©The Author(s) 2026.
World J Methodol. Mar 20, 2026; 16(1): 108646
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108646
Published online Mar 20, 2026. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108646
Table 2 Different approaches for faecal microbiota transplantation
| Approach | Method | Pros | Cons |
| Colonoscopy | Delivery of fecal material into the colon via a colonoscope | High success rate, allows direct placement in the colon | Invasive, requires bowel preparation, potential complications like perforation |
| Nasogastric/nasoenteric tube | Tube insertion through the nose into the stomach or small intestine for faecal infusion | Non-surgical, effective for small intestine delivery | Risk of aspiration, discomfort, nausea and vomiting |
| Capsule delivery | Freeze-dried faecal material in capsules taken orally | Non-invasive, convenient, avoids procedural risks | Requires multiple capsules, potential for reduced efficacy in some cases |
| Enema | Faecal material mixed with solution and introduced via the rectum | Simple, can be done at home, avoids invasive procedures | Lower retention time, may require multiple doses |
| Rectal infusion | Controlled delivery of faecal material into the rectum | Less invasive than colonoscopy, localized delivery | Requires professional administration, may not reach upper colon effectively |
- Citation: Mishra A, Juneja D. Decolonizing the gut from multidrug-resistant bacteria: Current strategies and future perspectives. World J Methodol 2026; 16(1): 108646
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v16/i1/108646.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v16.i1.108646