Copyright
©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Dec 20, 2025; 15(4): 106591
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.106591
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.106591
Table 3 Implantation details, n (%)/mean ± SD
Characteristic | Study population n = 10 |
Distance from incisors to proximal tumor border, cm | 39.3 ± 5.8 |
Distance from surgeon’s proposed proximal resection line to BioXmark®, cm1 | 3.8 (± 1.1) |
Number of implantations per patient | 4 |
Amount of BioXmark® per implantation, μL | 82 ± 17.5 |
BioXmark® visible on intraoperative ultrasound in vivo | 6 (60) |
BioXmark® not visible or missing data on intraoperative ultrasound in vivo | 4 (40) |
BioXmark® visible on intraoperative ultrasound ex vivo | 3 (30) |
BioXmark® not visible or missing data on intraoperative ultrasound ex vivo | 7 (70) |
- Citation: U Solstad T, Mucha AW, Olsen AA, Grossjohann H, Achiam MP. Preoperative marking of the proximal resection margin in esophageal cancer with a surgical fiducial marker: First experiences. World J Methodol 2025; 15(4): 106591
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2222-0682/full/v15/i4/106591.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.106591