Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 116022
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.116022
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.116022
Table 3 Readability indices used to evaluate artificial intelligence-generated patient education responses
| Index | Description | Scoring/interpretation | Ref. |
| FRE | Based on average sentence length and syllables per word, indicates text readability | 0-100 scale; higher = easier; approximately 60 = 8th grade; approximately 30s = college-level | |
| SMOG | Estimates the grade level required to understand the text, focusing on complex polysyllabic words | Reported as United States education grade (e.g., 8th, 12th) | [11] |
| ARI | Uses characters per word and words per sentence to estimate grade level required | Score corresponds to United States grade level | [12] |
| GFI | Estimates years of formal education needed to understand text, emphasizing sentence length and complex words | Range 6-17; 6-6.9 recommended for patient education | [13] |
| ARC | Composite measure averaging multiple indices (e.g., SMOG, ARI, GFI, FRE) to estimate grade level | Reflects approximate United States grade level needed for comprehension | - |
- Citation: Goyal K, Goyal MK, Taranikanti V, Wander P, Chowdhary R, Kalra S, Prashar G, Vuthaluru AR, Goyal O. Do bots provide correct and adequate guidance regarding acidity: A blinded comparison rated by patients and physicians. World J Methodol 2026; 16(3): 116022
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i3/116022.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.116022