BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Home / Archive / Volume 12, Issue 14
  • This Article
Peer-Review Report of This Article
CrossCheck and Google Search of This Article
Academic Rules and Norms of This Article
Citation of this article
Corresponding Author of This Article
Research Domain of This Article
Article-Type of This Article
Open-Access Policy of This Article
Times Cited Counts in Google of This Article
Journal Information of This Article
Publication Name
World Journal of Clinical Cases
ISSN
2307-8960
Publisher of This Article
Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA

Case Report
©The Author(s) 2024.
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2024; 12(14): 2426-2430
Published online May 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i14.2426
Figure 3
Full Size Figure Download Figure
Figure 3 Photograph taken seven months after the secondary rhinoplasty. A: Lateral view; B: Worm’s eye view. Despite removing the implant, the nasal height was not significantly depressed and severe deformity did not occur as the contracture at the nasal tip was corrected.
Write to the Help Desk
Copyright © 1993-2026 Baishideng Publishing Group Inc, 7041 Koll Center Parkway, Suite 160, Pleasanton, CA 94566, USA. All rights reserved, including rights relating to text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies. For open-access content, the applicable copyright and licensing terms govern.