Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 18, 2025; 13(2): 104080
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.104080
Table 2 Studies summarizing utility of contrast-enhanced ultrasound in Crohn’s disease activity assessment
Ref.
Study type
Number of patients
Utility of CEUS in CD
Sidhu et al[50], 2023Retrospective25 pediatricCEUS with shear wave elastography differentiated inflammatory from fibrotic strictures, correlating with histopathology
Wang et al[36], 2024Retrospective52CEUS detected active inflammation using dynamic perfusion parameters with high sensitivity (97.4%) and specificity (100%)
Cheng et al[33], 2016Retrospective77CEUS quantified intestinal wall perfusion and identified influencing factors like depth, pressure, and intraluminal gas
Giangregorio et al[29], 2009Prospective30CEUS predicted clinical activity and follow-up outcomes using time-intensity curves and vascularization analysis
Girlich et al[30], 2009Retrospective20 CD, 4 controlsQuantified bowel wall vascularity and inflammation with CEUS, showing significant differences compared to controls
Horjus Talabur Horje et al[32], 2015Prospective105CEUS matched MRE accuracy (99%) for active ileitis, with high sensitivity (100%) and specificity (92%)
Kratzer et al[28], 2005Prospective21CEUS quantified vascularity and differentiated active from inactive CD and other complications like abscesses
Laterza et al[102], 2020Prospective54CEUS perfusion parameters predicted response to anti-TNF therapy and identified patients at risk of clinical relapse
Białecki et al[34], 2014Prospective42CEUS correlated with endoscopic activity and fecal calprotectin. Higher vascularity and peak enhancement indicated active CD
Ding et al[149], 2022Prospective76CEUS showed similar diagnostic accuracy to CTE for active inflammation. CEUS was better at detecting mural vascularization
Guidi et al[113], 2006Prospective25CEUS predicted response to infliximab in active CD by assessing vascularization and bowel wall enhancement
Malagò et al[47], 2012Prospective30CEUS findings showed good correlation with MRI in lesion length, wall thickness, and inflammatory activity assessment
Nylund et al[44], 2013Retrospective37Quantitative CEUS differentiated inflammatory from fibrotic strictures based on blood flow and volume
Paredes et al[45], 2013Prospective60CEUS demonstrated high accuracy (98.3%) for postoperative recurrence in CD, correlating well with endoscopy
Pauls et al[46], 2006Prospective21CEUS and MRI were comparable in evaluating vascularity and bowel wall inflammation in active CD
Ponorac et al[48], 2023Prospective36 pediatricCEUS showed high specificity (100%) for assessing pediatric CD activity, correlating well with endoscopy and PCDAI scores
Ripollés et al[93], 2013Retrospective50CEUS differentiated phlegmon from abscess with 100% specificity, aiding in treatment planning for CD complications
Ripollés et al[31], 2013Prospective25CEUS differentiated inflammatory from fibrostenotic lesions with good correlation to histopathology, aiding in therapy decisions
Mao et al[49], 2018Prospective31CEUS detected fistulous tracts associated with abscesses, with high sensitivity (86.7%) and specificity (100%), improving diagnostic precision
Schirin-Sokhan et al[42], 2011Prospective18CEUS demonstrated partial agreement with CDS and was superior for therapy response assessment in active CD
Wilkens et al[38], 2018Retrospective50High peak CEUS enhancement with minimal decline suggested severe CD due to prolonged microbubble retention in inflamed bowel walls
Wilkens et al[87], 2018Prospective20CEUS and dynamic CE-MRE provided complementary insights into stricture stiffness, with CEUS emphasizing inflammatory characteristics