Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remains a health concern characterized by heterogeneity and high mortality. Surgical resection, radiofrequency ablation, trans-arterial chemoembolization, and liver transplantation offer potentially curative treatments for early-stage disease, but recurrence remains high. Most patients present with advanced-stage HCC, where locoregional therapies are less effective, and systemic treatments-primarily multi-kinase inhibitors and immune checkpoint inhibitors-often yield limited responses. Precision medicine aims to tailor therapy to molecular and genetic profiles, yet its adoption in HCC is hindered by inter-/intra-tumoral heterogeneity and limited biopsy availability. Advances in molecular diagnostics support reintroducing tissue sampling to better characterize genetic, epigenetic, and immunological features. Liquid biopsy offers a minimally invasive method for capturing real-time tumor evolution, overcoming spatial and temporal heterogeneity. Artificial intelligence and machine learning are revolutionizing biomarker discovery, risk stratification, and treatment planning by integrating multi-omics data. Immunological factors such as tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, natural killer cells, macrophages, and fibroblasts have emerged as determinants of HCC progression and treatment response. Conversion therapy-combining systemic agents with locoregional treatments-has showndemonstrated promise in downstaging unresectable HCC. Ongoing efforts to refine biomarker-driven approaches and optimize multi-modality regimens underscore precision medicine's potential to improve outcomes. PubMed (January 2002-February 2025) was searched for relevant studies.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common malignancy and the third leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Contemporary advances in systemic and locoregional therapies have led to changes in peer-reviewed guidelines regarding systemic therapy as well as the possibility of downstaging disease that may enable some patients with advanced disease to ultimately undergo partial hepatectomy or transplantation with curative intent. This review focuses on all modalities of therapy for HCC, guided by modern-day practice-changing randomized data where available. The surgical management of HCC, including resection and transplantation, both of which have evolving criteria for what is considered biologically resectable and transplantable, as well as locoregional therapy (i.e., therapeutic embolization, ablation, radiation, and hepatic arterial infusion), are discussed. Historical and modern-day practice-changing trials evaluating immunotherapy with targeted therapies for advanced disease, as well as adjuvant systemic therapy, are also summarized. In addition, this article examines the critical dimension of toxicities and patient-oriented considerations to ensure a comprehensive and balanced discourse on treatment implications.

Transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) [Atezo-Bev-TACE] has shown promising therapeutic efficacy in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC). However, there is currently no published research on biomarkers that can predict the treatment outcomes of Atezo-Bev-TACE. This study aims to evaluate the predictive value of the baseline neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) in uHCC patients undergoing Atezo-Bev-TACE treatment.

This retrospective study included uHCC patients who received Atezo-Bev-TACE and tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) at the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China between November 1, 2020, and November 1, 2023. The primary endpoint of the study was the correlation between baseline NLR and PLR with overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were the efficacy and safety of the Atezo-Bev-TACE regimen.

Among the 71 enrolled patients with uHCC who received Atezo-Bev-TACE therapy, the objective response rate was 55.0%, with a median OS of 20.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 17.4-21.0 months) and a median PFS of 10.4 months (95% CI 7.7-13.1 months). Patients with tumor response had significantly lower baseline NLR and PLR values compared to those without response (2.5 vs. 4.0, P < 0.001; 106.9 vs. 131.3, P = 0.001). The optimal cut-off values for NLR and PLR were determined to be 2.9 and 148.0, respectively, based on receiver operating characteristic curves. Patients with baseline NLR < 2.9 had significantly longer median OS (not reached vs. 17.8 months, P = 0.014) and improved median PFS (15.6 months vs. 9.3 months, P = 0.034) compared to those with NLR ≥ 2.9. Similarly, patients with baseline PLR < 148.0 had a significantly better median OS (20.0 months vs. 12.0 months, P = 0.004) and longer median PFS (13.7 months vs. 6.4 months, P < 0.001) compared to those with PLR ≥ 148.0. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses identified baseline PLR ≥ 148.0 as an independent risk factor for poorer survival outcomes. Additionally, most adverse events (AEs) observed during Atezo-Bev-TACE treatment were grade 1-2, with fewer grade 3-4 AEs, and no grade 5 AEs were reported. Comparative analysis between the Atezo-Bev-TACE group (71 patients) and the TKIs-TACE group (63 patients) demonstrated that the ORR of the TKIs-TACE group was 34.9%, lower than that of the Atezo-Bev-TACE group (55.0%). No statistically significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics between the two groups before treatment. The median OS in the Atezo-Bev-TACE group was 20.0 months, significantly superior to the 14.7 months in the TKIs-TACE group (P = 0.005). Similarly, the median PFS in the Atezo-Bev-TACE group was 10.4 months, significantly better than the 7.8 months in the TKIs-TACE group (P = 0.008).

A baseline NLR ≥ 2.9 and PLR ≥ 148.0 may serve as predictive factors for poor OS and PFS in uHCC patients receiving Atezo-Bev-TACE treatment. Furthermore, the Atezo-Bev-TACE regimen demonstrates good efficacy and safety in the clinical management of uHCC patients.

Primary liver cancer ranks as the sixth most prevalent malignant tumor and stands as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally, posing a significant threat to public health. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of liver cancer worldwide. Surgical resection remains the cornerstone treatment for achieving radical cure and prolonged survival in HCC patients. Contrary to Western countries, the majority of HCC patients in China present with hepatitis B virus infection and consequent liver cirrhosis, with most cases diagnosed at an intermediate or advanced stage. This complexity results in a poor prognosis. Recent advancements in local therapeutic techniques and the introduction of systemic therapies, including targeted and immunotherapy agents, have provided new avenues for both clinical and basic conversion therapy for advanced HCC. Integrating multi-dimensional local and systemic therapies, multi-modal sequential, and comprehensive multidisciplinary approaches into the management of HCC patients has demonstrated promising conversion success rates. This holistic management strategy involves combining multiple treatment modalities vertically and coordinating various disciplines horizontally. However, significant challenges remain, including the precise selection of patients eligible for conversion therapy, the optimal choice of conversion therapy regimens, and the accurate determination of surgical timing post-conversion therapy. Addressing these challenges is crucial for hepatobiliary surgeons. High-quality, randomized controlled trials are urgently needed to generate robust evidence for clinical practice. This review aims to synthesize the latest research developments both in China and internationally and examines key issues in the realm of HCC conversion therapy.

Biopsy of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may help with selecting appropriate chemotherapy with inconclusive imaging; concern about potential seeding may limit its use.

A systematic review was conducted to assess the risk of tumor seeding with biopsy of HCC excluding nonliver cancers or seeding after interventions.

A total of 2,339 unique abstracts were identified; 37 studies were included in the final analysis. The rate of tumor seeding was 0.62% (range 0%-7.77%) in 13,959 biopsies performed. The average reported median lengths of follow-up was 35.8 months (range 10.5-60 months).

Overall, the risk of tumor seeding with biopsy of HCC is low.

Extrahepatic recurrence (EHR) is a significant negative prognostic factor in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although EHR is commonly observed in high-risk patients following HCC hepatectomy, its occurrence without concurrent intrahepatic HCC remains poorly understood. Therefore, this study aims to examine the clinical characteristics and risk factors associated with EHR in patients without intrahepatic HCC at diagnosis.

This study included 1066 treatment-naïve patients who underwent curative hepatectomy for HCC at four tertiary academic centers between January 2004 and December 2019. After excluding those with intrahepatic recurrence (IHR), concurrent EHR, or incomplete clinical records, 569 patients were included in the final analysis. Risk factors for EHR were assessed using multivariate Cox regression over a median follow-up period of 3.91 years.

Among the cohort, 38 patients developed EHR post-surgery without residual intrahepatic HCC, with a median follow-up of 1.04 years. These patients experienced earlier initial HCC recurrence than those without EHR (1.73 vs. 4.43 years). Multivariate analysis revealed significant associations between EHR and microvascular invasion (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.418, p = 0.020), tumor necrosis (HR: 2.592, p = 0.009), and initial tumor staging beyond the Milan criteria (HR: 3.008, p = 0.001). Moreover, Cox regression analysis revealed that EHR strongly correlated with decreased post-hepatectomy survival (HR: 14.044, p < 0.001). Cumulative EHR and survival rates were closely linked to the number of risk factors present.

EHR without detectable IHR is significant and warrants close monitoring in high-risk patients.

The study conducted by Wang et al, focuses on the role of Rho GTPase activating protein 12 (ARHGAP12), in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This research reveals that ARHGAP12 expression, markedly elevated in malignant cells of HCC, correlates strongly with adverse outcomes for patients. Furthermore, the study illustrates that ARHGAP12 enhances the ability of HCC cells to invade and contributes to their resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) through modulation of the focal adhesion pathway. To comprehensively investigate the relationship between ARHGAP12 and TKI resistance, this study integrates single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing methodologies along with data from tumor immune single-cell hub 2, Gene Expression Omnibus, The Cancer Genome Atlas, CellMiner, Genomics of Drug Sensitivity in Cancer 2, as well as immunohistochemical staining and proteomic analyses. Statistical analyses, including the Wilcoxon rank-sum test and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, were employed to evaluate the correlation between ARHGAP12 expression levels and clinical parameters, as well as drug sensitivity. It is evident that a more profound exploration of the molecular dynamics of HCC, especially those related to resistance against TKIs, is essential.

Cabozantinib (CAB) causes a high incidence of adverse events in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) and requires dose adjustments. We evaluated the efficacy and safety of the 7-on/7-off regimen composed of 7 consecutive days' administration of CAB followed by a 7-day rest period. This was a retrospective analysis of 35 patients with u-HCC, who were treated with CAB in a multicenter cohort in Japan from 2020 to 2024. The clinical outcomes of 12 patients treated with the 7-on/7-off regimen and 23 patients treated with daily dosing were compared. There were significant differences in overall survival (12.4 months vs. 6.3 months, p = 0.03), median progression-free survival (4.8 months vs. 3.2 months, p < 0.01), objective response rate (16.7% vs. 0.0%, p = 0.04), and incidence of any adverse events (75.0% vs. 100.0%, p = 0.03) between the 7-on/7-off regimen group and daily dosing group. The median duration of drug exposure (122 days vs. 42 days, p < 0.01) and median duration of dose reduction (100 days vs. 23 days, p < 0.01) were prolonged significantly in the 7-on/7-off group than in the daily dosing group. CAB in a 7-on/7-off regimen may improve the tolerability and treatment response in patients with u-HCC.

Hepatocellular carcinoma arises in the setting of cirrhosis in most cases, requiring multidisciplinary input to define resectability. In this regard, more precise surgical management considers patient factors and anatomical states, including resection margins, tumour biology, and perioperative therapy. Together with advances in surgical techniques, this integrated approach has resulted in considerable improvements in patient morbidity and oncological outcomes. Despite this, recurrence rates in hepatocellular carcinoma remain high. As the systemic treatment landscape in hepatocellular carcinoma continues to evolve and locoregional options are increasingly used, we review current and future opportunities to individualise the surgical management of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

To assess the relationship between survival outcomes and subtypes of radiological progressive disease (PD) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo/Bev).

A total of 462 patients with Atezo/Bev-treated HCC diagnosed with radiological PD during follow-up were enrolled. PD was classified into three categories: progression or emergence of intrahepatic lesions (PD-IH), macroscopic vascular invasion (PD-MVI), and extrahepatic spread lesions (PD-EHS). We defined PD-multiple as the presence of two or more PD categories. Subsequent analysis was categorized into the "PD-IH or PD-EHS" and "PD-MVI or PD-multiple" groups.

The median progression-free survival (PFS) durations for patients with PD-IH, PD-MVI, PD-EHS, and PD-multiple were 5.3, 3.2, 3.9, and 3.5 months (p = 0.003). Patients with "PD-IH or PD-EHS" and "PD-MVI or PD-multiple" had median PFS of 5.2 and 3.5 months (p < 0.001). Median overall survival (OS) for PD-IH, PD-MVI, PD-EHS, and PD-multiple was 22.3, 15.1, 19.4, and 14.2 months (p = 0.002). The OS for patients with "PD-IH or PD-EHS" and "PD-MVI or PD-multiple" was 21.4 and 14.5 months (p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that ECOG-PS ≥ 1 (hazard ratio (HR), 1.508), α-fetoprotein levels ≥ 100 ng/mL (HR, 1.293), albumin-bilirubin grade ≥ 2 (HR, 1.573), liver cirrhosis (HR, 1.361), and PD subtypes PD-MVI or PD-multiple (HR, 1.735) were independently associated with OS.

Patients with HCC undergoing Atezo/Bev treatment, diagnosed with PD-multiple (not solely based on IH or EHS) or PD-MVI, experienced poor prognosis, specifically in terms of OS.

In the current systemic therapy era, such as immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy, treatment strategy of hepatocellular carcinoma is changing. Transarterial chemoembolization is more expected as a curative treatment option than before. Therefore, it is important to learn key techniques of transarterial chemoembolization procedures to achieve complete response. This article delineates the current indications for transarterial chemoembolization and several techniques used for its implementation.

Recent advances in systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma are remarkable. The treatment goal for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma is to prolong survival, while for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma, it is to achieve a cancer-free and drug-free status. Patients unsuitable for transarterial chemoembolization may benefit from prior systemic therapy with lenvatinib or atezolizumab plus bevacizumab. The TACTICS-L trial, a prospective phase II trial, demonstrated favorable progression-free and overall survival by lenvatinib-transarterial chemoembolization sequential therapy. The REPLACEMENT trial, a multicenter, prospective, single-arm phase II trial, confirmed combination immunotherapy efficacy with atezolizumab plus bevacizumabin a population exceeding up-to-seven criteria. In a proof-of-concept study, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab plus curative therapy showed a 35% complete response rate and 23% drug-free status in intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma patients with a tumor burden exceeding up-to-seven criteria.

Background/Objectives: The Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) staging system for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) was updated in 2022 to refine patient stratification, particularly in patients with intermediate-stage (BCLC B) HCC. Although transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) remains a key treatment for these patients, there is no prognostic model for survival outcomes based on the pretreatment factors of patients who meet the updated 2022 BCLC indications for TACE. The aim of this study was to develop a pretreatment risk model predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with intermediate-stage HCC and reclassified as candidates for TACE according to the updated 2022 BCLC criteria. Methods: This retrospective study included 658 HCC patients treated with first-line TACE according to the updated BCLC 2022 guidelines. Pretreatment factors such as the Child-Pugh score, tumor burden (up-to-11 criteria), bilobar tumor involvement, and serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels were analyzed. Cox proportional hazards models were used to identify significant predictors of OS, with these factors subsequently incorporated into a risk prediction model. Results: Significant predictors of OS included Child-Pugh score ≥ 7, bilobar tumor involvement, beyond up-to-11 criteria, and AFP ≥ 400 ng/mL. A risk model was developed using these factors, stratifying patients into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The median OS in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups was 53, 35, and 21 months, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed pretreatment risk prediction model may be useful for predicting OS and guiding TACE candidacy in intermediate-stage HCC patients based on the updated 2022 BCLC guidelines.

Since the development of tremelimumab plus durvalumab (Dur/Tre) for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC), it has been used as not only an initial but also later line treatment in clinical practice. This study aimed to elucidate clinical prognostic factors for progression-free survival (PFS) in Dur/Tre treatment cases.

Enrolled were 183 uHCC patients treated with Dur/Tre from 2023 to May 2024 (median age, 74 years; male patients, 152; Child-Pugh class A:B, 150:33; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B:C, 59:124; initial line use, 64). Clinical factors with prognostic influence on PFS in these patients were retrospectively evaluated.

The median observation period was 7.2 months (interquartile range, 3.2-10.4). History of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atz/Bev) treatment was the only significant prognostic factor for PFS at introduction of Dur/Tre in multivariate analysis (hazard ratio 2.040, p = 0.028) (median PFS: without vs. with = 5.6 vs. 2.7 months, p < 0.001). Although immune-mediated adverse events (imAE) occurrence was only significant in univariate analysis, when objective response and disease control rates were examined according to imAE positivity (any grade) at the time of analysis, those were noted in 14.4% and 39.2%, respectively, of patients without imAE, while in patients with imAE (any grade), they were noted in 18.2% and 56.1%, respectively (p = 0.523 and p = 0.038, respectively).

History of Atz/Bev treatment may be an independent clinical factor for poor PFS at Dur/Tre introduction.

Despite the extensive research on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) exploring various treatment strategies, the survival outcomes have remained unsatisfactory. The aim of this research was to evaluate the ability of machine learning (ML) methods in predicting the survival probability of HCC patients. The study retrospectively analyzed cases of patients with stage 1-4 HCC. Demographic, clinical, pathological, and laboratory data served as input variables. The researchers employed various feature selection techniques to identify the key predictors of patient mortality. Additionally, the study utilized a range of machine learning methods to model patient survival rates. The study included 393 individuals with HCC. For early-stage patients (stages 1-2), the models reached recall values ​​of up to 91% for 6-month survival prediction. For advanced-stage patients (stage 4), the models achieved accuracy values ​​of up to 92% for 3-year overall survival prediction. To predict whether patients are ex or not, the accuracy was 87.5% when using all 28 features without feature selection with the best performance coming from the implementation of weighted KNN. Further improvements in accuracy, reaching 87.8%, were achieved by applying feature selection methods and using a medium Gaussian SVM. This study demonstrates that machine learning techniques can reliably predict survival probabilities for HCC patients across all disease stages. The research also shows that AI models can accurately identify a high proportion of surviving individuals when assessing various clinical and pathological factors.

This study aimed to investigate the role of the autophagy-related long noncoding RNA (lncRNA) MIR210HG in hepatocellular carcinoma and its potential as a therapeutic target.

LncRNA MIR210HG expression and its correlation with survival outcomes in hepatocellular carcinoma patients were analyzed using data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were conducted to assess survival correlations. Quantitative reverse transcription PCR was used to measure lncRNA MIR210HG expression in liver cancer cells and normal liver cells. Functional assays, including CCK-8, Transwell, flow cytometry, and western blot, were performed to evaluate the effects of lncRNA MIR210HG on cell proliferation, invasion, apoptosis, and autophagy in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Elevated lncRNA MIR210HG expression correlated with poor overall survival in hepatocellular carcinoma patients. LncRNA MIR210HG expression was significantly up-regulated in hepatocellular carcinoma cells compared to normal liver cells. Knockdown of lncRNA MIR210HG inhibited cell proliferation and autophagy, while promoting apoptosis in hepatocellular carcinoma cells, findings that were confirmed through both in vitro and in vivo studies.

The findings suggest that lncRNA MIR210HG contributes to hepatocellular carcinoma progression by regulating autophagy and could serve as a promising therapeutic target in hepatocellular carcinoma treatment strategies.

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is standard care for unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to evaluate the addition of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab to TACE versus dual placebo plus TACE in patients with unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma.

In this multicentre, randomised, double-blind, phase 3 study (LEAP-012), patients were recruited from 137 global sites in 33 countries or regions. Eligible patients were age 18 years or older with unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma not amenable to curative treatment, but with tumours amenable to TACE, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1, and Child-Pugh class A disease. Eligible participants were randomly assigned (1:1), stratified by study site, α-fetoprotein level, ECOG performance status, albumin-bilirubin grade, and tumour burden, by a central interactive response system, to receive TACE and either oral lenvatinib (bodyweight ≥60 kg: 12 mg; bodyweight <60 kg: 8 mg; once daily) plus intravenous pembrolizumab (400 mg once every 6 weeks for up to 2 years) or matched dual placebo (oral and intravenous). Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (threshold one-sided p=0·025), per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours version 1.1 (modified for the current study to allow for up to five target tumours in the liver and requiring new intrahepatic tumours to meet LI-RADS 5 criteria to be considered progressive disease) by blinded independent central review, and overall survival (threshold one-sided p=0·0012) in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population (ie, all participants randomly assigned to treatment). Safety was assessed in the as-treated population (ie, all participants who were randomly assigned and received at least one dose of any study treatment). Here, we report results from the first interim analysis (final analysis for progression-free survival). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04246177, and is active but not recruiting.

Between May 22, 2020, and Jan 11, 2023, 847 patients were screened, of whom 480 (57%) were enrolled and randomly assigned to receive TACE plus lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab (n=237) or TACE plus dual placebo (n=243; ITT population). Median age was 66 years (IQR 58-73), 82 (17%) of 480 participants were female, 398 (83%) were male, 98 (20%) were White, 347 (72%) were Asian, four (1%) were Black or African American, and five (1%) were American Indian or Alaska Native. Median follow-up as of data cutoff (Jan 30, 2024) was 25·6 months (IQR 19·5-32·4). Median progression-free survival was 14·6 months (95% CI 12·6-16·7; 132 events [20 deaths and 112 progressions]) with lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab and 10·0 months (8·1-12·2; 154 events [eight deaths and 146 progressions]) with placebo (hazard ratio [HR] 0·66 [95% CI 0·51-0·84]; one-sided p=0·0002). 69 (29%) of 237 in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 82 (34%) of 243 from the placebo group died, with a 24-month overall survival rate of 75% (95% CI 68-80) in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and 69% (62-74) in the placebo group (HR 0·80 [95% CI 0·57-1·11]; one-sided p=0·087). Grade 3 or worse treatment-related adverse events occurred in 169 (71%) of 237 participants in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group and in 76 (32%) of 241 in the placebo group, the most common of which were hypertension (57 [24%] vs 18 [7%]) and platelet count decreased (27 [11%] vs 15 [6%]). Deaths due to treatment-related adverse events occurred in four (2%) participants in the lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab group (n=1 each due to hepatic failure, gastrointestinal haemorrhage, myositis, and immune-mediated hepatitis) and one (<1%) in the placebo group (due to brain stem haemorrhage).

TACE plus lenvatinib plus pembrolizumab showed significant, clinically meaningful improvement in progression-free survival in patients with unresectable, non-metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma compared with TACE plus placebo. The numerical improvement in overall survival is encouraging, but longer follow-up is necessary.

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Inc, Rahway, NJ, USA, and Eisai, Nutley, NJ, USA.

Transarterial chemoembolisation (TACE) is standard of care for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that is amenable to embolisation; however, median progression-free survival is still approximately 7 months. We aimed to assess whether adding durvalumab, with or without bevacizumab, might improve progression-free survival.

In this multiregional, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study (EMERALD-1), adults aged 18 years or older with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to embolisation, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 at enrolment, and at least one measurable intrahepatic lesion per modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) were enrolled at 157 medical sites including research centres and general and specialist hospitals in 18 countries. Eligible patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by TACE method, region, and portal vein invasion, using an interactive voice response or web response system, to TACE plus either durvalumab plus bevacizumab (1500 mg intravenous durvalumab once every 4 weeks, then 1120 mg durvalumab plus 15 mg/kg intravenous bevacizumab once every 3 weeks), durvalumab plus placebo (same regimen using placebo instead of bevacizumab), or placebo alone (same regimen using placebo instead of durvalumab and instead of bevacizumab). Participants, investigators, and those assessing outcomes were masked to treatment assignment until data analysis. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, by blinded independent central review (BICR), and per RECIST version 1.1, with durvalumab plus bevacizumab versus placebo alone in the intention-to-treat population (ITT; ie, all participants assigned to treatment). Key secondary endpoints were progression-free survival by BICR per RECIST version 1.1 with durvalumab plus placebo versus placebo alone, overall survival, and time to deterioration in select patient-reported outcomes. Participants continue to be followed up for overall survival, and overall survival and patient-reported outcomes will be reported in a later publication. Safety was assessed in the safety analysis set, which included all participants assigned to treatment who received any study treatment (ie, any durvalumab, bevacizumab, or placebo) by treatment received. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03778957, and is closed to accrual.

Between Nov 30, 2018, and July 19, 2021, 887 patients were screened, of whom 616 were randomly assigned to durvalumab plus bevacizumab (n=204), durvalumab plus placebo (n=207), or placebo alone (n=205; ITT population). Median age was 65·0 years (IQR 59·0-72·0), 135 (22%) of 616 participants were female, 481 (78%) were male, 375 (61%) were Asian, 176 (29%) were White, 22 (4%) were American Indian or Alaska Native, nine (1%) were Black or African American, one (<1%) was native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander, and 33 (5%) were other races. As of data cutoff (Sept 11, 2023) median follow-up for progression-free survival was 27·9 months (95% CI 27·4-30·4), median progression-free survival was 15·0 months (95% CI 11·1-18·9) with durvalumab plus bevacizumab, 10·0 months (9·0-12·7) with durvalumab, and 8·2 months (6·9-11·1) with placebo. Progression-free survival hazard ratio was 0·77 (95% CI 0·61-0·98; two-sided p=0·032) for durvalumab plus bevacizumab versus placebo, and 0·94 (0·75-1·19; two-sided p=0·64) for durvalumab plus placebo versus placebo. The most common maximum grade 3-4 adverse events were hypertension in participants who received durvalumab and bevacizumab (nine [6%] of 154 participants), anaemia in participants who received durvalumab and placebo (ten [4%] of 232 participants), and post-embolisation syndrome in participants who received placebo alone (eight [4%] of 200 participants). Study treatment-related adverse events that led to death occurred in none of 154 participants who received durvalumab and bevacizumab, three (1%) of 232 who received durvalumab and placebo (n=1 for arterial haemorrhage, liver injury, and multiple organ dysfunction syndrome), and three (2%) of 200 who received placebo alone (n=1 for oesophageal varices haemorrhage, upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage, and dermatomyositis).

Durvalumab plus bevacizumab plus TACE has the potential to set a new standard of care. With additional follow-up of the EMERALD-1 study, future analyses, including the final overall survival data and patient-reported outcomes, will help to further characterise the potential clinical benefits of durvalumab plus bevacizumab plus TACE in hepatocellular carcinoma amenable to embolisation.

AstraZeneca.

Background/Objectives: Combination therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (ATZ/BEV) is extremely effective and yields a high response rate in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In this study, the efficacy of adding locoregional therapy to ATZ/BEV in patients with stable disease (SD) HCC was investigated. Methods: One hundred five HCC patients who were treated with ATZ/BEV or lenvatinib (LEN) as first-line chemotherapy for unresectable HCC were evaluated on the basis of the modified RECIST criteria. SD patients whose initial antitumor effect was achieved received locoregional therapy, and the overall survival (OS) rate was assessed. Results: This study included 58 ATZ/BEV-treated participants and 47 LEN-treated participants. Twenty-eight SD patients (ATZ/BEV) and 20 SD patients (LEN) were identified. OS was significantly greater in ATZ/BEV-treated patients who also received locoregional therapy than in those who did not receive this additional therapy (p = 0.0343), whereas there was no difference between LEN-treated patients who also received locoregional therapy and those who did not. The locoregional therapy consisted of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and/or radiofrequency ablation (RFA). When assessing the add-on effect of TACE and/or RFA in the SD patients treated with ATZ/BEV, five patients were found to achieve CR. Conclusions: The addition of locoregional therapy, such as TACE/RFA, was found to affect SD patients. When a response is limited during ATZ/BEV therapy, it is important to consider the therapeutic option of adding locoregional therapy, as this additional treatment may contribute to improved prognosis via immune modulation.

Current prognostic models for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) are not extensively validated and widely accepted. We aimed to develop and validate a continuous model incorporating tumor burden and biology for individual survival prediction and risk stratification.

Overall, 4,377 treatment-naive candidates for whom TACE was recommended, from 39 centers in five countries, were enrolled and divided into training, internal validation, and two external validation datasets. The novel model was developed using a Cox multivariable regression analysis and compared with our original 6-and-12 model (the largest tumor size [ts, centimetres] + tumor number [tn]) and other available models in terms of predictive accuracy.

The proposed model, named the '6-and-12 model 2.0', was generated as 'ts + tn + 1.5×log10 alpha-fetoprotein (AFP)', showed good discrimination (C-index 0.674) and calibration (Hosmer-Lemeshow test p = 0.147), and outperformed current existing models. An easy-to-use stratification was proposed according to the different AFP levels (≤100, 100-400, 400-2,000, 2,000-10,000, 10,000-40,000, and >40,000 ng/ml) along with the corresponding tumor burden cutoffs (8/14, 7/13, 6/12, 5/11, 4/10, and any tumor burden); that is, if the AFP level was 400-2,000 ng/ml, the stratification should be low-(≤6)/intermediate-(6-12)/high-risk (>12) strata. Hence, it could divide the patients into three distinct risk categories with a median overall survival of 45.0 (95% CI, 40.1-49.9), 30.0 (95% CI, 26.1-33.9), and 15.4 (95% CI, 13.4-17.4) months (p <0.001) from low-risk to high-risk strata, respectively. These findings were confirmed in validation and subgroup analyses.

The 6-and-12 model 2.0 significantly improved individual outcome predictions and better stratified the candidates recommended for TACE; thus, this model could be used in both clinical practice and trial design.

In this international multicentre study, we developed and internally and externally validated a novel outcome prediction model for candidates with HCC who would be ideal for TACE. The model, called the 6-and-12 model 2.0, was based on 4,377 patients from 39 centers in five countries. The model offers individualized outcome prediction, outperforming the original 6-and-12 model score and other existing metrics across all datasets and subsets. Based on different levels of alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) and corresponding cut-offs of tumor burden, patients could be stratified into three risk strata with significantly different survival prognoses, which could provide a referential framework to control study heterogeneity and define the target population in future trial designs.

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), recently renamed metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), is the most prevalent liver disease worldwide. It is associated with an increased risk of developing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the background of cirrhosis or without cirrhosis. The prevalence of NAFLD-related HCC is increasing all over the globe, and HCC surveillance in NAFLD cases is not that common. In the present review, we attempt to summarize promising treatments and clinical trials focused on NAFLD, nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), and HCC in the past five to seven years. We categorized the trials based on the type of intervention. Most of the trials are still running, with only a few completed and with conclusive results. In clinical trial NCT03942822, 25 mg/day of milled chia seeds improved NAFLD condition. Completed trial NCT03524365 concluded that Rouxen-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) or sleeve gastrectomy (SG) results in histological resolution of NASH without worsening of fibrosis, while NCT04677101 validated sensitivity/accuracy of blood biomarkers in predicting NASH and fibrosis stage. Moreover, trials with empagliflozin (NCT05694923), curcuvail (NCT06256926), and obeticholic acid (NCT03439254) were completed but did not provide conclusive results. However, trial NCT03900429 reported effective improvement in fibrosis by at least one stage, without worsening of NAFLD activity score (NAS), as well as improvement in lipid profile of the NASH patients by 80 or 100 mg MGL-3196 (resmetirom). Funded by Madrigal Pharmaceuticals, Rezdiffra (resmetirom), used in the clinical trial NCT03900429, is the first FDA-approved drug for the treatment of NAFLD/NASH.

This study aims to investigate the clinical utility of the derived neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR) and the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in predicting treatment outcomes for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing combination therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atez/Bev).

A retrospective analysis was conducted on 310 patients. The dNLR, NLR, and GNRI were calculated, and their impact on progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was assessed. The formula for calculating dNLR is: (neutrophil count ÷ [white blood cell count-neutrophil count]), which means it does not require lymphocyte count. Furthermore, GNRI-dNLR and GNRI-NLR scores were defined, and their prognostic values were also analyzed.

The median PFS of this cohort was 7.2 months (95% CI: 5.9-8.5), and the median OS was 24.9 months (95% CI: 19.6-30.2). The dNLR, NLR, and GNRI were significant predictors of both PFS and OS. The dNLR showed a significant correlation with the NLR (Pearson correlation coefficient, p < 0.0001). Patients with high GNRI-dNLR scores demonstrated significantly worse PFS and OS compared to those with low scores (p = 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Compared to stratification by GNRI alone, the GNRI-dNLR or GNRI-NLR provided better stratification for both PFS and OS.

The dNLR could be a valuable substitute for NLR as a prognostic marker in patients with unresectable HCC undergoing Atez/Bev therapy. It offers a feasible alternative for databases lacking lymphocyte count information, ensuring comprehensive patient stratification and outcome prediction. The GNRI-NLR or GNRI-dNLR score provided better stratification compared to GNRI alone.

The exact role of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC) is still unknown. The combination of HAIC and sorafenib has been proven to be more effective than sorafenib alone in the first-line treatment of aHCC. The aim of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of HAIC plus regorafenib in the second-line treatment of aHCC.

This is a multicenter, open-label, randomised controlled phase III trial. A total of 294 patients with aHCC, who are unable to tolerate the first-line systemic therapy or progress after the first-line systemic therapy, will be enrolled in the study. The patients will be randomly (2:1) assigned into the combination treatment group (HAIC plus regorafenib, n=196) and the control group (regorafenib alone, n=98). HAIC and regorafenib (160 mg/day) will be given in a 4-week cycle. The primary endpoint is overall survival in the intention-to-treat population. The second endpoints include progression-free survival, overall response rate, time to progression, etc. The radiological assessments will be based on the criteria of Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1.

This study is approved by the ethics committee of Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. All participants are required to provide written informed consent. The results of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and esteemed academic conferences.

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2300073075).

Durvalumab plus tremelimumab (Durva/Treme) has recently been approved as a first-line or later-line treatment for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (u-HCC) in Japan. We assessed the real-world outcomes of Durva/Treme for u-HCC, with a focus on treatment efficacy and safety.

We retrospectively evaluated 22 patients with u-HCC treated with Durva/Treme at Iwate Medical University during the period from 2023 to 2024, with a comparison of the clinical outcomes between patients who received Durva/Treme as first-line and later-line treatments. We further evaluated changes in the modified albumin-bilirubin (mALBI) grade during treatment.

There were 10 patients in the first-line group and 12 patients in the later-line treatment group. During the follow-up with a median duration of 7.6 months, the median progression-free survival (first-line versus later-line: 4.7 months versus 2.9 months, p = 0.85), the objective response rate (0.0% versus 16.7%, p = 0.48), the disease control rate (60.0% versus 58.4%, p = 1.00), and the incidence of any adverse event (50.0% versus 75.0%, p = 0.38) were not statistically different between the two groups. The changes in the mALBI scores were not statistically significant (p = 0.75).

Durva/Treme may be effective and safe for patients with u-HCC, even in patients who receive Durva/Treme as a later-line treatment.

RNA-dependent protein kinase (PKR) may have a positive regulatory role in controlling tumor growth and progression in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the downstream substrates and the molecular mechanism of PKR in the growth and progression of HCC have not been clarified. In this study, mass spectrometry analysis was performed with immunoprecipitated samples, and 4.1R was identified as a protein that binds to PKR. In transfected COS7 cells, an immunoprecipitation experiment showed that 4.1R binds to wild-type PKR, but not to a kinase-deficient mutant PKR, suggesting that PKR binds to 4.1R in a kinase activity-dependent manner. In HCC cell lines, HuH7 and HepG2, the expression level of 4.1R protein was shown to be regulated by protein expression and activation of PKR. Interestingly, high expression of 4.1R, as well as PKR, is associated with a worse prognosis in HCC. PKR increased HCC cell growth in both anchorage-dependent and anchorage-independent manners, whereas 4.1R was involved in HCC cell growth only in an anchorage-independent manner, not in an anchorage-dependent manner. The rescue experiment indicated that increased anchorage-independent growth of HCC cells by PKR might be caused by 4.1R. In conclusion, PKR associates with 4.1R and promotes anchorage-independent growth of HCC. The PKR-4.1R axis might be a new therapeutic target in HCC.