©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Sep 18, 2025; 13(3): 111716
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i3.111716
Published online Sep 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i3.111716
Figure 2 Forest plots of in-hospital mortality, all-cause mortality, and in-hospital reoperation comparing outcomes of valve-sparing aortic root replacement in bicuspid aortic valve vs tricuspid aortic valve patients.
A: In-hospital mortality; B: All-cause mortality; C: In-hospital reoperation. BAV: Bicuspid aortic valve; TAV: Tricuspid aortic valve.
- Citation: Adugna LF, Asfeha NF, Musa ME, Haile EA, Hailu SZ, Anjulo MT, Tafesse HT, Khan ZH, Hussain A. Comparison of outcomes following valve-sparing aortic root replacement in patients with bicuspid and tricuspid aortic valves: A meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2025; 13(3): 111716
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v13/i3/111716.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i3.111716