Minireviews
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Dec 20, 2025; 15(4): 106148
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.106148
Table 4 Role of fecal microbiota transplantation in Crohn’s disease
Ref.
Type of study
Participants
Findings
Conclusion
Sokol et al[29]RCT8 received FMT. 9 received sham transplantationFlare-up in 3/8 in FMT group. Flare-up in 6/9 in sham group. Higher decrease in CDEIS in FMT groupDifference in flare-up was not statistically significant. Limitations: Small sample size; low baseline CDEIS sham group
He et al[30]Prospective cohort study25 CD patients received multiple FMTs at 3-month interval. No control groupRemission induced in 52%. Sustained remission decreased overtime: 48% at 6 months. 32% at 12 months. 22.7% at 18 monthsSome efficacy in inducing clinical remission. Effect diminished despite repeated administrations. Limitations: Lack of control group, small sample size, absence of endoscopic evaluation
Suskind et al[31]Open label study9 CD patients. No control group7/9 achieved remission at 2 weeks. 5/9 showed persistent remission after 6 and 12 weeks Potential benefits of FMT. Limitations: No control group, small sample size. Inclusion of antibiotics. Continuation of immunomodulators after FMT
Wang et al[32]Prospective cohort study139 CD patients. No control groupRemission in 56%. Adverse effects (AE) in 13.6% (25/139). AE in 84% resolved without treatment. AE in 16% needed medications. AE rate 217% in manual FMT preparation group vs 8.7% in automated machine-operated groupFMT generally safe. Automated purification method safer than manual method. Reasonable remission rate
Xiang et al[33]Prospective cohort study174 CD patients. No control group43% achieved clinical remission. Sustained remission in 20.1% at 43 months. Frozen FMT showed 11.3% lower response compared to fresh FMTPotential benefits of FMT in CD patients. Limitations: No control group. Lack of biomarkers. Lack of endoscopic findings
Yang et al[34]Prospective cohort study27 CD patients
14 received FMT via colonoscopy and 13 via gastroscopy. No control group. Follow-up period – 8 weeks
Clinical remission in 66.7%. No difference between colonoscopy (64.3) vs gastroscopy (69.2%) group. Clinical response in 77.8%. No difference between colonoscopy (78.6) vs gastroscopy (76.9%) groupPotential benefits of FMT. Limitations: No control group. Short follow-up period