BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Retrospective Study
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Jan 14, 2022; 10(2): 469-476
Published online Jan 14, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i2.469
Table 2 Relationship between the expression of different CD44 proteins and characteristics of gastric stromal tumors, n (%)
Index
CD44 protein positive (n = 59)
CD44 protein negative (n = 27)
χ2
P value
Age (yr)1.176 0.278
≥ 6032 (54.24)18 (66.67)
< 6027 (45.76)9 (33.33)
Gender0.884 0.347
Male26 (44.07)9 (33.33)
Female33 (55.93)18 (66.67)
Lesion site1.283 0.256
Gastric antrum7 (11.86)5 (18.52)
Body of stomach12 (20.34)7 (25.93)
Base of stomach40 (67.80)15 (55.56)
Risk classification6.5340.038
Very low risk18 (30.51)14 (51.85)
Low risk27 (45.76)12 (44.44)
Medium and high risk14 (23.73)1 (3.70)
Mitosis6.8220.009
≤ 536 (61.02)24 (88.89)
> 523 (38.98)3 (11.11)
Lesion diameter (cm)1.5840.208
> 2.0 cm41 (69.49)15 (55.56)
≤ 2.0 cm18 (30.51)12 (44.44)


Write to the Help Desk