Copyright: ©Author(s) 2026.
World J Transl Med. Nov 28, 2026; 12(4): 127250
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.127250
Published online Nov 28, 2026. doi: 10.5528/wjtm.127250
Table 2 Biological information provided by intact and C-terminal fibroblast growth factor 23 measurements
| Measurement | What the assay detects | Biological information | Main interpretive limitation |
| iFGF23 | Full-length FGF23; antibodies recognize epitopes on opposite sides of the cleavage site | Circulating biologically active hormone available for receptor activation | May remain stable despite markedly increased production when cleavage rises in parallel[36,37] |
| cFGF23 | Intact hormone plus C-terminal fragments; antibodies recognize epitopes downstream of the cleavage site | Composite signal influenced by both production and proteolytic processing | Does not measure C-terminal fragments selectively and should not be interpreted as intact hormone[36,37] |
| Paired iFGF23 and cFGF23 | Both measurements obtained in the same clinical or experimental setting | Supports interpretation of discordant assay responses; does not directly quantify production, cleavage, or fragments | Assay methods are not standardized or interchangeable. Research interpretation, not a direct cleavage-rate measure[36,37] |
| C-terminal fragments | Not selectively quantified by current cFGF23 assays | Potential modulation of BMP-hepcidin signaling and iron availability | Biological activity remains supported mainly by experimental evidence. Mouse and cellular evidence[4] |
- Citation: Donate-Correa J. Iron, inflammation, and fibroblast growth factor 23: Integrating molecular crosstalk, cardiovascular biology, and therapeutic perspectives. World J Transl Med 2026; 12(4): 127250
- URL: https://www.wjgnet.com/2220-6132/full/v12/i4/127250.htm
- DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.5528/wjtm.127250