Observational Study
Copyright ©The Author(s) 2025.
World J Methodol. Dec 20, 2025; 15(4): 105386
Published online Dec 20, 2025. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v15.i4.105386
Table 2 Comparison of resting numerical rating scale, dynamic numerical rating scale, and number of balls lifted in spirometry after surgery between the two study groups, mean ± SD
Time post-extubation (hours)
ESB (n = 34)
TEA (n = 34)
P value
Resting NRS
01.70 ± 1.031.05 ± 0.770.004a
61.64 ± 0.981.2 ± 0.880.055
122.17 ± 0.932.0 ± 1.100.480
242.76 ± 1.322.20 ± 1.320.080
362.64 ± 1.432.52 ± 1.180.710
483.29 ± 1.192.88 ± 1.250.170
723.2 ± 1.072.61 ± 0.920.010a
Dynamic NRS
03.0 ± 1.31.7 ± 1.00.0001a
63.23 ± 1.231.9 ± 1.050.0001a
123.7 ± 1.082.8 ± 1.20.003a
244.29 ± 1.462.9 ± 1.40.0001a
364.23 ± 1.533.2 ± 1.20.0045a
484.64 ± 1.343.58 ± 1.300.0015a
724.52 ± 1.163.5 ± 0.990.0002a
Number of balls lifted in spirometry after surgery (1/2/3)
010/22/22/25/70.015a
68/16/101/11/220.002a
1210/10/141/7/260.003a
246/16/121/9/240.008a
364/18/121/12/210.060
484/18/121/9/240.020a
724/16/141/6/270.005a