©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 108875
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108875
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108875
Table 5 Comparison of common methods of fecal microbiota transplantation administration
| Enema | Capsule | Colonoscopy | Nasogastric, nasoduodenal or nasojejunal tube | |
| Delivery | Distal colon | Small intestine/colon | Right colon/terminal ileum | Upper GI tract to stomach/duodenum/jejunum |
| Starting amount of feces | 25-200 g | 80-100 g | 25-200 g | 12.5-150 g |
| Final delivery volume per dose | 300-500 mL | 30-40 capsules | 30-500 mL | 30-500 mL |
| Pros | Well tolerated, no sedation, can be done at home | Non-invasive, faster, well-tolerated | Higher efficacy | Minimally invasive, avoids sedation risks |
| Cons | Retention difficulty, lower efficacy | Requires multiple doses, risk of gastric acid degradation; avoid FMT capsules if the patient has dysphagia, difficulty swallowing pills or gastroparesis | Invasive, requires sedation, risk of perforation | Risk of aspiration, patient discomfort |
- Citation: Mundhra SK, Kochhar R. Methodological insights into fecal microbiota transplantation: Dissecting key approaches for success. World J Methodol 2026; 16(1): 108875
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i1/108875.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108875