Montes SFP, Rodríguez IG, Ugarteburu RG, Villamil LR, Mendez BD, Gil PS, Madera JM. Intraoperative laparoscopic complications for urological cancer procedures. World J Clin Cases 2015; 3(5): 450-456 [PMID: 25984519 DOI: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i5.450]
Corresponding Author of This Article
Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes, MD, Urology Department, Cabueñes Hospital, Calle de los Prados, 395, 33203 Gijón, Asturias, Spain. spello84@hotmail.com
Research Domain of This Article
Urology & Nephrology
Article-Type of This Article
Systematic Reviews
Open-Access Policy of This Article
This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
World J Clin Cases. May 16, 2015; 3(5): 450-456 Published online May 16, 2015. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i5.450
Intraoperative laparoscopic complications for urological cancer procedures
Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes, Ivan Gonzalez Rodríguez, Rodrigo Gil Ugarteburu, Luis Rodríguez Villamil, Begoña Diaz Mendez, Patricio Suarez Gil, Javier Mosquera Madera
Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes, Ivan Gonzalez Rodríguez, Rodrigo Gil Ugarteburu, Luis Rodríguez Villamil, Begoña Diaz Mendez, Patricio Suarez Gil, Javier Mosquera Madera, Urology Department, Cabueñes Hospital, 33203 Gijón, Asturias, Spain
Author contributions: Fernández-Pello S designed research; Fernández-Pello S, Gonzalez I, Gil R, Diaz B and Mosquera J performed research; Suarez P analyzed data; Fernández-Pello S and Gonzalez I wrote the paper; all authors contributed to this manuscript.
Conflict-of-interest: All the authors declare the absence of any conflict of interest.
Data sharing: No additional data are available in order of the kind of narrative literature review.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Correspondence to: Sergio Fernández-Pello Montes, MD, Urology Department, Cabueñes Hospital, Calle de los Prados, 395, 33203 Gijón, Asturias, Spain. spello84@hotmail.com
Telephone: +34-98-5185000
Received: November 24, 2014 Peer-review started: November 26, 2014 First decision: January 8, 2015 Revised: January 30, 2015 Accepted: April 8, 2015 Article in press: April 9, 2015 Published online: May 16, 2015
Abstract
AIM: To structure the rate of intraoperative complications that requires an intraoperative or perioperative resolution.
METHODS: We perform a literature review of Medline database. The research was focused on intraoperative laparoscopic procedures inside the field of urological oncology. General rate of perioperative complications in laparoscopic urologic surgery is described to be around 12.4%. Most of the manuscripts published do not make differences between pure intraoperative, intraoperative with postoperative consequences and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: We expose a narrative statement of complications, possible solutions and possible preventions for most frequent retroperitoneal and pelvic laparoscopic surgery. We expose the results with the following order: retroperitoneal laparoscopic surgery (radical nephrectomy, partial nephrectomy, nephroureterectomy and adrenalectomy) and pelvic laparoscopic surgery (radical prostatectomy and radical cystectomy).
CONCLUSION: Intraoperative complications vary from different series. More scheduled reports should be done in order to better understand the real rates of complications.
Core tip: We decided to perform this literature review to light and to arrange the intraoperative rates of laparoscopic urological cancer complications, which are such as messy in the different manuscripts published. This idea leaves from an urological team which performs more than 150 laparoscopic procedures per year since 2005.
