BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Minireviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Sep 20, 2026; 16(3): 110991
Published online Sep 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i3.110991
Table 5 System specifications and clinical readiness of institution-based radar-based microwave breast imaging systems
Institution
Antenna setup
Frequency range (GHz)
Patient orientation
Coupling medium
System configuration
Imaging technique
Development phase
Bristol (United Kingdom)-MARIA[25]60 wide-slot antennas3.0-8.0ProneParaffin oil, wax, aqueous mediaStationary, 16-port Keysight VNAModified delay-and-sumNear product launch
Calgary (Canada)-TSAR[26]Monostatic antipodal Vivaldi0.05-15.0ProneCanola oilPC-controlled synthetic array, laserConfocal DAS, skin artifact correctionVerification and validation
McGill (Canada)[44]16 resistively-loaded traveling wave antennas2.0-4.0ProneUltrasound gelOscilloscope and pulse generator arrayDelay-multiply-and-sumEarly feasibility
Galway (Ireland)-Wavelia[45]18-element Vivaldi array1.0-4.0ProneLiquidStationary array with VNATR-MUSIC (time-reversal method)Verification and validation
Chalmers (Sweden)[46]20 monopole antennas0.2-3.0/0.5-6.0ProneAir or oil-filled phantomOff-the-shelf SDR componentsConfocal DAS or no imagingFeasibility
Perugia (Italy)–Mammowave[47]1 horn + 1 microstrip monopole1.0-9.0ProneAirCobalt C1209 and Copper M. VNAHuygens-based approachVerification and validation
Hiroshima (Japan)[48]4 × 4 dome-shaped array3.1-10.6SupineGlycerineUWB CMOS synthetic arrayConfocal DASVerification and validation
São Paulo (Brazil)[49]Dual-patch bistatic array5.0-7.0FowlerSilicone rubber interfaceUWB transceiver setupEnhanced confocal DASFeasibility


Write to the Help Desk