Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2017.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2017; 5(6): 132-149
Published online Dec 26, 2017. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v5.i6.132
Table 9 Risk factors for instrumentation failure (all types) after surgical correction of adult spinal deformity with osteotomy
FactorsOR (95%Cl: min; max)P valuePredictive values
SnSp+PV-PV
Preoperative SVA ≥ 100 mm4.1 (1.5; 11.3)0.0070.460.830.480.82
Postoperative change of SVA > 76 mm (absolute values)4.4 (1.1; 18.0)0.0410.320.900.600.75
Postoperative SVA < 50 mm, if preoperative SVA≥ 110 mm9.3 (1.4; 63.2)0.0250.670.820.400.93
Preoperative LL 48°-60°0.15 (0.01; 1.3)0.0430.050.760.070.67
Thoracolumbar and/or lumbosacral crossing junction(s)6.5 (1.4; 30.2)0.0060.920.370.360.92
Fixation to sacrum and/or pelvic4.0 (1.2; 12.8)0.0260.830.440.340.89
Maximum rod contouring angle > 60°4.4 (1.2; 16.1)0.0250.620.730.400.87
Precontoured posterior rods vs in situ contouring0.35 (0.1; 1.3)0.0500.380.360.160.65
Domino and/or parallel connectors number > 16.3 (0.5; 72.6)0.0630.080.990.670.76
Postoperative pseudarthrosis9.2 (2.1; 39.3)0.0020.290.960.700.80
Integral index by multiple regression modeling (1) ≥ 0.467.8 (2.0; 29.9)0.0020.750.720.550.87