BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Authors Evaluation
Tang YC, Gao RP, Lv YX, Wang Y, Guo XB. Applications of nanozymes in the diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal malignancies. World J Gastroenterol 2026; 32(44): 121972 [DOI: 10.3748/wjg.121972]
Evaluation of a Journal’s Credibility by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a journal’s credibility is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the manuscript editing and publishing process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the online submission system?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the peer review report?
Yes
3 Are you satisfied with the editing quality of the article?
Yes
4 Are you satisfied with the article PDFs?
Yes
5 Are you satisfied with the online full-text article?
Yes
6 Are you satisfied with the prepared figures in the online full-text article?
Yes
7 Are you satisfied with the prepared tables in the online full-text article?
Yes
8 Are you satisfied with the published articles processes?
Yes
9 Are you satisfied with the requirement for providing academic rules and norms?
Yes
10 Are you satisfied with the academic misconduct detection report?
Yes
11 Are you satisfied with the period of publication?
Yes
12 Are you satisfied with the editing and publishing rules and norms?
Yes
Evaluation of a Journal’s Peer Review by Authors
The purpose of an author’s evaluation of a given journal’s peer review is to assess the degree of satisfaction with the peer review process. This evaluation is for user’s reference only.
1 Are you satisfied with the time spent for peer review?
Yes
2 Are you satisfied with the anonymous peer review process?
Yes
3 Is the peer review report of great help to your manuscript?
Yes
4 Do you think the peer review report for your manuscript is fair or objective?
Yes
Author‘s Comments
From submission to online publication, communication with your journal's editorial office was timely throughout all stages, including initial review, peer review, revision, and proofreading. I would especially like to thank the editorial staff for their patient assistance with copyright agreements and figure clarity issues. I also extend my sincere gratitude to the editors and reviewers for their specific and constructive review comments and meticulous proofreading checks. Overall, the experience was professional and efficient. I am willing to submit again and recommend this journal.