Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Jun 20, 2026; 16(2): 109312
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.109312
Published online Jun 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.109312
Table 2 Regional respondents’ knowledge of consent legislation, n (%)
| Variable | Know about consent legislation | F test | P value | |
| Yes | No | |||
| North central | 9 (45.0) | 11 (55.0) | ||
| North East | 2 (67.7) | 1 (33.3) | 6.936 | 0.214 |
| North West | 1 (14.3) | 6 (85.7) | ||
| South East | 8 (57.1) | 6 (42.9) | ||
| South South | 2 (28.6) | 5 (71.4) | ||
| South West | 11 (64.7) | 6 (35.3) | ||
- Citation: Okonkwo KC, Davwar PM, Musa Y, Bojuwoye MO, Onyia CP, Egboh SMC, Chukwurah SN, Obasi E, Asaolu OI, Adiri WN, Okeke UF, Dankiri NA, Udigwe CF. From understanding to agreement: The current state of informed consent in Nigerian endoscopic practice. World J Methodol 2026; 16(2): 109312
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i2/109312.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i2.109312