Modgil V, Nagar N. Sudden death due to acute variceal bleeding: A review of diagnostic challenges and clinical presentation. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 128231 [DOI: 10.5528/wjtm.128231]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
I sincerely thank the Editor, editorial team, and reviewers for their valuable time, constructive feedback, and professional support throughout the submission, peer review, and publication process.
I am highly satisfied with the journal's online submission system, the quality and fairness of the peer review process, editorial communication, manuscript handling, and overall publication experience. The reviewers' comments were constructive and helpful in improving the scientific quality and presentation of the manuscript.
I also appreciate the efficiency of the editorial and production teams, the quality of the final published article, and the journal's adherence to academic and publishing standards.
Overall, my experience with the journal has been very positive. I appreciate the professionalism and dedication of the entire editorial team and look forward to future opportunities to contribute to the journal.