BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Systematic Reviews
Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2026; 16(2): 109986
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.109986
Table 1 Characteristics of the selected studies
Ref.
Design
Population
Patient characteristics
Intervention
Comparator
Primary outcome
Key findings
Soria et al[10], 2018 (FLAURA)RCT (n = 556)Treatment-naïve advanced NSCLCMedian age 64 years, 64% female, 62% Asian, PS 0-1Osimertinib 80 mg dailyErlotinib 150 mg or gefitinib 250 mg dailyPFS mPFS: 18.9 months vs 10.2 months (HR: 0.46, P < 0.001)
Ramalingam et al[9], 2020 (FLAURA-OS)RCT (n = 556)Treatment-naïve advanced NSCLCSame cohort as FLAURAOsimertinib 80 mg dailyErlotinib or gefitinibOS mOS: 38.6 months vs 31.8 months (HR: 0.80, P = 0.046)
Reungwetwattana et al[24], 2018RCT (n = 144)Treatment-naïve with CNS metastasesMedian age 62 years, 69% female, 83% Asian, all with baseline BMOsimertinib 80 mg dailyErlotinib or gefitinibCNS ORRCNS ORR: 91% vs 68% (P = 0.0009)
Cho et al[25], 2019 (FLAURA Asian)RCT (n = 357)Asian treatment-naïve advanced NSCLC100% Asian, median age 62 years, 62% femaleOsimertinib 80 mg dailyErlotinib or gefitinibPFSmPFS: 16.5 months vs 11.0 months (HR: 0.46, P < 0.001)
Wu et al[11], 2018 (AURA3-CNS)RCT (n = 144)T790M+ post-EGFR-TKI progressionMedian age 61 years, 61% female, 73% Asian, all with BMOsimertinib 80 mg dailyPlatinum-pemetrexedCNS ORRCNS ORR: 70% vs 31% (P = 0.015)
Brown et al[14], 2020 (RTOG 0933)RCT (n = 518)Brain metastasesMedian age 61 years, 48% female, mixed primary tumorsHA-WBRT + memantineHistorical WBRT controlsCognitive functionHVLT-R decline: 7.0% vs 30% historical (P < 0.001)
Brown et al[13], 2017 (NCCTG N107C)RCT (n = 194)Resected brain metastasesMedian age 60 years, 48% female, 85% NSCLCPost-op SRSPost-op WBRTCognitive functionBetter cognitive preservation with SRS
Brown et al[15], 2016RCT (n = 213)1-3 brain metastasesMedian age 60 years, 46% female, 84% NSCLCSRS aloneSRS + WBRTCognitive functionCognitive decline: 63.5% vs 91.7% (P < 0.001)
Jänne et al[26], 2024 (FLAURA2-CNS)RCT (n = 557)Treatment-naïve advanced NSCLCMedian age 64 years, 61% female, 48% AsianOsimertinib + chemotherapyOsimertinib alonePFSEnhanced CNS activity with combination
Li et al[19], 2023 (FLOWERS)RCT (n = 200)MET aberrant, EGFR+Treatment-naïve with MET amplification/mutationOsimertinib ± savolitinibOsimertinib monotherapyPFSOngoing trial design rationale
Shi et al[2], 2014 (PIONEER)Cohort (n = 1482)Asian adenocarcinomaMedian age 58 years, 58% female, 100% AsianObservationalNot applicableMutation prevalenceEGFR mutations in 60.9% of adenocarcinomas
Gu et al[31], 2024Cohort (n = 186)Advanced adenocarcinoma with BMMedian age 58 years, 55% female, TP53 co-mutationsEGFR-TKI therapyTP53 wild-type comparisoniPFSTP53 co-mutation: Worse iPFS (7.1 months vs 14.8 months)
Rangachari et al[3], 2015Cohort (n = 351)EGFR+ vs ALK+ with BMEGFR+: Median age 65 years, 76% femaleMixed therapyALK+ comparisonSurvival patternsBM in 25.4% EGFR+, mOS 19.9 months post-BM
Magnuson et al[27], 2016Cohort (n = 351)Treatment-naïve with BMMedian age 65 years, 76% female, PS 0-2RT deferral analysisUpfront RT comparisonOSComparable survival: 46 months vs 46 months (P = 0.95)
Ballard et al[8], 2016Cohort (n = 189)Preclinical + clinical BMMixed characteristicsOsimertinib activityHistorical EGFR-TKI comparisonResponse ratesSuperior CNS penetration and activity
Magnuson et al[28], 2017Cohort (n = 351)EGFR-TKI-naïve with BMMedian age 65 years, 76% female, multiple BM 68%Combined vs EGFR-TKI aloneEGFR-TKI monotherapyIntracranial control12 months IC progression: 21% vs 47% (P = 0.014)
Chen et al[29], 2019Cohort (n = 105)Asymptomatic BMMedian age 59 years, 62% female, PS 0-1RT + TKI vs EGFR-TKI aloneEGFR-TKI monotherapyiPFS, OSiPFS: 19.1 months vs 10.2 months; OS: 41.2 months vs 23.1 months
Miyawaki et al[30], 2020Cohort (n = 180)EGFR+ with BMMedian age 64 years, 59% female, 1-3 BM 48%Sequencing analysisTreatment sequence comparisoniPFS1-3 BM: Comparable; ≥ 4 BM: Benefit from upfront RT
Iuchi et al[5], 2013Cohort (n = 41)Japanese with BMMedian age 65 years, 61% female, PS 0-2Gefitinib monotherapyHistorical controlsResponse rateIntracranial ORR: 87.8%, mOS: 18.8 months
Eichler et al[4], 2010Cohort (n = 82)NSCLC with BMMedian age 58 years, 57% femaleSurvival comparisonEGFR wild-typeOSEGFR+: 15 months vs 5 months wild-type (P = 0.003)
Yamamoto et al[33], 2017Cohort (n = 1194)Multiple BMMedian age 64 years, 58% female, 2-10 BMSRS outcomesSingle BM comparisonToxicity, cognitionLow toxicity rates, preserved cognition
Tatineni et al[32], 2023Cohort (n = 267)NSCLC with BMMedian age 66 years, 59% female, 2010-2019 eraEGFR-TKI + RTHistorical comparisonSurvival outcomesImproved outcomes with modern approaches
Yan et al[20], 2019Cohort (n = 89)Leptomeningeal metastasesMedian age 57 years, 62% female, poor PSWBRT analysisNon-WBRT comparisonOSWBRT did not improve survival
Hsu et al[6], 2025Cohort (n = 127)Baseline BMMedian age 64 years, 65% female, treatment-naïve1st vs 2nd gen EGFR-TKIGeneration comparisonPFS2nd gen: Modest improvement (11.2 months vs 8.7 months)
Zhong et al[21], 2025Cohort (n = 42)Leptomeningeal metastasesMedian age 58 years, 64% female, poor prognosisIntrathecal pemetrexedHistorical controlsResponseFeasible but limited efficacy
Pan et al[34], 2025Cohort (n = 156)EGFR+ with BMMedian age 61 years, 58% female, multiple BMBrain RT analysisNon-RT comparisonEfficacyRT benefit in patients (> 3 brain metastases, ECOG 0-2, and moderate-severe symptoms)
Dohm et al[22], 2022Cohort (n = 389)NSCLC BMMedian age 63 years, 56% female, mixed treatmentsSRS + systemic therapyTreatment comparisonOSVariable outcomes by systemic therapy type


Write to the Help Desk