Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 120949
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.120949
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.120949
Table 2 Summary of key studies informing the methodological recommendations
| Ref. | Study design | n | Key outcomes/findings | Notable limitations/risk of bias | Role in this review |
| Yamane et al[1], 2014 | Prospective case series | 14 eyes | Original description of flanged ISHF; demonstrated secure scleral fixation without sutures | Very small sample; single surgeon; no comparative control group; short follow-up | Foundational technique description |
| Yamane et al[2], 2017 | Prospective case series | 100 eyes | Flanged modification introduced; strong centration results; low dislocation rate | Single center; single surgeon; no randomization; retrospective outcome assessment | Primary clinical validation |
| Stem et al[9], 2019 | Retrospective case series | 55 eyes | Learning curve analysis; improved outcomes with increasing surgical experience | Retrospective; small sample; variable follow-up; potential selection bias | Learning curve and training |
| Rocke et al[4], 2020 | Retrospective case series | 112 eyes | Tunnel geometry analysis; IOL stability data; CT Lucia PVDF haptic outcomes | Retrospective; heterogeneous surgical technique across cases; variable follow-up | Tunnel geometry & IOL stability |
| Schranz et al[11], 2023 | Comparative retrospective study | 78 eyes | AR40e vs CT Lucia outcomes; haptic behavior and flange formation comparison | Retrospective; limited long-term follow-up; single center; small groups | IOL model comparison |
| Zhang et al[5], 2024 | Systematic review & meta-analysis | 1847 eyes (pooled) | Pooled CME rate approximately 13%-14%; favorable visual outcomes; shorter OR time vs sutured fixation | High heterogeneity across included studies; retrospective designs dominate; variable definitions of complications | Broadest comparative evidence |
| LoBue et al[17], 2024 | Bench/cadaveric experimental study | Ex vivo (4 IOL models) | Haptic tensile strength: CT Lucia 153 N > MA60AC 1.00 N > AR40e 087 N > LAL 0.83 N | Non-clinical; ex vivo findings may not fully predict in vivo behavior; limited generalizability | Haptic material & tensile strength |
- Citation: Usta Küçükbezirci G, Gürcan B, Patel N, Ramsey DJ, Alwreikat A. Standardizing the Yamane flanged intrascleral haptic fixation: A framework for efficacy, complication mitigation, and reproducible training. World J Methodol 2026; 16(3): 120949
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i3/120949.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.120949