Retrospective Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2022.
World J Clin Cases. Aug 6, 2022; 10(22): 7760-7771
Published online Aug 6, 2022. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v10.i22.7760
Figure 1
Figure 1 Consistency between metagenomic next-generation sequencing and conventional methods. A: In diagnosing central nervous system (CNS) virus infections; B: In diagnosing CNS fungal infections; C: In diagnosing CNS bacterial infections. mNGS: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing.
Figure 2
Figure 2 The distribution of the detection rate. A: 17 true-positive pathogenic viral; B: 13 true-positive pathogenic bacteria; C: 5 true-positive pathogenic fungi. Blue bars refer to pathogens detected by the metagenomic next-generation sequencing, while red bars refer to pathogens detected by the conventional methods. mNGS: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing.