Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 110991
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.110991
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.110991
Table 6 Summary of clinical evaluation of microwave breast imaging systems
| Application | Description | Advantages | Challenges/limitations | Ref. |
| Primary breast cancer detection | Detects malignant tumors based on dielectric contrast | Non-ionizing, safe, repeatable; good for dense breasts | Low spatial resolution; noise sensitivity | [54,55] |
| Differentiating benign vs malignant lesions | Uses dielectric differences for classification | Good contrast between tissues; non-invasive | Needs clinical validation | [56] |
| Post-treatment monitoring | Tracks tissue changes after surgery or radiation | Can detect permittivity changes over time | Limited scans at longer follow-ups | [57] |
| Lesion size and localization | Assesses size/location in real-time | Complements mammography where sensitivity is limited | Dense breasts can obscure signals | [58] |
| Lymph node metastasis detection | Detects axillary lymph nodes using radar MWI | Helps with TNM staging; reduces unnecessary surgeries | Difficult with overlapping tissues | [59] |
| Breast tissue classification with ML | Uses AI/ML to classify lesion-containing vs healthy scans | Improves sensitivity; useful for screening | Signal variability; system training needs | [60,61] |
| Early detection in dense breasts | MBI outperforms mammography in dense tissues | No compression, non-ionizing, suitable for frequent use | Still requires more data from large trials | [62] |
| Adjunct to conventional imaging | Used in combination with ultrasound/MRI | Improves diagnostic confidence | Requires data integration methods | [56,63] |
| ML-based diagnostic models | CNNs and U-Nets used for tumor classification & segmentation | Enhances accuracy and image reconstruction | Needs diverse, well-annotated datasets | [64,65] |
| Detection of treatment-related changes | Tracks dielectric changes post-radiotherapy | Shows significant permittivity differences | Limited follow-up data | [57] |
| Clinical feasibility of portable systems | Portable devices tested for in-clinic use | Cost-effective, accessible, repeatable | Small patient numbers so far | [66] |
| Synthetic breast phantoms and simulations | Used to validate algorithms and device configurations | Allows modeling of dielectric variability | Phantom data may not generalize to real breasts | [67,68] |
| Contrast-agent enhanced MWI | Use of nanoparticles (e.g., ZnO) for dielectric contrast | Enhances visibility of tumors | Needs further safety studies | [69] |
- Citation: Akesson I, Kovac R, Son H, Teixeira de Castro Gonçalves Ortega AC, Fedorov D, Perera Molligoda Arachchige AS. Microwave breast imaging: A review of clinical potential and technological advances. World J Methodol 2026; 16(3): 110991
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i3/110991.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.110991