©2013 Baishideng.
World J Transl Med. Aug 12, 2013; 2(2): 13-21
Published online Aug 12, 2013. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.v2.i2.13
Published online Aug 12, 2013. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.v2.i2.13
Table 3 Modified naranjo probability of intervention-caused response
| Questions | Yes | No | Don’t know | Case report | |
| 1 | Are there previous conclusive reports on this response? | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 don’t know |
| 2 | Did the response appear after the intervention was administered? | 2 | -1 | 0 | +2 Yes |
| 3 | Did the response disappear when the intervention was discontinued? | +1 | 0 | 0 | +1 Yes |
| 4 | Did the response reappear when the intervention was re-administered? | +2 | -1 | 0 | +2 Yes |
| 5 | Are there alternative causes that could on their own have caused the reaction? | -1 | +2 | 0 | +2 No |
| 6 | Did the reaction reappear when a placebo was given? | -1 | +1 | 0 | +1 No |
| 7 | Was the intervention detected in the blood in concentrations known to be toxic? | +1 | 0 | 0 | 0 No |
| 8 | Was the response more apparent when the dose was increased, or less apparent when the dose was decreased? | +1 | 0 | 0 | 0 No |
| 9 | Did the patient have a similar response to the same or similar intervention in any previous exposure? | +1 | 0 | 0 | +1 Yes |
| 10 | Was the response confirmed by any objective evidence? | +1 | 0 | 0 | +1 Yes |
| Patients total score | 10 |
- Citation: McCullough RW. High-potency sucralfate prevents and rapidly reverses chemo-radiation mucositis in a patient with stage 4b head and neck cancer. World J Transl Med 2013; 2(2): 13-21
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6132/full/v2/i2/13.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5528/wjtm.v2.i2.13