Meta-Analysis
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2016.
World J Meta-Anal. Dec 26, 2016; 4(6): 118-123
Published online Dec 26, 2016. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v4.i6.118
Table 4 Univariate and multivariate analysis of potential risk factors for lymph node metastasis
Statistical testORLower 95%CIUpper 95%CIP value
Univariate analysis
Age (< 70 or ≥ 70 yr)0.320.031.750.19
Sex (male or female)1.040.18111
Location of tumor center (Siewert type I or II)2.10.3110.80.37
Depth of invasion (M or SM)2.30.28108.30.67
Depth of invasion (≥ 500 μm or < 500 μm)4.890.5840.80.14
Differentiation (undifferentiated or differentiated)6.61.2933.70.01
Tumor size (< 30 mm or ≥ 30 mm)3.10.7214.80.08
Macroscopic tumor type (elevated or depressed)1.430.319.10.74
Ulceration (yes or no)1.910.448.70.33
Barrett’s esophageal adenocarcinoma (yes or no)0.790.173.420.75
Lymphovascular invasion (yes or no)5.11.0425.10.02
Multivariate analysis
Differentiation (undifferentiated or differentiated)6.081.426.40.01
Lymphovascular invasion (yes or no)4.661.0919.90.03