Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2017; 5(6): 132-149
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.132
Table 1 Main demographic and clinical characteristics of the studied case series (patients who underwent surgical correction of adult spine deformity with osteotomy, n = 94)
Demographic characteristicSubgroup (if applicable)Measure unitsStatistical characteristicsValue
AgeNAYearsn94
Median59.5
Mean58.6
SD12.7
Min23
Max82
GenderMaleSubjectsNumber (%)30 (32)
FemaleNumber (%)64 (68)
Body mass indexNAConventional unitsNumber79
Median26.6
Mean27.2
SD5.6
Min16.2
Max43.5
Primary diagnosisDegenerative scoliosisSubjectsNumber (%)9 (9.6)
Idiopathic scoliosisNumber (%)29 (31.1)
Degenerative kyphosisNumber (%)13 (13.9)
Mixed and other adult spine deformitiesNumber (%)43 (45.4)
Smoking statusNeverSubjectsNumber (%)38 (40.4)
FormerNumber (%)37 (39.4)
CurrentNumber (%)14 (14.9)
Not specifiedNumber (%)5 (5.3)
EthnicityCaucasiansSubjectsNumber (%)82 (87.2)
HispanicNumber (%)7 (7.4)
Not specifiedNumber (%)5 (5.3)
Osteoporotic statusOsteoporosis or osteopeniaSubjectsNumber (%)29 (30.3)
Table 2 Main characteristics of the index operation (surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with posterior instrumentation and osteotomy, n = 94)
Characteristics of operationSubgroup (if applicable)Measure unitsStatistical characteristicValue
Index operationPrimarySubjectsNumber (%)20 (21)
ReoperationNumber (%)74 (79)
Number of fused levelsNANumberMedian8
Min; max2; 17
Type of osteotomyPSOSubjectsNumber (%)51 (54)
SPONumber (%)43 (46)
Osteotomy locationLumbarSubjectsNumber (%)58 (62)
ThoracicNumber (%)20 (21)
Thoracolumbar junctionNumber (%)13 (14)
SacrumNumber (%)3 (3)
Inter-level junctions crossing by instrumentationCervicothoracicSubjectsNumber (%)2 (2)
ThoracolumbarNumber (%)24 (26)
LumbosacralNumber (%)13 (14)
Thoracolumbar and lumbosacralNumber (%)48 (51)
NoNumber (%)7 (7)
Fixation to sacrum (not pelvis)NASubjectsNumber (%)38 (40)
Fixation to sacrum and/or pelvisNASubjectsNumber (%)59 (63)
Use of anterior fusionNASubjectsNumber (%)36 (38)
Number of anterior levels fusedNASubjectsMedian2
Min; max1; 6
Supplemental anterior support/fixation by implant or instrumentationNASubjectsNumber (%)62 (66)
Use of cementNASubjectsNumber (%)23 (25)
Use of bone morphogenetic proteinNASubjectsNumber (%)49 (52)
Use of individually precontoured posterior rodsPrecontouredSubjectsNumber (%)32 (34)
In situ contouringSubjectsNumber (%)62 (66)
Connecting to previously implanted instrumentationNASubjectsNumber (%)16 (17)
Use of Domino and/or parallel connectors2SubjectsNumber (%)2 (2)
1Number (%)11 (12)
0Number (%)81 (86)
Table 3 Characteristics of sagittal spinopelvic alignment before and after index operation, and level of perioperative change
Spinopelvic characteristic, unitsSubgroupnCharacteristics of distribution
PercentilesMeanSD
Min1025507590Max
Sagittal vertical axis, mmPreop94015337410512820373.942.4
Postop61-660.21440609416741.738.4
Postop-Preop617334-5-30-59-96-182-33.147.8
Postop-Preop (abs)61010203860961824635.7
Lumbar lordosis, L1-S1, degreePreop7748193645569934.419.4
Postop90332435261719751.316.6
Postop-Preop74-37-641630385016.117.4
Postop-Preop (abs)741391731375019.713.2
Thoracic kyphosis, T1-T12, degreePreop64-3112339546410939.421.9
Postop81918324451587541.914.7
Postop-Preop62-41-19-1011325341.615.9
Postop-Preop (abs)62012121829411210.3
Pelvic tilt, degreePreop68813192735434827.810.4
Postop78-49132027335120.29.7
Postop-Preop61105-2-8-15-19-29-7.99.1
Postop-Preop (abs)6102581519299.96.7
Pelvic incidence – lumbar lordosis mismatch, degreePreop68-43-1092337476620.921.6
Postop78-41-17-721328413.815.6
Postop-Preop61254-2-18-31-37-48-16.216.6
Postop-Preop (abs)620391831374819.213.2
Table 4 Undesirable postoperative events and additional treatment after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy (n = 94)
IndexNumber of casesRate, % (95%Cl: min; max)
Fall after operation before mechanical complication(s)1415% (11.3; 18.7)
Postoperative pseudarthrosis1010.6% (7.4; 13.6)
Cases with 1 mechanical complication2627.6% (23.0; 32.2)
Cases with a few (2-4) mechanical complications1516.0% (12.2; 19.8)
Additional surgical treatment (revision/reoperation)4042.5% (37.4; 47.6)
Additional conservative treatment1415.0% (11.3; 18.7)
Table 5 Association of different types of mechanical complications with postoperative revision/reoperation after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy (n1 = 94)
Mechanical complicationn1Association with revision/reoperation after index operation
n2OR (95%Cl)P value
Total (failure of spine and/or instrumentation)413220.0 (6.9; 57.4)< 0.0001
Failure of spine (total)242118.8 (5.0; 70.3)< 0.0001
Vertebral fracture (total)191719.2 (4.1; 90.1)< 0.0001
PJF1111> 19.0< 0.0001
DSF657.6 (0.8; 67.6)0.033
Instrumentation failure (total)24186.6 (2.3; 18.8)0.001
Screw loose17124.2 (1.3;13.2)0.014
Screw fracture22NA0.161
Rod fracture741.9 (0.4; 8.9)0.453
Iliac bolt connector (loose and/or fracture)435.7 (0.6; 53.4)0.308
Disconnection of instrumentation769.4 (1.1; 81.1)0.022
Table 6 Risk factors for mechanical complications (all types: Failure of spine and/or instrumentation) after surgical correction of adult spine deformity with osteotomy
Risk factor(s)OR (95%Cl: min; max)P valuePredictive values
SnSp+PV-PV
Preoperative SVA > 110 mm4.5 (1.3; 15.4)0.0110.270.920.730.62
Postoperative SVA > 75 mm5.4 (1.4; 21.1)0.0140.240.940.770.62
Preoperative LL< 20°5.5 (1.8; 16.9)0.0020.370.910.750.65
Postoperative change of LL > 34° (absolute values)4.7 (1.2; 18.0)0.0280.220.940.750.61
Postoperative change of PI-LL > 34° (absolute values)6.4 (1.2; 33.2)0.0330.290.940.800.62
Type of osteotomy SPO vs PSO0.42 (0.18; 1.0)0.0450.340.450.330.47
Fall after operation before mechanical complication6.1 (1.6; 23.7)0.0070.270.940.790.63
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic if number of fused levels > 42.4 (0.9; 6.4)0.0680.740.460.530.68
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic if number of fused levels > 4 with PSO3.6 (0.92; 13.9)0.0530.780.500.670.64
Postoperative pseudarthrosis14.6 (1.8; 120.9)0.0020.220.980.900.62
Integral index based on parameters presented above by results of multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.4631.7 (6.7; 149.3)< 0.0010.790.890.860.83
Table 7 Risk factors for mechanical complications of spine (all types: Vertebral fracture, proximal junctional failure, and distal segment degeneration/failure) after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Risk factor(s)OR (95%Cl: min; max)P valuePredictive values
SnSp+PV-PV
Postoperative SVA > 106 mm11.3 (1.1; 118.1)0.0430.200.980.750.79
Type of osteotomy: SPO vs PSO0.39 (0.1;1.1)0.0460.290.490.160.67
Fall after operation before mechanical complication5.3 (1.6; 17.5)0.0060.330.910.570.80
Postoperative change of TK > 25° (absolute values)4.8 (1.1; 20.8)0.0410.310.910.560.79
Postoperative change of PT > 8° (absolute values)3.3 (0.9; 11.1)0.0450.690.600.380.84
Postoperative change of PI-LL > 34° (absolute values)3.8 (0.9; 15.6)0.0650.310.890.500.79
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.4614 (2.7; 73.6)< 0.0010.850.720.500.93
Table 8 Risk factors for different mechanical complications of spine after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Mechanical complication of spineRisk factorsOR (95%Cl: min; max)P valuePredictive values
SnSp+PV-PV
Vertebral fractureCurrent smoking5.7 (1.7; 19.1)0.0080.370.910.500.85
Type of osteotomy: SPO vs PSO0.25 (0.1; 0.8)0.0200.210.480.090.71
Fall after operation before mechanical complication4.3 (1.3; 14.5)0.0240.320.890.430.84
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.4611.7 (2.2;61.5)< 0.0010.830.700.450.93
Proximal junctional failureCurrent smoking4.2 (1.0; 016.8)0.0550.360.880.290.91
Osteoporosis/osteopenia3.19 (0.9; 11.3)0.0750.550.720.210.92
PSO and > 5 levels fused in osteoporosis/osteopenia10.4 (0.8; 137.8)0.0391.000.840.291.00
Fall after operation before mechanical complication4.2 (1.0; 16.8)0.0550.360.880.290.91
Reoperation vs primary operation20.1 (2.5; 163.6)< 0.0010.920.650.280.98
Type of osteotomy: SPO vs PSO0.23 (0.05; 1.1)0.0480.180.510.050.82
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.464.6 (0.4; 47.3)0.1670.750.600.140.97
Distal segmental degeneration/ failurePreoperative LL ≤ 20°20.9 (2.3; 190.6)0.0020.830.810.230.99
Thoracolumbar crossing junction18.6 (2.0; 164.9)0.0040.830.780.210.99
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic0.08 (0.01; 0.73)0.0010.140.330.020.83
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.462.9 (0.1; 89.1)0.1860.670.590.050.98
Table 9 Risk factors for instrumentation failure (all types) after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
FactorsOR (95%Cl: min; max)P valuePredictive values
SnSp+PV-PV
Preoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm4.1 (1.5; 11.3)0.0070.460.830.480.82
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)4.4 (1.1; 18.0)0.0410.320.900.600.75
Postoperative SVA < 50 mm, if preoperative SVA≥ 110 mm9.3 (1.4; 63.2)0.0250.670.820.400.93
Preoperative LL 48°-60°0.15 (0.01; 1.3)0.0430.050.760.070.67
Thoracolumbar and/or lumbosacral crossing junction(s)6.5 (1.4; 30.2)0.0060.920.370.360.92
Fixation to sacrum and/or pelvic4.0 (1.2; 12.8)0.0260.830.440.340.89
Maximum rod contouring angle > 60°4.4 (1.2; 16.1)0.0250.620.730.400.87
Precontoured posterior rods vs in situ contouring0.35 (0.1; 1.3)0.0500.380.360.160.65
Domino and/or parallel connectors number > 16.3 (0.5; 72.6)0.0630.080.990.670.76
Postoperative pseudarthrosis9.2 (2.1; 39.3)0.0020.290.960.700.80
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.467.8 (2.0; 29.9)0.0020.750.720.550.87
Table 10 Risk factors for screw loosening and rod fracture after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Instrumentation failureRisk factorsOR (95%Cl: min; max)P valuePredictive values
SnSp+PV-PV
Screw looseningPreoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm5.1 (1.6; 15.4)0.0050.530.820.390.89
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)5.4 (1.3; 22.9)0.0260.380.900.500.84
Postoperative SVA < 50 mm, if preoperative SVA ≥ 110 mm20.6 (2.6; 163.8)0.0040.670.910.570.94
Preoperative LL < 34°3.4 (1.0; 10.9)0.0340.690.610.310.88
Fixation to sacrum and/or pelvic2.5 (0.8; 8.3)0.1030.780.420.240.89
Postoperative pseudarthrosis9.9 (2.4; 40.0)0.0010.350.950.600.87
Rod fracture15.6 (2.7; 89.8)0.0010.290.970.710.86
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.4629.0 (3.3;251.9)< 0.0010.920.730.500.97
Rod fracturePreoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm9.6 (1.7; 53.5)0.0080.710.790.220.97
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)11.3 (2.0; 63.3)0.0070.570.890.400.94
Postoperative SVA < 50 mm, if preoperative SVA ≥ 110 mm33.0 (2.6; 424.1)0.0020.500.970.750.92
Preoperative LL < 20°4.9 (1.0; 24.3)0.0500.570.790.210.95
Postoperative change of LL ≥ 30°7.4 (1.3; 41.5)0.0220.710.750.230.96
Postoperative pseudarthrosis8.6 (1.6; 46.2)0.0190.430.920.300.95
Domino and/or parallel connectors5.8 (1.1; 29.6)0.0520.430.890.230.95
Sagittal rod contouring angle > 56°9.8 (1.1; 85.2)0.0190.860.620.150.98
Number of crossing junctions > 15.6 (0.7; 48.5)0.0870.860.480.120.98
Connecting to previously implanted instrumentation8.3 (1.7; 41.9)0.0140.570.860.250.96
Iliac bolt connector loose and/or fracture17 (1.9;147.0)0.0260.670.890.500.94
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.466.9 (0.7; 66.5)0.0270.800.630.180.97
Table 11 Risk factors for iliac bolt connector loosening/fracture and disassociation of instrumentation after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
Instrumentation failureRisk factorsOR (95%Cl: min; max)P valuePredictive values
SnSp+PV-PV
Iliac bolt connector loosening/fracturePreoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm24.0 (1.6; 356.0)0.0210.750.890.600.94
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)7.4 (0.7;81.4)0.0290.800.650.400.92
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.464.69 (0.4; 47.3)0.0690.750.600.140.97
Disassociation of instrumentationType of osteotomy, SPO vs PSO0.15 (0.02; 1.3)0.0500.130.510.020.86
Lumbar osteotomy7.4 (0.7; 81.4)0.0290.800.650.400.92
Fixation to sacrum or pelvic4.8 (0.6; 40.8)0.0390.880.410.120.97
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.464.5 (0.4; 47.4)0.0690.750.600.140.97