Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Meta-Anal. Apr 28, 2022; 10(2): 52-62
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v10.i2.52
Published online Apr 28, 2022. doi: 10.13105/wjma.v10.i2.52
Ref. | Cases (observation group/control group) | Treatment measures | Control measures | Evaluating indicator | |
Zeng et al[18], 2014 | 30/30 | Wrist ankle acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief | |
Liu et al[18], 2010 | 51/51 | Block acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief/VAS score | |
Liu et al[18], 2007 | 30/30 | Block acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief/VAS score | |
Liu et al[21], 2008 | 51/51 | Block acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief/VAS score | |
Sun et al[22], 2021 | 80/60 | Triple puncture and remaining needle acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief | |
Hu et al[22], 2004 | 36/50 | Wrist ankle acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief | |
Hu et al[22], 2005 | 36/40 | Wrist ankle acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief | |
Cai et al[22], 2009 | 54/54 | Tianyuam acupuncture | Three step analgesic ladder therapy | Degree of pain relief/VAS score |
- Citation: Mou HY, Chen J, Chen ZY, Du H. Different methods of acupuncture for relief of pain due to liver cancer: A network meta-analysis. World J Meta-Anal 2022; 10(2): 52-62
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2308-3840/full/v10/i2/52.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.13105/wjma.v10.i2.52