Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 18, 2025; 13(2): 104080
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.104080
Table 6 Summary of studies evaluating role of contrast enhanced ultrasound in characterizing strictures in Crohn’s disease
Ref.
Study type
Number of patients
IUS parameter
Follow-up
Results
Białecki et al[34], 2014Prospective42 (Adult CD)CEUSCross-SectionalCEUS correlated with endoscopic activity and fecal calprotectin; higher vascularity and peak enhancement indicated active CD
Ding et al[149], 2022Prospective76 (Adult CD)CEUS vs CTECross-SectionalCEUS showed similar diagnostic accuracy to CTE for active inflammation; CEUS was better at detecting mural vascularization
Guidi et al[113], 2006Prospective25 (Adult CD)CEUSCross-SectionalCEUS predicted response to infliximab in active CD by assessing vascularization and bowel wall enhancement
Malagò et al[47], 2012Prospective30 (Adult CD)CEUS vs MRICross-SectionalCEUS findings correlated well with MRI in lesion length, wall thickness, and inflammatory activity assessment
Nylund et al[44], 2013Retrospective37 (Adult CD)Quantitative CEUSCross-SectionalQuantitative CEUS differentiated inflammatory from fibrotic strictures based on blood flow and volume
Paredes et al[45], 2013Prospective60 (Adult CD Post-Surgery)CEUS ParametersCross-SectionalSonographic score using CEUS achieved 98% sensitivity and 100% specificity for detecting postoperative recurrence; kappa = 0.946
Pauls et al[46], 2006Prospective21 (Adult CD)CEUS vs Dynamic MRICross-SectionalHigh correlation between CEUS and MRI in assessing bowel wall vascularity; CEUS showed 217.5% enhancement compared to MRI's 262%, r = 0.623
Ponorac et al[48], 2023Prospective36 (Pediatric CD)Quantitative CEUS, PCDAI, and fecal calprotectinCross-SectionalQuantitative CEUS demonstrated 78.57% sensitivity and 100% specificity compared to endoscopy; substantial agreement with PCDAI (kappa = 0.62)
Wang et al[36], 2024Retrospective52Dynamic CEUS parameters12 monthsCEUS showed high sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (100%) for active CD
Ripollés et al[93], 2013Retrospective50 (Adult CD)CEUS (Phlegmon vs Abscess)Cross-SectionalCEUS showed 100% specificity for distinguishing abscess from phlegmon, with excellent interobserver agreement (kappa = 0.953)
Ripollés et al[31], 2013Prospective25 (Adult CD undergoing surgery)CEUS vs histopathologyCross-SectionalCEUS correctly classified 23/28 segments based on histopathological inflammation or fibrostenosis with substantial agreement (kappa = 0.632)