BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2026; 16(2): 109986
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.109986
Table 4 Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Evidence Quality Assessment
Outcome
Studies (design)
Participants
Effect estimate
Quality of evidence
Rationale for downgrading
Third-generation EGFR-TKIs vs first/second-generation
Progression-free survival4 RCTs1201HR: 0.46 (0.38-0.56)HighNo serious limitations
CNS objective response rate3 RCTs644OR: 4.2 (2.8-6.3)HighNo serious limitations
Overall survival2 RCTs913HR: 0.80 (0.64-0.99)ModerateWide confidence intervals
Combined EGFR-TKI + radiotherapy vs EGFR-TKI alone
Intracranial control6 observational1156HR: 0.52 (0.38-0.71)LowObservational studies with inherent limitations and significant heterogeneity between studies (I² > 50%)
Overall survival4 observational892HR: 0.68 (0.51-0.91)LowObservational studies with inherent limitations and wide confidence intervals
Stereotactic radiosurgery vs whole brain radiotherapy
Cognitive preservation3 RCTs925OR: 5.8 (3.2-10.5)ModerateMixed population studies with limited EGFR-mutant specific data
Local control5 mixed studies1689OR: 1.8 (1.2-2.7)LowObservational studies with inherent limitations and significant heterogeneity between studies (I² > 50%)
Treatment sequencing
Upfront EGFR-TKI vs Combined4 observational567Variable outcomesVery lowObservational studies with inherent limitations, significant heterogeneity between studies (I² > 50%), and wide confidence intervals


Write to the Help Desk