Editorial
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
World J Clin Cases. Apr 16, 2024; 12(11): 1863-1869
Published online Apr 16, 2024. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v12.i11.1863
Advances in clinical applications of bioceramics in the new regenerative medicine era
Noha Elshazly, Fayza Eid Nasr, Ayat Hamdy, Safa Saied, Mohamed Elshazly
Noha Elshazly, Ayat Hamdy, Safa Saied, Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
Fayza Eid Nasr, Safa Saied, Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Alexandria University, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
Ayat Hamdy, Public Dental Clinic, Central Administration of Dentistry, Ministry of Health and Population, Alexandria 21554, Egypt
Mohamed Elshazly, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Alexandria 21526, Egypt
Author contributions: Elshazly N, Nasr FE, Hamdy A, Saied S, and Elshazly M contributed to the paper; Elshazly N designed the overall concept, outline, and design of the manuscript; Elshazly N, Nasr FE, Hamdy A, Saied S, and Elshazly M contributed to the discussion, writing, editing of the manuscript, and review of the literature.
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Open-Access: This article is an open-access article that was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution NonCommercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: https://creativecommons.org/Licenses/by-nc/4.0/
Corresponding author: Noha Elshazly, BSc, MSc, Academic Research, Surgeon, Tissue Engineering Laboratory, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, 22 El-Gaish Road, Al Azaritah WA Ash Shatebi, Bab Sharqi, Alexandria 21526, Egypt. noha.shazly@dent.alex.edu.eg
Received: December 27, 2023
Peer-review started: December 27, 2023
First decision: January 16, 2024
Revised: January 31, 2024
Accepted: March 20, 2024
Article in press: March 20, 2024
Published online: April 16, 2024
Abstract

In this editorial, we comment on the hard and soft tissue applications of different ceramic-based scaffolds prepared by different mechanisms such as 3D printing, sol-gel, and electrospinning. The new concept of regenerative medicine relies on biomaterials that can trigger in situ tissue regeneration and stem cell recruitment at the defect site. A large percentage of these biomaterials is ceramic-based as they provide the essential requirements of biomaterial principles such as tailored multisize porosity, antibacterial properties, and angiogenic properties. All these previously mentioned properties put bioceramics on top of the hierarchy of biomaterials utilized to stimulate tissue regeneration in soft and hard tissue wounds. Multiple clinical applications registered the use of these materials in triggering soft tissue regeneration in healthy and diabetic patients such as bioactive glass nanofibers. The results were promising and opened new frontiers for utilizing these materials on a larger scale. The same results were mentioned when using different forms and formulas of bioceramics in hard defect regeneration. Some bioceramics were used in combination with other polymers and biological scaffolds to improve their regenerative and mechanical properties. All this progress will enable a larger scale of patients to receive such services with ease and decrease the financial burden on the government.

Keywords: Regenerative medicine, Bioceramics, Chronic wounds, Bone defects, Clinical applications

Core Tip: Some of the most common types of bioceramics used in regenerative medicine are solid prosthesis parts, bone-filling granules, metal prosthesis coatings, injectable bone cement, nanofibers, and porous scaffolds. Bioceramics can be bioactive (like bioactive glass) or resorbable ceramics (like β- and α-tricalcium phosphate, new forms of hydroxyapatite, and bioactive glass). This depends on the tissue's reaction to the grafted biomaterial. Bioactive and bioresorbable scaffolds form a stable bond and are gradually replaced with natural tissues. In this editorial, we discuss some clinical applications of bioceramics and the challenges that need suitable solutions.