Copyright
©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 26, 2022; 10(12): 3698-3708
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3698
Published online Apr 26, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3698
Group | Cases | CEA (mg/L) | CA19-9 (kU/L) | CA125 (kU/L) | |||
Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | Before treatment | After treatment | ||
Observation group | 60 | 38.49 ± 6.12 | 11.40 ± 2.32a | 50.30 ± 12.21 | 19.92 ± 3.42a | 163.30 ± 34.43 | 54.30 ± 12.28a |
control group | 58 | 40.02 ± 7.05 | 20.24 ± 2.50a | 52.29 ± 11.73 | 28.38 ± 2.95a | 168.29 ± 37.71 | 79.10 ± 14.42a |
t | -1.260 | -19.919 | -0.902 | -14.368 | -0.751 | -10.070 | |
P value | 0.210 | 0.000 | 0.369 | 0.000 | 0.454 | 0.000 |
- Citation: Ding F, Chen RY, Hou J, Guo J, Dong TY. Efficacy and prognostic factors of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer. World J Clin Cases 2022; 10(12): 3698-3708
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2307-8960/full/v10/i12/3698.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v10.i12.3698