Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 18, 2025; 13(2): 104080
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.104080
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.104080
Table 3 Studies summarizing utility of small intestinal contrast ultrasound in Crohn’s disease
Ref. | Study type | Number of patients | Impact on management |
Hakim et al[54], 2019 | Retrospective | 93 pediatric | Sensitivity of 98.7% and specificity of 100% for small bowel lesions; substantial agreement with MRE (κ = 0.77) |
Pallotta et al[55], 2013 | Prospective | 51 pediatric | Sensitivity of 96% in proven CD, superior to conventional ultrasound for jejunal and ileal lesions, with excellent lesion localization |
Parente et al[56], 2004 | Prospective | 102 adults | Comparable to barium studies for disease extent; improved interobserver agreement after contrast ingestion |
Onali et al[60], 2012 | Prospective | 15 adults | Sensitivity of 92% for strictures; comparable to CTE for lesions and luminal complications |
- Citation: Pal P, Mateen MA, Pooja K, Rajadurai N, Gupta R, Tandan M, Duvvuru NR. Intestinal ultrasound in Crohn’s disease: A systematic review of its role in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment response. World J Meta-Anal 2025; 13(2): 104080
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v13/i2/104080.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.104080