BPG is committed to discovery and dissemination of knowledge
Opinion Review
©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 108646
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108646
Table 2 Different approaches for faecal microbiota transplantation
Approach
Method
Pros
Cons
ColonoscopyDelivery of fecal material into the colon via a colonoscopeHigh success rate, allows direct placement in the colonInvasive, requires bowel preparation, potential complications like perforation
Nasogastric/nasoenteric tubeTube insertion through the nose into the stomach or small intestine for faecal infusionNon-surgical, effective for small intestine deliveryRisk of aspiration, discomfort, nausea and vomiting
Capsule deliveryFreeze-dried faecal material in capsules taken orallyNon-invasive, convenient, avoids procedural risksRequires multiple capsules, potential for reduced efficacy in some cases
EnemaFaecal material mixed with solution and introduced via the rectumSimple, can be done at home, avoids invasive proceduresLower retention time, may require multiple doses
Rectal infusionControlled delivery of faecal material into the rectumLess invasive than colonoscopy, localized deliveryRequires professional administration, may not reach upper colon effectively


Write to the Help Desk