BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 120949
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.120949
Table 2 Summary of key studies informing the methodological recommendations
Ref.
Study design
n
Key outcomes/findings
Notable limitations/risk of bias
Role in this review
Yamane et al[1], 2014 Prospective case series14 eyesOriginal description of flanged ISHF; demonstrated secure scleral fixation without suturesVery small sample; single surgeon; no comparative control group; short follow-upFoundational technique description
Yamane et al[2], 2017 Prospective case series100 eyesFlanged modification introduced; strong centration results; low dislocation rateSingle center; single surgeon; no randomization; retrospective outcome assessmentPrimary clinical validation
Stem et al[9], 2019 Retrospective case series55 eyesLearning curve analysis; improved outcomes with increasing surgical experienceRetrospective; small sample; variable follow-up; potential selection biasLearning curve and training
Rocke et al[4], 2020 Retrospective case series112 eyesTunnel geometry analysis; IOL stability data; CT Lucia PVDF haptic outcomesRetrospective; heterogeneous surgical technique across cases; variable follow-upTunnel geometry & IOL stability
Schranz et al[11], 2023 Comparative retrospective study78 eyesAR40e vs CT Lucia outcomes; haptic behavior and flange formation comparisonRetrospective; limited long-term follow-up; single center; small groupsIOL model comparison
Zhang et al[5], 2024 Systematic review & meta-analysis1847 eyes (pooled)Pooled CME rate approximately 13%-14%; favorable visual outcomes; shorter OR time vs sutured fixationHigh heterogeneity across included studies; retrospective designs dominate; variable definitions of complicationsBroadest comparative evidence
LoBue et al[17], 2024 Bench/cadaveric experimental studyEx vivo (4 IOL models)Haptic tensile strength: CT Lucia 153 N > MA60AC 1.00 N > AR40e 087 N > LAL 0.83 NNon-clinical; ex vivo findings may not fully predict in vivo behavior; limited generalizabilityHaptic material & tensile strength


Write to the Help Desk