
- Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Rajesh P Shah
- Section of Radiology-Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - Juliet Emamaullee
- Department of Surgery, Keck Medicine of USC/Children's Hospital-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Nancy M Dunbar
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine and Department of Medicine, Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA
| | - Michelle Sholzberg
- Departments of Medicine and Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, St. Michael's Hospital, Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jacqueline N Poston
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
- Department of Pathology, Division of Clinical Pathology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont, USA
| | - Robin J Soto
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, UC San Diego Health, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Ammar Sarwar
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Karina Reyner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Baylor Scott and White, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Shivang Mehta
- Division of Transplant Hepatology, Baylor Scott and White, Fort Worth, Texas, USA
| | - Marwan Ghabril
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| | - Timothy R Morgan
- VA Long Beach Healthcare System-Section of Gastroenterology, Long Beach, California, USA
| | - Stephen Caldwell
- Division of Gastroenterology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lim N, Devuni D, German M, Guy J, Rabiee A, Sharma P, Shingina A, Shroff H, Pillai A. The rise of multidisciplinary clinics in hepatology: A practical, how-to-guide, and review of the literature. Hepatology 2024:01515467-990000000-00982. [PMID: 39212328 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000001036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/12/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
Multidisciplinary clinics (MDCs) are gaining momentum throughout the medical field, having initially been pioneered in oncology clinics due to their inherent ability to streamline complex care and improve both patient outcomes and the patient care experience. Liver transplant and hepatobiliary tumor clinics are examples of established MDCs in hepatology. With the changing landscape of liver disease in regard to etiology and patient complexity and acuity, there is a clear need for efficient, highly coordinated care. These changes highlight opportunities for hepatology MDCs in alcohol-associated liver disease, metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, and palliative care. This review provides practical advice in navigating the complex logistics of establishing and maintaining a hepatology MDC while also reviewing the emerging evidence on clinical outcomes for patients seen in these MDCs. As hepatology looks to the future, establishment of MDCs in key clinical areas will be the cornerstone of patient care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas Lim
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA
| | - Deepika Devuni
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Massachusetts, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Margarita German
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jennifer Guy
- Department of Transplantation, California Pacific Medical Center, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Atoosa Rabiee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Washington DC Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Washington, District of Columbia, USA
| | - Pratima Sharma
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Alexandra Shingina
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - Hersh Shroff
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - Anjana Pillai
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Medicine, University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abdelmalak J, Strasser SI, Ngu NL, Dennis C, Sinclair M, Majumdar A, Collins K, Bateman K, Dev A, Abasszade JH, Valaydon Z, Saitta D, Gazelakis K, Byers S, Holmes J, Thompson AJ, Pandiaraja D, Bollipo S, Sharma S, Joseph M, Sawhney R, Nicoll A, Batt N, Tang MJ, Riordan S, Hannah N, Haridy J, Sood S, Lam E, Greenhill E, Lubel J, Kemp W, Majeed A, Zalcberg J, Roberts SK. Different Patterns of Care and Survival Outcomes in Transplant-Centre Managed Patients with Early-Stage HCC: Real-World Data from an Australian Multi-Centre Cohort Study. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1966. [PMID: 38893086 PMCID: PMC11171392 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16111966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2024] [Revised: 05/18/2024] [Accepted: 05/18/2024] [Indexed: 06/21/2024] Open
Abstract
The management of early-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is complex, with multiple treatment strategies available. There is a paucity of literature regarding variations in the patterns of care and outcomes between transplant and non-transplant centres. We conducted this real-world multi-centre cohort study in two liver cancer referral centres with an integrated liver transplant program and an additional eight non-transplant HCC referral centres across Australia to identify variation in patterns of care and key survival outcomes. Patients with stage Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) 0/A HCC, first diagnosed between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2020, who were managed at a participating site, were included in the study. Patients were excluded if they had a history of prior HCC or if they received upfront liver transplantation. A total of 887 patients were included in the study, with 433 patients managed at a liver cancer centre with a transplant program (LTC) and 454 patients managed at a non-transplant centre (NTC). Management at an LTC did not significantly predict allocation to resection (adjusted OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.50 to 1.11, p = 0.148). However, in those not receiving resection, LTC and NTC patients were systematically managed differently, with LTC patients five times less likely to receive upfront ablation than NTC patients (adjusted OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.13 to 0.28, p < 0.001), even after adjusting for tumour burden, as well as for age, gender, liver disease aetiology, liver disease severity, and medical comorbidities. LTCs exhibited significantly higher proportions of patients undergoing TACE for every tumour burden category, including those with a single tumour measuring 2 cm or less (p < 0.001). Using multivariable Cox proportional hazards analysis, management at a transplant centre was associated with reduced all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.98, p = 0.036), and competing-risk regression analysis, considering liver transplant as a competing event, demonstrated a similar reduction in risk (adjusted HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.99, p = 0.041), suggesting that the reduced risk of death is not fully explained by higher rates of transplantation. Our study highlights systematic differences in HCC care between large volume liver transplant centres and other sites, which has not previously been well-described. Further work is needed to better define the reasons for differences in treatment allocation and to aim to minimise unwarranted treatment variation to maximise patient outcomes across Australia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Abdelmalak
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Simone I. Strasser
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.L.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Natalie L. Ngu
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.L.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Claude Dennis
- AW Morrow Gastroenterology and Liver Centre, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, NSW 2050, Australia; (S.I.S.); (N.L.N.); (C.D.)
| | - Marie Sinclair
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Avik Majumdar
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Kate Collins
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Katherine Bateman
- Department of Gastroenterology, Austin Hospital, Heidelberg, VIC 3084, Australia; (M.S.); (A.M.); (K.C.); (K.B.)
| | - Anouk Dev
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (A.D.); (J.H.A.)
| | - Joshua H. Abasszade
- Department of Gastroenterology, Monash Health, Clayton, VIC 3168, Australia; (A.D.); (J.H.A.)
| | - Zina Valaydon
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Daniel Saitta
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Kathryn Gazelakis
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Susan Byers
- Department of Gastroenterology, Western Health, Footscray, VIC 3011, Australia; (Z.V.); (D.S.); (K.G.); (S.B.)
| | - Jacinta Holmes
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (D.P.)
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Alexander J. Thompson
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (D.P.)
- Department of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Dhivya Pandiaraja
- Department of Gastroenterology, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne, Fitzroy, VIC 3065, Australia; (J.H.); (A.J.T.); (D.P.)
| | - Steven Bollipo
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Suresh Sharma
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Merlyn Joseph
- Department of Gastroenterology, John Hunter Hospital, New Lambton Heights, NSW 2305, Australia; (S.B.); (S.S.); (M.J.)
| | - Rohit Sawhney
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (R.S.); (A.N.); (N.B.)
- Department of Medicine, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Amanda Nicoll
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (R.S.); (A.N.); (N.B.)
- Department of Medicine, Eastern Health Clinical School, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia
| | - Nicholas Batt
- Department of Gastroenterology, Eastern Health, Box Hill, VIC 3128, Australia; (R.S.); (A.N.); (N.B.)
| | - Myo J. Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
| | - Stephen Riordan
- Department of Gastroenterology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Randwick, NSW 2031, Australia;
| | - Nicholas Hannah
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (J.H.); (S.S.)
| | - James Haridy
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (J.H.); (S.S.)
| | - Siddharth Sood
- Department of Gastroenterology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia; (N.H.); (J.H.); (S.S.)
| | - Eileen Lam
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - Elysia Greenhill
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
| | - John Lubel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| | - William Kemp
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| | - Ammar Majeed
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| | - John Zalcberg
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia;
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Stuart K. Roberts
- Department of Gastroenterology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (J.A.); (M.J.T.); (J.L.); (W.K.); (A.M.)
- Department of Medicine, Central Clinical School, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia; (E.L.); (E.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lang D, Agarwal R, Brown SA, Borgmann AJ, Lockney NA, Goff LW, Heumann TR. Multidisciplinary Care and Multimodal Treatment Approaches for Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma. ADVANCES IN ONCOLOGY 2024; 4:247-262. [PMID: 38882260 PMCID: PMC11178262 DOI: 10.1016/j.yao.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/18/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Daenielle Lang
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Rajiv Agarwal
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Sara A Brown
- Department Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Anthony J Borgmann
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Natalie A Lockney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Laura W Goff
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Thatcher R Heumann
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Martínez-Blanco P, Suárez M, Gil-Rojas S, Torres AM, Martínez-García N, Blasco P, Torralba M, Mateo J. Prognostic Factors for Mortality in Hepatocellular Carcinoma at Diagnosis: Development of a Predictive Model Using Artificial Intelligence. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:406. [PMID: 38396445 PMCID: PMC10888215 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14040406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/09/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for 75% of primary liver tumors. Controlling risk factors associated with its development and implementing screenings in risk populations does not seem sufficient to improve the prognosis of these patients at diagnosis. The development of a predictive prognostic model for mortality at the diagnosis of HCC is proposed. METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study, the analysis of data from 191 HCC patients was conducted using machine learning (ML) techniques to analyze the prognostic factors of mortality that are significant at the time of diagnosis. Clinical and analytical data of interest in patients with HCC were gathered. RESULTS Meeting Milan criteria, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) classification and albumin levels were the variables with the greatest impact on the prognosis of HCC patients. The ML algorithm that achieved the best results was random forest (RF). CONCLUSIONS The development of a predictive prognostic model at the diagnosis is a valuable tool for patients with HCC and for application in clinical practice. RF is useful and reliable in the analysis of prognostic factors in the diagnosis of HCC. The search for new prognostic factors is still necessary in patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miguel Suárez
- Gastroenterology Department, Virgen de la Luz Hospital, 16002 Cuenca, Spain
- Medical Analysis Expert Group, Institute of Technology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
- Medical Analysis Expert Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), 45071 Toledo, Spain
| | - Sergio Gil-Rojas
- Gastroenterology Department, Virgen de la Luz Hospital, 16002 Cuenca, Spain
| | - Ana María Torres
- Medical Analysis Expert Group, Institute of Technology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
- Medical Analysis Expert Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), 45071 Toledo, Spain
| | | | - Pilar Blasco
- Department of Pharmacy, General University Hospital, 46014 Valencia, Spain
| | - Miguel Torralba
- Internal Medicine Unit, Guadalajara University Hospital, 19002 Guadalajara, Spain (M.T.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Alcalá de Henares, 28801 Alcalá de Henares, Spain
- Translational Research Group in Cellular Immunology (GITIC), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), 45071 Toledo, Spain
| | - Jorge Mateo
- Medical Analysis Expert Group, Institute of Technology, Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, 16071 Cuenca, Spain
- Medical Analysis Expert Group, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Castilla-La Mancha (IDISCAM), 45071 Toledo, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Mezzacappa C, Rossi R, Jaffe A, Taddei TH, Strazzabosco M. Community-Level Factors Associated with Hepatocellular Carcinoma Incidence and Mortality: An Observational Registry Study. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2024; 33:270-278. [PMID: 38059831 PMCID: PMC10872555 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-23-0902] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2023] [Revised: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) incidence and outcomes vary across populations in the United States, but few studies evaluate local drivers of observed disparities. We measured HCC incidence at the community level and assessed community-level HCC risk factors with the goal of informing resource allocation to improve early case detection, which is associated with improved outcomes. METHODS Clinical and demographic data including census tract of residence for all adults diagnosed with HCC in the Connecticut Tumor Registry between 2008 and 2019 were combined with publicly available U.S. Census and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) data at the ZIP Code tabulation area (ZCTA) level. The average annual incidence of HCC was calculated for each ZCTA and associations between community-level characteristics, HCC incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival were evaluated. RESULTS Average annual HCC incidence during the study period was 8.9/100,000 adults and varied from 0 to 97.7 per 100,000 adults by ZCTA. At the community level, lower rates of high school graduation, higher rates of poverty, and rural community type were associated with higher HCC incidence. Persons with HCC living in the highest incidence ZCTAs were diagnosed at a younger age and were less likely to be alive at 1, 2, and 5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Community-level socioeconomic factors are strongly associated with HCC incidence and survival in Connecticut. IMPACT This reproducible geo-localization approach using cancer registry, Census, and CDC data can be used to identify communities most likely to benefit from health system investments to reduce disparities in HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Mezzacappa
- Yale Liver Center, Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Raiza Rossi
- Yale Liver Center, Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
| | - Ariel Jaffe
- Yale Liver Center, Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
- Yale Cancer Center
| | - Tamar H Taddei
- Yale Liver Center, Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
- Yale Cancer Center
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System
| | - Mario Strazzabosco
- Yale Liver Center, Section of Digestive Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine
- Yale Cancer Center
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Kinsey E, Lee HM. Management of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in 2024: The Multidisciplinary Paradigm in an Evolving Treatment Landscape. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:666. [PMID: 38339417 PMCID: PMC10854554 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16030666] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2023] [Revised: 01/26/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Liver cancer is the third most common cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) makes up the majority of liver cancer cases. Despite the stabilization of incidence rates in recent years due to effective viral hepatitis treatments, as well as improved outcomes from early detection and treatment advances, the burden of HCC is anticipated to rise again due to increasing rates of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and alcohol-related liver disease. The treatment landscape is evolving and requires a multidisciplinary approach, often involving multi-modal treatments that include surgical resection, transplantation, local regional therapies, and systemic treatments. The optimal approach to the care of the HCC patient requires a multidisciplinary team involving hepatology, medical oncology, diagnostic and interventional radiology, radiation oncology, and surgery. In order to determine which approach is best, an individualized treatment plan should consider the patient's liver function, functional status, comorbidities, cancer stage, and preferences. In this review, we provide an overview of the current treatment options and key trials that have revolutionized the management of HCC. We also discuss evolving treatment paradigms for the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Kinsey
- Division of Hematology, Oncology, and Palliative Care, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
- Massey Comprehensive Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
- Stravitz-Sanyal Institute for Liver Disease and Metabolic Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Hannah M. Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
- Stravitz-Sanyal Institute for Liver Disease and Metabolic Health, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
- Hume-Lee Transplant Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Chernyak V. Up-to-Date Role of Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System in Hepatocellular Carcinoma. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:59-72. [PMID: 37945145 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.06.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2023]
Abstract
This article overviews Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS), a system that standardizes techniques, interpretation and reporting of imaging studies done for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance, diagnosis, and locoregional treatment response assessment. LI-RADS includes 4 algorithms, each of which defines ordinal categories reflecting probability of the assessed outcome. The categories, in turn, guide patient management. The LI-RADS diagnostic algorithms provide diagnostic criteria for the entire spectrum of lesions found in at-risk patients. In addition, the use of LI-RADS in clinical care improves clarity of communication between radiologists and clinicians and may improve the performance of inexperienced users to the levels of expert liver imagers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, NY, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Sobnach S, Kotze U, Spearman CW, Sonderup M, Nashidengo PR, Ede C, Keli E, Chihaka O, Zerbini LF, Li YJ, Gandhi K, Krige J, Jonas E. The management and outcomes of hepatocellular carcinoma in sub-Saharan Africa: a systematic review. HPB (Oxford) 2024; 26:21-33. [PMID: 37805364 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2023.09.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/18/2023] [Indexed: 10/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of mortality in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA). This systematic review aimed to appraise all population-based studies describing the management and outcomes of HCC in SSA. METHODS A systematic review based on a search in PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), AfricaWide and Cochrane up to June 2023 was performed. PRISMA guidelines for systematic reviews were followed. The study protocol was registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (registration no: CRD42022363955). RESULTS Thirty-nine publications from 15 of 48 SSA countries were identified; 3989 patients were studied. The majority (74%) were male, with median ages ranging from 28 to 54 years. Chronic Hepatitis B infection was a leading aetiology and non-cirrhotic HCC was frequently reported. Curative treatment (liver resection, transplantation and ablation) was offered to 6% of the cohort. Most patients (84%) received only best supportive care (BSC), with few survivors at one year. CONCLUSION The majority of SSA countries do not have data reporting outcomes for HCC. Most patients receive only BSC, and curative treatment is seldom available in the region. Outcomes are poor compared to high-income countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanju Sobnach
- Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - Urda Kotze
- Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - C Wendy Spearman
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Mark Sonderup
- Division of Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Pueya R Nashidengo
- Department of Surgery, Windhoek Central Hospital, University of Namibia School of Medicine, Windhoek, Namibia
| | - Chikwendu Ede
- Netcare Alberton Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa
| | - Elie Keli
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hôpital Militaire d'Abidjan, Abidjan, Republic of Côte d'Ivoire
| | - Onesai Chihaka
- Department of Surgery, University of Zimbabwe, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Luiz F Zerbini
- International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (ICGEB), Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Yifan J Li
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Radcliffe Department of Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Karan Gandhi
- Department of Surgery, Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Jake Krige
- Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - Eduard Jonas
- Department of Surgery, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Surgical Gastroenterology Unit, Groote Schuur Hospital, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Singal AG, Llovet JM, Yarchoan M, Mehta N, Heimbach JK, Dawson LA, Jou JH, Kulik LM, Agopian VG, Marrero JA, Mendiratta-Lala M, Brown DB, Rilling WS, Goyal L, Wei AC, Taddei TH. AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma. Hepatology 2023; 78:1922-1965. [PMID: 37199193 PMCID: PMC10663390 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000466] [Citation(s) in RCA: 650] [Impact Index Per Article: 325.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/01/2023] [Indexed: 05/19/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Amit G. Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Josep M. Llovet
- Liver Cancer Program, Division of Liver Diseases, Tisch Cancer Institute, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
- Translational Research in Hepatic Oncology, Liver Unit, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute, Hospital Clinic, University of Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
- Institució Catalana de Recerca i Estudis Avançats, Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Mark Yarchoan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Johns Hopkins Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Neil Mehta
- University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Laura A. Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program/University Health Network, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Janice H. Jou
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - Laura M. Kulik
- Northwestern Medical Faculty Foundation, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Vatche G. Agopian
- The Dumont–University of California, Los Angeles, Transplant Center, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Jorge A. Marrero
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Mishal Mendiratta-Lala
- Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Daniel B. Brown
- Department of Radiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee, USA
| | - William S. Rilling
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Lipika Goyal
- Department of Medicine, Stanford School of Medicine, Palo Alto, California, USA
| | - Alice C. Wei
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| | - Tamar H. Taddei
- Department of Medicine (Digestive Diseases), Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
- Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Khalil M, Tsilimigras DI, Endo Y, Khan MMM, Munir MM, Katayama E, Rashid Z, Resende V, Dillhoff M, Cloyd J, Ejaz A, Pawlik TM. Association of Textbook Outcome and Hospital Volume with Long-Term Survival Following Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Matters More? J Gastrointest Surg 2023; 27:2763-2770. [PMID: 37940807 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-023-05880-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/16/2023] [Accepted: 10/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Both textbook outcome (TO) and hospital volume have been identified as quality metrics following cancer surgery. We sought to examine whether TO or hospital volume is more important relative to long-term survival following surgical resection of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS Patients who underwent surgery for HCC between 2004 and 2018 were identified using the National Cancer Database. TO was defined as R0 margin resection, no extended length of stay, no 30-day readmissions, and no 90-day mortality. The impact of TO and hospital case volume on long-term survival was determined using multivariable Cox regression. RESULTS Among 24,895 patients who underwent HCC resection, 9.0% (n = 2,252), 79.5% (n = 19,787), and 11.5% (n = 2,856) of patients were operated on at low-, medium-, and high-volume hospitals, respectively. Treatment at high-volume hospitals and achievement of a post-operative TO were independently associated with improved 5-year overall survival (OS). Pairwise comparison demonstrated that patients treated at high-volume hospitals who did not achieve a TO still had a better 5-year OS versus individuals treated at low-volume hospitals who did achieve a TO (5-year OS, no TO vs. TO: low-volume hospitals, 26.5% vs. 48.6%; high volume hospitals: 62.6% vs. 74.9%, respectively; p < 0.001). Overall, resection of HCC at a high-volume hospital was independently associated with a 54% reduction in mortality. CONCLUSION Long-term survival following HCC resection was largely associated with hospital case volume rather than TO. The effect of TO on long-term outcomes was largely mediated by hospital case volume highlighting the importance of centralization of care for patients with HCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mujtaba Khalil
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Diamantis I Tsilimigras
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Yutaka Endo
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Muhammad Muntazir Mehdi Khan
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Muhammad Musaab Munir
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Erryk Katayama
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Zayed Rashid
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Vivian Resende
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
- Federal University of Minas Gerais School of Medicine, Belo Horizonte, Brazil
| | - Mary Dillhoff
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Jordan Cloyd
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Aslam Ejaz
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Ge J, Sun S, Owens J, Galvez V, Gologorskaya O, Lai JC, Pletcher MJ, Lai K. Development of a Liver Disease-Specific Large Language Model Chat Interface using Retrieval Augmented Generation. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2023:2023.11.10.23298364. [PMID: 37986764 PMCID: PMC10659484 DOI: 10.1101/2023.11.10.23298364] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2023]
Abstract
Background Large language models (LLMs) have significant capabilities in clinical information processing tasks. Commercially available LLMs, however, are not optimized for clinical uses and are prone to generating incorrect or hallucinatory information. Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) is an enterprise architecture that allows embedding of customized data into LLMs. This approach "specializes" the LLMs and is thought to reduce hallucinations. Methods We developed "LiVersa," a liver disease-specific LLM, by using our institution's protected health information (PHI)-complaint text embedding and LLM platform, "Versa." We conducted RAG on 30 publicly available American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD) guidelines and guidance documents to be incorporated into LiVersa. We evaluated LiVersa's performance by comparing its responses versus those of trainees from a previously published knowledge assessment study regarding hepatitis B (HBV) treatment and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance. Results LiVersa answered all 10 questions correctly when forced to provide a "yes" or "no" answer. Full detailed responses with justifications and rationales, however, were not completely correct for three of the questions. Discussions In this study, we demonstrated the ability to build disease-specific and PHI-compliant LLMs using RAG. While our LLM, LiVersa, demonstrated more specificity in answering questions related to clinical hepatology - there were some knowledge deficiencies due to limitations set by the number and types of documents used for RAG. The LiVersa prototype, however, is a proof of concept for utilizing RAG to customize LLMs for clinical uses and a potential strategy to realize personalized medicine in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin Ge
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Steve Sun
- UCSF Health Information Technology, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Joseph Owens
- UCSF Health Information Technology, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Victor Galvez
- UCSF Health Information Technology, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Oksana Gologorskaya
- UCSF Health Information Technology, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
- Bakar Computational Health Sciences Institute, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Jennifer C. Lai
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Mark J. Pletcher
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Ki Lai
- UCSF Health Information Technology, University of California – San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Elhence H, Dodge JL, Farias AJ, Lee BP. Quantifying days at home in patients with cirrhosis: A national cohort study. Hepatology 2023; 78:518-529. [PMID: 36994701 PMCID: PMC10363198 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Days at home (DAH) is a patient-centric metric developed by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission, capturing annual health care use, including and beyond hospitalizations and mortality. We quantified DAH and assessed factors associated with DAH differences among patients with cirrhosis. APPROACH AND RESULTS Using a national claims database (Optum) between 2014 and 2018, we calculated DAH (365 minus mortality, inpatient, observation, postacute, and emergency department days). Among 20,776,597 patients, 63,477 had cirrhosis (median age, 66, 52% males, and 63% non-Hispanic White). Age-adjusted mean DAH for cirrhosis was 335.1 days (95% CI: 335.0 to 335.2) vs 360.1 (95% CI: 360.1 to 360.1) without cirrhosis. In mixed-effects linear regression, adjusted for demographic and clinical characteristics, patients with decompensated cirrhosis spent 15.2 days (95% CI: 14.4 to 15.8) in postacute, emergency, and observation settings and 13.8 days (95% CI: 13.5 to 14.0) hospitalized. Hepatic encephalopathy (-29.2 d, 95% CI: -30.4 to -28.0), ascites (-34.6 d, 95% CI: -35.3 to -33.9), and combined ascites and hepatic encephalopathy (-63.8 d, 95% CI: -65.0 to -62.6) were associated with decreased DAH. Variceal bleeding was not associated with a change in DAH (-0.2 d, 95% CI: -1.6 to +1.1). Among hospitalized patients, during the 365 days after index hospitalization, patients with cirrhosis had fewer age-adjusted DAH (272.8 d, 95% CI: 271.5 to 274.1) than congestive heart failure (288.0 d, 95% CI: 287.7 to 288.3) and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (296.6 d, 95% CI: 296.3 to 297.0). CONCLUSIONS In this national study, we found that patients with cirrhosis spend as many, if not more, cumulative days receiving postacute, emergency, and observational care, as hospitalized care. Ultimately, up to 2 months of DAH are lost annually with the onset of liver decompensation. DAH may be a useful metric for patients and health systems alike.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hirsh Elhence
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jennifer L. Dodge
- Department of Population Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Albert J. Farias
- Department of Population Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Brian P. Lee
- Division of Gastroenterology and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
El-Serag HB, Ward JW, Asrani SK, Singal AG, Rich N, Thrift AP, Deshpande S, Turner BJ, Kaseb AO, Harrison AC, Fortune BE, Kanwal F. Prevention of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC). White Paper of the Texas Collaborative Center for Hepatocellular Cancer (TeCH) Multi-stakeholder Conference. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2023; 21:2183-2192. [PMID: 37086825 PMCID: PMC10524305 DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2023.03.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Revised: 03/17/2023] [Accepted: 03/17/2023] [Indexed: 04/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS Texas has the highest age-adjusted incidence rate of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States. The Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas has funded the Texas Collaborative Center for Hepatocellular Cancer (TeCH) to facilitate HCC research, education, and advocacy activities with the overall goal of reducing HCC mortality in Texas through coordination, collaboration, and advocacy. METHODS On September 17, 2022, TeCH co-sponsored a multi-stakeholder conference on HCC with the Baker Institute Center for Health and Biosciences. This conference was attended by HCC researchers, policy makers, payers, members from pharmaceutical industry and patient advocacy groups in and outside of Texas. This report summarizes the results of the conference. RESULTS The goal of this meeting was to identify different strategies for preventing HCC and evaluate their readiness for implementation. CONCLUSIONS We call for a statewide (1) viral hepatitis elimination program; (2) program to increase nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and obesity awareness; (3) research program to develop health care models that integrate alcohol associated liver disease treatment and treatment for alcohol use disorder; and (4) demonstration projects to evaluate the effectiveness of identifying and linking patient with advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis to clinical care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John W Ward
- The Coalition for Global Hepatitis Elimination, The Task Force for Global Health, Decatur, Georgia
| | | | - Amit G Singal
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
| | - Nicole Rich
- Department of Medicine, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas, Texas
| | - Aaron P Thrift
- Section of Epidemiology and Population Sciences, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Dan L. Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | | | - Barbara J Turner
- Department of Medicine, Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ahmed O Kaseb
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Ariel C Harrison
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Brett E Fortune
- Department of Medicine, Montefiore Medical Center, Bronx, New York
| | - Fasiha Kanwal
- Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rich NE, Chernyak V. Standardizing liver imaging reporting and interpretation: LI-RADS and beyond. Hepatol Commun 2023; 7:e00186. [PMID: 37314738 PMCID: PMC10270536 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging plays a crucial role in diagnosis and post-treatment monitoring of primary liver cancers. Clear, consistent, and actionable communication of imaging results is crucial to avoid miscommunication and potential detrimental impact on patient care. In this review, we discuss the importance, advantages, and potential impact of universal adoption of standardized terminology and interpretive criteria for liver imaging, from the point of view of radiologists and clinicians.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicole E. Rich
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
- Harold C. Simmons Comprehensive Cancer Center, UT Southwestern, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Victoria Chernyak
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York City, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Seif El Dahan K, Reczek A, Daher D, Rich NE, Yang JD, Hsiehchen D, Zhu H, Patel MS, Bayona Molano MDP, Sanford N, Gopal P, Parikh ND, Yopp AC, Singal AG. Multidisciplinary care for patients with HCC: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hepatol Commun 2023; 7:e0143. [PMID: 37102768 PMCID: PMC10146543 DOI: 10.1097/hc9.0000000000000143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Accepted: 01/31/2023] [Indexed: 04/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Given the complexity of managing HCC, professional society guidelines advocate multidisciplinary care (MDC) for patients with HCC. However, implementation of MDC programs requires a significant investment of time and resources. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to enumerate potential benefits of MDC for patients with HCC. METHODS We conducted a search of the PubMed/MEDLINE and EMBASE databases and national conference abstracts to identify studies published after January 2005 that reported early-stage presentation, treatment receipt, or overall survival among patients with HCC, stratified by MDC status. We calculated pooled risk ratios and HRs for clinical outcomes according to MDC receipt using the DerSimonian and Laird method for random effects models. RESULTS We identified 12 studies (n = 15,365 patients with HCC) with outcomes stratified by MDC status. MDC was associated with improved overall survival (HR = 0.63, 95% CI: 0.45-0.88); however, its association with curative treatment receipt was not statistically significant (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 0.89-2.89) and pooled estimates were limited by high heterogeneity (I2 > 90% for both). Studies (n = 3) were discordant regarding an association between MDC and time-to-treatment initiation. MDC was associated with early-stage HCC (risk ratio = 1.60, 95% CI: 1.12-2.29), suggesting possible referral bias contributing to improved outcomes. Limitations of studies also included risk of residual confounding, loss to follow-up, and data preceding the availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSION MDC for patients with HCC is associated with improved overall survival, underscoring the likely benefit of managing patients with HCC in a multidisciplinary care setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karim Seif El Dahan
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Annika Reczek
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Darine Daher
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Nicole E. Rich
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California,USA
| | - David Hsiehchen
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Hao Zhu
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Madhukar S. Patel
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | | | - Nina Sanford
- Department of Radiation Oncology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Purva Gopal
- Department of Pathology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Neehar D. Parikh
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Adam C. Yopp
- Department of Surgery, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Department of Internal Medicine, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Karim MA, Singal AG, Kum HC, Lee YT, Park S, Rich NE, Noureddin M, Yang JD. Prediagnostic CT or MRI Utilization and Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: SEER-Medicare Database Analysis. CANCER RESEARCH COMMUNICATIONS 2023; 3:874-883. [PMID: 37377892 PMCID: PMC10187587 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-23-0075] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2023] [Revised: 04/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/04/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
Ultrasound-based surveillance has suboptimal sensitivity for early hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) detection, generating interest in alternative surveillance modalities. We aim to investigate the association between prediagnostic CT or MRI and overall survival in a contemporary cohort of patients with HCC. Using the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we analyzed Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with HCC between 2011 and 2015. Proportion of time covered (PTC) was defined as the proportion of the 36-month period prior to HCC diagnosis in which patients had received abdominal imaging (ultrasound, CT, MRI). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to investigate the association between PTC and overall survival. Among 5,098 patients with HCC, 3,293 (65%) patients had abdominal imaging prior to HCC diagnosis, of whom 67% had CT/MRI. Median PTC by any abdominal imaging was 5.6% [interquartile range (IQR): 0%-36%], with few patients having PTC >50%. Compared with no abdominal images, ultrasound [adjusted HR (aHR): 0.87, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-0.95] and CT/MRI group (aHR: 0.68, 95% CI: 0.63-0.74) were associated with improved survival. Lead-time adjusted analysis showed improved survival continued to be observed with CT/MRI (aHR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.74-0.87) but not ultrasound (aHR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.91-1.10). Increased PTC was associated with improved survival, with a larger effect size observed with CT/MRI (aHR per 10%: 0.93, 95% CI: 0.91-0.95) than ultrasound (aHR per 10%: 0.96, 95% CI: 0.95-0.98). In conclusion, PTC by abdominal images was associated with improved survival in patients with HCC, with potential greater benefit using CT/MRI. Regular utilization of CT/MRI before cancer diagnosis may have potential survival benefit compared to ultrasound in patients with HCC. Significance Our population-based study using SEER-Medicare database demonstrated that proportion of time covered by abdominal imaging was associated with improved survival in patients with HCC, with potential greater benefit using CT/MRI. The results suggest that CT/MRI surveillance may have potential survival benefit compared with ultrasound surveillance in high-risk patients for HCC. A larger prospective study should be conducted for external validation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammad A. Karim
- Population Informatics Lab, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Amit G. Singal
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Hye Chung Kum
- Population Informatics Lab, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Yi-Te Lee
- California NanoSystems Institute, Crump Institute for Molecular Imaging, Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, California
| | - Sulki Park
- Population Informatics Lab, School of Public Health, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas
| | - Nicole E. Rich
- Division of Digestive and Liver Diseases, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| | - Mazen Noureddin
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ju Dong Yang
- Karsh Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Kardashian A, Serper M, Terrault N, Nephew LD. Health disparities in chronic liver disease. Hepatology 2023; 77:1382-1403. [PMID: 35993341 PMCID: PMC10026975 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 112] [Impact Index Per Article: 56.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 06/14/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
The syndemic of hazardous alcohol consumption, opioid use, and obesity has led to important changes in liver disease epidemiology that have exacerbated health disparities. Health disparities occur when plausibly avoidable health differences are experienced by socially disadvantaged populations. Highlighting health disparities, their sources, and consequences in chronic liver disease is fundamental to improving liver health outcomes. There have been large increases in alcohol use disorder in women, racial and ethnic minorities, and those experiencing poverty in the context of poor access to alcohol treatment, leading to increasing rates of alcohol-associated liver diseases. Rising rates of NAFLD and associated fibrosis have been observed in Hispanic persons, women aged > 50, and individuals experiencing food insecurity. Access to viral hepatitis screening and linkage to treatment are suboptimal for racial and ethnic minorities and individuals who are uninsured or underinsured, resulting in greater liver-related mortality and later-stage diagnoses of HCC. Data from more diverse cohorts on autoimmune and cholestatic liver diseases are lacking, supporting the need to study the contemporary epidemiology of these disorders in greater detail. Herein, we review the existing literature on racial and ethnic, gender, and socioeconomic disparities in chronic liver diseases using a social determinants of health framework to better understand how social and structural factors cause health disparities and affect chronic liver disease outcomes. We also propose potential solutions to eliminate disparities, outlining health-policy, health-system, community, and individual solutions to promote equity and improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ani Kardashian
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Marina Serper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Pennsylvania Perelman School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - Norah Terrault
- Division of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Lauren D. Nephew
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
- Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Chernyak V, Fowler KJ, Do RKG, Kamaya A, Kono Y, Tang A, Mitchell DG, Weinreb J, Santillan CS, Sirlin CB. LI-RADS: Looking Back, Looking Forward. Radiology 2023; 307:e222801. [PMID: 36853182 PMCID: PMC10068888 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.222801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/03/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2023]
Abstract
Since its initial release in 2011, the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) has evolved and expanded in scope. It started as a single algorithm for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) diagnosis with CT or MRI with extracellular contrast agents and has grown into a multialgorithm network covering all major liver imaging modalities and contexts of use. Furthermore, it has developed its own lexicon, report templates, and supplementary materials. This article highlights the major achievements of LI-RADS in the past 11 years, including adoption in clinical care and research across the globe, and complete unification of HCC diagnostic systems in the United States. Additionally, the authors discuss current gaps in knowledge, which include challenges in surveillance, diagnostic population definition, perceived complexity, limited sensitivity of LR-5 (definite HCC) category, management implications of indeterminate observations, challenges in reporting, and treatment response assessment following radiation-based therapies and systemic treatments. Finally, the authors discuss future directions, which will focus on mitigating the current challenges and incorporating advanced technologies. Tha authors envision that LI-RADS will ultimately transform into a probability-based system for diagnosis and prognostication of liver cancers that will integrate patient characteristics and quantitative imaging features, while accounting for imaging modality and contrast agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria Chernyak
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Kathryn J. Fowler
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Richard K. G. Do
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Aya Kamaya
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Yuko Kono
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - An Tang
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Donald G. Mitchell
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Jeffrey Weinreb
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Cynthia S. Santillan
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| | - Claude B. Sirlin
- From the Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer
Center, New York, NY (V.C., R.K.G.D.); Liver Imaging Group, Department of
Radiology, University of California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (K.J.F.,
C.S.S., C.B.S.); Department of Radiology, Stanford University Medical Center,
Stanford, Calif (A.K.); Department of Medicine and Radiology, University of
California, San Diego, San Diego, Calif (Y.K.); Department of Radiology,
Radiation Oncology and Nuclear Medicine, Université de Montréal,
Montréal, Canada (A.T.); Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson
University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pa (D.G.M.); and Department of Radiology,
Yale Medical School, New Haven, Conn (J.W.)
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Braun F, Schäfer JP, Dobbermann H, Becker T, Linecker M. Hepatozelluläres Karzinom. BEST PRACTICE ONKOLOGIE 2023; 18:68-77. [DOI: 10.1007/s11654-023-00469-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2025]
|
27
|
Serper M, Tapper EB, Kaplan DE, Taddei TH, Mahmud N. Patterns of Care Utilization and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance: Tracking Care Across the Pandemic. Am J Gastroenterol 2023; 118:294-303. [PMID: 36114778 PMCID: PMC9898115 DOI: 10.14309/ajg.0000000000002011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/09/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION We studied longitudinal trends in mortality, outpatient, and inpatient care for cirrhosis in a national cohort in the first 2 years of the coronavirus disease-2019 pandemic. We evaluated trends in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance and factors associated with completion. METHODS Within the national cirrhosis cohort in the Veterans Administration from 2020 to 2021, we captured mortality, outpatient primary care provider, gastroenterology/hepatology (GI/HEP) visits, and hospitalizations. HCC surveillance was computed as percentage of time up to date with surveillance every 6 months (PTUDS). Multivariable models for PTUDS were adjusted for patient demographics, clinical factors, and facility-level variables. RESULTS The total cohort was 68,073; 28,678 were eligible for HCC surveillance. Outpatient primary care provider and GI/HEP appointment rates initially dropped from 30% to 7% with a rebound 1 year into the pandemic and steady subsequent use. Telemedicine monthly visit rates rose from less than 10% to a peak of 20% with a steady gradual decline. Nearly 70% of Veterans were up to date with HCC surveillance before the pandemic with an early pandemic nadir of approximately 50% and 60% PTUDS 2 years into the pandemic. In adjusted models, use of a population-based cirrhosis dashboard (β 8.5, 95% CI 6.9-10.2) and GI/HEP visits both in-person (β 3.2, 95% CI 2.9-3.6) and telemedicine (β 2.1, 95% CI 1.9-2.4) were associated with a higher PTUDS. DISCUSSION Outpatient utilization and HCC surveillance rates have rebounded but remain below at baseline. Population-based approaches and specialty care for cirrhosis were associated with a higher completion of HCC surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Serper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Elliot B. Tapper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA
- Gastroenterology Section, Ann Arbor Healthcare System, Ann Arbor, VA, USA
| | - David E Kaplan
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
| | - Tamar H. Taddei
- Section of Digestive Diseases, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
- VA Connecticut Healthcare System, West Haven, CT
| | - Nadim Mahmud
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Leonard Davis Institute of Health Economics, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
- Department of Medicine, Corporal Michael J. Crescenz VA Medical Center, Philadelphia, PA
- Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Biostatistics, Epidemiology & Informatics, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Positive predictive value of LI-RADS US-3 observations: multivariable analysis of clinical and imaging features. ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY (NEW YORK) 2023; 48:271-281. [PMID: 36253490 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03681-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 09/06/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine how clinical and imaging features affect the positive predictive values (PPV) of US-3 observations. METHODS In this retrospective study, 10,546 adult patients who were high risk for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from 2017 to 2021 underwent ultrasound screening/surveillance. Of these, 225 adult patients (100 women, 125 men) with an US-3 observation underwent diagnostic characterization with multiphasic CT (93; 41%), MRI (130; 58%), or contrast-enhanced ultrasound (2; 1%). US-3 observations included focal observations ≥ 10 mm in 216 patients and new venous thrombi in 9 patients. PPV with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using diagnostic characterization as the reference standard. Multivariable analysis of clinical and imaging features was performed to determine the strongest associations with cancer. RESULTS Overall PPV for an US-3 observation was 33% (27-39%) for at least intermediate probability of cancer (≥ LR-3) and 15% (10-20%) for at least probable cancer (≥ LR-4). At multivariable analysis, cirrhosis had the strongest effect size for at least probable cancer (p < 0.001; odds ratio OR 20.4), followed by observation size (p < 0.001; OR 2.65) and age (p = 0.004; OR 1.05). Alpha-fetoprotein, visualization score, and observation echogenicity were not statistically significant associations. Modality (MRI versus CT) did not affect PPV. Due to the large effect of cirrhosis, PPV was then stratified by the presence (n = 116; 52%) or absence (n = 109; 48%) of cirrhosis. For at least probable cancer (≥ LR-4), PPV increased from 4% (0-7%; non-cirrhotic) to 26% (18-34%; p < 0.001; cirrhosis). CONCLUSION Cirrhosis most strongly affects PPV of US-3 observations for at least probable cancer at diagnostic characterization among high-risk patients, increasing to 1 in 4 among cirrhotic patients from 1 in 25 among non-cirrhotic patients.
Collapse
|
29
|
Holman A, Parikh N, Clauw DJ, Williams DA, Tapper EB. Contemporary management of pain in cirrhosis: Toward precision therapy for pain. Hepatology 2023; 77:290-304. [PMID: 35665522 PMCID: PMC9970025 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32598] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 05/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Chronic pain is highly prevalent in patients with cirrhosis and is associated with poor health-related quality of life and poor functional status. However, there is limited guidance on appropriate pain management in this population, and pharmacologic treatment can be harmful, leading to adverse outcomes, such as gastrointestinal bleeding, renal injury, falls, and hepatic encephalopathy. Chronic pain can be categorized mechanistically into three pain types: nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic, each responsive to different therapies. By discussing the identification, etiology, and treatment of these three mechanistic pain descriptors with a focus on specific challenges in patients with cirrhosis, we provide a framework for better tailoring treatments, including nonpharmacologic therapies, to patients' needs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexis Holman
- Division of Rheumatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Neehar Parikh
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Dan J. Clauw
- Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Anesthesiology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - David A. Williams
- Chronic Pain and Fatigue Research Center, Anesthesiology Department, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Elliot B. Tapper
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Maharaj AD, Lubel J, Lam E, Clark PJ, Duncan O, George J, Jeffrey GP, Lipton L, Liu H, McCaughan G, Neo E, Philip J, Strasser SI, Stuart K, Thompson A, Tibballs J, Tu T, Wallace MC, Wigg A, Wood M, Zekry A, Greenhill E, Ioannou LJ, Ahlenstiel G, Bowers K, Clarke SJ, Dev A, Fink M, Goodwin M, Karapetis CS, Levy MT, Muller K, O'Beirne J, Pryor D, Seow J, Shackel N, Tallis C, Butler N, Olynyk JK, Reed‐Cox K, Zalcberg JR, Roberts SK. Monitoring quality of care in hepatocellular carcinoma: A modified Delphi consensus. Hepatol Commun 2022; 6:3260-3271. [PMID: 36153817 PMCID: PMC9592757 DOI: 10.1002/hep4.2089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2022] [Accepted: 07/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Although there are several established international guidelines on the management of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), there is limited information detailing specific indicators of good quality care. The aim of this study was to develop a core set of quality indicators (QIs) to underpin the management of HCC. We undertook a modified, two-round, Delphi consensus study comprising a working group and experts involved in the management of HCC as well as consumer representatives. QIs were derived from an extensive review of the literature. The role of the participants was to identify the most important and measurable QIs for inclusion in an HCC clinical quality registry. From an initial 94 QIs, 40 were proposed to the participants. Of these, 23 QIs ultimately met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final set. This included (a) nine related to the initial diagnosis and staging, including timing to diagnosis, required baseline clinical and laboratory assessments, prior surveillance for HCC, diagnostic imaging and pathology, tumor staging, and multidisciplinary care; (b) thirteen related to treatment and management, including role of antiviral therapy, timing to treatment, localized ablation and locoregional therapy, surgery, transplantation, systemic therapy, method of response assessment, and supportive care; and (c) one outcome assessment related to surgical mortality. Conclusion: We identified a core set of nationally agreed measurable QIs for the diagnosis, staging, and management of HCC. The adherence to these best practice QIs may lead to system-level improvement in quality of care and, ultimately, improvement in patient outcomes, including survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashika D. Maharaj
- Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - John Lubel
- Alfred Health and Central Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Eileen Lam
- Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | | | | | - Jacob George
- Storr Liver Centre, Westmead Institute for Medical ResearchWestmead Hospital and University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | | | - Lara Lipton
- Royal Melbourne HospitalWestern HealthParkvilleAustralia
| | - Howard Liu
- Princess Alexandra HospitalWoolloongabbaAustralia
| | - Geoffrey McCaughan
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and Centenary Institute for Medical ResearchNewtownAustralia
| | | | - Jennifer Philip
- St. Vincent's Hospital and University of MelbourneMelbourneAustralia
| | - Simone I. Strasser
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital and University of SydneyCamperdownAustralia
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Tu
- Sydney Institute for Infectious Diseases and Storr Liver CentreWestmead Hospital, and University of SydneySydneyAustralia
| | - Michael C. Wallace
- Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital and Medical SchoolUniversity of Western AustraliaPerthAustralia
| | - Alan Wigg
- Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
| | - Marnie Wood
- Royal Brisbane and Women's HospitalHerstonAustralia
| | - Amany Zekry
- St. George and Sutherland Clinical CampusSt. George HospitalSydneyAustralia
| | - Elysia Greenhill
- Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Liane J. Ioannou
- Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Golo Ahlenstiel
- Blacktown Clinical School and HospitalWestern Sydney UniversityPenrithAustralia
| | - Kaye Bowers
- Alfred Health and Department of SurgeryMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Stephen J. Clarke
- Royal North Shore Hospital and University of SydneySt LeonardsAustralia
| | | | - Michael Fink
- Austin Hospital and University of MelbourneHeidelbergAustralia
| | | | | | - Miriam T. Levy
- Department of GastroenterologyLiverpool Hospital, University of New South WalesLiverpoolAustralia
| | - Kate Muller
- Flinders Medical Centre and Flinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia
| | | | - David Pryor
- Princess Alexandra HospitalWoolloongabbaAustralia
| | | | | | | | - Nick Butler
- Princess Alexandra Hospital and University of QueenslandWoolloongabbaAustralia
| | - John K. Olynyk
- Fiona Stanley Hospital and Edith Cowan UniversityMurdochAustralia
| | | | - John R. Zalcberg
- Public Health and Preventative MedicineMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| | - Stuart K. Roberts
- Alfred Health, Gastroenterology Department, and Central Clinical SchoolMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
The therapeutic spectrum of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in cirrhosis has expanded over the last decade and consists of surgical, interventional and systemic approaches. The tumor stage and liver function are important for the therapeutic strategy. Curation can be achieved by liver resection or transplantation. Access to transplantation is limited by organ shortage and waiting time. Locoregional therapies can be used as a bridge to transplant or for down-sizing in a neoadjuvant setting as well as palliative therapy. Advanced stages might benefit from systemic or immunotherapy. Modern multimodal therapy planning, timing and reevaluation are part of the tasks of tumor boards specialised in the liver, including the option of liver transplantation. Therapies can be used alone or in combination and according to the experience of the center. A curative strategy should always be pursued at initial presentation.
Collapse
|
32
|
Verma M, Brahmania M, Fortune BE, Asrani SK, Fuchs M, Volk ML. Patient-centered care: Key elements applicable to chronic liver disease. Hepatology 2022. [PMID: 35712801 DOI: 10.1002/hep.32618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2022] [Revised: 06/07/2022] [Accepted: 06/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/08/2022]
Abstract
Chronic liver disease (CLD) is a progressive illness with high symptom burden and functional and cognitive impairment, often with comorbid mental and substance use disorders. These factors lead to significant deterioration in quality of life, with immense burden on patients, caregivers, and healthcare. The current healthcare system in the United States does not adequately meet the needs of patients with CLD or control costs given the episodic, reactive, and fee-for-service structure. There is also a need for clinical and financial accountability for CLD care. In this context, we describe the key elements required to shift the CLD care paradigm to a patient-centered and value-based system built upon the Porter model of value-based health care. The key elements include (1) organization into integrated practice units, (2) measuring and incorporating meaningful patient-reported outcomes, (3) enabling technology to allow innovation, (4) bundled care payments, (5) integrating palliative care within routine care, and (6) formalizing centers of excellence. These elements have been shown to improve outcomes, reduce costs, and improve overall patient experience for other chronic illnesses and should have similar benefits for CLD. Payers need to partner with providers and systems to build upon these elements and help align reimbursements with patients' values and outcomes. The national organizations such as the American Association for Study of Liver Diseases need to guide key stakeholders in standardizing these elements to optimize patient-centered care for CLD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manisha Verma
- Department of Medicine, Einstein Healthcare Network, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | - Brett E Fortune
- Montefiore Einstein Center for Transplantation, Bronx, New York, USA
| | | | - Michael Fuchs
- Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia, USA
| | - Michael L Volk
- Loma Linda University Health, Loma Linda, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
A global evaluation of advanced dosimetry in transarterial radioembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma with Yttrium-90: the TARGET study. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2022; 49:3340-3352. [PMID: 35394152 PMCID: PMC9308596 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-022-05774-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Accepted: 03/20/2022] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To investigate the relationships between tumor absorbed dose (TAD) or normal tissue absorbed dose (NTAD) and clinical outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with yttrium-90 glass microspheres. METHODS TARGET was a retrospective investigation in 13 centers across eight countries. Key inclusion criteria: liver-dominant HCC with or without portal vein thrombosis, < 10 tumors per lobe (at least one ≥ 3 cm), Child-Pugh stage A/B7, BCLC stages A-C, and no prior intra-arterial treatment. Multi-compartment pre-treatment dosimetry was performed retrospectively. Primary endpoint was the relationship between ≥ grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia (such that > 15% of patients experienced an event) without disease progression and NTAD. Secondary endpoints included relationships between (1) objective response (OR) and TAD, (2) overall survival (OS) and TAD, and (3) alpha fetoprotein (AFP) and TAD. RESULTS No relationship was found between NTAD and ≥ grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia, which occurred in 4.8% of the 209 patients. The mRECIST OR rate over all lesions was 61.7%; for the target (largest) lesion, 70.8%. Responders and non-responders had geometric mean total perfused TADs of 225.5 Gy and 188.3 Gy (p = 0.048). Probability of OR was higher with increasing TAD (p = 0.044). Higher TAD was associated with longer OS (HR per 100 Gy increase = 0.83, 95% CI: 0.71-0.95; p = 0.009). Increased TAD was associated with higher probability of AFP response (p = 0.046 for baseline AFP ≥ 200 ng/mL). CONCLUSION Real-world data confirmed a significant association between TAD and OR, TAD and OS, and TAD and AFP response. No association was found between ≥ grade 3 hyperbilirubinemia and NTAD. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT03295006.
Collapse
|
34
|
Computational Modeling of Radioembolization: How to Calculate Infinity. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2021; 44:2020-2021. [PMID: 34704154 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-021-02989-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2021] [Accepted: 10/08/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|