Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2023.
World J Clin Cases. Nov 16, 2023; 11(32): 7761-7769
Published online Nov 16, 2023. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v11.i32.7761
Table 1 Comparison of clinical data between the control and female sexual dysfunction groups [n (%), mean ± SD]
FactorControl group (n = 52)FSD group (n = 134)t/χ2/ZP value
Age (yr)47.78 ± 4.0348.49 ± 3.65-1.1560.249
Spouse age (yr)51.14 ± 5.2650.57 ± 4.800.7070.480
BMI (kg/m2)22.34 ± 2.7522.86 ± 2.31-1.3040.194
Delivery times (time)2.64 ± 0.792.75 ± 0.92-0.7600.448
BIS score (point)9.33 ± 2.8714.63 ± 4.52-7.8560.000
Education level, n (%)
    Junior high school and below34 (65.38)102 (76.12)-1.5420.123
    Senior middle school14 (26.92)27 (20.15)
    College and above4 (7.69)5 (3.73)
Monthly income (yuan), n (%)
    < 200021 (40.38)100 (74.63)-4.6520.000
    2000-500015 (28.85)23 (17.16)
    > 500016 (30.77)11 (8.21)
HAMD score (point)7.83 ± 2.3213.44 ± 3.65-10.2960.000
Retirement, n (%)24 (46.15)66 (49.25)0.1440.704