Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
Artif Intell Gastroenterol. Jun 8, 2025; 6(1): 106149
Published online Jun 8, 2025. doi: 10.35712/aig.v6.i1.106149
Table 2 Result of artificial intelligence colonoscopy on polyp detection and missing rate
Ref.
Adenoma detection with AI
Adenoma detection without AI
Heterogeneity I2
Adenoma missing rate
False positive
Soleymanjahi et al[25]44.7% (RR: 1.21, 95%CI: 1.15-1.28)37%76%AI: 16.1%, Conv: 35.3% (RR: 0.47, 95%CI: 0.36-0.60, I2 = 35%)
Makar et al[17]20% (RR: 1.20, 95%CI: 1.14-1.27)Lower than AI aid64%55% reduction (RR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.37-0.54, I2 = 22.44%)39% increase in total (RR: 1.39, 95%CI: 1.23-1.57, I2 = 1.81%)
Lee et al[15]RR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.17-1.31Lower than AI aid53%RR: 0.44 (95%CI: 0.35-0.56, I2= 41%)
Patel et al[26]44% (RR: 1.11, 95%CI: 0.97-1.28)38%83%
Lou et al[18]RR 1.24, 95%CI: 115-1.33 78.87%50.5% decrease (RR: 0.495, 95%CI: 0.390–0.627, I2 = 48.76%)12.2% increase in total. Range (7.5%–16.9%)
Barua et al[27]29.6% (RR: 1.52, 95%CI: 1.31-1.77)19%48%11.2% increase in total. Range (7.1%-20.1%)
Mehta et al[28]37.3% (OR: 1.91, 95%CI: 1.32–2.18)30%
Shiha et al[29]33.7% (RR: 1.76, 95%CI: 1.55-2.00)23%28%
Zhang et al[30]33% (OR: 1.52- 1.72)
Nazarian et al[31]34% (OR: 1.53, 95%CI: 1.32-1.77)Lower than AI aid45%
Adiwinata et al[32]OR: 1.58 (95%CI: 1.37-1.82)Lower than AI aid
Vadhwana et al[33]No improvement74%
Hassan et al[34]44.0% (RR: 1.24, 95%CI: 1.16-1.33)36%70%16% decrease (RR: 0.45, 95%CI: 0.35-0.58, I2 = 49%)0.52 increase per colonoscopy, Mean Difference 018 polypectomies (95%CI: 0.11-0.26, I2 = 92%)
Lui et al[35]24.2% (RR: 1.242, 95%CI: 1.159-1.332)78%50.5% decrease (RR: 0.495, 95%CI: 0.390-0.627, I2 = 48.76%)12.20% increase in total
Huang et al[36]35.4% (RR: 1.43, 95%CI: 1.33-1.53)25%36%10.5% increase in total. Range (7.1%-17.3%)
Li et al[37]OR: 1.75, 95%CI: 1.52-2.0139%
Wang et al[38]10% (AUC 0.79, 95%CI: 0.79-0.82)90%
Ashat et al[39]33.7% (OR 1.76, 95%CI: 1.55-2.00)30%28%
Deliwala et al[40]77% (OR: 1.77, 95%CI: 1.50-2.08)35%
Hassan et al[41]36.6% (RR: 1.44, 95%CI: 1.27-1.62)25%42%
Wei et al[42]36.3% (RR: 1.13, 95%CI: 1.01-1.28)36%64%
Mohan et al[43]32.8% (RR: 1.5, 95%CI: 1.33-1.51)21%56%10.3% increase in total (I2 = 93%)
RR: Relative risk; AI: Artificial intelligence; AUC: Area under the curve; OR: Odds ratio; ADR: Adenoma detection rate.