Systematic Reviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Meta-Anal. Jun 18, 2025; 13(2): 104080
Published online Jun 18, 2025. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v13.i2.104080
Table 15 Summary of studies evaluating role of point of care ultrasound in inflammatory bowel disease
Ref.
Study type
Comparator
Follow up
Number of patients
Impact on management
Novak et al[18], 2015ProspectiveCRP, Harvey Bradshaw Index2 years49 CDPOCUS changed management (escalation, de-escalation, surgery referral) in nearly 60% of cases. Half of the patients with clinically inactive disease had IUS activity
Wright et al[186], 2020Prospective cross-sectionalMRE and ileo-colonoscopyPOCUS done within 3 months of MRE42 CDCompared to MRE, POCUS was accurate in assessing disease activity, extent, and complications. POCUS had moderate agreement with MRE (κ = 0.50) and ileo-colonoscopy (κ = 0.55)
Gonen et al[193], 2021ProspectiveColonoscopy3 months117 CDPOCUS changed management in 40% of cases. Accuracy of decision improved from 63% to 90%. Surgical decisions were taken in 11% of cases. Colonoscopy and POCUS assessments were comparable
Bots et al[20], 2022RetrospectiveMRI, ColonoscopyMRE within 8 weeks of IUS345 (280 CD and 65 UC)POCUS changed management in 60% of cases, leading to a 48% change in medications. Correlation with IUS was 86.3%, and correlation with MRI was 80%. Adoption of IUS reduced the reliance on MRI
Rispo et al[173], 2023ProspectiveIleo-colonoscopy, IUSCross-sectional86 UCHand-held IUS and standard IUS were comparable in terms of BWT and BWS Excellent agreement between HHIUS and IUS (κ= 0.86)
St-Pierre et al[196], 2023Multicenter observationalN/ACross-sectional158 IBDPOCUS detected active inflammation in 65% of cases, leading to changes in IBD-specific medications in 57%. Avoided or delayed urgent endoscopy in 85%, significantly improving resource utilization and reducing procedural burden