Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Dec 26, 2022; 10(36): 13264-13273
Published online Dec 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i36.13264
Table 3 Clinical outcomes for 14 patients with early esophageal cancer after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection

Case 1
Case 2
Case 3
Case 4
Case 5
Case 6
Case 7
Case 8
Case 9
Case 10
Case 11
Case 12
Case 13
Case 14
Sex MaleMaleMaleFemaleFemaleMaleMaleMaleFemaleMaleFemaleMaleMaleFemale
Age in yr6645507567616345707267556667
Tumor locationLtUtLtMtMtMtLtLtMtMtMtLtLtMt
Macroscopic type0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIc0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa0-IIa
Tumor size in mm50.749.548.443.847.253.360.749.259.846.559.545.251.858.6
Resection size in mm56.152.652.747.550.857.665.053.264.750.163.547.154.661.2
Transverse extension of mucosal defect≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8Entire≥ 3/4 and < 7/8Entire≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8≥ 3/4 and < 7/8
Longitudinal extension of the mucosal defect in mm≥ 50≥ 50< 50≥ 50≥ 50≥ 50≥ 50< 50≥ 50≥ 50≥ 50< 50≥ 50≥ 50
Depth of tumor invasionM3M2M1M1M2M3M2M1M2M1M2M1M1M2
Stricture NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Follow up time in mo91212121212151828286678
Residual NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo
Recurrence NoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNoNo