Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 116058
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.116058
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.116058
Table 6 Hemodynamic outcomes by anesthetic agent
| Ref. | Parameter | Propofol | Etomidate | Ketamine | P value |
| Shahu et al[5], 2024 | MAP change (mmHg) | +18.2 ± 8.4 | +12.3 ± 6.7 | - | < 0.01 |
| Shahu et al[5], 2024 | HR change (bpm) | +22.1 ± 9.3 | +16.4 ± 7.2 | - | < 0.05 |
| İkiz et al[9], 2021 | MAP change (mmHg) | +16.7 ± 7.9 | - | - | - |
| İkiz et al[9], 2021 | HR change (bpm) | +19.8 ± 8.6 | - | - | - |
| Mathur et al[10], 2024 | MAP change (mmHg) | +17.3 ± 8.1 | - | - | - |
| Zhong et al[14], 2016 | MAP change (mmHg) | - | - | +24.6 ± 10.2 | - |
| Zhong et al[14], 2016 | HR change (bpm) | - | - | +28.3 ± 11.7 | - |
- Citation: Tilokani H, Jawed I, Shehzadi A, Ali A, Khan A, Qadir U, Bin Gulzar AH, Zahid R, Khan S, Mal M, Zakeri MA, Aslam H, Siddique MU. Impact of different anesthetic agents (propofol, etomidate, ketamine) on seizure duration and cognitive recovery in electroconvulsive therapy. World J Methodol 2026; 16(3): 116058
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i3/116058.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.116058